Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call to stall projects in the capital 'would be a catastrophe'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
BUSINESS leaders in Edinburgh have warned it would be "catastrophic" for the capital's economy if a string of major developments were put on hold until a inquiry into the city's World Heritage status is complete.

The capital's Chamber of Commerce has accused the director-general of Unesco – Koichiro Matsuura – of making "ridiculous" comments about the city's planning process which threaten to undermine efforts to help Edinburgh beat the impact of the credit
crunch.

The Scotsman revealed yesterday how Mr Matsuura had argued that no major decisions should be taken on key developments until the results of a year-long inquiry were published. The Scottish Government, the City of Edinburgh Council and Historic Scotland have key decisions to make on schemes such as Caltongate, Haymarket and the new St James Centre.

But officials at the business group have described Mr Matsuura as having "a lack of understanding of the city's economic environment that beggars belief".

Graham Birse, deputy chief executive, said: "If Mr Matsuura had his way, all development in Edinburgh would be suspended for a year.

"Is he seriously suggesting that developments that have been subjected to the full rigour of our planning process, over a period of some years, should be stopped in their tracks? Complying with his request would be catastrophic for Edinburgh."





The full article contains 226 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 August 2008 9:04 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 21/08/2008 00:41:39


'OH' Yes the 'Political Correctness' creeping in now is it?

So you want games?

OK! Name the said, "BUSINESS leaders" that said this!
2

yankey,

21/08/2008 01:00:42

For years developement in Edinburgh has meant only one thing CORRUPTION

How could this scum put the unique city of Edinburgh in the slightest danger of looking like any city anywhere

Read Edinburgh Sucks for some truly frightening facts

3

Pilrig.,

Livingston 21/08/2008 05:46:07
Think of all the potential tourists flooding in to see Caltongate and Haymarket Tower.
4

Boy Wonder,

21/08/2008 08:26:47
These "business leaders" certainly don't have the public's best interests at heart!

Our World Heritage status bring us lots of tourist dollars. Should we give that up so the "Chamber of Commerce" has its way for themselves.

Come on, Histrionic Scotland .. say something useful!
5

DAVID,

Edinburgh 21/08/2008 08:43:04
No, it wouldn't be disastrous for Edinburgh.

What would be disastrous for Edinburgh is to be looking back in 40 years and thinking "why did we allow all this generic, clone, derivative architecture rubbish to be built?".

Kind of like we're doing now in 2008 in relation to great post-war rubbish like the St James Centre, Edinburgh University's George Square campus, etc etc.
6

Buttress,

21/08/2008 12:46:29
This man, remember, is the rentagob for the Chamber of Commerce (one of them at least).

Birse is paid to do PR for the organisation. That's his involvement. Ask him how much he got paid to say this to The Scotsman.

Manesh Chande of Mountgrange holds the Chamber of Commerce Property Portfolio.

And let's remember - it was Historic Scotland which asked for a visit from UNESCO, as that organisation has grave concerns regarding certain developments. UNESCO added Caltongate to the list as it has grave concerns.

Edinburgh World Heritage and other local and national heritage and community organisations objected. They were ignored. Jim Lowrie sits on the Board of Directors of EWH. He should be comnsidering his position. He voted for the scheme as Planning Convenor.

Remember the EU is still investigating land and buildings sales, too.


Ignore him folks, He's talking through his rear. And the C and C and Mountgrange are - well, to coin a phrase, as thick as thieves.

Yes we hold on. Yes we know that Mountgrange manipulated the consultation procedure. Yes we are aware of so much that shouldn't have happened over the Caltongate development.

It's all here - read the blog too, see the letter which has been sent to the council:

www.eh8.org.uk


Our World Heritage Site is far, far more important than the opinions of those employed by the Chamber of Commerce to manipulate public opinion.





7

we the people,

21/08/2008 13:17:26
world heritage status is vital to us. most of the new architecture i have seen go up in recent years (st andrews sq, princes st, george 4th bridge) seems to have been done by the same firm and looks (already) dated and tacky. if they put more of that up on the high street it will be a disaster, especially some kind of faux skyscrapaer - totally out of character and totally out of order.
8

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 21/08/2008 20:54:51
How would a call to stall projects in the capital be a catastrophe? Stalling the projects might be a catastrophe, although this is hyperbolic language - but how can a mere call to stall the projects be a catastrophe? In any case, it seems Mr Matsuura has already made the call. Has the sky fallen on our heads?
9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 21/08/2008 21:00:41
Looking back at history the New Town was originally designed as a whole, and in an area quite apart from the Old Town. In more recent times the French have more or less built a new city at La Defense, away from tourist Paris. The Italians have done the same thing at Venice, with a new city on the mainland side of the lagoon. So why don't we do the same in Edinburgh - a New New Town? I propose the Sighthill area, between the Glasgow and Calder Roads. It has good access to the airport, too. Any seconders?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.