Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Big thaw could leave the Arctic ice-free by 2013



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 June 2008
THE Arctic could be ice-free in summer within five years, scientists have warned.
Sea ice is melting at a faster rate than last year, despite a cold winter, according to new data released yesterday by the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC).

Figures show that 2008 began with ice covering a larger area than at the begi
nning of last year. Since then, however, the levels have shrunk to what they were last June, a record-breaking period for sea-ice loss. Researchers say that much of the ice is so thin it melts easily, and that previous forecasts for an ice-free Arctic during the summer season may now have to be brought forward drastically.

Julienne Stroeve, a research scientist at the NSIDC, said: "We had a bit more ice in the winter, although we were still way below the long-term average. So we had a partial recovery.

"But the real issue is that most of the pack ice has become really thin, and if we have a regular summer now it can just melt away."

In March, Nasa reported that the area covered by sea ice was slightly larger than in 2007, but much of it consisted of thin floes that had formed during the previous winter. These are much less robust than thicker, less saline floes that have already survived for several years.

Only a few years ago, scientists were predicting ice-free Arctic summers by about 2080. Now, that day could arrive within a generation.

Last summer saw the levels of Arctic sea ice shrink to the smallest extent yet recorded, down to 4.2 million sq km from 7.8 million sq km in 1980.

Dr Stroeve said: "I think we're going to beat last year's record melt, though I'd love to be wrong.

"If we do, then I don't think 2013 (the year when the Arctic could be ice-free in summer] is far off anymore. If what we think is going to happen does happen, then it'll be within a decade anyway."

From a climate point of view, the melt could bring global impacts accelerating the rate of warming and the rising of the sea level.

Dr Ian Willis, of the Scott Polar Research Institute in Cambridge, said: "This is a positive feedback process. Sea ice has a higher albedo (reflectivity] than ocean water, so as the ice melts the water absorbs more of the sun's energy and warms up more, and that in turn warms the atmosphere more – including the atmosphere over the Greenland ice sheet."

Greenland is already losing ice to the oceans, contributing to the gradual rise in sea levels. The icecap holds enough water to lift sea levels globally by about seven metres, were it all to melt.

Because ice reflects more heat than water, as more ice melts the sea could get warmer, speeding up global warming and causing more ice to melt.

Natural climatic cycles, such as the Arctic Oscillation, play a role in year-to-year variations in ice cover, but Dr Stroeve believes the sea ice is now so thin that there is little chance of the melting trend turning round.

"If the ice were as thin as it was in the 1970s, last year's conditions would have brought a dip in cover, but nothing exceptional," she added. "But now it's so thin that you would have to have an exceptional sequence of cold winters and cold summers in order for it to rebuild."

The Arctic is already heating up at a faster rate than many other parts of the Earth's surface. While average temperatures on the planet rose by about 0.6C since 1900, the regional temperatures of the Arctic have risen by 2-3C.

How much worse is it all going to get?

What has gone wrong?


Sea ice, which floats on the surface of the ocean, naturally expands in coverage each winter and recedes in summer, but there has been a significant overall loss recorded during the past three decades. Most specialists agree that, as more ice is lost in summer, the Arctic is liable to heat up faster – instead of solar energy being reflected from the surface of the white ice, it is absorbed by the open, darker ocean, leading to even more melting of the ice.

What other repercussions could this trend have?

The dramatic shrinkage, should it continue, may speed up the melting of Arctic permafrost by up to 3.5 times, potentially damaging the environment for plants, animals, and humans by releasing billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide and methane.

Is the sea ice in danger of disappearing altogether?

Some computer models used by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predict the Arctic will be virtually ice-free by summer 2070. More pessimistic forecasts suggest that this may happen within five to ten years.

How will it affect polar bears?

Given they rely on ice floes for shelter, hunting and breeding, they are already suffering. Scientists have documented significant weight loss among pockets of the species, and a decline in birth rates among bears in certain regions.



The full article contains 863 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 June 2008 10:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

No 42 days,

20/06/2008 15:35:50
If our planet is too hot today, what is its optimum temperature? The enviro-fanatics can't tell us because it's well known that the earth goes through cycles; it's perfectly natural!
2

truthsleuth,

20/06/2008 15:53:30
#1 No 42 days

We know the earth goes through 'cycles of warming and cooling'.
This is not the point.
The problem is the RATE at which these changes occur.

ie the problem is ACCELERATED CLIMATE CHANGE

Get your head out of your exhaust pipe.

On second thoughts leave it there eventually your engine will stop.
3

11+failed,

the pans 20/06/2008 17:15:37
Seems 2013 is set to be a vintage year, we were told three years ago that by 2013 Scotland could be an icy wasteland due to the failure of the Gulf Stream. Of course, that has now been put on hold while "further research is undertaken",that being political speak for give us more public money to prove our theory wrong.
4

Alexander,

20/06/2008 17:44:02
2 truthsleuth,
Presumably when you say "ACCELERATED CLIMATE CHANGE" you are talking about the fall in mean global temperature since 1998. Particularly the rapid fall of 0.38°C from May last year.
Global mean temperature is presently at its lowest since 1994. Since 1998 atmospheric CO2 has risen by 6%.
5

E300,

20/06/2008 17:57:56
#4
More likely truthsleuth is referring to the unexpected 16 month fall in global temperature of 0.774°C
6

traprain,

E lothian 20/06/2008 18:24:43
Time to look out these old fur coats! Coldest May since 1992. 4th coldest on record since measurements began in 1979.
7

truthsleuth,

21/06/2008 01:27:10
You pick your dates don't you.
Open your eyes a bit wider.
8

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 21/06/2008 09:03:29
More denialist nonsense from Alexander, E300 and traprain.

Not one of the figures they give for various temperatures is correct, or even particularly relevant.

The point is that average global temperatures have been increasing, and continue to increase, at a background rate of 0.18 to 0.19 degree Celsius per decade. Imposed upon that background rate is a large amount of "noise" caused by variations in several factors, most significantly changes in ocean currents (eg El Nino and La Nina that respectively increase and decrease global temperatures), but also including large volcanic eruptions (which cause cooling) and less significantly changes in the sun that have caused very slight variations in temperature in that time.

The following graph shows monthly global temperatures since 1975 from the two main monitoring organisations, HADCRU and NASA GISS, with the best fit trends shown. Note the huge monthly variation.

http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/t1975.jpg

Note also that it is possible to find several periods, by cherry-picking the data, when it would be possible to say that "the Earth has cooled". Such cherry picked data is not significant, but the above three idiots couldn't even do that accurately: all their data is incorrect. See
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh%2Bsh/monthly
and
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts.txt

for the raw data upon which the above graph is based.

9

Gannyaa,

Vancouver Island 24/06/2008 16:58:01
Sangáay 'láa! Good Day!

Very Interesting. Does computer weather modelling used today include the percession factors of the earth's spin? Percession must have a dramatic effect on the earth's overal temperature by some measurable degree.

At the moment our data only spans about 6000 years or more, so predictions based on the last 6000 years may not reflect what will happen the next 20,000 years. Scientifically data has been collected for the last 100 years. A percessional year is a 26,000 year cycle. What percessional season is the earth entering? Aquarius? Age of water?

Haw'aa
10

Spanners,

04/09/2008 03:02:32
Slioch,

You demonstrate the usual disjoint from reality of an enviro-dunce. Your say our temp is rising "..0.18 to 0.19 degree Celsius per decade." That's garbage.

The Earths temp has risen between 0.2 and 0.6 degrees C in 100 years. I don't know if you've noticed how cold, wet and windy this 'summer' is, and the last summer, and that this winter was the coldest worldwide for a century - there's no warming anywhere. Fact.

In fact despite a 30% rise in CO2 (made by nature not man) the Earths temp has been flat as a pancake for the past decade. In fact there's no connect between mans industrialisation and Earths temp. NASA GISS said 1998 was the hottest year on record. Until an ameteur found a Y2K bug in their data and corrected it that 1942 (pre-industrial growth) was the hottest year.

Just one in a colossal database of enviro-hysteria falsehoods of science and climatic errors.

The only warming is the hot air from the shrill desperate enviros and the UN IPCC's global computer models (GCM's). The reality is no warming or "accelerated rate of change". Only the junk science of GCM's which predict warming because they 'science' they're based on is faulty/missing real facts about science.

For example the GCM's do factor in water vapour warming Earth but do not factor in water vapour cooling which is just as powerful. The 'missing' known science facts of water cooling (cloud albedo - clouds reflecting the suns radiative warming) means the GCM's predict runaway warming.

Namely they are 'set to predict warming/bias'. They are not to be trusted and their predictgions are not worth the paper they're written on because they fail to include known science. They are bent. This is schoolboy error science. Which sums up the UN's IPCC and this entire climate fraud.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.