Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Englishman bids to end shoot-outs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 February 2008
AN AMBITIOUS attempt has been launched from the home of penalty heartbreak – England – to replace decisive shoot-outs with a process dubbed 'The Advantage', which has an abbreviated spot-kick contest prior to extra-time.
Englishman Henry Birtles, negotiator of broadcast rights for a TV production company, submitted his proposal to Fifa early in the new year and it is believed that world football's governing body is warming to the idea.

The process would work thus. A cup tie is tied at the end of 90 minutes, so each team takes three penalties apiece – sudden death is also an option – and the winner of that contest would take 'The Advantage' into extra-time. If no goals are scored in the additional 30 minutes, then the team with 'The Advantage' goes through.

It would seem a preposterous idea, stripping away the drama and pressure of a decisive penalty shoot-out with a token gesture devoid of meaning for fully half an hour. And that 30 minutes would in all likelihood see the team with 'The Advantage' park themselves on the edge of their own area to defend like dervishes. Hardly a recipe to enliven extra-time – when was the last time you heard anybody say 'I really enjoyed extra time, thoroughly entertaining'?

Yet it seems the corridors of power are quite receptive to the proposal. Sepp Blatter, the Fifa president, was deeply dissatisfied with the fact that the last World Cup final was decided on penalties. "When it comes to World Cup finals it is passion and when it goes to extra time it is drama, but when it comes to penalty kicks it is tragedy," he said. "Football is a team sport and penalties in not about a team, it is about the individual."

However, penalties have produced some of the most memorable episodes of footballing theatre in recent years. Who can forget Chris Waddle's wild slash over the bar against West Germany that sealed England's World Cup fate in 1990? Or Gareth Southgate's feebleness compared to Andreas Moller's triumphant blast when the two sides met again in the Euro 96 semi-finals? Or David Beckham's re-enactment of Waddle's ineptitude against Portugal in Euro 2004?

The list goes on. Some truly great players have missed penalties – Roberto Baggio and Franco Baresi when Italy lost the World Cup final to Brazil in 1994, Marco Van Basten when Denmark knocked the Netherlands out in Euro 92. It does not make them tragic figures, merely mortal, someone that fans can identify with.

Birtles claims 'The Advantage' is "clearly a fairer way of deciding the outcome of a match. It will increase the game as a spectacle." Perhaps, but only because it would be fascinating to watch players who have botched their penalties attempt to redeem themselves or, alternatively, collapse in a distraught mess in extra time. That does not erase the sense of cruelty to the individual that Blatter insists upon.

Birtles continues that 'The Advantage' "will mean the re-birth of extra-time because this phase of play has largely become seen as non-competitive. Now extra time will become the highlight." Similar claims were made of golden and then silver goals, but they have since fallen by the wayside, never fully recovering from the fatal blow dealt by Oliver Bierhoff's weak winner for Germany in the final of Euro 96 against the Czech Republic.

It will take more than a rejig of a game's order to make extra time exciting again.

The full article contains 587 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2008 11:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: England's football team
 
1

hibeeboy,

edinburgh 05/02/2008 12:00:10
would have to be an english man to come up with this one!!!!

keep it as it is............
2

rhode island scot,

05/02/2008 12:41:49
Most people agree that the penalty shoot out is a sad way to end a contest , the 'advantage'idea makes no sense for the reasons your article points out . Why not introduce another statistic in the event of a tie . How about SHOTS ON GOAL ? It would make for some more attacking and exciting football , make sitting back defending a one goal lead a riskier tactic and cut down on the slow mindnumbing mid-field build up . Passing the ball back to your keeper from mid field would, hopefully become a thing of the past .
It would probably improve the shooting as well . Another box on the scoreboard would keep everyone informed and a winner would most likely be decided .
Still tied? Unlikely , but another 30 minutes of the same format would do it .
3

Guiseppe Tortolano,

05/02/2008 13:14:27
#3

It would appear your time with the septics has addled your brain.
All you would get is players shooting from all over the pitch.
"slow mindnumbing mid-field build up" - that's called passing.
4

rhode island scot,

05/02/2008 13:36:36
That comment #3 could only come from an Italian . It was you lot who started the sideways game back in the 70's and put us all to sleep .Slow moving 0-0 ties might be acceptable in Italy , but most people would like to see some action !
5

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 05/02/2008 14:15:07
Stone, scissors, paper would be another alternative.
6

greener,

edinburgh 05/02/2008 15:04:24
I think this is an interesting idea - yes it would mean one team sticking 10 behind the ball but that would still be more exciting than watching two teams who have settled for penalties. Worth a trial, I would have thought.

Either way, just using the proposal as an excuse to go over England's penalty failings is feeble (perhaps if Scotland ever reached a knockout stage you'd have a few such stories of your own).
7

jerrymanders,

Missed my bus waiting for the match to end. 05/02/2008 15:46:31
#5

Aye, good one. But would it be best of 3? Or 5? Or...................................................
8

Itchy,

05/02/2008 22:38:37
Leave the shootout.

The object of football is to score goals and penalties ensure that there are goals
9

KelsoKillie,

On holiday 06/02/2008 05:28:16
Another suggestion - during extra time take two players off each side every five minutes till there are only 5 left on each side. Works a treat in rugby where the sevens variety is far more exciting but shorter.

Or just introduce far larger goals for extra time - having 10 men behind the ball wouldn't be much use if the strikers could just shoot over their heads. Hardly any draws in Aussie Rules as it is pretty easy to score.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.