Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 6th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

FSA warns financial sector of higher fees



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 July 2008
FINANCIAL services companies face the prospect of paying out more to the industry regulator to cover the cost of new measures brought in after the Northern Rock crisis.
Hector Sants, the chief executive of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), warned yesterday that the watchdog will have to levy higher fees on the firms it regulates to cover its higher costs.

Regulated firms already pay between £1,500 and £25,
000 to become FSA-registered.

At the FSA's annual public meeting yesterday, Sants told around 400 financial company representatives that a programme to ensure that banks are better supervised would lead to "increased costs".

He added that the costs meant the FSA would be likely to exceed its budget in the financial year 2008-9, and the impact would continue into the next year.

Industry bodies yesterday raised concerns over the possibility of increased fees, but added that they supported regulation in the financial services industry.

Sants said: "The last year has been difficult for the FSA. Perhaps the most challenging since its creation ten years ago. You should be in no doubt we regret the events surrounding Northern Rock.

"But respected and durable institutions grow stronger in times of adversity."

A spokeswoman for the FSA said: "We are not proposing the change in fees for2008-9 but it has implications for costs in 2009-10."

A spokesman for the Association of British Insurers said: "We will monitor the situation, and are happy to speak to the FSA over any proposed changes to the structure of fees.

"Insurers are committed to effective regulation and are keen to support it."



The full article contains 275 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 8:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 25/07/2008 09:34:55
Strangulation by regulation.

The FSA is a monopoly, a 'private' company exempt from the protections afforded to the populace by Competition Act, the regulated have no choice other than to pay 'protection money', the banks and the insurers are those being protected. The fees it levies pay for things other than regulation therefore it is a tax, as is the BBC licence fee. The FSA's walls are adorned with expensive works of art, the staff (and friednms of the FSA) keep taxis very busy, they fly to exotic far off places for purposes unknown, there are no mandatory qualifications for regulators because 'we don't need to be qualified'.

Despite all the money the FSA is gathering and squandering it appears that the markets are worse now than they were two decades ago when the FSA started regulating under the old name of SIB.

'Consumers' are worse off than they were all those years ago, just look around you at the failures of banks and insurers, they all fell between the 'Gap'.

Regulation is bust but it will render the industry bust before the polticians grab the nettle that is spreading like the parasitic weed that it is...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.