Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Call to privatise Channel 4

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 April 2008
CHANNEL 4 should be privatised, the former chief creative officer of the Big Brother production company, Endemol, said last night.
Andy Duncan, Channel 4's chief executive, has previously estimated that the broadcaster faces a funding shortfall of £100 million because of the digital switchover. Industry figures have advocated that Channel 4 receives a slice of the BBC's licence
fee to plug the shortfall.

But Peter Bazalgette told the Royal Television Society in a speech last night that handing the broadcaster direct public money could compromise Channel 4. He said: "One of the things many of us cherish most about Channel 4 is its bloody-minded independence. And we fear for it if it takes public money directly.

"What we should investigate, while examining long-term solutions for Channel 4, is a privatisation which preserves its character".

He also called for Radio 1 and Radio 2 to be privatised, and for ITV and Five to lose their public service broadcasting obligations after digital switchover.

Mr Bazalgette is advocating a new public service search engine, Boggle, which would feature arts and drama programming from organisations ranging from the Tate Gallery to the National Theatre.

Mr Bazalgette is not the first to call for Channel 4 to be privatised.

Earlier this month, the right-wing think-tank the Adam Smith Institute published a report stating that it should be among a number of institutions that could taken out of the public purse.

When he was chancellor, Gordon Brown also considered privatisation as a viable option for raising revenue.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 April 2008 11:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Channel 4
 
1

Angus Ogg,

23/04/2008 11:35:13
This is one of the most important, in fact seismic stories that the Scotsman has covered. I am just wondering why there are no comments from anyone yet.

Anything that affects the UK media, especially terrestrial media is a hugely important thing.
2

Guga II,

Rockall 23/04/2008 15:17:33
Why don't they just scrap the iniquitous television tax?

The EBC can take advertisments easily; they have plenty of self-advertising on their stations, so why not make money out of advertising?

I know we can't expect any help from out MP's as they all claim for their "TV Licence", i.e. television tax, on their expenses. They don't care that the ordinary tax payer has no such get out.
3

should have gone to specsavers,

Thurso 23/04/2008 16:02:44
#2
I wholeheartedly agree.

The BBC gets over £10/ month from half the population of the UK; about £3 Billion pounds a year. Theres no way the BBC represents value for money.

It wouldnt be so bad if I actually wanted to watch the BBC, but the quality of thier programming has diminished to very poor levels, and I resent not having the choice that other consumers in Europe and the States have.
4

should have gone to specsavers,

Thurso 23/04/2008 16:11:29
I should have clarified my last sentence:
The choice other consumers in the USA and Europe have is the choice of not purchasing a product that they dont wish to buy, or of choosing a superior product over an inferior product without being forced to buy both.
From a certain point of view, the BBC licence enforces an unfair trade monopoly.
Also, in my view, people who have been fined £1000 pounds for not paying their BBC licence have had their human rights breached.
Every foreigner I've ever met has remarked that they get superior programming quality from private TV networks. Networks with far smaller budgets than £3 billion pounds a year.

For citizens of a democracy which supposedly practices enlightened-capitalism we sure put up with some strange practices.
5

should have gone to specsavers,

Thurso 23/04/2008 16:15:50
>> right-wing think-tank the Adam Smith Institute

Oh, and also the Adam Smith Institute is hardly a *right-wing* think tank. They spend their time finding ways to improve the UK economy.

By that token the BBC are a communist cabal!
6

,

23/04/2008 17:40:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.