Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Channel 4 cleared in Big Brother contestant's use of racist word

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 November 2007
CHANNEL 4 has been cleared over this summer's Big Brother race row, in which a contestant used the word n*****.
The media watchdog Ofcom ruled the broadcaster was right to show student Emily Parr using the term because the programme made clear that her comment was offensive and unacceptable.

The regulator also rejected viewer accusations of double standard
s over Channel 4's decision to evict Ms Parr while keeping in a housemate who used "homophobic" language.

Laura Williams twice used the term p*** on the show - but the first comment went unchallenged and the second earned her only a reprimand in the Diary Room.

Ms Parr's comment and subsequent departure prompted 450 complaints to Ofcom, while Ms Williams attracted 200.

A number of viewers complained the phrase Ms Williams used is just as offensive to gay people as Ms Parr's remark is to black people.

But in a ruling published yesterday, Ofcom cleared the programme of discrimination and double standards.

"In our view, it is not possible to establish definitively the degree of offence that use of the word 'p***' can cause in all contexts," the watchdog said. "For example, it is clear that within the gay community itself, the word can be used in a playful, affectionate or self-deprecating way.

"There is insufficient or no evidence to suggest that Laura Williams used the word complained of in a [derogatory] way."

Channel 4 said it "underestimated" the potential offence caused by the first episode, which became clear when viewers complained, and when Ms Williams used the term again, she was told Big Brother would not tolerate homophobic language. By contrast, Ms Parr was removed from the house after asking black housemate Charley Uchea "are you pushing it out, you n*****?" as they danced around the living room.



The full article contains 309 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 November 2007 9:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Reality TV , Channel 4
 
1

,

06/11/2007 04:01:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1119125, Article id was mapped to record!
2

I'm no really here,

06/11/2007 06:37:44

#1 It's a bit like the word n*****, they can use it about themselves, but no one else can call them it. I wish they would publish these rules somewhere - and they keep changing them.

3

,

06/11/2007 06:57:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1119204, Article id was mapped to record!
4

JayJay,

Right here 06/11/2007 08:04:19

Someone please bring this dreadful zoo of a programme to an end. They surely must have gone beyond the scrapings of the bottom of a barrel by now?
Anything that removes Davina McColl, Dermott O'Leary or that terminally unfunny twit Russell Brand from my screen must surely be a step forward for human achievement.

5

sam the god,

06/11/2007 08:16:10

is nig*er not spanish for black?

6

Boy Wonder,

06/11/2007 08:50:08

When will Channel Four stop inflicting this terminally sick show on the country???

7

Nick_Byrne,

Glasgow 06/11/2007 08:51:34

#5 I whole heartedly agree.

They are probably three of the most irratating people on television.

Of course now we have weeks of the "I'm a Celebrity..." Nonsense filling up pages in our newspapers.

I despair.

8

,

06/11/2007 09:06:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1119447, Article id was mapped to record!
9

Blou Neus,

Noord van die Jukskei 06/11/2007 09:29:11

In our view, it is not possible to establish definitively the degree of offence that use of the word 'p***' can cause in all contexts," the watchdog said. "For example, it is clear that within the gay community itself, the word can be used in a playful, affectionate or self-deprecating way.

Exactly the same is the word n***** if you ask me.

10

Cadgers,

Perth 06/11/2007 11:17:32

Okay, I got my comment removed for saying a particular colour of brown, but could someone please tell me wot the p*** is?

11

Boy Wonder,

06/11/2007 12:14:14

Take the first letter from each of the following words, Cadgers ... Please Order Old Firewood!

I know ... crazy innit? Crazy as ole Charlie Linskaill!

12

,

06/11/2007 12:18:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1119923, Article id was mapped to record!
13

Cadgers,

Perth 06/11/2007 12:44:46

#12 As in "and yer gone" Boy Wonder? Jeezy peeps I despair. "We're doomed I tell you, doomed...

This is almost as embarassing as getting my arithmatic( almost:-) ) so wrong yesterday.

14

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 06/11/2007 13:44:38

What's all the fuss about? It was one word used in a daft reality show which everybody would have probably missed if someone hadn't deemed to make it their mission to moan about it.

All it does is demonstrate a well-known fact---that the people who take part in these kinds of shows are morons.

15

NorT,

Edinburgh 06/11/2007 14:21:42

Both words used are perfectly acceptable. The sonner the PC and nanny state goes the better. I still have my Robertsons golliwog collection and wear one on my lapel.

16

Kathy Athey likes normal men, bad luck dave!!!,

http://tinyurl.com/39bssq 06/11/2007 14:29:19

11. Cadgers,

Rhymes with roof, and a roofter might be a person that likes those he works with.

17

Cadgers,

Perth 06/11/2007 14:54:51

#17 I did get it suck, just bothers the hell oot of me that quite a bit of our language is becoming a no go area. What is wrong with using words like gay,poof and that not to be mentioned word for a shade of brown?

18

Bill (Wales),

06/11/2007 14:59:26

What a crap website....(and newspaper)....
They will remove ANY comment that is even remotely worth reading.....(mine was no 13)

19

Si Tu Han,

Switzerland 06/11/2007 16:05:08

I have recently had a trip to India where a formal and official Paki-Indian bilateral conference was taking place, was billed as such, and there this abreviation is normal (and not pejorative): It simply distinguishes one stan from another. think Afgani, Kurdi, and so on.

20

Isabel,

06/11/2007 18:38:51

Seeing one small clip of the programme was enough to let me know that it's not for me. I don't understand how people can watch this boring rubbish.

21

Country Lass,

06/11/2007 18:53:54

I was working in Canada and said to my colleagues one night "Let's go for a chinky" and one of my asian colleagues made a formal complaint about me. In my meeting with HR about it I listed about 10 things that were commonly said about scots/brits that (supposedly) annoyed me - and I said that all the things were racist (abbreviations especially!) and wanted them stopped. HR wifie could not see how it was similar (as I am white). It was quite funny to see her squirm! What is acceptable to some just isn't to others - this can vary by age, region and lots of other influences. If you cause offence, apologise and move on. And change channel if you don't like what's on the telly!

22

,

06/11/2007 20:40:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1121429, Article id was mapped to record!
23

,

06/11/2007 21:49:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1121512, Article id was mapped to record!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.