Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scottish R&D quango forced to go cap in hand to Europe for cash

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 November 2008
SCOTLAND's flagship publicly backed research and development body will be forced to look for additional cash from Europe as it prepares for cuts in its budget as a consequence of the Scottish Government slashing funding at Scottish Enterprise.
ITI Scotland, a ten-year programme that funds and develops commercially oriented technologies and services, faces a cut in its annual budget for 2009 as Scottish Enterprise (SE) reviews its spending after its own budget was cut earlier this year.

Shonaig Macpherson, chairman of ITI Scotland, said that, although the ITI programme was ahead of schedule in bringing new technologies to market, it faced cuts in its 2009 allocation.

Last year ITI Scotland received £38.1 million from SE but has said it will have to be "realistic" about funding in 2009.

ITI Scotland is an umbrella company for three ITIs that focus on energy, technology and media, and life sciences.

Although the ITI programme was launched in 2003 with an estimated £450m ten-year budget, the organisation relies on SE for its annual budget allocation. The ITI is often described as "arm's length" to the government and SE, but it is understood in future the two organisations will be working more closely together.

Macpherson also cast doubt on whether the scheme would realise its £450m budget as this "was not written in stone". She said the group was actively looking at tapping extra funds through the EU's European Regional Development Fund and other funding streams. Last year, ITI Scotland also made £112,000 on the back of exploiting the outcomes of its research programmes. Macpherson expects this income will rise in the coming years.

Macpherson told The Scotsman: "I think we have to be realistic about what is going on in the world around us and whether or not that funding will be there for us. We will be looking for additional funding."

Alex Neil, the SNP MSP, said a decision by SE to cut the organisation's budget would be "cutting off their nose to spite their face".

He added: "If we really are going to build an economy that can compete in tomorrow's world then the work of the ITI is vital in the key areas of energy, tech media and life sciences. I am a big fan of the ITIs."

Critics of the organisation, however, believe that the ITIs have performed poorly and have called for a review of the company's budget and the return on the tax payer's investment. Professor Grahame Bulfield, the former head of science and engineering at Edinburgh University, and former head of research at Roslin, was involved with the formation of the ITIs and believes they are underperforming.

"If they are going to be funded at the same level they are now, someone needs a very close evaluation of the value they are producing for Scotland both in terms of things getting to the market place and things being created.

"We should be doing better in terms of producing a life sciences industry, an IT industry and a modern engineering industry than we are doing. It is not that we don't have the science and the scientists, it is we are not able to put that into practice. It is a big challenge for Scotland."

Macpherson said ITI was currently preparing a full economic impact review for release next year.

In its annual report, released at the end of October, ITI said it had launched 25 R&D programmes. Eleven of these had been completed, producing commercial applications licensed to Scottish companies including anti-hack software and drug screening technology.

Since 2004, the organisation has spent £134m and filed 133 patents.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 November 2008 9:03 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

SouthernSkye,

12/11/2008 07:16:27
Never heard of them. What have they actually DONE since 2003? Would be nice to know what we tax payers get for our money. I see no mention in the story that "ITI, who were responsible for the X Y Z" so, do tell, I am really curious.
2

observer9,

12/11/2008 08:13:06
More hi-de-hi, than ITI.

The farcical board room reshuffles, resignations, questionable decision making on funded projects, the collapse of their hyped up funding war chest versus the money they have burned and the results they have delivered makes you realise its Scottish Enterprise by another name.

Yet again ITI is revealing itself as a more than iffy organisation.
3

Susan Caan,

12/11/2008 09:03:13
There are some clever people in ITI but an odd phenomenon seems to happen when you are run or even connected to a quango is that bureaucracy takes over and things turn to mush.

Einstein would be amazed at Quangos abilities to both slow down time ( bureaucracy + innovation progress) and gobble up money faster than a Black Hole.

They have got to get real, today, right now and help deliver projects that can be developed quickly, taken to market and return profits.
4

Shaken,

12/11/2008 09:09:46
Glad to see the bonfire of the quangoes has 'found out' a rather dubious agency which as done what exactly?
5

David McLaren,

12/11/2008 13:09:28
Immediate Technology Initiatives are required for today’s marketplace.

ITI's aims are good but the targets are too far away. They are partly a think tank but a re-think tank is what is needed for our economic future.

Future pharma breakthroughs are laudable but in our globalised, nano second, highly competitive economies, projects, innovation, breakthroughs, jobs and profit need to come now.

A remodelling of ITI’s aims by concentrating on accelerating projects would not be a dilution of the role it plays as this could actually boost its performance and catapult Scottish initiatives into markets faster than similar organisations both here in the UK and abroad.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.