Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Alcohol abuse expert found guilty of drink-driving



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 May 2008
HE WAS the government adviser on alcohol abuse who couldn't say when. Paul Yates is used to lecturing on the dangers of drunkenness, but yesterday the academic heard a sheriff cast doubt on his testimony and so found him guilty of twice drink-driving.
The senior research fellow at the Scottish Addiction Studies Group claimed that he was not drunk while driving home, but later had secretly downed shots of whisky in his garden shed, with the result that he was over the limit when the police arrived
at his door shortly afterwards.

However, the sheriff at Perth Sheriff Court dismissed his story, banned him from driving for three years and imposed a £1,500 fine.

Yates, nicknamed "Rowdy", is based at the addiction studies group at Stirling University, and his solicitor, Virgil Crawford, yesterday commented on the irony of his employment. Mr Crawford said: "He holds senior positions in various organisations both nationally and internationally. Against that, he does find it ironic and regretful that he finds himself before the court for these offences."

Yates, 57, claimed he had only drunk a small amount in the pub and had then "topped up" in the shed . However, a medical expert told the court that Yates would have needed to have downed three very large whiskies in minutes to achieve the reading he claimed. When police officers arrived at Yates's home he told them at the time that he had taken a single swig of whisky from the bottle.

Sheriff Lindsay Foulis said: "I have listened very carefully to all that has been said and I regret that I do not find your evidence convincing with regard to the alleged post-driving drinking."

Yates was awaiting trial on that charge when he was caught again by officers suspicious about his mud-caked 4x4 vehicle. The police patrol spotted Yates driving near his home on 15 December last year.

They pulled him over for a roadside check because the mud was obscuring his registration plate and immediately noticed the strong smell of alcohol. Yates admitted driving his Vauxhall Frontera while approximately twice the legal limit. He continued to deny the earlier offence and told his trial at the sheriff court that he was not drunk at the wheel on 4 August, 2006.

On that occasion, Tayside Police were contacted by a passing taxi driver, who had seen Yates leaving a pub in Crieff and staggering across the road to his car. The taxi driver followed him for more than a mile. The court was told that Yates's car was seen weaving from side to side, and officers went to his home and spoke to him an hour later.

He claimed he had downed "a half-and-a-half" in the pub before retiring to his shed and taking a swig of whisky from a bottle.

PROFILE

PAUL Yates is the author of several books on the effects of alcohol and drug addiction.

He is the executive director of the European Working Group on Drugs Oriented Research, and the vice-president of the European Federation of Therapeutic Communities. He also chairs the Royal College of Psychiatrists' addictions advisory group and was made an MBE in 1994 for services to the prevention of drug misuse.

He has advised ministers on a variety of drug and alcohol issues.



The full article contains 561 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 22/05/2008 00:58:43
Paul Yates should be FIRED with immediate effect, what A DISGRACE to all the committees he is serving on.
2

Booster,

22/05/2008 01:40:00
"Against that, he does find it ironic and regretful that he finds himself before the court for these offences."

Ironic is not the word I would use.

He needs to face up to his problems and get help before he injures someone with his reckless attitude to drink driving.
He should also show some humility and stop lecturing on drink whilst he clearly has poor control over his own use of it.
3

EPS,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 02:22:24
#1, #2 It is easy to kick a man when he is down. Remember the phrase, "There but for the grace of God go I."
4

Julian.,

edinburgh 22/05/2008 02:32:58
#3

So just because nobody's perfect we shouldn't criticise others when they do wrong? In this case the guy has done doubly wrong in commiting a crime and being a complete hypocrit in doing so.
5

FooFoo,

Glasgow 22/05/2008 05:18:30
Very difficult for him to continue in his posts now surely - not only regarding the subject matter of his lecturing, but also that he has effectively been called a liar by the Sheriff. No credibility left whatsoever.
6

Snuffy Ivy,

Aberdeen 22/05/2008 05:20:33
Mr. Yates is a big boy now, and at 57 years old, still tells lies!
7

Lance Boyle,

22/05/2008 06:35:50
3

EPS, I agree. McAskill was down, he bounced back, and just look at him now...
8

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 22/05/2008 06:57:18
Perhaps he was just studying the effects of alcohol on driving? An expert engaging in hands-on field-studies?

Or is he just your average hypocrite?
9

TM,

LA, USA 22/05/2008 07:24:08
Why does the Scotsman allow comment on this story but not on the one about the drug addict who committed a brutal murder with a knife, for a second time, after serving only ten years the first time he did it????????
10

Hmmm..,

22/05/2008 07:55:21
Good point #9. Scotsman are a law unto themselves. No logic when they decide not to open a story for comments. Is there freedom of speech or not?

With regard to Paul Yates (any relation to Paula?) disgrace to Scotland. Scotland is quickly becoming a laughing stock. We are living up to our stereotypes aren't we? And its just embarrassing. I left 20 years ago, and it has made me more patriotic, yet I have absolutely no idea why. Most of the time I just feel ashamed. What is it about Scotland and booze? Are we a depressed nation or something? What has made us like this?
11

an interested party,

22/05/2008 08:14:14
oh yeahs a world where a man can be an expert yet is expected to have no first hand knowledge of his subject

if anything this ban will increase his first hand knowledge of the issues involved, but no we dont want
an alcohol expert to know anything about it.

maybe his post will be filled from the temperance movement
12

Iain's,

22/05/2008 08:21:21
I am surprised that we are surprised.

This is the kind of thing supported by New Labour.

The evil tories went to jail for less.

VOTE THEM OUT!
13

Iain's,

22/05/2008 08:21:37
I am surprised that we are surprised.

This is the kind of thing supported by New Labour.

The evil tories went to jail for less.

VOTE THEM OUT!
14

Anglofile,

22/05/2008 08:42:45
At least he has shown that he is an "expert" on alcohol abuse. Or has he lied about that too?
15

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 10:08:50
hahahahahahaha!

Gave me a smile at the start of the day :-)
16

G,

dundy 22/05/2008 10:26:59
#13 has been on the sauce as well.....
17

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 10:59:13
So this idiot presumes to lecture us all on the effects of drink does he?

I wonder how many other bigotted hypocrits there are out there, preaching one set of rules for us, but meanwhile doing exactly the opposite?

Is it any wonder that any nanny-state reports on the effects of drink are rediculed by me? And they expect us to believe the "Scotland has a drink problem"? This moron is one of the ones who help spread that propaganda for christs sake!
18

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 11:02:53
Another thing..

"...swig of whiskey from the bottle..."

As far as I am aware, only jakeys, and "gun-slingers" do that. Most people pour themselves a drink in a civilised manner. Even Jack Regan used a glass.
19

Bob10,

22/05/2008 11:35:43
10.Hmmm

"What is it about Scotland and booze? Are we a depressed nation or something? What has made us like this?"

Possibly the climate!
20

,

22/05/2008 11:43:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

22/05/2008 11:47:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 11:57:50
#17

Can't see the connection between Yates offences and the veracity of government warnings which you ridicule.

Just make sure that your ridiculing isn't a form of denial.

The facts are plain enough. Alcohol has got steadily cheaper and consumption has risen. There's trouble brewing in a lot of livers and by the time their owners find out it will be too late.

Ridicule that at your peril.
23

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:01:17
#22:

Looks like you've been taken in Cramondo.

According to you, anyone who doesn't swallow all the daft, groundless propaganda that is thrown at us by hypocritical morons like Yates is probably in "denial". what kind of rediculous attitude is that? Are we really supposed to take people like Yates seriously?

Believe me, this is just the tip of the iceburg. You can be certain that there are many, many more who are currently engaged in the war against alcohol who have previously got drunk and made fools of themselves---and continue to do so.

They are hypocrits to a man (or woman) and should be ignored and/or laughed at.
24

Poetess50,

22/05/2008 13:09:24
#19 - I'll agree with you about the climate....my drinking escalated after coming here!
25

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:21:25
All I'm saying is that there is no connection between Yates' particular circumstances (albeit embarrassing and possibly hypocritical) and our individual decisions about how much heed to take of health warnings.

You're quite good at turning my measured words into sweeping generalisations.

I could do the same to you: because Yates has been caught out here it is now safe for everyone to drink as much as they want because all health warnings have become invalid.

Enjoy your lunchtime drink.
26

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:22:10
Forgot to add. My comment is a response to #23
27

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:54:10
Cramondo,

I'm afraid you've failed the "twisting it around" test!

The fact that Yates has been caught breaking the law does not imply that it is therefore safe for anyone to do the same. From what I read here, he wasn't just marginally over, but substantially over---twice in the space of less than a year.

That puts him firmly in the category of hypocrit. No doubt his many lectures and papers would have at least touched on the subject of drinking and driving and would more likely have covered the subject in great detail. This didn't happen by accident. No-one gets caught donig what he was doing by accident. Maybe marginally over the limit could be put down to an error of judgement, but substantially over twice in the space of 10 month most certainly cannot.

If you religiously follwed all the health advice that is given nowadays you'd probably drive yourself mad with worry and confusion. Such are the number of conflicts. At the end of the day it is down to common sense. I'm always suspicious when a big deal is made about something because real "big deals" have a habit of being self-evident and do not require constant hype and horror stories. When you consider that people like Yates are part and parcel of the hype then the logical thing to do is to ignore them because of their track record.
28

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:55:44
Sorry, that those time period should have been "...less than two years..." and "...22 months..."

Doesn't change the basic principle though.
29

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 14:16:39
#27

Last word from me you'll be glad to know.

Go back to your post 17 "they expect us to believe that Scotland has a drink problem".

I mistakenly read into that that you think that Scotland does NOT have a drink problem, and that there is some connection with the hypocracy of health experts who don't practise what they preach.

Now I'm not sure what you think about the proposition that many Scots drink too much. Personally, I think that is beyond doubt. Maybe I have been "taken in" by flawed advice but there you go.

It's perfectly possible to be an "expert" in a field and to ignore your own advice. In fact, possibly the biggest experts in the addiction field are those who are or have been addicts themselves.
30

Bemused and above it all,

22/05/2008 15:48:09
it is somewhat ironic isnt it?
31

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 16:36:53
No. I do not believe that Scotland has an alcohol problem. I do not believe that many Scots drink too much.

There is evidence of a problem with a minority of people mis-behaving after having consumed alcohol but that is more of a problem with law enforcement and the general, childish attitude nowadays that it is big and clever to act like a moron after a few drinks.

The problems we have can be solved by promoting the idea that the mark of a man is to HOLD his drink and to enforce the EXISTING laws properly.

They have re-defined "binge drinking" to mean having anything over their rediculously low "recommended maximum". By doing this, they have made it meaningless.

I agree that some of the best experts may be reformed addicts themselves, however I do not take kindly to being told not to do something by someone who is doing exactly the opposite themselves---especially if they are doing it to a greater degree than I ever would.

I don't believe Yates does have a medical problem. I believe he is just irresponsible and has been lucky enough to get himself into the position where he is able to pontificate to others. He should be fired because of this and never work in this area again.

You can bet your bottom dollar that this won't happen though.
32

Pocket Dictionary,

22/05/2008 18:18:30
Next week - anti-smoking czar caught having a fly ciggie behind the bins.

33

Euan,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 18:20:59
#32

Or in his garden shed.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Can any more be done to cut down the number of youths binge drinking?
Yes, more punitive measures should be taken against shops
Yes, hit the parents of teenage drinkers hard
No, if they want to get alcohol they'll get it somehow

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.