Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Makeover mood is rampant in capital

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 October 2006
JAMES CRAIG is renowned as the man who put Edinburgh on the architectural map with his design of the New Town. Nearly 250 years later his work lives on and continues to draw people to Scotland's capital. But the city has changed hugely since Craig's day.
Now, with major redevelopment projects springing up across Edinburgh, comparisons are once more being made to the pivotal times in the 18th century when Craig made his mark. In fact, just today the Evening News has revealed a £200 million hotel devel
opment for the notorious gap site next to Haymarket Station.

City council leader Ewan Aitken says: "What's happening is a revolution for the city. In a sense the standard that James Craig set with the New Town is the standard we should be aspiring to today, and I see some signs of it."

So just what is happening and where?

QUARTERMILE


Twin Towers are set to pierce the Edinburgh skyline as one of the most controversial redevelopment projects starts to change the city landscape.

The renowned architect Sir Norman Foster has designed two 11-storey blocks of flats as part of a massive project transforming the former Edinburgh Royal Infirmary site into a modern complex of luxury homes and leisure facilities.

At £400m, the redevelopment is one of the most expensive in the city and includes the creation of more than 900 apartments.

And while some of the historic 18th and 19th century hospital buildings are to be retained alongside new ultra-modern glass and steel architecture, others, such as the old Simpson's maternity pavilion and the Queen Mary Maternity Home, have been bulldozed since work began in 2004.

Meanwhile, developers Gladedale say the complex will be completed by 2012.

GRASSMARKET


The famous area is to change as around a third of the parking spaces are converted into a new pedestrianised zone under a £7.5m project to transform the area into a centre for modern Continental cafe culture.

The council has worked with Glasgow-based architects Gillespies on the plans which will create pavement seating for the street's renowned eating and drinking establishments.

But traffic and parking will still be allowed on the main road through the Grassmarket following protests from residents and traders against earlier plans to wipe out every parking space.

The design of the project is expected to start within months if planners grant approval.

CALTONGATE


The£200m Caltongate development has sparked controversy. It has provoked furious protests by residents, who have set up a Save Our Old Town campaign group because of their anger at plans to demolish 1930s tenements to make way for a five-star hotel and a conference centre.

The masterplan features up to 200 new homes, offices, cafes, bars and restaurants and a public square, in and around the former New Street bus depot.

Council leaders made major changes to the original blueprint by Edinburgh architect Allan Murray, which was unveiled in March. They included demolishing one tenement block instead of two.

But campaigners are still angry over the loss of two listed buildings - the Sailors' Ark hostel and Canongate Venture offices.

London-based developer Mountgrange plans to start work on the site in the next 12 months.

ST ANDREW SQUARE


St Andrew Square is being revamped with an £8m scheme designed by Glasgow architects Gillespies to be very much in keeping with Craig's philosophy.

Ageing trees will be replaced and new lawns and natural stone walkways will be created, along with a pavilion and a "reflective pool". A coffee bar will be created and chairs brought into the square during the day to encourage people to use it. Work is due to begin next month and is set to finish next spring.

PARC CRAIGMILLAR


Pedestrians will have priority over cars, and pavements will become a thing of the past in the new Craigmillar.

The Dutch-style "home zone" streets pioneered in Holland in the 1970s are a key part of a 15-year scheme which will see more than £400m being pumped into the community.

Derelict estates are being torn down to make way for some 3000 new homes, including affordable housing, centred on Wauchope Square and Greendykes.

The masterplan includes designs for five new schools, a library and the transformation of around 150 acres of surrounding land into play areas and picnic spots. Residents are said to be happy about much of the scheme. But there have been concerns that local people will be priced out of the market.

City council-backed development company Parc (Promoting and Regenerating Craigmillar) says that while the first phase is due to start next month , the details are still subject to ongoing public consultation.

ST JAMES CENTRE


Few will mourn the passing of St James House as its reign as one of Edinburgh's ugliest buildings draws to a close. The office block is to be demolished and replaced with a new department store under a £200m scheme to revamp the St James Centre shopping complex. New owners, Henderson Global Investors, hope to start work next year, completing the project by the end of 2008.

WATERFRONT


Over the next 15 or so years, a £1bn regeneration programme is set to revamp the seafront. It is all part of an even bigger plan to create the "Forth Riviera" stretching into Leith and Newhaven.

Hotels, theatres, art galleries, shops, bars and restaurants and offices are also to be built along with schools, walkways and bridges. A public park, a marina, a concert arena and a cruise liner terminal have also been proposed. The redevelopment is expected to create up to 16,000 new jobs between now and 2015.

FOUNTAINBRIDGE


More than 650 new houses and offices are to be built. The project is set to be one of the biggest schemes in the city centre in the last 50 years. A developer consortium involving AMA, Grosvenor and RBS is behind the scheme.

The £70m plans will turn the old Tartan Club into two and three-bedroom flats, duplexes and penthouses, as well as offices.

Nearby, the first phase of the Edinburgh Quay development, a joint venture between British Waterways and Miller Developments is about to move into its second phase - a £60m project to complete the regeneration of Lochrin Basin. In a linked project, housebuilder Mactaggart & Mickel is hoping to join forces with Edinburgh Quay developers on a new £35m scheme to build more than 130 new homes.

Other major projects taking place around the city include a £2bn redevelopment of Leith Docks, a £1bn upgrade at Edinburgh international airport, a £200m science park at Little France and a £30m revamp at Fort Kinnaird.



The full article contains 1129 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 October 2006 3:22 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

Mike Hunt,

edinburgh 20/10/2006 11:14:32

What a mediocre list of anytown creations. I'd bet my pension that not a single one of these new buildings will be deemed worthy of note in 50 years time, and certainly none will last as long as James Craig's work has.

History has shown that there are few 1960's buildings of any architectural merit, except maybe the Scot Prov building in St Andrew Square.

I hope the Grassmarket fares better than the revamped Castle St, which is now nothing more than unregulated double-parking and damaged granite bollards. Leave the Grassmarket alone, it's hard-working and down-to-earth, like Edinburgh used to be, before gentrification.

Aah, that's better.

2

inter alia,

the capital 20/10/2006 11:31:23

i agree about the 60s buildings .. edinburgh university did itself no favour in george square. re the grass market, thought this was already agreed it should be covered over with a glass roof, have amsterdam-type cafes, public hangings, followed by a concert!

3

Paul Voltaire,

20/10/2006 11:34:31

The sums of money mentioned are all but mere pie in the sky

4

Ang,

20/10/2006 12:24:32

In response to #1

1) Castle street-

Fair point about the double parking, but that is more due to planners not having the courage of their convictions (i.e. not making a bigger pedestrian zone) than the redevelopment itself. It looks miles better than any of the streets nearby which have not been redeveloped (i.e. George St, Rose St.)

2) "Leave the Grassmarket alone, it's hard-working and down-to-earth, like Edinburgh used to be before gentrification"

It is not down to earth. It is an underused mess which is full of parked cars. Why is turning a car park into a better space for the public about gentrification? Seems simply about better use of public space to me.

Perhaps you should have said "Leave the Grassmarket alone, it used to be a public space, but it turned into a car park in the sixties. We are Scots so we will just stoically ignore bad planning and since we are obsessed with class we will argue that any new development is some sort of middle class conspiracy."

5

inter alia,

the capital 20/10/2006 12:33:12

up by victoria street is a memorial to covenantors

6

maggie,kitty,

AULD REEKIE! 20/10/2006 12:40:15

why dont the mad council just flatten the city and build one for themselves? Iam sure thats what they would love to do as long as they got paid for the idea.

7

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

Newington 20/10/2006 12:42:20

What happened to the proposals for the roundabout at the top of Leith Walk?

8

DAVID,

Edinburgh 20/10/2006 12:45:50

In 20 years time, we will look back on most of these developments as missed opportunities. Why can't we get better world-class architects and design firms involved so we get a better result that builds upn Edinburgh's unique character?

The standard of most new build housing, for example, is absolutely pathetic - cheap and nasty, using unsympathetic poor quality materials to leave a result that is out of keeping with Edinburgh's core look and feel. Developers are building houses and flats that may be trendy now, but in 20 years time nobody will want them.

And if you think I'm wrong, go and take a look at some of the new flats down Leith way - there's no way I'd want to live in them. Jerry built, un-sound-proofed rubbish.

9

Ross,

20/10/2006 12:48:55

When they start talking about restaurants, coffee shops, bars. That sounds nice but will this be all your commercial bull shit like Pizza Hut, Starbucks, the Walkabout ect..
If so these places are already invading the city and it is loosing it's charactor.
Princes St-Burger king, Mcdonalds ect
The Royal Mile-Starbucks, The Fire Sation ect
the list go's on.
What happened to our indentity

10

Leila,

20/10/2006 13:04:00

Angus - you cannot be serious! Castle Street looks better than neighbouring streets? It is a wasteland with a few lumps of something like marble dotted around which are so uncomfortable they cannot have been intended as seating. The Grassmarket can do without that sort of redevelopment.

11

JHC,

20/10/2006 13:28:38

I get angry when I see all the plans for the city!
For over six months I have been complaining about missing blocks, broken bollards, broken lights, lack of street cleaning and little has been done - this is one part of Rose Street (World Heritage Site) for which I have received many council promises but......

Another thing is when will this council take action about taxis flounting the pedestrian area of Rose Street. Sorry folks but this does annoy me when I hear of the millions being wasted in other parts of the city

12

DAVID,

Edinburgh 20/10/2006 13:48:22

Jim and Ross - spot on!

There seem to be loads of us sensible people around in Edinburgh, it makes me wonder where they find the idiots that infest the Council (politicians and staff) or who on earth votes them in in the first place.

13

What do you mean my chosen name is not available?,

20/10/2006 14:02:38

I've had cause to walk to and from Castle Street a couple of times recently and was really impressed with the improvement. I think it's lovely.

14

sjs,

Edinburgh 20/10/2006 14:39:31

Re: Post 8: World class architects are involved: Sir Norman Foster, who designed the Swiss Embassy in London - one of the most iconic members of London's skyline, and who restored the German Reichstag (Parliament) in Berlin following the destruction of its historic stone dome in WWII. He also designed the dome for the roof of the British Museum in London - another iconic result.

But to be fair, I've seen the Quartermile designs and don't think it matches Foster's previous developments - most of which have been successful. This is partially because he is working with an existing old building - never easy, and because his plans were chopped down by "let's keep Edinburgh's skyline stumpy" brigade, who allowed things like the current Craigmillar to happen. We just have to wait and see if all these designs : a)actually happen, and b) whether they turn out well or not. Stop being so negative!

As for saving the Old Town... I don't consider 1930s ugly tenements to be worth saving. But if they do knock them down, they should have something tasteful put in its place. Not some grotesque modern affair.

15

Ang,

20/10/2006 15:17:49

#10

I agree that the marble seats are not good but here is why I think Castle Street looks better than neighbouring streets:

- the pavement is the same level as the street, which makes it easier to cross as a pedestrian and makes it feel more like a pedestrian area
- the stonework is much better quality than the concrete paving/asphalt which is used in the rest of the city
- at the moment (and we will see how long this lasts) it all fits together - there are no random strips of asphalt, broken slabs etc.

If you want to see a street which really is a wasteland then go and have a look at the road surrounding Charlotte Square. Instead of being at most a shared space for cars and pedestrians it is a wide asphalt racetrack.

I suppose it is a personal thing, but to my mind Britain is pretty hopeless when it comes to building pavements which look good and Castle Street is a welcome change for the better

16

D. Graham,

Glasgow 20/10/2006 16:17:31

Its a pity that Edinburgh seems to be following in Glasgow's footsteps by demolishing historic buildings and replacing them with characterless structures that could be found anywhere in the world. While major regeneration has so far been an incredible success in Glasgow, too many old buildings have been lost in this urban renaissance, and Im sure that many more will go in the next ten years. Lets just hope that Edinburgh planners are not as ruthless as their Glasweigan counterparts.

17

Jockyw,

Edinburgh 20/10/2006 16:39:17

The shop selection in Princess Street is a disgrace and certainly doesn’t have an international feel. The council changed many road plans to suite the congestion charges and since they were not voted in they have not changed many back. From Gorgie at Haymarket you cannot turn left causing a rat run through Grovernor Crescent, wonderful. The council are making a mess now; it all looks bloody awful now and in the future.

18

Ted,

20/10/2006 17:44:06

These schemes are, by and large, a function of Trevor Davies' myopic planning role (I say that as a spec-wearer, so lay off, PC police!). So long as his pieces of pointless corporate architecture don't replace something better, I don't mind so much. The plan to gut the High St has got to be stopped, though.

19

Julian,

20/10/2006 22:29:52

David # 8. Is Norman Foster not a world class architect?

20

Aitch,

Edinburgh 20/10/2006 22:39:41

I really wish Edin. Council would be a lot more daring in the sorts of things they approve and sanction. It's probablone of the reasons why Edinburgh struggles to attract architects of world renkown to design here. Plenty of other European cities have been enriched by controversial modern design alongside historic buildings. Consider how many of those sorts of projects are now considered integral to those cities.

Can you imagine the reaction if a London Gherkin was suggested for Edinburgh, or the glass pyramid in the Louvre? The recent museum extension in Edinburgh had to hide most of it's development underground!

The council seem terrified to let anyone do anything radical for fear of offending the old guard. I wouldn't say demolish the old, but both old and new can be presented together sympathetically and enhance each other

I agree with most of the previous correspondents that the things going up right now don't take the city forward, they just fill gaps for a few more years until they beome carbuncles

We're just not creating iconic landmarks that will redefine the city and that people will want to save a generation from now!!

21

Julian,

21/10/2006 00:24:16

Aitch # 19. Have to disagree. As previously stated Norman Foster is a world reknowned architect. The London Gherkin building which you admire and can't believe would be built in Edinburgh was actually designed by Foster, who is the leading architect behind Quartermile. The controversial modern buildings which you praise being built in other European cities are also in abundance in Edinburgh. Of the top of my head, under that category (whether you like them or not) we have The Scottish Parliament, the conference centre, the dynamic earth building, cameron toll shopping centre. Oh, and how about that strange green building at the junction of London Road and Abbey Lane?

22

Julian,

21/10/2006 00:25:35

Aitch, almost forgot, surely that museum extension you mentioned is also a controversial building.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.