Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Go green to save the planet… and £80,000



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

LIVING an environmentally friendly lifestyle can save more than £80,000 and cut carbon emissions by nearly 900 tonnes, a scientist will tell a group of schoolchildren today.
Dr David Reay, who is giving the opening speech of the second annual James Clerk Maxwell Lecture Series at the Edinburgh Academy, has calculated how different choices over a lifetime can have a radical effect on a person's impact on the planet and t
heir finances.

A fairly affluent western person who is "ignorant" of climate change might produce 1,251 tonnes of greenhouse gases, costing £131,000.

However, a similar person who lives a "climate-aware" life might produce just 370 tonnes at a cost of £48,845, a saving of 881 tonnes of emissions and £82,155.

The lecture is the first of four talks on climate change in the series, which will be followed by a "question time" session featuring politicians from the Scottish Conservatives, Labour, the SNP and the Liberal Democrats and an audience of pupils invited from every secondary school in Edinburgh.

Dr Reay, of Edinburgh University, said: "What I really want to do is show the students how they can play a part.

"If you take one person making a difference and multiply that by the school, it adds up to a large amount of greenhouse gases saved."

To make his case, Dr Reay uses two characters, "Aware Amy" and "Greedy George" – right – to illustrate the impact of leading a green or environmentally unfriendly lifestyle.

He said he decided that "people power" was the way forward in 2001 when George Bush, the United States president, withdrew his country from the Kyoto climate-change treaty.

Dr Reay added: "Ever since then, I've believed we cannot just leave this to governments, we cannot wait for George Bush to go out of power, or get a new prime minister. All of us have to starting tackling this today.

"I do all the normal things you hear about. I have energy- efficient appliances, (my family and I] have got solar panels on our house, we holiday in Scotland and try to source locally produced food. We compost, have a worm farm, which the kids always like seeing, and we recycle. We wear extra jumpers in the winter.

"Our lifestyle is very much a comfortable one. You don't have to be living on a hill, eating berries and chanting to tackle climate change."

David Standley, the deputy rector of the Edinburgh Academy, said climate change was chosen as the theme of the lecture series partly because he "felt very strongly there's a lot of biased ignorance on both sides of the environmental debate".

"There are some serious questions to answer, many of which I am ignorant about and I feel I need to know more," he said, citing biofuels as a difficult issue.

Mr Standley added: "I'm pushing retirement, decisions about the environment aren't going to affect my generation, but the kids in our school are going to be affected, so I feel they have a right to challenge those decisions."



The full article contains 518 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Unimpressed one,

23/01/2008 08:27:05
Another 'qualified' person spouting junk science verging on religious rant. Thankfully he is retiring.
2

Mark Renton,

Edinburgh 23/01/2008 09:13:16
Fact: By far the most substantial "green" contribution anyone can make is also the simplest. Simply have fewer children. Any other contribution pales by comparison. Having one child creates a legacy of consumption that completely obliterates any and all "green" efforts that you could ever make in your own lifetime. This truth is self-evident and yet we are left with the guilt-inducing nonsense that is printed day-after-day in this wretched publication.
3

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 23/01/2008 09:22:06
"I do all the normal things you hear about. I have energy- efficient appliances, (my family and I] have got solar panels on our house, we holiday in Scotland and try to source locally produced food. We compost, have a worm farm, which the kids always like seeing, and we recycle. We wear extra jumpers in the winter."

Yes but you still exist. Still produce CO2 and, as the GW religionists have told us, the planet needs help now and quick which means a total stop in CO2 production. Therefore, the goodly Dr, is, in fact, doing diddly squat to "save the planet", but is, in fact, a tight erse, like most scientists who are hungry for the next grant.
4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 23/01/2008 10:00:32
So according to Dr Reay, technology is going to remain forever static.

Yes, there are a lot of common sense rules that people should obey, but technology will move on---provided stupid politicians don't block it---and we will get round any possible problems in the future.
5

bluehead,

edinburgh 23/01/2008 11:21:34
awa in tak a lang walk oaf a shoart pier
6

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth, Scotland 23/01/2008 11:35:17
Living in caves eating berries and maybe the odd rabbit now and again. Last person to bed at 6pm snuffs out the candle, but you're only allowed that to be lit for an hour so you can sing green songs. Travel only permitted to vote Labour. Anyone frozen to death during the night can be placed in a hessian sack, if you can get one or make it. Cost £20 per year. Climate still changing. CO2 still being produced. Anyone up for it?!
7

nabodican,

Portree 23/01/2008 13:21:37
What a plonker this man is, spends his career getting fundimg from anyone who wants statistics to further their cause and line their pockets.
As for his costings ! which part of thin air did he pull them out of !
8

Neil,

Glasgow 23/01/2008 14:41:11
An if we went for nuclear power & cut electricity bills by 50% how much would we save per person over a lifetime? Bearing in mind that 80% of electrictiy is not part of our household bills a back of the envelope estimate suggests more than the headline £80,000.
9

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 23/01/2008 20:19:47
This GW junk science is getting tedious. Co2 is NOT a pollutant.
10

jerrymanders,

Planet Earth 4B, Humankind 1M and the winner is 23/01/2008 23:02:32
Saving the Planet? Total nonsense. The Planet will continue on as it has done through far greater changes in the past and surely too in the future. Save our necks, more like. Species change is a fact of life on this Planet. Why should we be any different, especially as we are making things worse for ourselves, not better?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think Scotland faces a serious threat from the effects of climate change?
Yes
Yes
No
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.