Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scottish government halts Lewis wind farm plans



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

THE Scottish Government today cited environmental concerns for rejecting plans to build the largest land-based wind farm in Europe on the Isle of Lewis.
Ministers ruled the 176-turbine farm on protected moorland at Barvas Moor in the Western Isles were incompatible with European law. The moor is designated under the EC Bird Directive and EC Habitats Directive.
Government: Standing stones on Lewis, not the Continent's largest wind farm. Picture: TSPL
Government: Standing stones on Lewis, not the Continent's largest wind farm. Picture: TSPL

Developers Lewis Wind Power (LWP) said the decision to turn down the £500 million project was a bitter disappointment. Environmental agencies welcomed the news.

Energy minister Jim Mather said he had considered the views of the local authority, the nearly 11,000 objections and 98 letters of support before coming to his decision.

"European legislation requires a specific procedure to be followed when proposals which could potentially affect Special Protection Areas come forward," Mr Mather said. "I considered all the relevant issues and concluded it would not be possible to approve this application."

Mr Mather continued: "The Lewis Wind Farm would have significant adverse impacts on the Lewis Peatlands Special Protection Area, which is designated due to its high value for rare and endangered birds."

LWP – a consortium of AMEC and British Energy – applied to construct and operate 234 wind turbines on Barvas Moor and other locations in north Lewis in October 2004. The application was trimmed to 176 two years later.

"Lewis Wind Power is bitterly disappointed by the Scottish Government's decision to reject our proposal for a wind farm on Lewis," LWP said in a statement. "Over the six years of this project, we have conducted extensive environmental and economic studies and designed the development around these findings.

"As a result, we believe we had put forward a detailed case showing the benefits of our proposal and the benefits it would bring to Lewis, the Highlands and Islands region and to Scotland.

"We also believe that during our discussions with the government, we demonstrated that this proposal could have been approved without violating European law."

LWP said the development would have created 400 local jobs and had the backing of local council members and businesses.

The Scottish Chambers of Commerce criticised the decision to reject the wind farm. Chief executive Liz Cameron said: "We cannot afford for the Scottish Government to play fast and loose with the security and reliability of our future electricity supplies and run the risk of the lights going out in Scotland."

But environmental groups backed the government for rejecting the development. The Scottish Wildlife Trust said the decision protected one of the most extensive areas of blanket bog in the world.

Western Isles SNP MSP Alasdair Allan said: "Today represents the end of a very long and at times painful debate in the islands.

"This was one of the most controversial planning developments that Scotland has faced in recent times."

He said "most people" would be relieved at the ministers' conclusion but said supporters of the development had argued the case with integrity.

He added: "I have long made clear my own view that the sheer scale and environmental impact of this project was such that it could not command the support of the communities most affected."

SNP MP Angus MacNeil said: "It's a fact that not every scheme makes it through the planning process and when the views of people in the islands are taken into consideration the decision in this proposal could really only have gone one way."



The full article contains 573 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Royalty,

Zandvoort 21/04/2008 14:02:31
Thank the lord.

Theres enough wind up there without farming more of the stuff.

What they realy need up there is hot air.

Mr Salmond take note.
2

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 14:13:04
Where are all the nationalists with their promises of 'a Scotland made wealthy on renewable energy' now?
3

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 14:45:06
#2

Oaf. The question is one of balance, of developing renewable energies without destroying natural habitat or landscapes that are among the most spectacular in the world.

This is a great decision by the government who recognise the unsuitability of such a senstitive area for the construction of wind farms.

There will be plenty of other sites that are more suitable.

The balance of developing renewables and maintaing precious habitat is something this government understands, even while there are certain morons in the world who don't understand this or, for that matter, understand anything.
4

Miss H,

21/04/2008 14:45:52
What's your point HM? That because the Government rule out one wind farm they are against renewable energy?

Even you can't be that daft surely.
5

Unimpressed one,

21/04/2008 14:48:30
I'm impressed with SNP decision. Now that they're on a common sense roll, let's see them back new nuclear power stations to make up the predicted shortfalls.
6

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 14:50:58
3. Jackie Priest in 'SNP are amazing and perfect and wonderful and flawless' shocker!
7

David MacVicar,

web 21/04/2008 14:55:08
4 Miss H,
That is HM you are typing too his level of daftness has no bounds.

There were certainly many political elements in cancelling this project though it is certainly the correct decision.

What I wonder is where to now for Lewis and onshore wind, which is most regularly windy place onshore in the Scotland, hence UK, hence western Europe?
Any comments Miss H?

I am glad this was rejected for (my own) political reasons. British Energy - a largely Nuclear Business about to be sold to EDF. Not the most encouraging managers of a huge renewable project.
8

David Ban,

04620 Vera 21/04/2008 14:58:51
Especially 2# and 5#; when oil arrived- though the Scots were kept in the dark about it - the technology available to extract the oil from very inaccessible areas of the ocean floor was barely available! As they say "where there is a will there is a way" and the riches promised - again not for the Scots_ was the spur to a gigantic and rapid leap in extraction technology.

The Pentland Firth with its tremendous energy potential is waiting there for the technology to produce huge amounts of power. Develope it I say and make sure that all this renewable energy is available to Scotland first.

No more nuclear waste dumps near where I was born in Caithness!
9

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 14:59:58
5. Nonsense. We have the potential to supply 0.001% of Europe's energy needs if we can just cover every windswept hilltop and island with wind turbines and then every beach and estuary with wave and tidal generators.

However, the SNP are dead right in protecting isolated and sparsely populated areas regardless of their wind potential. It is much better to build them.....well, somewhere must be more suitable.

Matching this by just building a handful of modern nuclear reactors is nonsense.
10

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 21/04/2008 15:01:20
Fantastic decision. Liz Cameron should watch her mouth.
11

David MacVicar,

web 21/04/2008 15:06:52
8 David Ban.

The point on Nuclear in Scotland is moot.
The S.Parliament rejected it.
Nobody will bring it back.
The UK did not propose any new plants in Scotland anyway and wont change now.

It is a dead parrot, Nuclear fission in Scotland is Dead, deceased, kicked the bucket. It is neither resting not stunned. It is terminal.

Waste dumps are another issue though.
Highland numptys garden perhaps?
12

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 15:07:14
Of course this has nothing to do with this being a marginal SNP seat.

Such a notion is ridiculous.
13

The Spook in Leith ,

on Campus 21/04/2008 15:16:01
Nuclear is the only sensible option. I am totally with HM on this.

What is that whirly-gig doing in the picture?
14

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 15:19:06
#9

Highland Blighty,

Is this you?

"However, the SNP are dead right in protecting isolated and sparsely populated areas regardless of their wind potential. It is much better to build them.....well, somewhere must be more suitable."

Is it a fakey? Cause now you're agreeing with what I spelt out to you above, and now you're acknowledging the good governance of SNP.

Glad to see you're getting on board.


(By the way, why do you keep saying "We" this and "We" that? You don't live in Scotland and you're not from Scotland. You're not one of "We").
15

brownlie,

21/04/2008 15:23:19
13 The spook

That is a picture of HM's halo distorted by hot air.
16

danielrober,

21/04/2008 15:24:13
Well here's looking forward to some small sensible schemes, rather than mega-engineeing projects. This part of the world still offers fantastic investment opportunities for engineering and power company firms to build RE projects and make reasonable profits.

This is not the end of RE in Scotland, far from it i hope this is just a different start.
17

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 15:29:51
#9

Oh, I see. You were being ironic.

Subtlety is not one of your strong points, Blighty. Stick to the big mouth bluster.

Anyway, I would expect someone who isn't Scottish and doesn't live in Sctland to have no idea about the value of areas in Scotland of exceptional natural and scientific value.

I wonder if you've ever stepped outside your own street. Is this what makes you so steeped in ignorance?


18

puskas,

East kilbride 21/04/2008 15:30:40
No2, Obviously a windup. Please tell us, surely not a serious post or I should say posts.

19

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 15:34:32
17. I was going to say I'm a LOT closer to Holyrood than you....but then again, all of Western Europe is closer to Holyrood than you.

The entire universe is closer to reality than you.

And if subtlety is not one of my strong points, what does that say about someone who missed my point completely?

You are very amusing!
20

puskas,

East kilbride 21/04/2008 15:39:58
In modern Scotland we do not wish Nuclear Energy...

Not necessary, and the dangers left to our further generations should not be acceptable to any straight thinking adult.

I have mentioned before on here that after many years in the industry "including reprocessed fuel" many of my friends in electrical engineering have passed away with all forms of cancer. Predominately Bowel and Bladder.. The last count in 1996 7 engineers from 22 had died in this manner all working from the same site office... That figure has almost certainly increased.
21

Louis Catorze,

21/04/2008 15:42:19
"...let's see them back new nuclear power stations to make up the predicted shortfalls."

Oh yes...let's replace one non-renewable energy source with another. That's clever.
22

brownlie,

21/04/2008 15:46:59
19 Highland

Even as a fellow unionist, and, therefore, much more intelligent than the nats I am struggling to see your point regarding your figure of 0.001% which is strangely akin to the figure you claim participate in the national conversation. Are you seriously suggesting that some-one has been able to measure the efficacy of putting wind-farms on every hill in Scotland or is that part of the irony which you are now becoming famous for?
23

,

21/04/2008 15:48:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 15:51:00
Has someone put new batteries in Jackie Priest?

You clearly have no idea who I am. Mind you, this fits the overall pattern with you in that you clearly have no idea about anything.
25

,

21/04/2008 15:52:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

The Strategist,

21/04/2008 15:53:32
This is a sensible decision.

I now look forward to RBS using some of the £10bn or so they're raising from their shareholders to invest in Scottish new energy technology companies.

27

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 15:54:15
And you scored zero on that one for 'Highland Mighty' but you did score two out of three for 'Jackie Priest' so...silver lining etc.!
28

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 15:55:36
26. Sadly not, it will be going towards propping up its sub-prime debts.
29

kimba,

21/04/2008 15:55:52
25. They must be "Ever Ready"!
30

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 15:58:01
#27

Don't start trying to fake it, Blighty. It's perfectly obvious you've never had anything to do with Scotland in your whole life. You've admitted it before, so don't try and worm your way out of it with internet bluff.

31

kimba,

21/04/2008 15:58:17
Jeez, salmond really is a suck-up to europe.
32

Greenheatman,

TAIN 21/04/2008 15:58:18
Good for them. It's about time that this con trick of producing intermittent dribbles of electricity that is NEVER consumed - it is generated on top of the the conventional thermal stations' output and lost for ever in the nanosecond of generation.

Science has to start looking at non-intermittent systems, like Gentec venturi, because random outputs from renewables is well past its 'sell by' date
33

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 16:01:47
30. I admitted not being Scottish and not living in Scotland, did I?

Oh, I see what you are doing. In that case...

You already admitted that you are clinically insane and are only in Switzerland as that is where your parents decided was the best hospital.
34

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 16:05:57
32. Tell us more, Andrew. Is this a feasible concept? Any proven technology, for instance?
35

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 16:06:21
#33

You are also pathetically easy to wind up.

Now shut up and let people get back to talking about this excellent decision by the SNP that, as you can see, is pleasing all of us, nat and unionist alike.

The only people it doesn't please are people with a chip on their shoulder about the Scots who don't have the slightest idea about anything Scottish.
36

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 16:09:38
Jackie Priest: "....this excellent decision by the SNP that, as you can see, is pleasing all of us, nat and unionist alike."

REALITY: "Lewis Wind Power is bitterly disappointed by the Scottish Government's decision to reject our proposal for a wind farm on Lewis," LWP said in a statement. "Over the six years of this project, we have conducted extensive environmental and economic studies and designed the development around these findings.

"As a result, we believe we had put forward a detailed case showing the benefits of our proposal and the benefits it would bring to Lewis, the Highlands and Islands region and to Scotland.

"We also believe that during our discussions with the government, we demonstrated that this proposal could have been approved without violating European law."

LWP said the development would have created 400 local jobs and had the backing of local council members and businesses.

The Scottish Chambers of Commerce criticised the decision to reject the wind farm. Chief executive Liz Cameron said: "We cannot afford for the Scottish Government to play fast and loose with the security and reliability of our future electricity supplies and run the risk of the lights going out in Scotland."
37

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 16:10:18
Jackie Priest, when was the last time you voted for the SNP out there?
38

kimba,

21/04/2008 16:13:52
35,Jackie, it was only a few weeks ago that salmond was harping on about "renewables" now he is stopping them because europe says so,we all know which way a independent scotland will end up!
39

Jackie Priest,

21/04/2008 16:15:56
#37

2007.
40

Boy Wonder,

21/04/2008 16:16:37
Hooray!!! Now get Scottish Hydro's mainland plans scotched and we're on a roll!!! :D
41

Highland Mighty,

21/04/2008 16:17:31
39. Of course you did. How silly of me.

In what constituency? Zurich?
42

Unimpressed one,

21/04/2008 16:43:16
The Scottish Chambers of Commerce criticised the decision to reject the wind farm. Chief executive Liz Cameron said: "We cannot afford for the Scottish Government to play fast and loose with the security and reliability of our future electricity supplies and run the risk of the lights going out in Scotland."

The poor woman probably thought the decision had gone the other way - why else would she make such an obviously stupid statement as the above?
43

Duncan in Edinburgh /,

21/04/2008 16:49:25
Now if they had included 500 houses a 450-room hotel and golf resort . . . .
44

brownlie,

21/04/2008 16:51:02
Disappointing news for us unionists and especially for the ex Labour Energy Minister Brian Wilson who is a director of Amec who cunningly decided to disguise themselves as Lewis Wind Power. Amec(Nuclear) are also looking for contracts to dispose of nuclear waste.

Where better, once they got a toe-hold in Lewis, to dump nuclear waste in an area with a stable rock formation, little population and, in case of accidents, a safe distance from Westminster.
45

Unimpressed one,

21/04/2008 17:00:14
The Scottish Chambers of Commerce criticised the decision to reject the wind farm. Chief executive Liz Cameron said: "We cannot afford for the Scottish Government to play fast and loose with the security and reliability of our future electricity supplies and run the risk of the lights going out in Scotland."

The poor woman probably thought the decision had gone the other way - why else would she make such an obviously stupid statement as the above?
46

Unimpressed one,

21/04/2008 17:03:33
#44, Good point, I'm sure NIREX will consider Lewis. However remember that much of our nuclear waste, excluding the high level stuff which is in the minority, comes from hospitals and research institutes. Where do you suggest they put this stuff, (keep it clean!) or are you against all nuclear materials per se?
47

Greenheatman,

TAIN 21/04/2008 17:04:19
#32 I am hoping to get prototype Mk 2 in the water this summer. Yes, it will work, the concept of using (green) heat to generate base load electricity is well proven - that's what powering my computer as I type!
48

malkster,

Scotland 21/04/2008 17:14:38
It is pretty obvious that the SNP will always go with the popular choice. Wind farms are good lets build them says Alex, oh they dont want them on Lewis then don't build them. Government is about hard choices not just popular ones.
49

Union is Best,

21/04/2008 17:19:11
48. Quite right! Look at our Labour UK government - doubling tax on the lowest paid by abolishing the 10p rate was both hard (on the low paid) and unpopular!

And the SNP approving 11 other wind farms this year clearly shows there anti-pathy to wind farms, irrespective of local opinion or environmental considerations of each particular application. All these birds and environmental nonsense - they should be harder on and less popular with birds.
50

spiderman,

21/04/2008 17:26:34
Great decision. But, to mix metaphors, windmills will only tilt at the wind and can never add up to more than a hill of beans. Nuclear is the answer - modern reactors are safe and clean and waste disposal isn't the problem the public think it is. And look what a bit of nuclear did for me! The SNP, whose policies seem generally sound to me, urgently need to revise their energy policy.
51

Nomada,

21/04/2008 17:26:54
#48 - The Scottish 'Government' would have had to make this decision whatever the popular view. The only relevant factor was EU law under the Birds Directive, and (belatedly) our Great Leader has tumbled to the fact that the SG is subject to the laws of his beloved Europe. If AMEC/LWP have lost money on this so what? They took a gamble on a very poor risk and lost. If the SG had approved the scheme, everyone in Scotland would have lost as EU structural funds would have been drastically cut as a penalty. It was always a daft plan, they were told so, but they persisted to the bitter (and costly) end.
52

Shionnach,

21/04/2008 17:32:34
Fantastic news, I think I'll have a dram or two the night to celebrate. Hopefully we will no longer need the Mega pylons through the Cairngorms National Park


53

brownlie,

21/04/2008 17:39:55
46 Unimpressed

Yes!
54

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 21/04/2008 19:55:23
Put all the Wind farms around London,there's enough wind coming out of that joint to keep the whole of Europe going for centuries!
55

faddy,

germany 21/04/2008 19:58:38
Good decision. I'm surrounded by the monsters.Terrible things.
56

Rodger the Leith lodger,

edinburgh 21/04/2008 19:59:52
Dear J Priest - please do not have the arrogance to assume that you speak for the people of Scotland or that of those in Lewis. I think that this is a disaster for Scotland and another lever for the NIMBYs to prevent other similar schemes. My opinion, and only mine, is that this joke known as the Scot's parliament has had a kickin' again, and it won't be the last time. But please, please don't suggest that it would be any better with independence as the gadget show is about to comeon the telly.
57

The Strategist,

21/04/2008 20:21:05
Well it will help keep down the trade deficit.. After all we don't build these turbines.
58

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 21/04/2008 20:37:00
I don't understand. If the Goverment rejected the wind farm on Lewis because it goes against European environmental directives, then surely the Trump development should also be rejected for the same reasons? You can't pick and choose what European directives you want to adhere to depending on your fancy. Surely not?
59

Shionnach,

21/04/2008 20:56:26
#56 Rodger the Leith lodger
NIMBY's ???
So why don't we have wind farms in the center of Edinburgh, plenty of suitable locations, Arthurs Seat, Blackford Hill, Braid Hills and where that stupid castle thing is. ? Answer, because it would spoil your skyline, so lets not go on about nimby's
60

Nomada,

21/04/2008 21:09:27
#58- You should be studying indeed. The wildlife implications of the Trumptown application are nothing at all to do with EU directives - just national policy and regulations on SSSIs. The Habitats and Birds Directives apply to designated SACs or SPAs and a few designated species wherever they are.

No picking and choosing - if Menie was an SAC or SPA there would be no argument, no PLI, and no development.
61

McX,

21/04/2008 21:16:40
There's more than meets the eye to this decision.
62

BigScotBastinIceland,

21/04/2008 21:22:14

Big schemes are never the answer. A smaller windfarm to provide the electricity needs of the people actually living near it: ain´t that far more sensible?

Nuclear power - the sun is a huge nuclear reactor that will go on pouring energy onto the planet for the next 500 million years - there is absolutely no need to build a nuclear reactor...
63

scotinbc,

western canada 21/04/2008 21:35:09
It certainly seems that Scotland is not open for business.Birds can fly elsewhere and Lewis would have 400 needed jobs. The Aberdeenshire people would have jobs, creating more people to prosper. I guess all you greenies want to get your electricity from pedal power. The world will eventually come to an end. It may be 5 billion, 5 million or 5days away. It's gonna happen.
64

The Strategist,

21/04/2008 22:21:55
#63

Important you appreciate that any jobs created would have been temporary construction jobs.

The permanant jobs related to the design, development and manufacturing of the wind turbines are based elsewhere and mainly in Denmark, Germany or the USA.

We don't do manufacturing anymore.
65

luckyman,

Glasgow 21/04/2008 22:40:00
Kiss goodbye to wave power in the UK... Oh dear we are the global technology leaders

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.