Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Channel Tunnel fire extinguished, but thousands still stranded

View Video
Download Video

Video

Eurostar spokesman Simon Montague offers advice for passengers

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 September 2008
THE fire in the Channel Tunnel has been put out after burning for more than 16 hours, French police said today.
A spokesman for the Calais force said the main seat of the fire was extinguished at 7am today UK time.

Firefighters then spent two hours smothering minor fires nearby, he said.

Three hundred firefighters – 100 British and 200 French – fought the fire overnight and brought it under control early this morning.

Eurostar said it did not expect services to resume today. Around 30,000 passengers were due to travel on 50 Eurostar services going through the tunnel today.

They will be offered a full refund, a spokeswoman said.

The blaze began on a freight train carrying lorries from Folkestone to Calais.

Thirty-two lorry drivers, including seven British nationals, and train staff fled from the blaze down the safety and maintenance tunnel when it broke out just before 3pm yesterday.

Six people suffered smoke inhalation injuries but did not need hospital treatment.

Some lorry drivers were forced to smash windows in the train to escape after doors became jammed shut, reports said.

Patrick Lejein, 50, from Bruges in Belgium, gave a dramatic account of their desperate escape after smashing a window.

He told Le Parisien newspaper: "There was a burning lorry and a series of explosions – about 20 of them.

"Everything was exploding around us – tyres, fuel tanks, and then there was this smoke which prevented us from seeing and breathing properly."

Mr Lejein added: "The door of our carriage was locked, impossible to open. We had to save ourselves by smashing a window with a hammer.

"We escaped from the train through this window. It was at that moment that we panicked the most. We imagined ourselves trapped there. We really were very lucky."

France's transport minister Dominique Bussereau told French radio station Europe-1 the cause "likely resembles something accidental".

French authorities confirmed that there was a vehicle containing around 100kg (220lb) of a chemical known as phenol – also known as carbolic acid – close to the site on fire.

But a spokesman for local police said that it did not make the situation any more dangerous and the source of the blaze has not been identified.

The closure caused huge tailbacks on roads near the tunnel entrance as dozens of lorries were forced to park on the M20 and other surrounding roads.

Kent Police said Operation Stack, in which police park freight traffic on the roads, was still in force this morning.

"There is some freight traffic parked on the motorway but not much," a spokesman said.

"Motorists are advised to avoid the area."

Kent Fire and Rescue service chief fire officer Bill Feeley described the difficulties his team faced as they tackled the blaze in temperatures of around 1000C.

Firefighters using breathing apparatus faced thick black smoke in the tight tunnel space, he said.

They were rotating crews regularly so they could get refreshment, he said.

Some 40 or 50 firefighters will remain in the tunnel until they are sure every last bit of the blaze is extinguished, he said.

"Our most important priority is to make the fire completely extinguished the length of the tunnel," he said.

He said: "Even one burning tyre... if you imagine the smoke that emits... if you multiply that several times, that's the kind of conditions our people have been facing.

"That's obviously the reason why we've used a number of firefighters.
They take a fair bit of punishment down there as part of their job so we've got to make sure they're refreshed regularly and they're not fatigued.

"That's why we've still got 50 or 60 people on scene until they're satisfied the fire has been completely extinguished.

"It's a serious fire and a serious incident but I'm pleased to say we've made positive progress this morning."

An investigation of the cause of the fire would follow once the all-clear is given, he said.

The full article contains 664 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 September 2008 11:33 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Channel Tunnel
 
1

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 12/09/2008 12:13:07
Great: The safety system is so good on Chunnel trains that it locks the doors when there is a fire! That's brilliant isn't it? Turn each carriage into a crematorium.

I've used the Eurotunnel once but never again. It looks like it is simply unsafe.
2

Senga Jean,

12/09/2008 12:36:55
The Chunnel does not have the latest safety equipment.
3

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 13:08:58
#1:

Its all down to the nanny state principle that people cannot be trusted to realise that before a train sets off, the doors must be shut and whilst it is in motion, they must remain shut. So they make them automatic to take the decision away from the individual.

Then something goes wrong and the release mechanism fails, causing people to become trapped inside. Give me the old-fashioned slam-shut doors any day. At least you could open them easily in an emergancy.

I've never had any desire to use the channel tunnel and probably never will have. I prefer to go on a ship.
4

Deadpan,

12/09/2008 14:07:07
#3 You obviously haven't lost a friend through one of the old style doors failing and them falling out.

Thankfully a fate that no longer befalls people on our railways.
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 12/09/2008 14:44:50
#5:

Actually, I have (although not close friends). And more than one on different occasions.

They happened to be drunk at the time. Whilst it was a tragic loss the investigations all pointed to the fact that the door had been opened, not failed.

I'd still rather have slam-shut doors---which I will stay away from when the train is moving---than risk being trapped in a train unable to open an automatic door because either the mechanism has failed or the power has gone.
6

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 12/09/2008 14:51:47
#5 No, being sealed in and dying of suffocation or death by burning is obviously a far nicer way to go.

Also, official incompetence comes into play again: I was once on one of those Gatwick North - South Terminal shuttles and it stopped at the terminal but the doors would not open because it had stopped 3 m short. They refused to let us out (we were told to wait three hours in the sun for an "offsite rescue crew" to arrive) - even though we all had planes to catch. Absurd. there was no risk. In the end we rebelled en mass and used the manual override (although they threatened to arrest all of us!!!). Sadly Eurotunnel appears to have no such manual override.
7

nolimits,

Far North 12/09/2008 16:09:38
Its funny, that the more advanced technology gets, the more it seems to lose its grasp on the basics.
8

Yankee girl,

USA 12/09/2008 18:32:26
Sorry to point this out, but this situation is the reason you don't want a tunnel for the Forth Crossing.
9

D Napier,

12/09/2008 21:05:14
#9. Well said Yankee girl.

I don't see any sign of John Carson peddling his Forth tunnel propaganda today. Now there's a surprise.
10

Friar Tuck,

12/09/2008 21:59:56
#5 - Yankee girl:

I don't think you can compare the Forth crossing to the Channel tunnel. They are very different. If a tunnel was built under the Forth, it would be much shorter than the Channel tunnel and would be a "road" tunnel, not a "railway" tunnel. Having said that, if I was building "ANY" tunnel, I would install smoke & fire detectors, linked to a sprinkler system. (There would also be a sump pump system to get rid of the water so the tunnel would not flood.) The sooner any fire is extinguished, the better. Any fire fighter or fire investigator will tell you that 99% of the people who die in fires die from carbon monoxide poisoning, not from the fire itself.
11

Yankee girl,

USA 13/09/2008 01:41:17
11 Friar Tuck

You are correct in all your tunnel design features. In fact all of those are design requirements for modern tunnels. Additionally, you have exhaust venting requirements that can vent the smoke and fumes.

You can have very deadly fires in tunnesls much shorter than the Forth crossing - we've had them here in the States. I'm not sure about your point on the cars/trains using the tunnel We've had some massive tunnel fires caused by collisions between cars or trucks. All it takes is one big rig that crashes and causes a multi-vehicle pile up.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.