Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

UN: It's time to get tough with celebrity drug abusers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 March 2008
Report warns that lenient sentences glamorise drug use and send message to young people that stars receive special treatment
LENIENCY towards celebrities who abuse drugs is sending out the wrong message to children and young people, the United Nations drug-control agency said yesterday.

The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) warned that allowing famous people,
such as singers Pete Doherty and Amy Winehouse and supermodel Kate Moss, to get away with drug crimes had a damaging effect on impressionable youngsters and undermined faith in the criminal justice system.

Professor Hamid Ghodse, INCB member, said: "They get more lenient responses by the judiciary and law-enforcement, and that is regrettable.

"There should not be any difference between a celebrity who is breaking the law and non-celebrities.

"Not only does it give the wrong messages to young people, who are often quite impressionable, but the wider public become cynical about the responses to drug offenders."

He suggested drug-abusing celebrities from the worlds of music and sport were treated with leniency, but was unwilling to name specific individuals.

"A number of people have got a lenient response in the UK and around the world," Prof Ghodse said at the launch of the INCB's annual report.

The document said: "Depending on how the authorities respond in the case, the media reports and associated internet chatter often reflect or generate perceptions that the system has treated the celebrity… more leniently than others. The authorities… should ensure that public celebrities who violate drug laws are made accountable."

The report also expressed concern about rising opium production in Afghanistan – an issue which Britain has taken a lead in combating.

Prof Ghodse, a former chairman of the INCB and professor of international drug policy at St George's University, London, said he believed international forces in Afghanistan had lost control, with opium production rising to 8,200 tonnes last year.

The total in the previous 12 months was 6,100 tonnes, and just 185 tonnes in 2001 after a crackdown by the Taleban, which then had political control of the country.

"It is not only drug agencies that can tackle this issue; it has to be with the rest of the elements that are trying to help," he said.

The INCB called on Asian governments to set up or strengthen controls on the chemical acetic anhydride, which is used to manufacture cocaine from the opium crop.

Tougher limits on the chemical could reduce amounts being smuggled into Afghanistan for use in illicit heroin factories, the organisation said.

Britain remains one of the countries with the highest rates of abuse of cocaine, along with Spain and Italy, the report said.

It reproduced previously published Home Office data, which showed that cocaine use in England and Wales rose from 2 per cent to 2.4 per cent in 2005-6 for people aged 15 to 64.

While Prof Ghodse welcomed figures which indicated a continuing fall in cannabis use in the UK, he repeated concerns about a rise in the drug's strength.

Home Office data revealed earlier this year that powerful "skunk" varieties accounted for just 15 per cent of cannabis seizures in 2002, but now make up between 70 per cent and 80 per cent.

The INCB oversees how governments adhere to international drug-control treaties.

PUBLIC BATTLES
AMY Winehouse was questioned by police last month after video footage emerged of a woman, alleged to be her, apparently smoking crack cocaine and speaking of having taken Ecstasy and valium.

Singer Pete Doherty's drug abuse has also been well-publicised. He has frequently escaped jail sentences after being caught with illegal substances. In October 2007 he was handed a suspended prison term for drugs and motoring offences after he admitted driving while uninsured and with no MoT while in possession of crack cocaine, heroin, ketamine and cannabis.

He was sentenced to four months in jail, suspended for two years. An 18-month drugs supervision order had been lifted days before – six months before it ended.

His one-time girlfriend, Kate Moss, escaped prosecution when a newspaper printed a photo in September 2005, in which she appeared to snort cocaine.



The full article contains 700 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 March 2008 11:20 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 05/03/2008 03:14:19
apart from the great results of ODs' killing off some of these high profile junkies, long jail terms for others are needed and why not drug test them before filming? or a concert?

Not going to happen so I will just celebrate when each one of those junkies croaks it, no loss to the human race and great news for cross continent coffin movers :-)
2

Geraldine Mullins,

Perth Western Australia 05/03/2008 06:48:50
The INCB needs to get serious with countries that abuse their international narcotics treaties. Such as Australia. Australian National Drug Policy is mega funded by the billionaire oligarch George Soros - anyone know him? Soros through his organisation Drug Policy Alliance in Washingon funds the Australian Drug Foundation which develops Drug Policies for our elite sporting organisation. So if national sportspersons from other countries want to use any amount of any drug and play sport - especially Australian Football League, our national game, just come to Australia. No probs. In fact the more speed, ice, meth you take the more chance for you in becoming the national footy champion. If you have a bit of a hiccup and get stoned on the streets of Perth, run away from booze buses and/or visit your friend, another sporting icon, just before he dies from drug overdose well you might just have to go for a dry out to a 10 star luxury Malibu rehab. No sweat the footy team pays for you to fly First Class to the US, your rehab stay AND a personal fitness trainer. Great inspiration for kids. But West Australians say that our footy icons do not have to be role models for their young fans.
3

Boy Wonder,

05/03/2008 07:52:32
"It's time to get tough with celebrity drug abusers"!

Agree completely! Throw the book at them and make examples of them!
4

\seasider,

Saltcoats 05/03/2008 08:09:06
#1 #2
Quite right if sportsmen and women can be given a mandatory drug test before an event why not the stars of showbusiness. Many occupations are already subject to tests for illegal substances. These high profile entertainers admired by our youth would not be long in ceasing the habit when they knew a drug test lay before performances. For them it would mean Drugs test positive = No performances = No contract = No income = Lifestyle gone.
5

GraniteCity,

05/03/2008 08:13:58
Yeah lets all pick on Amy but if this is the way the UN wants it then I shall expect them soon to be calling for the removal of several high profile knighthoods from Sir(s) McCartney, Elton, Jagger et al, hardly shrinking violets of the 60's and 70's were they.
6

Gothic Rose,

05/03/2008 10:48:23
Moses was stoned so it must be alright.See the Guardian.Got the lot Burning Bushes and every thing:)))
Oh God make my day.
Wheres Galatic Cannibal?Discoursing with Moses or dining in the Amazon on Ayahuasca omelette.
7

ex-labour,

05/03/2008 11:21:06
The whole approach it totally wrong.

The headline should read: "It's time to get touch on celebrity DRUG DEALERS." -

So-called 'celebrities' don't get their drugs from your average street dealer - and are more likely to know the 'Mr Big' and his associates. They can afford to have 'real' contacts. Being celebrities they should easily be followed and their dealers tracked - And a spell in the pokey for even one of the self-deluded 'celebrities' would be a bonus.
8

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2008 12:06:39
Yet another non-thinking knee-jerk from labour.

Ok, so you haul the likes of Docherty, Winehouse and Moss over the coals and give them what for. Despite the fact that Docherty severely needs this kind of treatment, is this really going to endear the authorities to the millions of fans? I somehow think not.

I recall the story about that pillar of the establishment, Sir William Rees-Mogg writing an article in the Times entitled "Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?" about the recent arrest of Mick Jagger and Keith Richards in 1967. The intent of this article was to persuade the "establishment" that throwing the book at the two main members of one of the most popular groups in the UK would not have been a very good move. The Stones were subsequently more or less cleared instead of receiving a lengthy prison sentence.

Clearly, whoever has suggested throwing the book at the modern celebrities is either too young to remember the Redlands arrest, has not done their research properly or is just plain stupid---or a combination of all three.

Ex-Labour (like that handle!) has the right idea. go for the pushers, not the celebrities.
9

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2008 16:58:50
#10:

I hear what you say and to an extent I agree. When Richards, Moon, Bonham, Lynott et al took their drugs, they mainly did it behind closed doors and not in front of a camera filming for the world's press. About the only exception to this was Morrison, who lit up a joint on stage.

Of course, in those days, the paparazzi practically didn't exist so there was no-one really LOOKING to take pictures of them doing drugs so who knows.

There is no simple solution to this problem. The fact remains that none of the modern stars are doing anything that hasn't been done before them by others---many times over and often with a lot more panache than they could ever hope to muster. Dwarves with bowls of cocaine on their heads comes to mind here.

Maybe we need to look to the past for an answer. As Mick Jagger once said about his compadres, "Either they've cleaned up, they're vegetables or they're dead."
10

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 05/03/2008 20:30:06
So a celebrity gets a light sentence for doing drugs - let's say, for example, Kate gets caught again and she gets six months' probation.

Now, you've got a fifteen-year-old girl in Scotland. Let's imagine she's thinking of getting a bellyful of booze and a few lines of powder up her nose. (It'll result in someone getting stabbed to death.)

Hands up the folk who believe she did it because she thought, "Oh, it's okay to get drunk and high because Kate Moss didn't get punished."
11

Tobytoo,

Southington.U.S.A. 05/03/2008 23:54:59
#7 Last week G.C. said that he was going to Texas.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.