Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


34 birds of prey were found poisoned last year – and it's the tip of the iceberg

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 November 2008
AT LEAST 34 birds of prey were poisoned in Scotland last year, a new report has revealed.
RSPB Scotland, which carried out the research, said the numbers were probably just the tip of the iceberg.

Victims ranged from a golden eagle – one of the only breeding pair in the Borders – to peregrines and buzzards.

Twelve red kites were poisoned, making it the worst year on record for persecution of that rare species.

All the dead birds were tested by the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, which revealed the presence of poison.

Most commonly, bait was laced with the agricultural pesticide carbofuran, a chemical that has been banned since 2001.

The report showed there were 37 separate confirmed incidents involving poisoning. In some cases poison was found, but no victims. This was a reduction compared to 2006, when there were 42 confirmed incidents.

However, it was still higher than the annual average for 1999 to 2006, which was 27.

And the report, Bird of Prey Persecution 2007, showed there were a further 32 alleged incidents of raptor poisoning reported to RSPB Scotland, which could not be confirmed.

Stuart Housden, director of RSPB Scotland, said:

"These figures are deeply troubling, especially when we know that wildlife crime takes place in remote areas, where it is relatively easy to conceal evidence of wrong-doing.

"These confirmed cases must represent a tip of an iceberg. While we know that many land managers behave responsibly, it is important that they stand up and provide information to the police on criminal activity against wildlife that comes to their attention.

"Sweeping these issues under the carpet is not acceptable.

"Only in this way will the problem be stamped out once and for all."

In addition to poisonings, there were 78 reports of other illegal activities, such as traps discovered that were intended to catch birds of prey, nest destruction, intentional disturbance of breeding raptors and deliberate shooting.

Of these, 17 were confirmed incidents, 30 were classed as probable and in the remaining there was not enough evidence.

RSPB Scotland says birds of prey produce so few young during their lives that illegal killing is putting populations of rare raptors such as golden eagles and red kites at risk.

The charity called for adequate resources to be made available for the investigation of crimes against raptors.

There were just three prosecutions last year for crimes against birds of prey. Penalties ranged from community service to a £1,000 fine.

A thematic review earlier this year advised bringing in a wildlife crime officer for each police force in Scotland.

Duncan Orr-Ewing, the head of species and land management at RSPB Scotland, said there was a link between the areas where bird-of-prey persecution took place and grouse moors.

"In Wales, where they now only have a few grouse moors, this problem has almost disappeared," he said.

Just last week, it was revealed a sea eagle had been discovered poisoned near Glenogil estate in Angus.

Michael Russell, the environment minister, said crimes against birds of prey were "absolutely unacceptable", and he demanded the perpetrators were brought to justice.

He added: "I fully support the RSPB in continuing to raise awareness of the shameful blight on Scotland that is bird poisoning, and I expect to work closely with them in the near future."

The Scottish Rural Property and Business Association, which represents the interests of landowners in Scotland, declined to comment on the report.


The full article contains 590 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 November 2008 9:58 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Birds of prey
 
1

jerrymanders,

18/11/2008 00:56:01
Anybody who goes shooting knows that birds of prey are fair game. I have seen owls and kestrels blown away in the name of sport. BTW racing pigeons are fair game too. I have nothing against shooting, it just depends what you shoot.
2

viking nz,

new zealand 18/11/2008 04:04:46
scotland your a joke when it comes to looking after the wildlife.somebodys pocket is being lined to keep the gentry happy .
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 18/11/2008 06:14:05
I thought those birds were territorial. Mark the position found, draw a circle round it, where the circles congregrate check out the folk that are advertising grouse shooting. Not rocket science you know. I have also heard, though it may be a rumour, that some shooters from EU shoot anything with wings and the occassional beater.
4

yockel,

18/11/2008 06:37:00
Yes you are right drunken profit and the bit of the EU you are looking for is that long narrow country that sticks out in to the Med.

On a plain reading of the article, surely the headline should have been "50% of RSPB claimed raptor persecutions can not be substantiated, again."
5

gus1940,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 07:07:39
Confiscate the land - that will soon stop it.
6

BLM,

Perth Australia 18/11/2008 07:08:59
I would like to see the mean swines who poison these delightful creatures, drink a tumbler or two of their own evil brew, and I would stand by and watch as they writhe in the agony that poison inflicts. Barbarians indeed and not a good thing frae Bonnie Scotland.
7

Phil MaGlass,

Holland 18/11/2008 07:35:26
long term jail sentences and take the land from the ar5eholes
8

drunken proffet,

Tassy 18/11/2008 07:44:24
I would like to say that Tasmania was free from that kind of barbarianism however they still use 1080 to protect the tree plantations when they are growing.
The birds eat the animals who may nibble at the trees and have quite a horrific death. Thought I would mention that in case you reckoned that Australia was as pure as the driven snow. You are right though, a lot of them remain and they are truly magnificent.
9

The Glasgow Ranger,

Edinburgh. 18/11/2008 07:49:07
52,000 will lose their jobs with Citigroup yet haedline news features 34 poisoned birds of prey.

Bizarre.
10

Dave,

Western Isles 18/11/2008 07:55:07
11

Can you no smell a "Scotsman Campaign" coming on? They failed miserably with an Eco one so now they are going to try a "save the birdie" one.

Your comment (a good one BTW) also highlights how skewed this country is; where we think saving the birdies/animals etc is more important that these poor sods losing thier jobs left right and centre.
11

Anton,

Porto Sant'Elpidio 18/11/2008 07:58:55
I'm afraid #5 yockel may be right :-(

It's a long time -and barbari- custom for males from Calabria, the southernmost tip of the "shoe", also known as Saudi Calabria, to bring home a killed migrating raptor as proof of the shooter's "maleness"...
As for shooting "anuthing with wings", yes, that's unfortunately true. Even though there's a widespread anti-hunting movement, the right to hunt is a political issue and its staunchest proponent is the former Communist Party, on grounds that the "Working Class" has the right to enjoy what was a privilege of the upper classes... so where there were thousands of discriminating hunters who dedicated a weekend now and then to the sport, now there are millions of non-discriminating wild shooters and it's impossible to control all of them. :-(((
12

Kornelius,

Aberdeen 18/11/2008 08:27:47
Whilst I feel sadness at this waste I want to ask you if a child that loses its father on separation is a much more important issue than wildlife?
13

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 08:35:05
#14, of course not. Nothing is more important than a few birds of prey, unless it's all those lovely lichens that are being put at risk for something as trivial as creating jobs in Aberdeenshire.
14

Farmernot,

18/11/2008 08:37:28
A child treated appallingly in Haringay gets a small paragraph today......and the Hootsmon chooses once again to highlight with a full page some birdie pictures (EVERY WEEK !!).........btw the graphics portray a Sea Eagle (Not Golden eagle) and a Kestrel (not peregrine). Poor Journo
15

The Glasgow Ranger,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 08:42:19
#16 - Good point.

I wonder if the poisoned birds of prey will feature on the agenda for the next G20 meeting?
16

Endemoniada,

18/11/2008 08:46:38
#16 Maybe when a child comes in contact with one of these baits, laced with highly toxic and illegal chemicals, scattered indiscriminately around our countryside you'll realise why this is so important. The people doing this obviously couldn't care less what their victims are....
17

Boy Wonder,

18/11/2008 08:48:05
Take the estates away from the "owners" and turn it back into public land. Stop the shooting parties and the poisoning will stop.

The Law HAS to hit these perpetrators with REAL force to achieve anything!

Save our wildlife!!!
18

Farmernot,

18/11/2008 09:05:07
#18.......You obviously put birdlife as higher priority than human life............Oh dear !!!
19

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 18/11/2008 09:08:16
The technology now exists, as shown by the recent tracking of migratory young ospreys, to fit young birds of prey with devices to show their exact position, hour by hour.

It is therefore possible to do the same with non-migratory species such as eagles and buzzards and red kites.

If a few birds were so tagged in areas where poisoning is suspected then the event could be detected and investigated probably even before the persons involved were aware that it had occurred. Thus the chance of finding the evidence would be greatly enhanced.

The main expense of such a scheme would be the labour involved in the tracking IF this were done with paid manpower. However, it should be possible, particularly if organised within a city where many people would be available, to organise 24 hour surveillance using purely voluntary labour.

Such a scheme would remove the greatest defence of the poisoners - the low chance of being discovered. The very fear of knowing that some of the birds that they were trying to poison might be tagged would act as a great disincentive.

What is needed is for the RSPB and police to organise a trial of such a scheme. Perhaps Mike Russell could convene a meeting of interested parties to examine the possibilities.
20

drunken proffet,

Tassy 18/11/2008 09:08:44
#14,15,16,17. There are very few things more important than a child and family life. However everything is relative. A lot of folk prefer pets rather than partners and children as they get older. Others just like watching them in their natural habitat.
21

Brodric,

18/11/2008 09:29:30
Powers should exist to search the buildings of the landowner on (or nearest to) the place in which the bird was found. Combined with tagging perhaps.

Comments about what is more important, sic: fathers/children; abused children etc etc. Its not about what is more important. All these issues are important - but the fate of these beautiful birds doesn't get that much space overall in the news. And it deserves space too.
22

Nellie,

Liverpool 18/11/2008 09:35:04
#11, It's not bizarre. BOTH demonstrate the enormous folly of Mankind - the slaughter of birds is an abomination committed by people who have no respect for Nature and their own local ecosystem or the wishes of the majority of the population to see these magnificent birds survive. They are driven by selfish self interest. Similarly, men caused this current economic crisis as a consequence of their own selfish interests, without as seconds thought for the consequences their action could, and have, on thousands of people losing their savings and their jobs the World over.

But hang on a moment .... to put those in perspective, I also see the Scotsman has not published more about the *millions* of people left in poverty and dying of starvation and disease in Somalia and other diverse places around the World. Their plight makes the 52k jobs lost in Citibank look like a mild cold.
23

World class concrete,

18/11/2008 09:37:28
#14: what has the issue of fathers losing contact with their children got to do with illegally poisoning birds of prey? Absolutely nothing. You're just trying to elicit a "which is more important: children or birds?" type of discussion, which is pointless and irrelevant to this story.
24

Nellie,

Liverpool 18/11/2008 09:39:49
#22 - Well said! Indeed, if it came to saving the life of a bird or that of the person who shot it, the bird would get my help every time. People who wontedly take or destroy lives, human or otherwise, for no good reason they are not worthy of the air they breathe.
25

robbee,

borders 18/11/2008 09:48:44
I don't think I have ever met a Game Keeper who did not shoot birds of prey and cats routinely. They are not conservationists you know.
26

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 09:52:05
#26, what about people who swat moths or flies just because they find them irritating?
27

AJM,

18/11/2008 10:03:52
I doubt if the landowners will be loosing any sleep over articles like this. Only if action is promised against where it hurts, ie their pockets will there be any change in behaviour.
What is saddening is the continuation of the ignorance of the environment that these poisonings display. Whilst in the south the kite population has risen to considerable numbers on the Black Isle they are struggling, only difference is illegal killing of the birds.
I look forward to future articles explaining how exactly the scottish government is going to tackle this illegal activity. I do hope that they do not feel that the landowners are too powerful to tackle, we will wait and see, the answer will be increase in the number of fines and new legislation to make possession of these chemicals and offence.

So rather than just have a go at the SNP for doing nothing about an issue that has been around now for some time, below is my proposal.

Illegal baits found on land should immediately bring about a fine to the land owner, similar to those we have recently seen. No good them squealing "its nothing to do with me", if the RSPB can find the baits so can the gamekeepers and they should have removed them. Tough if a few get caught by spiking of land, but it will only redress the inbalance and it will be very few.

Or how about keep some of the agricultural subsidy back until numbers of raptors on an estate can be documented and then release the funds. I am sure that once it is the financial interests of the estate to have raptors, their numbers will increase rapidly.
28

Partan,

Fife 18/11/2008 10:07:10
To the usual suspects.
If your mind is so one-dimensional that you can only be concerned about one issue at a time, that's your problem.
In the interests of balance, the article re. the loss of 52,000 jobs is on the front page of the paper, this one is on pg.11.
29

AJM,

18/11/2008 10:07:12
#27 Quite, the clue is in the title "Game keeper" not conservationists as some pretend they are. They are not guardians of the countryside, they are there to look after the chicks and birds that are to be shot, their role is make sure there are plenty of birds to shoot. Not in their job description to look after anything else.
30

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 10:10:13
Many estate owners must very reluctantly put up with birds and animals of prey sharing their wee bit of hill and glen with their precious grouse, pheasant, deer, and other game.

However, it's very doubtful if any of these landowners give a hoot about conservation? IF, they could get away with it, just like their Victorian predecessors, they would probably exterminate every predator in sight? We are always told that shooting is a way of conserving different species? Why then, breed and exterminate 10,000 pheasants, in a short flight to their deaths?

In the USA, anyone systematically poisoning birds or animals would have the full force of the FBI and US FWS
come down on them and they would appear in the Federal Courts before their feet touched the ground!

Many years ago, Scottish shoots advertised in Germany, Italy, and elsewhere, used to quote some amazing prices before this information became too sensitive for estate owners! Its all about profit!
31

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 10:27:49
#33, > Why then, breed and exterminate 10,000 pheasants, in a short flight to their deaths? <

Why, then, breed and exterminate millions upon millions of battery chickens who don't even get to run about for a little before their deaths?
32

AJM,

18/11/2008 10:30:09
#33 in the pursuit of balance I would say that you should not worry about to short life of the pheasant when you compare it to the life of the chicken that may well fill your chicken tikka sandwich. One has been allowed to live in the open and stood some chance of escaping the shot. Most of the punters are terrible shots. The others live we know is short miserable and spent eating in a small area.

I also exclude estates that are deer only as in my opinion they have no interest at all in the extermination of raptors.
33

MacMhuirich,

Ljubljana 18/11/2008 10:33:18

@11 and 12

You tend to find that a society which doest care for its wildlife and nature does not look after its people either.
34

ray_mccoonie,

West Calder 18/11/2008 10:48:41
#34 - I hate the way battery chickens are reared but at least they are done so for food. The whole shooting for "sport" thing disgusts me even more though. Breeding pheasant and grouse so some bunch of A-holes can get their kicks blasting them with a shotgun is barbaric and shouldn't belong in this day and age. Its a hark back to Victorian times that should have been outlawed years ago.
35

Brodric,

18/11/2008 11:01:23
Powers should exist to search the buildings of the landowner on (or nearest to) the place in which the bird was found. Combined with tagging perhaps.

Comments about what is more important, sic: fathers/children; abused children etc etc. Its not about what is more important. All these issues are important - but the fate of these beautiful birds doesn't get that much space overall in the news. And it deserves space too.
36

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 11:17:56
#37, but people eat the pheasants and grouse that have been shot.
37

ray_mccoonie,

West Calder 18/11/2008 11:18:28
#38 - well said that man. Just for those who moaned about the Scotsman apparently making this story more of a headline than human interst articles, think yourself lucky. You should pop on over to the Daily Record website where all their headlines are related to bloody football!
38

stonepark,

Ayrshire 18/11/2008 11:20:00
37 Whilst I appreciate thats what it appears, all game shot normally gets eaten, on small shoot the game is taken home by the guns and on larger shoots it gets sold to game dealers, where it then gets prepackeaged and sold onto to supermarkets and the continent where they consume more game than we do.

Whilst I do not condone illegal killing of raptors, when any controls on them are banned (i.e. even non-lethal ones such as relocating and technically it is illegal to even scare them), a small number of people look for other means.

What is required is an integrated raptor policy which provides options, rather than a protect them at all costs and from everything policy which currently exists.

What must also be remembered is that the more gamekeepers who kill vermin such as crows, foxes etc, (even though the rspb don't like this sound ecological fact) by killing competitors and enhancing prey (whether pheasants, blackbirds, rabbits or others)it benefits the raptor population.

The raptor population increases to take acount of this, and this would be manageable if raptors had an integrated policy but at present does not exist, so in default illegal methods takes over.

Anyone interested should look at the study (i believe run by GCT and RSPB) on Hen Harriers. Basically, starts off couple pair hen harriers and thousands of grouse, goes to something like 14 pairs hen harriers and high hundreds of grouse and then goes to couple pair hen harriers and low hundreds of grouse.

It therefore appears that the environments carrying capacity is low (i.e. few hundred grouse and couple pair hen harriers). By shooting grouse and supporting hen harriers numbers increased to such as extent the grouse were decimated, if that number of HH could have been held at say 8 pair, 6 pair more than carrying capacity of environment, it would be a benefit to the HH population and allowed continued grouse shooting. By fully protecting raptors, no control was available so numbers incr
39

ray_mccoonie,

West Calder 18/11/2008 11:21:12
#37 - aye right! And we are supposed to think that they are shooting them for that reason? Get real! They are shooting them to satisfy their blood lust at killing something. All good sport don't you know old boy!
40

ray_mccoonie,

West Calder 18/11/2008 11:22:01
Sorry - my last reply was referring to post #39.
41

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 11:46:55
#42, would it be better, then, to have battery pheasants and battery grouse, killed in the same way as battery chickens? It would seem to me that pheasants and grouse at present have a rather less bad time of it than battery chickens do, but perhaps you disagree.
42

ray_mccoonie,

West Calder 18/11/2008 11:55:00
#45 - no I don't really disagree and I did say earlier that I don't like the way battery chickens are reared. I suppose the bottom line for me is that I just detest the whole shooting of wild birds/animals for sport thing and the people who indulge in it. I just cannot see what pleasure any decent human being can get from it.
43

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 12:00:43
#46, fair point. I don't wholly agree with you but I respect your point of view.
44

Micjonger,

18/11/2008 12:51:47
One hears of the many raptors poisened by Carbofuran,but one never hears of grouse or other game being similarly poisened. Do you think the latter are immune?
45

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 18/11/2008 12:52:36
#21
I understand that the RSPB does, in fact, fit transmitters to non-native birds that it introduces into new areas - certainly this was the case with Red Kites and I'm pretty sure they did it with the Sea Eagles. Tagging native species seems logical but unfortunately the transmitter batteries last less than a year so it would be a massive on-going task. Perhaps a GPS chip powered by a miniature motion generator? I assume tracking would be relatively easy with satellite technology and, if the bird movements are shown on the web, there would be a huge army of volunteers to monitor their positions (and also a few unscrupulous lairds and keepers, I'm afraid).

However if the current tagging of Kites and Sea Eagles is not discouraging the poisoning - or should I say alleged poisoning? - I'm not optimistic that widespread tagging would make much difference.

The article itself (and many of the posts) fall wide of the mark. Under modern estate husbandry, the addvantages of maintaining raptors more than balances out the disadvantages. It is simply not in the interests of lairds and keepers to kill hookies unless their numbers become disproportionately high. The cretinous few who can't come to terms with this should be banned from owning or using firearms for life.

The exception is the White Tailed Eagle, sorry "Sea Eagle" which can and does cause considerable financial damage - not to the lairds and their shooting pals but to the crofter and hill farmer who is forced to stand by and watch his lambs being massacred and his livelihood shattered by these foreign imports.
46

ignorant townie?,

Scotland 18/11/2008 13:03:07
Coming in a bit late on this one but heres a few points to consider which answere some of the above..

1. poisoning is a blunt instrument not a forensic tool - thats why the gamekeepers doing this dont always find their victims and hide them.

2. we now have the strongest laws in europe to deal with this...why isnt it happening ?...because the of the Police and the Justiciary.The police are worse than useless at getting anything done because of apathy, bureaucracy and in a few cases at the top, downright corruption - pals of the landowners and keepers.
The same goes for our Fiscals and Sheriffs...

There have been a few glorious exceptions - but they soon get worn down by all the barriers put in their way. Who's going to pursue wildlife crime when it leads to more work, pressure from bosses and damage to your career.

Like it or not the countryside is still run by the thugs and bullies who kill raptors...from Dukes down to shoot managers...they are also the people with connections to top Police officers, Fiscals, Sheriffs and Civil Servants.

thats why next year will be no better.

and to the idiots who say things are getting better because theres a slight drop in poisoned birds and animals found - dont you realise each finding is a lucky accident...how can you statisticise that???!
47

Teofilio Cubillas,

18/11/2008 13:03:21
#48

Grouse don't eat the rabbits and other carrion that the gamekeepers lace with carbofuran.
48

Monitor,

Luncarty 18/11/2008 13:14:18
Have you seen theDecember "Scottish Field"? Have you ever observed a gaggle of geese making their way to their feeding grounds and have you ever observed them arriving on a loch altogether and taking off altogether?

I bought a goose for dinner one year from a supermarket which was a disappointment. We suspected it had been a wild goose.

A Wood pigeon which was shot by a friend provided us with a delicious meal, another time. Doocots in times gone by provide good eating for the owners in the Winter time so I am told.

To appreciate our food is a wonderful feeling and to give Thanks for it is a Wonder to behold.
49

Endemoniada,

18/11/2008 13:15:35
#49 Jacqueline - the Golden Eagle in the Borders last year was not an "alleged" poisoning. It was an established fact. The carcass was uplifted by the police and tested by the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, as were the corpses of the other victims. Similarly, the White-tailed Eagle found in Angus earlier this year was tested by SASA and confirmed as a victim of poisoning, using illegal chemicals. No "alleged" about it!

What is alleged is "lambs being massacred", by re-introduced white-tailed eagles, a species made extinct in Scotland by the actions of those who saw all birds of prey as vermin and shot/poisoned all "hookies" they could. Isn't it nice to know that attitudes have become so much more enlightened 100 years on....
50

Brodric,

18/11/2008 14:30:58
Although I agree that landowners have done a lot to preserve many things in the countryside, it doesn't give them the right to decide which wildlife has the right to survive or not, even if there is a wee bit of a conflict of interest over their money-making activities - we all know grouse and pheasant shooting brings in a pretty penny.

If they cannot be persuaded to take an active interest in the protection of diversity of wildlife, they must be forced to do so. Lifestyle cannot take precedence over the survival of a species that is only doing what it does from instinct to survive; only taking what it needs. Unlike man.
51

MattyMat,

So Cali 18/11/2008 16:02:18
Goes to show how barbaric it remains there in Scotland-- If there was this much killing of wildlife in the states, PETA and other organizations would have heads rolling faster than you can say carbofuran. And there's no fines or "community service" for offenders-- it's a stay in the pokey, my friends.

Get angry or just watch your ecosystem die like your community spirit.
52

gus1940,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 16:10:02
The shooting idiots just don't get it.

It's not the killing of birds that civilised people object to - it is the killing for fun as a social event that is disgusting.



53

Laddy Saunders,

18/11/2008 17:35:08
I want to live in a world where birds of prey carry guns and fire back.
54

Geomac 1,

Scotland 18/11/2008 18:44:33
Yet another biased report by Jen - is there to be no end to the one sided preaching of this "lady"!!!

All 4 commentators on this article were from the tree hugging and bird loviong fratenrnity. Shame on you Miss Haworth - and on the Scotsman.

Like others, I am fed up to the back teeth with this highly biased campainging on behlaf of the RSPB and their like
55

,

18/11/2008 18:50:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
56

Endemoniada,

18/11/2008 19:17:50
#59 Geomac - if I understand your illiterate ramblings correctly, you are suggesting that a Scottish Government minister is from the tree hugging fraternity - the same government that gave Trump the go-ahead? It also appears that the decidedly un-treehugging SRPBA were given the opportunity to contribute, but didn't wish to.

This isn't campaigning. It's reporting the fact (previously reported by the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency) that the nineteenth century practice of leaving indiscriminate poison baits is still being utilised in 21st century Scotland and is killing some of our most magnificent wildlife.

Who is going to stop this? The Scottish Gamekeepers Association seems to be AWOL at the moment. Maybe it's just run out of excuses and has realised that it's standard suggestion that elves planted these baits or corpses on the estates where they were found is patent rubbish....

So, given the SGA's complete impotence in putting its own house in order, perhaps organisations like RSPB need to continue to trumpet this national disgrace until it is stopped.
57

cambeuluk,

UK 18/11/2008 23:45:43
I must confess that I am puzzled at the posts which suggest that in the face of serious issues affecting our own species we should not express anger and concern regarding the destruction of the world's wildlife. Why should compassion be ring-fenced? As a doctor, I have dedicated my professional life to the health of children. Because I love children I want them to grow up in a world that values variety and the natural gifts of this planet over profit. I would rather they know that it is their responsibility to care for their environment rather than exploit it.

What lesson do we offer a child if we teach them that they can either be concerned about the environment OR their own species, but not both? Why not teach them the facts, that all life on this planet is part of a whole - the circle of life - and that compassion need not have boundaries?

If people feel that the media are paying more attention to the destruction of wildlife than to the needs of children or adults losing their jobs then criticise the media, rather than dismiss the importance of our wildlife or those who seek to protect our natural heritage.
58

Dylan fan,

Planet earth 19/11/2008 12:33:43

I can't help but think that we are jealous of things that fly. Man is in awe of these creatures and in someway masters them when he shoots them dead. How sad for man.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.