Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The article has been unable to display.
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 07/08/2007 04:33:43

Dragonhead, who gets the money from the "donated" organ of the executed prisoner? I'll bet it wasn't his relatives.

2

BK,

Cyberspace 07/08/2007 05:06:16

I hope Paul Lee realises that a prisoner (who may not have been a criminal, possibly just a political activist) may have been killed to iorder to make noney from selling his organs, so his transplant makes him guilty of cold blooded murder.

3

Conan,

Here 07/08/2007 06:22:46

I am sure that Mr. Lee took all that into account, BK .... but, what were his choices?

1. Live.

2. Die.

What would you choose - 1 or 2, BK?

4

vernon,

callander 07/08/2007 08:04:14

One possible solution would be to opt out of donation upon death. The projected increase in organs would halt this moral dilema. I cannot see any arguable objection to organ donation in a country where we freely donate blood

5

entropent,

07/08/2007 08:14:58

The "opt out" approach presumes that the State is entitled to one's body after death, unless one specifically directs otherwise. I am not comfortable with establishing that precedent. The government already confiscates half of one's estate at death, will they confiscate one's organs as well?

6

nell from falkirk,

07/08/2007 08:44:55

#4 Could see many people not happy with that option.

Imagine - you are in hospital, seriously ill after, say, a car crash.
A VIP, (for argument's sake, lets say a member of the Royal family, or a high-up in the Government) collapses and needs a heart transplant.

Yours fits the bill.

Would you be absolutely sure that you would be given all possible treatment to ensure your survival; or would there always be the doubt that the nod would come "from above" that some things be left undone, "in the national interest"?

7

Boy Wonder,

07/08/2007 08:56:50

Can I suggest eBay??

8

Guga II,

Rockall 07/08/2007 10:37:45

#6 Nell. They'd whip your heart out before you even realised it.

9

Al,

07/08/2007 11:26:27

The Chinese have got this right for once. We could save hundreds of innocent lives and solve prison overcrowding quite easily.

10

HEY HARVEY,

LANCASTER, MEXIFORNIA 07/08/2007 23:26:32

IT IS NOT LEGAL FOR AN ORGAN DONOR IN THE UNITED STATES TO ACCEPT MONEY FOR HIS DONATION. THE BROKERS - READ REAPERS - ARE THE ONES MAKING THE MONEY. IF THE DONORS OR THEIR SURVIVING FAMILIES COULD RECOUP SOME OF THE MONEY FOR ORGAN DONATIONS, I THINK THERE WOULD BE MORE AVAILABLE.

CIAO,

HARVEY S.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.


Error displaying section details: Value cannot be null. Parameter name: String