Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Red-hot Roddick just too good on the day, concedes Murray

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2009
DEJECTED and disappointed though he was after losing in four sets to Andy Roddick, Andy Murray held his head up and declared he had played well. He simply accepted that his opponent had played unbelievably well.
Murray often takes a long time after matches to warm down, take in some food and begin his recovery programme before presenting himself for a media conference. Yesterday by the time he faced the press, the disappointment of failing to become the first British men's finalist since 1938 was beginning to sink in, and he started off by implying he had not been shocked by how well Roddick had played.

"You always expect your opponents to play well, especially at this stage of the tournament," he said. "And he served great. Served really, really well in the tiebreaks. I think he maybe missed two first serves.

"I had a few chances in the first tiebreak. I had chances early in the third set. I didn't take them."

It was a close contest, as is usually the case with matches which feature two tiebreaks. In years to come the one abiding memory of it will surely be the quality of Roddick's game, but Murray rightly pointed out that he had not exactly played a bad match himself.

"I thought I played well. I mean, if you look at the stats, I hit more winners, less unforced errors, more aces. I'm sure the points that we won were very, very similar. It just came down to a few points here or there on his serve.

"And he served really well. Very close to the lines. Sometimes there's not a whole lot you can do with that, but I definitely didn't play a bad match."

Murray went on to explain that, while at times he stood back and Roddick was on the front foot, this was a question of tactics rather than his being cowed into passivity by the big-hitting Nebraskan. "I don't think I played that passive. You know, my game style against him is not always to sort of go on the court and try and blast winners all the time.

"Because he has such a big serve that you need to try and get into points and make returns. I used my slice well. I didn't pass as well as I normally do.

"But he came up with some good volleys and big serves, and that is what happened. Like I say, it wasn't through being too passive or me playing a poor match."

As the match wore on, Murray looked to be having difficulties with one of his knees, but he explained it was normal wear and tear rather than an injury. "It had nothing to do with the outcome of the match.

"I think you're always going to be a little bit stiff and sore when you get to the end of these sort of tournaments. But it wasn't anything that hampered my movement or anything."

Received wisdom, as voiced by Tommy Haas after his semi-final defeat by Roger Federer for example, was that Murray would have stood more of a chance against the five-time champion than Roddick. The Scot, however, refused to write off the American's chances. "I think if he serves like that he's got a chance against anyone, because it comes down to, like I said, a few points in each set. So regardless of whether it's Roger or me or anybody else, if he serves high 70s (that, is if he gets coming on 80 per cent of his first serve in] with the pace he's got on his serve, he's got a good chance."

The record books would suggest Roddick's chances against Federer are not that good, as he has won just two of his 20 encounters with the 2003-07 champion. But he had won only two out of eight against Murray before yesterday, so will not be fazed by bald statistics.

"I had a pretty good record against him as well going into today," Murray recalled. "Like I say, if someone serves 130 miles an hour consistently throughout the match, and at 75 to 80 per cent, it's very tough to break them, especially on a court like this that's quick."

It will be little consolation for Murray, but this fortnight does still represent progress for him, as he has yet again gone one round more than he did at his previous Wimbledon. Although he must now wait at least a year before contesting the final, he is more convinced than ever that he can go on to become the first home winner of the tournament since Fred Perry completed his hat-trick in 1936.

"I think I have a chance. And I think that the way I played this year it was very, very close to getting to the final.

"If I give myself those sorts of opportunities and keep playing well, and my consistency in the Grand Slams the last year or so has been so much better, I'm going to give myself opportunities to do it. I believe I can win a Grand Slam, whether it's Wimbledon or the US Open or Australia or whatever. I'm going to give myself chances.

"I'll move on very, very quickly and go and work on my game and improve and come back stronger. That's a pathetic attitude to have, if you lose one match and go away and let it ruin your year.

"I've had a very good year so far. I'm very close to the top of the game. The US Open I've always said is my best surface, my best chance to win a slam, and I'll give it my best shot there."

The one lingering frustration Murray had from the match was the code violation for an audible obscenity which he received from the umpire – completely unjustly, he insisted. "That stuff just annoys me when you're totally rushed into it," he said. "When you say, like, Hit the pass, and you get a code violation for that, it's a bit disappointing. So I hope I get an apology."

The full article contains 1030 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

04/07/2009 00:14:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/07/2009 00:28:14

Its the first time in a long time, that I have watched a tennis match in full, but one enjoys being patriotic, soo Andy Murray was the Man.
I enjoyed the match and was a 'tad' disappointed, but I am sure Andy Murray will be in our next final.




3

Brianwci,

04/07/2009 00:37:07
Excellent match. Roddick excelled himself but even then the match was very close.

I think Roddick's maturity won through in the end, allowing him to edge Murray in the crucial tie breaks.

Sunday should be a great match which Federer should win, but no guarantees.
4

Food snob,

Roslin 04/07/2009 02:16:14
Murray did us proud really. His weakness on the forehand side was his downfall.

Roddick will get well and truly rogered by Federer
5

response,

Syd 04/07/2009 03:49:54
Oh well the good thing is he will be called a Scot now instead of being British, Here we go it was the Scot that lost. Well done Andy you'll be back.
By the way is there a Scottish open ?
6

Finlang,

Hong Kong 04/07/2009 04:05:40
Andy made fantastic strides to get to the semi-final, and most of us are rightly proud of him. The improvement over the past year shows that there is much more to come. Some people tend to forget that he is only 22. He has come a long way in a short while, and will be back next year, the stronger from this experience.
7

PatG,

Russia 04/07/2009 04:33:27
Well done Andy. Dont listen to the idiots. You are doing a magnificent job on and off court. Not a lot in it but Roddick deservedly through. On the upside you progressed further than previously at W. Play as you are playing and you will have many grand slam finals ahead of you. You have done us proud. After a succesful grass court season your favoured hard courts loom. Onwards and upwards Andy.
8

steveenglandandGB,

04/07/2009 07:09:24
Once again silly comments on here. Trust me I can't find an article anywhere about Murray for the past 2 years where the word 'Scot' hasn't been mentioned if not in the headline, but in the 2nd sentence. There must be some legal agreement that it has to be mentioned in every report on him.

How many times was Tim Henman ever referred to as English?

Hardly ever.

I am not sure why the media pander so much to the needy insecure idiots. There are a huge number of Scots without chips on their shoulders who understandably would like Andy to be known as Scottish, but will accept that in some articles it isn't necessary.

However as long as baffoons such as MOJO on here exist I guess we'll all have to put up with over PC headlines and reports.
9

Away down In Gorgie (2),

04/07/2009 07:18:32
Another Hibby choking at the latter stages of the Big Cup.
10

UrbanFox,

Edinburgh 04/07/2009 08:21:26
Defeat can be the best teacher if you are prepared to learn. Murray has a problem, his attitude under pressure. Too often he was exultant when he won a point and visibly slumped when he lost one. His body language was revealing. Becker was right when he said that Roddick was the agressor in the match, Murray was too passive, some of his shots were too short and Roddick dispatched them with ease. Basically Murray doesnt play like a champion. Maybe he just needs to be a few years older.
11

Phil C,

04/07/2009 09:17:08
Well done Andy Murray. You represented Scotland and Britain well. I hope you're still at the top of your game when you can play for your own country, your birth right. Then we might avoid the jingoism which exists on both sides. The competition will be even fiercer, but better that than one 'partner' being continually squashed by the bigger one.

The English can use their wee red & white flags now, though the Swiss version might be more appropriate. I think that Federer is a class act (apart from the gold stuff) and that he'll win on Sunday. I think he'd have beaten Murray as well. Sadly, we'll never know. Hopefully Andy will be better next year and Nadal will also be there.
12

,

04/07/2009 09:27:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Archie, Gourock,

04/07/2009 09:48:16
Murray was garbage; Roddick less so.

Murray's mind fried after losing three break points in the first game of the third set from 0 40.

Very mediocre tennis indeed. Some serious questions have to be asked over Murray's mental fitness to ever win a slam. As long as Federer and Nadal remain active, Murray will not win one. Even without them, he'd probably struggle mentally to beat lesser opponents in the latter stages of top tournaments.

Let's get this straight.... Roddick was terrible. 70% "first services in" means jack when you don't convert.
14

Scunner,

Aberdeen 04/07/2009 10:37:39
Andy Murray is Scottish. Don't see why people get so upset when the press mention this. The majority of Scots who see themselves as British are Rangers/Hearts fans and Murray is a Hibee.
15

,

04/07/2009 11:10:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Al Pacino,

04/07/2009 11:31:20
With Rogerer homing in on No1 ranking again and with Nadal showing the signs of wear and tear physically and in his private life, Murray may end up number 2 before long. Come on Tim!
17

Away down In Gorgie (2),

04/07/2009 11:34:54
17

I regard myself as Scottish and I am a Hearts fan.

I hope Murray gets gubbed everytime he plays. FACT.





18

JCA REID,

Annan 04/07/2009 11:52:26
Various aspects of his game let him down to a player he's beaten in straight sets before at Wimbledon, especially his First Service. At one stage fllashed up on the screen only 45% of serves in with him winning only 71% of these points. both of these shoul be in the high eighties.
Murray has the US Open to concentrate on now & then there's next season.
All the Very Best to the lad.
19

Doc Martin,

04/07/2009 11:53:29
Well done Andy... Urban Fox called it right (and probably 95% of tennis fans) Murray is far to passive and allows his opponents to dictate the points. When he is aggressive, in brief stints he has eaten people alive. Hopefully... he will learn from this.

I going to stick my neck out on a limb here and say that this time next year, Miles will not be Andy's coach. I know he has created a great little team to be surrounded by, however, it seems to me that he is treading water at the moment... especially after the great start to the year. If you are no progressing, the you are regressing. Not quite sure he has the know all to get Andy up to the very top spot... I could be wrong though and would dearly love to be proven so.

One final mention to A-Rod who was far more than a one trick pony. He is a class act on and off the court. I sincerely hope he goes on and wins this now! All the best!
20

,

04/07/2009 11:55:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Malc.F,

France 04/07/2009 12:32:52
Stevenglander. So we Scots are pathetic chip on the shoulder merchants. Well just read on. During the match, which I watched on free to air BBC TV Scotland a notice came up on the screen telling English regional viewers that if they wished to keep watching the match switch to digital Scottish viewers need do nothing, the implication being that while the English were not to worried we better not upset the jocks. The presenter of Saturday Kitchen said that on his way to the studio his cabbie said that it was no problem,he's a scot. I know that lots of English people supported Murray unconditionaly and that thankfully cabbies opinions are not truly representative of the general public, but I get sick of hearing people on TV say England when they mean Britain. Have you ever heard a Scot say Scotland when they mean Britain? No I didn't think so.
22

view from the grassy knoll,

04/07/2009 13:10:53
just an observation

i followed the last hour of the match on bbc website via blackberry on train home from work in london to sussex (lived down south for years)

loads of people, mostly english, kept asking me for updates and were genuinely disappointed when murray lost.

i haven't picked up the anti-scottish sentiments at all re Murray. People are genuinely pleased we (ie. Britain) have a contendor for major tournaments. grass isn't even his best surface. watch him go in the US.

as for the BBC - just crass reporting - nothing else - they are all still stoned on expenses after Glastonbury.


23

Highland Hibby,

Inverness 04/07/2009 15:07:50
#25 fair points. The problem is that there are morons both sides of the border who look for trouble (see #20 for a good example).

Re not picking up anti-Scottish comments, my experience is the same. The problem is down to theEnglish who don't know the difference between England and Britain; and most of them are BBC and tabloid journos.

24

Joanna,

Cambs, England 04/07/2009 15:36:15
Everyone I know round here was rooting for Andy and most made a point of watching all his matches. We even had a Wimbledon lunch on Friday at work (strawberries of course) and the big sign on the noticeboard said "Go Murray!". People are genuinely disappointed that he isn't in the final.

Malc F

I'm not sure what you're getting at. While I was watching Andy M and A Rod on Friday the announcement came up saying English regions switch to analogue. Then, for at least 3 minutes (it felt longer) we lost transmission from analogue and digital. I was upset and I'm sure a lot of other people were. If they had just told us to switch to BBC 2 it would have been easier and no loss of viewing. Why do you see this as an anti-Scottish thing? It was the English regions who were disadvantaged and missed some of the match, and anyone who follows tennis knows 3 minutes is a long time to miss a crucial point.

What a very strange thing for you to be upset about.

25

Abacus,

04/07/2009 15:42:40
Can’t believe there are people on here who actually think the media brand Murray as Scottish / British depending on whether he has won or lost. I think if you want to believe something to be true and you actually actively seek evidence to confirm your beliefs, then you’re likely to find it.

I agree with Stevengland that it is really noticeable that the BBC refer to Andy as both British and Scottish in almost equal measure, it is particularly noticeable since I don’t recall Henman getting the same treatment. I am sure had Andy won (or even when he does win) there wouldn’t have been a sudden step change in the BBC branding.

Malc.F

Sorry Malc.F but your comments show a degree of ‘Chippyness’. First off, can’t see much wrong with the way BBC Scotland handled the scheduling thing? Also, I’m surprised you’re in the least bit bothered about what a cabbie said to the presenter of Saturday Kitchen! What about the comment from 25) ‘View from grassy knoll’... surely that’s worth more than the opinion of a cabbie?

Have to agree with you about people in England mixing up Britain and England, really not good enough, especially from people appearing on TV. However, I wouldn’t read too much into this, I think there are a number of reasons why it happens, and actually it isn’t because English people think that they are the same thing and that therefore Scotland is really just a region of England etc.
26

Joanna,

Cambs, England 04/07/2009 15:43:45
Just to clarify Malc F .. the move to analogue was so that those people in English regions who wanted to watch their local news and not the tennis could do so, while the tennis remained on digital BBC 1. But, nobody told Sky and there was a time delay while they sorted it out.

Whatever, I missed 3 minutes of a really good tennis match and you're the one who feels hard done by. Unbelieveable!
27

Highland Hibby,

Inverness 04/07/2009 18:09:52
#28 Look at the front of today's Times - Simon Barnes makes the Scottish loser/ English winner comments. Admittedly, he makes them as part of the best tennis story I have ever seen in a paper. Well worth a read.
28

,

04/07/2009 18:39:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

Highland Hibby,

Inverness 04/07/2009 19:14:49
Rats. Got it wrong myself at #30.
30

Abacus,

04/07/2009 19:34:55
#30 - Simon Barnes refers to Andy as a British player and says ‘For some, Murray will cease at once to be a Great British Hope and start to be a Scottish loser’. So like I said, the media haven’t suddenly changed tack. He is simply suggesting ‘some’ other people might. I don’t know who these other people are, and I doubt he does either.

I mean really, I live in England, there was huge support for Andy, everyone knew he was Scottish but he was also British. Nothing has changed, he will get the same support next time round win or lose. Yes, I’m sure if I looked under some rocks I would find some people that would support anyone against Andy because of his comment about supporting any team against England. If you look under rocks anywhere and you will find people like that.

I understand and respect your comments here, I just think there are a few people being too negative in their comments, there are far more positives if you choose to look at them.
31

Highland Hibby,

Inverness 04/07/2009 19:54:07
#33 I think we're arguing the same point here.

Did you read the article? It was one of Barnes' best, and he writes some great stuff.
32

Abacus,

04/07/2009 20:19:47
#34-Yes a good article indeed.
33

Highland Hibby,

Inverness 04/07/2009 20:28:34
#35 Glad we agree. Have a good weekend.

#29 Of course the Scot complained! Complaining of anti-Scottish bias is THE national sport up here :-)
34

livilion,

livingston 08/07/2009 10:46:57
#19 Doc Martin
Not progressing?! You don't reckon Murray this year is far better than he was this time last year? Four straight wins against the greatest living tennis player since the US Open, that's not progress?

Had Federer not won the French Open then Murray, with the injury to Rafa, would have started Wimbledon as the world no2 and potentialy top seed for the tournament.

The odds are that Murray will return to Wimbledon next year with an even better ranking, and an even better chance of taking the title.

btw the Andymurrayometer has the wee man at 77% British, down from a historic 92% high before the Roddick semifinal.

http://andymurrayometer.com/stats.htm
35

Screamer,

18/07/2009 17:04:01
Roddick is playing brilliant tennis I hope he keeps it up.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.