Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Stars' favourite green car-maker told white lies about emissions

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 June 2007
A TELEVISION advert for a "green" car driven by celebrities including Leonardo di Caprio has been ditched, after watchdogs criticised its environmental claims as misleading.
In UK commercials, Toyota boasted that their Prius model, a favourite with planet-saving stars, used "one tonne less per year" than others cars.

But an investigation by broadcast regulators found these figures were not true when comparing the 1.5
-litre Prius against cars with a similar-sized engine and only matched half of those with a 1.8-litre engine.

The Japanese car-maker was found guilty of breaching rules on using evidence, environmental claims, comparisons with other models and misleading advertising, said the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

The Prius has long boasted that its hybrid electric-petrol engine belches out less carbon dioxide than traditional petrol or diesel engines.

This has led to a rush of celebrities buying it to emphasise their environmentally aware credentials, including the singer Donny Osmond and the creator of Seinfeld, Larry David. Harrison Ford was chauffeured to an Oscar ceremony in the "green" machine.

But television adverts in the UK could not justify the claims, after regulators examined how the comparisons were made. The Prius pumps out 104g of for every kilometre travelled, according to official industry figures.

Toyota compared this with the average 172g of /kg for all new cars and then multiplied the difference of 68g/km by 12,425 miles, which is claimed to be the average domestic mileage for a motorist. But the ASA discovered that this figure is for the average US motorist, not the average British driver, who drives only around 8,327 miles a year - up to a third less.

Toyota told the ASA: "[We] qualified the claim by stating 'up to' one tonne less, to make clear that the emissions saved would not always be as much as one tonne."

The company also claimed the ad was passed by an independent consultant, "who had advised it was suitable to show that the Toyota Prius emitted significantly less than other cars".

The ASA upheld a viewer's complaint about the green claims made in the ad and ruled that it could not be shown again. The ruling said: "While the average annual distance driven by private cars in the US was 12,425 miles, the average for the UK was 8,327 miles.

"Toyota had qualified the claim by stating 'up to one tonne less per year' and the Prius emitted significantly less than some other cars with greater engine capacity.

"But we did not consider their evidence demonstrated that it emitted one tonne less than equivalent vehicles with diesel engines, or took into account the average annual distance driven by private cars in the UK."



The full article contains 465 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 06/06/2007 02:01:18

Picky, picky.

2

MarkB,

USA 06/06/2007 04:55:22

The "celebrities" who drive in a Prius when the cameras are running are the same who fly around the world in private jets. So much for the environment.

3

Media 1,

cape town and stockbridge 06/06/2007 08:27:15

Celebrities who jump on the green bandwagon have got to be the very worst sort of people on the planet.

Maybe they should just sing songs, make movies and do what we need them to do to cater for our entertainment. Other than that, we really should not have to see them, hear them or notice them.

4

drew 33,

edinburgh 06/06/2007 08:55:15

The Prius is bought by two groups, one group who have a fleet of cars and need one in their "stable" as a public statement of their "green" credentials; the other group, a bunch of middle class high spending consumers trying to salve their guilty consciences and give themselves an "edge" in their dinner party discussions.
Incidentally any first year engineering student knows that lugging a massive, heavy and expensive, short life battery, with its associated motors and control gear will result in a greater fuel consumption, compensated for only if the car is used extensively in stop start traffic.

5

Homer,

06/06/2007 09:13:57

The emission figures above come from the DfT database: http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk

They're based on measured fuel consumption under some representative test scenarios (see the site for details), but don't include emissions involved in producing or destroying the car - the "dust to dust" emissions.

A report from US market research firm CNW that looked at the dust-to-dust emissions of different models hit the headlines recently, and the Prius fared pretty badly. Unfortunately, that report was just about the worse piece of research I've ever seen - take a look for yourself.
http://cnwmr.com/nss-folder/automotiveenergy

The DfT and Carbon Trust are working on a methodology to measure the "embedded emissions" from all products and services. They've only just started consulting on it, so any new scheme is unlikely to be rolled out for a year or two yet.
http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/about/presscentre/310507_GHG...

6

Cant use my name anymore-Alex,

Prisoner of the Machine 06/06/2007 09:17:39

The Prius is really not very environmentally friendly at all if you start to look at manufacturing costs and process, the batteries and the fact that they need replacing at huge expense after just a few years

The Prius is in fact a gimmick, The 4.0 litre petrol Jeep wrangler ( yes Satans own, a 4x 4) has a smaller carbon footprint over its lifetime. and if I could be bothered I could link you to the stats which prove it.

7

Homer,

06/06/2007 09:41:16

#6, All of the media reports I've seen comparing the Jeep Wrangler and the Prius originate from the CNW report linked to in post #5 above.

Have a look at the report - it's absolute crap. I wouldn't trust their figures as far as I can throw a Prius battery.

I agree that the Prius will look less environmentally friendly when you include dust-to-dust emissions, but I'm not convinced it will work out worse than a Wrangler, since I haven't seen any reliable data that supports the comparison.

8

Bert,

06/06/2007 11:54:30

Well I never. Clarkson's right!

9

Friar Tuck,

06/06/2007 17:57:22

I will not buy a hybrid until I can find out:

1: How long will the batteries last?

2: How much will it cost to replace the batteries?

3: How much pollution will be caused when the batteries reach the end of their life?

June 6, 2007, 1857 hours.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.