Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Afghan workers kidnapped by millitants



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 September 2008
Taliban millitants are reported to have kidnapped around 155 Afghan labourers.
The militants stopped the buses in the Bala Baluk district of the western province of Farah on Sunday, said Interior Ministry spokesman Zemeri Bashary.

The laborers had been constructing a military base for the Afghan army in Farah city, the provi
ncial capital, said Gov. Younis Rasouli. He said 156 Afghans had been kidnapped, while Bashary said 155 were taken.
No one immediately claimed responsibility for the kidnappings. Bashary said he knew of no demands from the kidnappers.

"What demand might they have from the government? They are poor and innocent laborers who are traveling far distances for work," Bashary said.

Kidnappings of Afghans for ransom are routine in Afghanistan, and in July 2007 Taliban fighters kidnapped 23 South Koreans, killing two and releasing the rest. But the kidnapping of 155 people is the first time militants have attempted to abduct and hold such a large group.

In other violence, a roadside bomb ripped through a civilian vehicle in southern Afghanistan on Monday, killing six Afghans and wounding four others, the NATO-led force said.

The military alliance said the blast occurred in Tirin Kot, the capital of the southern Uruzgan province. It said a child was among those killed.

Juman Gul Himat, the police chief in Uruzgan, blamed Taliban militants for the attack.

Militants regularly attack Afghan and foreign troops with roadside bombs and suicide strikes, but hundreds of Afghan civilians have been killed.

Meanwhile, in southwestern Nimroz province Taliban militants attacked a police checkpoint Sunday, sparking a clash in which nine militants were killed and three police were wounded, said provincial Gov. Ghulam Dastagir Azad.

More than 4,500 people – mostly militants – have died in insurgency-related attacks this year.



The full article contains 297 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 September 2008 1:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Afghanistan
 
1

SouthernGent,

22/09/2008 18:41:19
It speaks volumes when there are no comments on this type article. Had the headline read "Afghan workers kidnapped by US", there would have been many.
2

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 22/09/2008 19:08:16
yup
3

Finnking,

Lempäälä 22/09/2008 19:33:49
Line 1: "Taliban millitants are reported to have kidnapped around 155 Afghan labourers. "

Line 8: "No one immediately claimed responsibility for the kidnappings."

Southern gent

Maybe so, but the lunatics in Afghanistan tend not try and justify killing beyond the "Get out of our country" justification while the 'US' et al try telling us that they are massacring civilians for some noble cause.

Also, if your headline was seen in this paper, i would be surprised. The US did indeed kidnap hundreds of Afghanis and took them to various prisons around the globe.But that's not a mainstream story of importance, is it?

If the people kidnapped were 'westerners', we can be sure that this story would be all over the media like a bad rash and this comment section would be full of "bomb 'em back to the dark ages" and "Make 'em a glass car park" and all the other crud. But, these folk are 'foreign' and generally less than 'white' so who cares, eh? Prior to the invasion the women were persecuted and there was little in the way of democracy. Now we have serious multi faceted warfare, foreign troops on a killing spree, the women are still a million miles away from being liberated and we have US puppet government.

Freedom and Democracy? Aye right. Still, the weapons firms' share holders are doing nicely.
4

SouthernGent,

22/09/2008 22:19:16
#3
You did a wonderful job of spinning your post to prove my point, yet failed miserably in condeming the militants in the article.
5

mike - across the pond,

finnking 22/09/2008 23:42:47
your BDS is absolutely ASTOUNDING....

you dont think the taleban are involved with terrorism within afghanistan?

wow... you have some ASTOUNDING spin...

you dont think that women have come LIGHTYEARS in afghanistan? remember the girl who was a finalist in the Afghani "Idol"? you are saying that she would have had that opportunity under the taleban?

granted, Afghani democracy is in its "proto-" stage, but what do you expect... if there was some magic "democracy" dust that would be great... but outside of your dreamworld THAT doesnt exist....

unfortunately there is NOTHING like that, and like Fred Thompson said, "these fledgling democracies dont HAVE Thomas Jeffersons, or John Adams, or James Madisons... the previous regimes in these countries have very carefully erradicated these great thinkers"
6

Finnking,

Lempäälä 23/09/2008 06:48:22
Quite astounding responses.

1.Southern gent:a)I didn't 'prove' your point, b)I did refer to them as lunatics and c)you didn't condemn them in anyway.

2.Mike: "you dont think the taleban are involved with terrorism within afghanistan?"--Where, exactly, in my post does it imply that, where? It doesn't. You either can no longer read or you're resorting to bog standard trolling techniques.

If you regard having a woman appearing on "Idols" as a sign of an improvement in liberation, then I can fully understand why you have problems effectively interpreting my comments. The women there still ensure forced chastity tests and many other forms of degradation. Pointing at one woman singing on TV and saying that that is "lightyears" better is, IMO, crass.

Regarding the concept of democracy; You regard a US installed puppet as an effective first step, a foundation, of a fledgling democracy? What about Kuwait and Saudi Arabia? Nations, created by the west, that are largely influenced by the west: women's rights? Democracy?

Your last paragraph: You honestly believe that the democracy you live in is some sort of 'great thing', ready for export, don't you? Quite amazing, really. You do not live in a democracy, Mike. Look up the definitions and try and apply to your electoral process. There have been great thinkers from all over the globe, Mike, Pashtun, too. Do you not see the arrogance of your remark?

BTW: you will find that Afghanistan had a well developing democratic process and massively better equality than at present. Sadly the US government trained and funded the lunatics in their midst to upset that government and draw the Russians into a war. The very last thing your government/elite want is 'democracy', Mike.
7

,

23/09/2008 14:46:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

23/09/2008 14:48:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

SouthernGent,

23/09/2008 15:07:36
#6
You absolutlely proved my point. Your post was more about the US than the condemnation of the militants. That speaks volumns.

You also qualified your reference to lunatics as if there was an excuse. There is no excuse for kidnapping innocent civilians.
10

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 23/09/2008 19:21:22
#8 and #9

Afghan resistance fighters? More appeasing and apologizing.
You keep bringing up 90 civilian deaths... which as you know has been proven to be the cause of rival tribes and deliberate misinformation given to Americans. Stop putting out your spin. The blame is on the heads of these rival tribes.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.