Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 21st August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Dwain Chambers loses Olympic ban battle



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

DISGRACED sprinter Dwain Chambers today lost his High Court bid to be allowed to compete at next month's Olympic Games in Beijing.
Mr Justice Mackay refused to grant an injunction temporarily suspending a lifetime Olympic ban imposed on the self-confessed drugs cheat by the British Olympic Association under a bylaw.

But Mr Justice Mackay told a packed courtroom today: "Many people both inside and outside sport would see this bylaw as unlawful.

"In my judgment, it would take a much better case than the claimant has presented to persuade me to overturn the status quo at this stage and compel his selection for the Games."

During a hearing yesterday, the judge had commented to Jonathan Crystal, representing Chambers: "The reality is that you are saying 'put him on the plane'."

Mr Crystal, an expert in sports law, had told the judge: "He represents our best chance of a podium finish in the 100 metres in Beijing."

Chambers, 30, served a two-year suspension for using the designer steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG).

Mr Crystal said the BOA bylaw was unfair, contrary to competition law and an unreasonable restraint on trade.

Chambers had already qualified to compete in the Olympic team after winning the 100 metres at the Olympic athletics trials in Birmingham last Saturday and setting his best time of the year.

David Pannick QC, representing the BOA, told the judge that Chambers "cannot show that sportsmen and women are significantly restrained in their trade by the bylaw which only concerns eligibility for an amateur event, which takes place once every four years and for which there is no prize money".

He added: "If the court were to make an order requiring the claimant to be selected, that would deprive another athlete of his place in the team, even though the legality of the rule may be upheld at a full trial."

As a self-confessed drugs cheat, Chambers was not a good example for Britain's next sports generation and the court should not force the BOA to pick him, Mr Pannick argued.

BOA chairman Lord Colin Moynihan welcomed the ruling.

Speaking outside court, he said: "It is a matter of regret that Dwain Chambers an athlete with such undoubted talent ... should by his own actions put himself out of the running to shine on the Olympic stage.

"The BOA will continue to send out a powerful message and important message that anyone found guilty of a drug offence should not have the honour to represent Team GB at the Olympic Games."

Chambers posed for pictures on the steps of the Royal Courts of Justice but would not say a word about the ruling.

He was surrounded by photographers as he crossed The Strand and disappeared towards his barrister's office.

The decision was welcomed by many in the sporting world.

Former Olympic gold medallist Denise Lewis said: "I think this is a very fair verdict in the circumstances and shows that Dwain now understands that he cannot break the rules just because he thinks it suits him. He knew the rules existed when he broke them.

"The decision also sends out a very strong message to anyone else who may attempt to appeal in this way and to anyone who is tempted to cheat
by using drugs to enhance their performance.

"It is very sad that this appeal has grabbed so many headlines and I really do think that the British bylaw should be adopted by the IOC and across the world so that everyone understands very clearly that if any athlete tests positive for drugs they forfeit any right to represent their country at any future Olympics.

"We must now get behind all the athletes representing Team GB in Beijing who have worked very hard to earn their places. I really think all our athletes will be delighted with this decision."

John Regis, who used to coach Chambers, told BBC News 24: "He's going to be gutted."

The full article contains 663 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 July 2008 1:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: 2008 Olympics
 
1

Media 1,

cape town 18/07/2008 12:48:41
Common sense prevails.
2

McMillar,

Fife 18/07/2008 13:00:00
Poor decision.
3

Poetess50,

Dundee 18/07/2008 13:00:37
Given China's human rights record, we should be banning the Olympics.
4

Bemused and above it all,

18/07/2008 13:10:20
Serves him right, he used a drug that was hard to detect for the reason he didnt want people to know, so how can you trust him when he says 'i'm clean now!'? Lets face it habitual drug users (for whatever reason) generally continue to dabble in some sphere or switch their addiction to the abstinence model with similar fervour
5

John south of Soutra,

18/07/2008 13:19:32
That is a fantastic decision, anyone who is caught taking performance enhancing drugs should really be banned for life and it's about all the sporting bodies did this
6

Regulator,

Atyrau 18/07/2008 13:20:45
The thing about drug use is that it gives an unfair advantage to the user that other "clean" sportsmen/women don't get. No it can't be that, other countries give their sportspeole proper facillities to train in and sponsorships to colleges and universities and jobs where they can train all day and get paid for it. These other countries ban drugs cheats for the prescribed length of time, then put them back on the road to Olympic Gold. Who are we kidding? The Olympics are a business, most other countries see them as such. I'm not saying encourage drug use, but what I am saying is don't put the Great Britain team at a disadvantage, an unfair disadvantage
7

Wee Wull,

Nr Peebles 18/07/2008 14:02:03
So Chambers is the best chance of GB getting a podium position. That is tantamount to approving the taking of drugs.

Regis says "He's going to be gutted"

He should have thought about that before taking the performance enhancing drugs! Some people just won't accept the consequences of their actions.

Good decision
8

Who?,

18/07/2008 14:25:20
This decision is a disgrace. The guy admitted his mistake, served his punishment and has now been punished again. Fair and tolerant societies give people second chances. This is not china, iran, russia, pakistan!

The BOA itself is nothing more than a corrup organisation run by people who would sell their children to a molester to make a quick pound. Thats not to mention the numerous scandals involving the olympic governing body whether it involved backhanders, prostitution, money laundering or just genral bribary and blackmail. That lot makes fifa look clean!

You will find out that about 85% of russian, american, chinease athletes will have been on performance enhancing drug programmes for the last two years. The race Ben Johnson won the 100m in 1988 has had 8 out of the ten competitors test positive for banned drugs in the intrevening years.

It would be nice if nobody took them but the rewards for success are now so tangible and the pressure from national bodies like the BOA for success make it inevitable.
9

,

18/07/2008 14:39:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Captain Fantastic,

Anywhere but here 18/07/2008 14:52:55
#9 You are an ass.hole.
11

Brown Dirt Cowboy.,

18/07/2008 14:57:29
11# So are you, you cheeky blighter
12

postmark fifty-five,

Yueqing city, Zhejiang province, China, 18/07/2008 15:14:22
#9 Barnaby Mason,
Why is it that you have to be a racist? Problem with your own identity? Just because this particular athlete that got caught happens to be black, has nothing to do with race. Athletes from all countries, all races, all religions, are guilty of doping. Why? Who knows. Big bucks to be made, fame, glory, hero worship, you name it, they all come into play here. Bottom line is, there is no place for racism here or anywhere, it's uncalled for and only makes things worse. Where I live live, I am a minority, but everybody treats me with respect, I get the red carpet treatment where ever I go, and if anything, they treat me too good, and if I don't stop them, they discriminate against their own to give me better treatment. Racism is just bad, as is all discrimination.
13

John Cameron,

Broughty Ferry 18/07/2008 15:17:34
This has got to be a good decision. Britain was getting a pretty poor reputation abroad for the behaviour of certain sprinters and javelin throwers in the past (who must not be named).
14

Pedantic,

Edinburgh City Centre 18/07/2008 15:19:30
8 Who?,

He admitted his mistake you say. Only after he got caught and had no choice in the matter. He wasn't admitting anything while he was getting away with it was he?

100% correct decision. This isn't a second punishment, it's an upholding of the first one, i.e. a lifelong Olympic ban.
15

Who?,

18/07/2008 15:30:12
#15 he wasn't going to admit it before he got caught was he? or before he even took the drugs?

Your point is?
16

Griffe,

18/07/2008 16:57:54
He's served his time and the lifetime ban should be lifted. When some muderer's life sentence amounts to six years before they are released from prison, a lifetime ban on Dwain Chambers cannot be justified. He should take his case to the Court of Human Rights.
17

postmark fifty-five,

Yueqing city, Zhejiang province, China, 18/07/2008 17:30:48
#17 Griffe,
I seem to recall that since he was with the British team he was banned for life from going to the Olympics, so I'm sure that he was well aware of that before and while he was taking the drugs. Should he be persecuted for the rest of his life for what he did? Of course not, but he knew he would have a lifetime ban as far as the Olympics are concerned, and that needs to be re-enforced, or the drug problem will just keep getting worse.
He can still perform at the world stage, just not at the Olympics.
As far as life sentences go on murderers, they should serve their time until they die, simple as that, that's why it's called a life sentence.
18

GlenB,

18/07/2008 17:42:33
I think he took a drug that increases muscle development - when the drug is no longer taken the muscle does not miraculously go away.
If training is continued the muscle does not deteriorate and so he still benefits from the drug's effect so the cheating of others who built their muscles legally continues.

19

Media 1,

cape town 18/07/2008 18:33:50
An issue such as this tells you something about human beings. We are debating whether the life ban rule is right or wrong, whilst chosing to forget that had Dwain Chambers not cheated, he would be allowed to run.
This entire case didnt happen because of the British Athletics Association code of conduct, it happened because Dwain Chambers cheated.
He cheated knowing about the life time ban, how then can he appeal that ban to suit his own agenda?
He wanted to cheat AND contest the life time ban and that is just not on.
The bottom line is that Dwayne Chambers would be running in Beijing if he hadnt cheated.
20

MIncepie475636245,

Alba 18/07/2008 20:50:55
Would this guy actually stand a chance of getting a medal at the olympics?
21

indune1,

Canada 18/07/2008 22:35:15

17 - Griffe - Criminals rarely profit from their crimes.

Chambers stood to earn millions in marketing if his cheating allowed him to win Olympic gold.

He knew the risk; thought he could lie and cheat the people of the United Kingdom and, ultimately, the international sporting community.

He knowingly cheated and at the same time accepted the financial and moral support of his nation.


Let him try his chances on the professional circuit.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.