Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Shooting galleries' plan urged to cut down drug deaths



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 June 2008
"SHOOTING galleries", where heroin addicts can inject in a safe environment, should be set up across Scotland to deal with increases drug use, a Holyrood think tank has advised.
The use of drug consumption rooms (DCRs) is advocated in a report, published today by Scotland's Futures Forum.

Authors of the report are calling for a major shift in government policy, warning that Scotland's war on drugs and alcohol will be lost
unless a radical new approach to law enforcement and community treatment is adopted.

The report, seen by The Scotsman, challenges current drug strategies, which target the lion's share of resources on the police and criminal justice system, rather than education and drug prevention. Tom Wood, vice-chair of the SFF's project, and one of the country's leading drug experts, said there was worldwide evidence suggesting DCRs can be part of the solution.

"In Scotland, we have to face the fact that we have the highest drug death rate in Europe. We have one of the highest rates of Hepatitis C from needle sharing.

"DCRs keep people in contact because there is the public health issue – blood-borne viruses like Aids and Hepatitis.

"It is not just a gang hut for drug addicts to attend at their convenience."

There are about 60 DCRs in eight countries around the world, including Australia, Canada and Switzerland and they are currently being piloted in England.

Some of Scotland's most senior police officers agreed that DCRs could be an option, according to the SFF report.

"While it was acknowledged that there was currently considerable public concern, and possible political avoidance, many accepted that DCRs had been effective in other countries, particularly where they addressed public injecting and reduced public nuisance," according to the report.



The full article contains 299 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 June 2008 12:17 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

archie12,

09/06/2008 06:07:52
I thought the pontificating chancer Wood had resigned from his so-called "leading drugs expert" position but now he resurfaces again. Its like some people cannot survive without the oxygen of publicity and self promotion.
2

Beth Boyle,

NY 09/06/2008 08:59:00
How about send them to the Kirk instead? What a mess our world is.
3

,

09/06/2008 10:09:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

09/06/2008 10:33:01
2...Aye 'Captain Kirk'....
5

an interested party,

09/06/2008 10:35:11
this article seem to only be telling half of the story, the bbc website has a broader reading of the report

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7442773.stm

scaremongering is not going to help the problem

people do drugs, we can either assist them in beating the habit or we can stick our heads in the sand, the illegality of drugs has little or no impact on the usage numbers. in fact the legal status most likely prevents many users from seeking help

but if we cant even have decent support services or discussions on how to tackle legal drugs (alcohol)what
hope is there for serious drugs harm reduction
6

sam the god,

09/06/2008 12:52:20
#3 Teofilio Cubillas

No such luck but we can only live in hope. Yet again these morons that are the think tank only have a PC mentality and bear no relevance on what the general public would like to happen ,also these junkies if they get places to go will cost the tax payers more money just let them inject themselves in some dank out of the way place the further away from decent people the better.
7

an interested party,

09/06/2008 13:37:25
blinkered rubbish no 6

right name for it so i am not surprised

but in the spirit of fair mindedness
you got any evidence?

see how the death penalty in Singapore stops the drugs trade in its tracks, see how locking up users and throwing away the key for dealers in America also stops the drugs, no!

oh ok you win making drugs extra extra specially super illegal will work,

wont stop harming communities or destroying life's but as your answer is to destroy lifes to save people from themselves then i am hardly surprised
8

hertscot,

09/06/2008 13:40:39
Surely the deaths of drug users at least removes their defective genes fromm the pool, purely darwinian, they are not fit for purpose therefore the chances of reproducing are limited by a fatality caused by their own behaviour.
9

skye surfer yes its me,

Skye 09/06/2008 13:52:32
No 6 , you have such a cute way of talking absolute rubbish. execute this kill that, you must be so perfect up there in your ivory tower .Do you have compassion for anyone ?Or is this commmodity only for yourself/
10

sam the god,

09/06/2008 14:11:43
#9 hertscot

fair comment but that will upset all the PC brigade
11

G,

dudny 09/06/2008 15:26:32
Great idea - can we site these DCRs in the Scottish Parliament and the council chambers of Scotland? If they think it is such a great idea they should volunteer their facilities!
After all, it is obvious from many of their decisions that our elected reps are "on" something so mixing with junkies shouldn't be that hard....
12

G,

dundty 09/06/2008 15:29:38
#9 and #11

Unfortunately being drug users do not stop them breeding....so no Darwinian advantage there! Also their early drug-addled deaths and the resulting poverty of their children's lives mean that drug-taking is often inherited...Better to solve the probelm than make "non-PC" = wildly wrong comments
13

ddmc,

09/06/2008 16:47:12
#13 the solution is to give them the drugs on the NHS but with a contraceptive added

prohibition has never worked anywhere
14

The wilkman,

Isle of Skye 09/06/2008 17:06:55
The odd thing about this Scotsman report on this report is that it misses out the main and most important recommendadtion - which is the one that ddmc comment 14 suggests.

Switserland, a very socially conservative country generally, has just moved to that. The results are dramatic - a big reduction in low-level property crime, and a reduction in the number of people using heroin.

But the biggest and most successful experiment in giving addicts a legal source for heroin by prescibing it to them was in the UK - from the 1920s to 1971 that was the way it was done here. By the end opiate/heroin addict numbers in Britain had fallen to 5000, there was no illegal heroin for sale anuwhere in the country (no customers) and there was no drug-related crime. Ask your parents, or look back if you're old enough.

And NB, while we had this very successful policy The States had a ban on doctors supplying addicts, and addiction had grown to half a million users (when the UK had 5000). It's after the Express ran a campaign in 1970 against supplying heroin legally to addicts that politicians, with little thought for the consequences, sent out new guidelines - and in an amazingly short time we had the same proportion of the population taking it as The States had.
15

sam the god,

09/06/2008 18:44:39
#13
yes it will if they get given pure heroin ie pan bread
16

The wilkman,

Isle of Skye 09/06/2008 18:52:46
reply to Blaqck Douglas 16.

My experience in Glasgow was that the kind of people who became instant junkies in the '70s weren't drug free in the late '60s! They bubbled town gas through milk, they drank illegally distilled stuff, took "black bombers" and other pills, drank meths, sniffed glue, etc. They didn't take heroin because it wasn't available. It wasn't available because there was no street level sales force - street level dealers are always junkies themselves and they do it to fund their heroin. When doctors prescribed it they didn't need to sell it so they didn't sell it, as a result there were only very few heroin junkies. But, the moment they couldn't get it legally, they were there to set the ball rolling. Now it's the world's biggest pyramid selling scheme.

As for social conservatism and ostracism keeping people away from heroin I don't buy it. The US was as socially conservative but their heroin epidemic was out of hand for most of the 20th Century. Socially deprived areas existed in the good old days too - as soon as legal heroin is unavailable and just a few people in the likes of Bridgeton or Possil discover it it's away like a brushfire.

As for sweeping it under the carpet - there was medical contact with each user. Their exact numbers, names and addresses were known. The fact that the respectable world was unaware of this tiny sub-culture isn't in my view describable as "sweeping it under the carpet". If the respectable had been aware what horrors were being kept at bay by giving 5000 people in the whole of Britain some dead cheap drugs they might not have listened to the prohibitionist rants from the Daily Express.
17

an interested party,

09/06/2008 20:03:57
well said wilkman
but to be honest it matters little how we got where we are, wasn't aware of the 70's thing, did know that the yanks morphine addiction started during and after the civil war but that comforts no one.

there are simply 2 options, carry on with our failing policy or try something else

of course this depends on your view point, if you believe that any drug user is the scum of the earth
then lets built 1000s of more prisons and raise taxes to 95%

or we can try and change the 'habits' of a few and break the cycle of addiction which will in the end benefit us ALL, just becuase you take drugs does not mean you should be exempt from paying taxes (ie earn a living) nor should you be cast aside and left to rot and your family shouldn't be tarred with the same brush and left without any form of sensible guidance

i am no expert and i have no answers but it is clear to me that the policies of the last 30 years have only allowed the problem to get worse and to effect more people

these people. however much you wish to use them for the foundations of the steps to your ivory tower, can in fact be useful members of our society. rich drug users are not overly a problem its when you earn less than your habit requires that societal problems occurs (theft in the main part and at a value of 10% of the goods its a huge issue)so if the need to steal to feed your habit is removed then the effects of the drug on anyone other than the user is negated

it is a situation that can be managed and contained
simply give them the drugs, removes dealers, removes crimes of theft, removes a large part of the reasons for a violent underworld and in general improves society for everyone

but OH NO I need to inhabit the moral high ground and condemn large sections of society to repeat the errors of a few, ad infinitum, hope it makes you feel good
18

an interested party,

09/06/2008 20:07:05
having re read that i am not aiming the accusations of misunderstanding at you wilkman but at 6, 9 and the rest of the christian right and anyone else that wishes to stick there heads in the sand for minor moralistic gain

the effects of this epidemic can be negated but so many people dont want that as it offends there stupidities
19

an interested party,

10/06/2008 07:25:36
sorry i forgot that pete and amy are out stealing every night making the streets feel unsafe and running the drugs underworld. if they where not pop stars they would barley be news

and i suppose OJ is a typical murderer

My view is not the enacted policies, or do you suspect that i am actually a government minister?

tbh I am alright jack

20

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 10/06/2008 11:38:36
#4 Horrible Cankers

What a corny joke.

Have you been cavorting like a semi-nake wood nymph in your garden and inhaling the "special herb" that you grow there.

By the way it is already +25C here and it is ony 6:45 a.m. THen comes the dreaded humidex in the afternoon that pushes the temperature up to +40 Celsius

Will our suffering never end?
21

hassan i sabbah,

edinburgh 10/06/2008 12:04:07
"A smile flitted over ChairmanGordon's face as he Pushed the plunger down,filling his body with Heroins sweet embrace.He glanced around his Bannockburn council flat,adjusted his SS uniform and languidly stroked his crotch.He summoned his faithful companion,an elderly German shepard wearing a leather cap. "Mon gies wan ay yer special kisses" The poor dog dutifully obeyed.
He surveyed his image in the mirror,a cruel smile on his lips,the elderly dog between his thighs
"Aye Eva,Ah wid love tae see ANY of thae vermin prove ME WRONG!!"
22

Calum Crubag,

10/06/2008 13:00:32
Chairman Gordon does of course enjoy his own drugs. But because they are deemed 'ok' by govt, he refuses to use his own mind and goes along with it.

Alcohol is way more damaging than cannibis. Does the legality soften the pain of the tens of thousands of deaths directly and indirectly because of it each year? No. End of debate.
23

an interested party,

10/06/2008 22:40:04
last word

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.