Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Should cannabis be upgraded from class C to class B?


BURNING ISSUE

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

YES

Neil McKeganey, professor of drug misuse research, Glasgow University
In 1995, the Lancet, one of the world's most respected medical journals, began an editorial with the words: "The smoking of cannabis, even long term, is not harmful to health." In 2007, the Lancet printed a total U-turn in a further editorial, which
stated that "research published since 1995 leads us now to conclude that cannabis use could increase the risk of psychotic illness". Governments, it said, "would do well to invest in sustained and effective education campaigns on the risk to health of taking cannabis".

Placing cannabis in class C was a move called for by David Blunkett, who regarded the drug as little more than a waste of police time. It was a move supported at the time by the police, who also wanted to concentrate on heroin and cocaine. The police and medical experts have now changed their view and come to realise that, in tackling the growing problem of illegal drug use in our cities and in our villages, you cannot turn away from the drug that is used more widely than any other: cannabis.

Classifying drugs is as much a political activity as a scientific issue. We need to send out a clear message that the government is serious about tackling all forms of illegal drug use, and we need to dispense with the idea that some drugs are more acceptable than others.

I hope that the Home Secretary has the courage to return cannabis to class B. In doing so, she would be righting an error on the part of a previous home secretary but, more importantly, she would signal that her government is, indeed, serious about tackling our growing drug problem.

NO

Linda Hendry, spokeswoman for the Legalise Cannabis Campaign Scotland

It would be a backward step because the taxpayer shouldn't have to pay by putting people in prison. It's harmful to send someone to jail – they can learn lots of bad things and will be more likely to move on to more serious drugs, such as heroin.

If people have health needs, then the issuing of cannabis should be dealt with through the health system. Similarly, if people have recreational needs, then cannabis should be sold in a regulated way, like alcohol.

The theory is that it should be controlled by being a class C drug, but that simply means you can buy some if you know the right dodgy people. At the moment, it's driven underground, so you don't know what you're getting. It should be labelled so people are given the facts.

Research has shown that cannabis consumption was higher when it was class B, so the idea that reclassifying it will reduce consumption is wrong. In fact, I believe young people will only be more likely to take it if it's illegal, as it will be regarded as daring.

It is often argued that cannabis is linked to mental health problems. But until everybody can freely report their cannabis use, we're not going to know what the statistics are. I don't think we know who takes it or when.

If shops can sell disgusting magazines on the top shelf, why can't they sell chocolate with cannabis inside? However, I certainly don't think children should be able to get it without a doctor's prescription.





The full article contains 565 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 February 2008 7:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 09:38:49
Legalise all drugs. Let individuals choose for themselves whether or not they want to use them.
2

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 06/02/2008 10:45:19
The issues involved here go well beyond a matter of individual choice. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime at UN Vienna reports that Afghanistan is now the world's biggest producer of cannabis. The controlling drug barons are evidently diversifying into the more easily pushable drugs. Production of opium in Afghanistan in 2007 was some 3,000 tons more than the entire world demand - and that is not counting the output from the "golden triangle" in south-east Asia.

It is clear that it is not the peasants who are stockpiling these surpluses, and that they are not being produced for commercial reasons. The UN is slowly gaining ground in Afghanistan - it is hoped that half of the country's 34 provinces will be free of drug production in 2008 - but there is still more than sufficient production in the lawless south-west of the country.

It is evident that the Taleban, Al Quaeda, the Camorra and the rest of the evil crime syndicates are hoarding stocks against the proverbial rainy day. That means that, even if the UN does manage to gain the upper hand in Afghanistan, they will still be able to finance their terrorist and other criminal activities for years ahead.

Truth is stranger than fiction, and no James Bond film ever approached the scale of this global war that the United Nations is having to conduct. Under the circumstances, calls for the legalisation of drugs for recreational purposes - medicinal purposes are, of course, another matter - are simply playing into the hands of those who would destroy the very fabric of our civilisation.

3

Craigrostan,

West Lothian 06/02/2008 11:01:46
What's the point of upgrading it again? For the past 50 years or so, we have made criminals of those who smoke a bit of pot, and has it got rid of it???? nope.

Cannabis is not going to go away, its been with us for over 2000 years, caused less damage to people and property than some other legal drugs that are in common use.

It's time we re-thought our policy on all drugs, and re-allocate the cash used in finding, then bringing to court the user and dealers.

Why is it that everytime we hear about Cannabis we get the same knee jerk reactions. If the system would just come clean maybe we could move on.
4

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 11:27:19
#2, surely the fabric of our civilisation is freedom and individual choice?
5

Mikey,

06/02/2008 11:27:56
Well said, #3! As long as we keep drugs illegal, we contribute to the mafiosi who produce the drugs! I have yet to meet anyone who can give me a good reason for keeping drugs illegal. Prohibition doesn't work!

It's time we stopped telling people how to run their lives and spent the money we devote to drug policy on more deserving causes!
6

hassan i sabbah,

edinburgh 06/02/2008 11:31:35
"Very fabric of our civilization"Bah! I Smoked some nice weed last night,Shivashanti, an Indica/sativa cross.No monies were passed on to The Taleban, Al Quaeda, the Camorra or any other terrorist organization. How could this be? I GREW IT MYSELF!
Try it.You just may like it!
7

,

06/02/2008 20:11:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.