Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Businesses demand 'Scotland first' policy from public sector

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
07 January 2008
SCOTLAND's public sector must adopt a "Scotland first" approach in improving procurement opportunities for small business, the Scottish Chambers of Commerce (SCC) said yesterday.
Director Liz Cameron called for a radical new attitude towards the "national economy" in the procurement policy of the Scottish public sector.

She called for a "less bureaucratic approach" to the dispensing of contracts to business, one that was
tailored to the realities of the Scottish business landscape, and which advantaged "native" businesses without contravening EU competition law.

The Scottish public sector, she said, could "best serve the national economy the more their supply needs are spread across all sizes of company, and the more those companies are based in Scotland".

The remarks are predicated on the widespread belief that competitors in Europe make public contracts easily accessible to homegrown companies.

The SCC statement calls for the public sector to "wholeheartedly buy-in" to the idea of prioritising the strategic aims of the Scottish economy above pure price considerations.

In this it goes a considerable way beyond the SNP government's economic strategy, which contains only vague commitments to "more effective use of public-sector procurement".

Cameron said: "We have actively engaged with the public sector on how business, particularly small business, can achieve access to its valuable markets.

"But this needs to be a two-way process. We need a commitment and an understanding of the wider economic picture from those who make the decisions. Price alone should not be the sole criterion of contract decisions."

Cameron said that business rejected the claim, made by the previous Labour administration, that growing the public sector (currently worth 51 per cent of Scottish GDP) automatically grew the private sector: "But local authorities, the health service, universities, colleges, schools, and the Scottish Government itself can best serve the national economy by spreading its supply needs across all sizes of company," she said.

"Ideally those companies should be based in Scotland."

The SCC is seeking a more "Scotland-friendly" interpretation of EU procurement rules, which define an SME as one with fewer than 250 employees.

As 95 per cent of Scottish businesses have ten or fewer employees the SCC wants micro-businesses – "tomorrow's growth companies" – to be given more chance to compete for contracts with non-Scottish companies at home, in the rest of the UK, and beyond.

Cameron added: "We are concerned that a push for economies of scale by the amalgamation into larger contracts (for example by local authorities pool-buying] could marginalise smaller players.

"If this is the route we are to take then there must also be provision, encouragement and support if necessary, for SMEs to bid as consortia and attention to process to ensure it is actually open to SMEs.

"There will be no advancement towards opening public procurement for smaller suppliers unless the public sector wholeheartedly embraces this concept."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

07/01/2008 00:43:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

School Inspector,

07/01/2008 06:34:46
Oh dear Liz,

First a demand that Glasgow is still so economically disadvantaged that it needs Scottish Enterprise based in Atlantic Quay and now and assumption that Scottish businesses are not able to compete on a European playing field for public-sector contracts. What has your organisation been doing for the last 150 years.
3

The Strategist,

07/01/2008 08:44:10
There has always been an assumption by Govt that bigger is better and in many cases American or European is also better... It's form of rear end covering.. They believe it reduces risk.

Much easier to say they don't understand why something has gone wrong when it's a so called major organisation..
4

John1,

Stirling 07/01/2008 10:10:23
What happens when an 'England First' policy is established south of the border? Will the same Scottish organisation complain of unfair practices? If France (as usual) etc are doing this sort of thing then they have to be in breach of EU legislation. Try following that one up.
5

Hamilton,

07/01/2008 10:10:31
Instead, why doesn't the SCC commission an independent audit of value for money in the public sector? This would also examine the international framework that Scottish business operates within, including the rationale of EU rules.

After all, the Royal Society of Edinburgh felt obliged to arrange a private study into Scotland's energy future.
6

Dundee and Angus Chamber of Commerce,

Dundee 07/01/2008 10:17:55
Liz Cameron has hit the nail on the head as one of the direct ways a Scottish Government procurement policy can help Scottish based businesses, is to understand the value which can be brought to procurement by a locally sourced solution. SME's in Scotland have proved time and again that they can deliver best value but procurement decision makers seem not to understand the difference between this and lowest price. Lowest price is not and never will be best value. Can someone please teach the decision makers how to establish best value as this will inevitably point to a locally based supplier.
7

Neil,

Glasgow 07/01/2008 11:31:37
We are going to build a £4.2 billion Forth Bridge when the rest of the world could do it for £300 million & Norway would cut a tunnel for £40 million. On balance I would rather hire the Norwegians than stick with Scottish firms.

I have yet to see any explanation from anybody in government on why it is costing this.
8

Sedov,

Scotland 07/01/2008 12:42:02
I thought that the whole idea of capitalism was to open up all markets to the driver of competition without state or any other kind of intervention. The policy of protectionism for a nation state has some strange bedfellows including the communist party and many on the left. What next, import controls for Scotland? And whats to stop other countries ganging up on us?
9

The Strategist,

07/01/2008 15:30:26
#9 Sedov .....

Au contraire.. Nothing to do with communism or the left wing. After all the USA is one of the most industrially nationalistic countries on the planet and Germany and France aren't that much different but they know how to play the game and of course they have ensured their dominance in a lot of sectors. That apart.. try getting an oil/gas type contract in Norway if you're not Norwegian!!

With American companies it's also been Govt work that has allowed them to grow, go global and compete internationally. The same is true to some extent with European companies.

It's a difference in attitude.. Here it's all about short term value for the taxpayer but in the USA in particular and again in some European countries it's also about long term strategy. We simply don't do long term strategy.

Let me give you one classic example. In the US they have the Jones Act which dictates that a ship operating between two or more US ports has to have been constructed and registered in the USA.. At one stage it was applied to the oil industry so it meant every supply boat or any other offshore vessel operating between an offshore rig or platform had to have been built in the USA. This meant no European or Scandinavian built ships could go into a US port if they had been working in the Gulf of Mexico. It took a long time for the US to accept that this was impractical because they just didn't have the full range of vessels the industry needed. But where they do it still applies.

Doesn't affect the UK of course because we don't build ships. Most of the N Sea vessels were built somewhere else.
10

Sedov,

Barnsley 07/01/2008 15:58:30
#10 The Strategist - Of course the US as (by far) the wealthiest nation in the world can play the protectionist game when it suits them and they often do ( eg steel in the 1980's) - but Scotland cannot- we rely very much on the world economy and trade with the rest of the UK.We even import sherry barrels from spain for the whisky industry. However, the US has a massive trade deficit with China in order to keep its people happy with cheap goods and raw materials - but again it can stand such a deficit, IN THE SHORT TERM. Scotland, if independent or otherwise could not - and we are not in a position to produce the volume and variety of goods at the price that, say, China can so we cannot afford to build barriers on procurement just to give Scotland an edge as it could rebound on us. The point that I am trying to make is that the old moneterist argument about non interference with the market is a dead one as you appeared to have agreed - but the tweaking of the economy like France or Germany to suit local politicians is not playing a long term clever game as you imply because no country can produce any one thing, eg ships or anything else without the import of materials from other countries. Thus, protectionism, the opposite of moneterism, is also a dodgy strategy because trade wars are not in the interests of capitalism in the short or long term.
11

The Strategist,

07/01/2008 16:43:08
#11 ... I completely agree that trade wars are in nobodies interests.

However, across the UK not just Scotland the "level playing field" approach has not done us much good at all. I'm a great believer in competition but I'm still waiting for us to be able to compete!
12

Martyk,

sussex 07/01/2008 20:03:43
If Scots firms cannot compete in their own back yard without preferential treatment we may as well pack it all in. Patheyic.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.