Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


RBS chairman McKillop quits as new regime strengthens its hold

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2009
THE new top pairing at Royal Bank of Scotland tightened their grip on the chastened institution yesterday as chairman Sir Tom McKillop stepped down abruptly three months ahead of schedule.
Sir Philip Hampton, appointed as deputy chairman and chairman-designate of the bank only last month, now takes over immediately.

The surprise move comes a week before McKillop and erstwhile RBS chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin are due to appear before the Treasury select committee to answer questions about the bank's fall from grace.

Stephen Hester replaced Goodwin as chief executive in the autumn, and the swift succession of Hampton was seen yesterday as the two putting their stamp on the bank's current strategic review.

RBS is also searching for three new non-executive directors.

McKillop, 65, who had been criticised for not checking Goodwin's allegedly "serial acquiror" tendencies, had been due to retire at the April AGM.

But he said yesterday that he believed it was "appropriate to bring this forward so that Sir Philip can complete the restructuring of the board and work with the board and executive teams on the strategy going forward".

Hester recently flagged up a £28 billion loss for 2008 under the previous management at the bank, in which the government has a 70 per cent stake following a taxpayer bail-out.

Hampton is chairman of Sainsbury's and a former chairman of UK Financial Investments, the arm's-length agency set up to monitor the government's holdings in banks. Hampton said McKillop "has chaired RBS through unprecedented turbulence in financial markets with great dedication and integrity". The new chairman said the bank faced "significant challenges", but that it was "extremely fortunate to have the support of the UK government and taxpayer and we mean to repay that support as soon as is practicable".

McKillop's withdrawal – he remains a non-executive director of BP – comes a week before the select committee appearance.

Andy Hornby and Lord Stevenson, chief executive and chairman of HBOS, now 43 per cent owned by the taxpayer, will also appear before MPs. Hester will appear the following day.

It is understood McKillop, whose basic salary was £750,000 at RBS, will not receive any special payments for early loss of office. His salary at BP, where RBS non-executive Peter Sutherland is chairman, is about £87,000.

Simon Willis, banking analyst at NCB Stockbrokers, said: "I don't know if McKillop was forced out early, but it probably suits both sides at this stage."

Stewart Hosie, the SNP's Treasury spokesman, said: "It makes sense to clear the decks to allow the new management team (at RBS] to get on with the job.

"However, we do need to guard against the Prime Minister using this early departure as a way of drawing a line under the banking crisis and pretending everything is fine. There's still a great deal of work to be done."




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 February 2009 9:05 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Brian from Accounts,

04/02/2009 00:07:15
"Extremely fortunate to have the support of the UK government"

I'd say so. To the tune of many millions of space credits.
2

Forward not Back,

04/02/2009 03:31:03
#1 - Completely. Meaning that the likes of McKillop can retire to a golf course while the rest of the population heads to the soup kitchen.
3

Evan Owen,

Uppergumtree 04/02/2009 07:16:04
They should ask for the bonuses to be repaid.
4

thistle do,

Here n'there 04/02/2009 08:19:23
"has chaired RBS through unprecedented turbulence in financial markets with great dedication and integrity". Maybe, but he made a rollocks of it. What exactly did he do for the money he was paid? What role did he play on behalf of the shareholders? Did he understand what was going on? Did he know misinformation was being given out?

I suggest that the are all "NO". What he did do was take the money and smile a lot. The man is totally discredited and should be brought to account or there is no point of corporate governance.
5

Mike S,

04/02/2009 09:05:20
What's the final payoff package?
6

JayJay,

Right here 04/02/2009 09:08:33
If ever an article managed, indirectly, to nail exactly what is wrong with the British Corporate elite, this one nails it.
McKillop leaves a smouldering wreck behind him, with the largest loss in UK corporate history to come, and is soft soaped by the new man at the helm. A new man, incidentally, who comes fresh from a major supermarket. Now remind me again, how did it work out the last time a grocer ran a Bank?
Then we find that McKillop and Peter Sutherland were enthusiastically engaged in the old boardroom sport of back-scratching...."fancy a non exec Mr Chairman? £87k per annum, one day a month, all the Mr Kiplings you can snaffle?" "Don't mind if I do Peter? next agenda item, lets buy ABN Amro for a daft price."
There is nothing "new" in the management teams supposedly rescuing the disasters left by their predecessors. Its simply the same old boys club, recycled pinstripe suits, trying to pretend that they were not closely involved in the sort of rampant "me, me,me" culture that dominates our boardrooms.
I believe in Japan, the corporate elite are paid no more than 3 times the salaries of their senior management. In our nice, fair, equitable world, where Sir This and Lord That, play musical chairs in the boardroom, blow up the economy, and re-invent themselves as corporate supermen, the multiplier is measured in the hundreds. Mind you, they are worth it, every penny.
7

Big T,

04/02/2009 10:08:22
Tam

Hand back the Knighthood!

Hand back the obscene bonuses!

Hand back the massive personal pension pot!

Now s*d off!!!
8

john birkett,

St Andrews 04/02/2009 15:14:57
Let's not forget it's our great UK Govt, like the previous US Govt, which bailed out these cankers with our children's taxes, without requiring in Oct as a pre-condition that all board & top executive employment contracts were no longer valid including pension accruals, no 2008 bonuses be paid at all, and that prior year bonuses paid out of "profits" that are now clearly bogus must be repaid. They could have insisted on this but didn't, so thanks Gordon and Alistair.
9

The Dog from Asia,

04/02/2009 15:26:14
All this time, everyone's focus has always been on the CEO/Chairman/Board when the big fat pay checks mostly end up in the hands of the Head of Global Banking & Markets guys from Equity to Fixed Income & Credit who blew up big. Those are the people you don't read about on the press everyday so there's no one to point finger to except poor Fred and Tom. And I bet you, RBS will still pay bonus this year. Just wait and see. Lots of them who screwed up big time in the bank are actually not even in UK but are living in foreign countries as expats with housing allowance as high as 200,000 pound a year with drivers and maids paying as low as 15% tax to other foreign countries. This bank is so slow in implementing changes that it will take forever before they figure out what to do. Not to mention it's super tedious to get all the integration work done. After all, Stephen Hester might be doing a few more rounds of downsizing after listening to some stupid Mckinsey consultants telling him what to do and most good guys will end up leaving anyway when the Titanic is sinking so deep. Why bother to stay? Then we end up with a bank with tons of toxic assets handled by the remaining stupid people. Seriously good luck to all UK tax payers.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.