Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Edinburgh 'needs £600m boost' to lead fight against downturn

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 December 2008
ABOUT £600 million of new investment is needed over the next three years to help Edinburgh withstand the economic downturn, according to a new report.
Council officials have delivered their most serious warnings yet about the potential impact of the financial crisis on the capital, stressing that urgent action is needed to tackle a host of previously "unimaginable" challenges.

Princes Street, the Waterfront, west Edinburgh and the Little France area will be at the centre of global promotional efforts aimed at staving off what the council believes could be years of "terminal decline".

Major retail developments, hotels, conference centres, visitor attractions, sporting and cultural events, company headquarters and scientific research facilities are all to be targeted as potential major investments.

The three-year strategy, to which the Scottish Government will be asked to sign up, has been revealed weeks after the council admitted that Edinburgh would suffer "significant repercussions" if the takeover of HBOS goes ahead because of its reliance on the financial sector.

Greg Ward, the new head of economic development, warned councillors that significant new resources would have to be diverted into efforts to help the capital combat the credit crunch.

He said: "The world, and Edinburgh's place in it, have changed dramatically. In our own planning, a worst-case scenario included the loss of one or more company headquarters.

"Such an event was thought to be a tipping point into severe economic decline. That's no longer just a planning scenario – it's a real possibility."

Mr Ward said the council had to make "very tough choices" about how it allocated its resources.

The Scotsman understands that the council hopes to earmark at least £5 million to go towards combating the credit crunch. Officials are drawing up plans to ring-fence part of the council's budget to ensure it can "hit the ground running" with its plan, which aims to offset the slump in the property market, triggered by a reduction in lending between banks.

It is hoped extra funding promised by the Scottish Government to reflect Edinburgh's capital city status can be used to offset the impact on the authority's own budget limitations. The council expects to find out in days how much of its bid for an extra £33 million a year has been accepted by the finance secretary, John Swinney.

Much of the efforts will focus on a new marketing body, independent of VisitScotland, that is expected to be up and running early next year.

Advertising campaigns and promotional drives are already being planned, which it is hoped will help the struggling retailers to cope with the downturn, offset the impact of tramworks expected to take place throughout 2009, and boost tourism spending by 15 per cent by 2012.

Tom Buchanan, the council's convener of economic development, said: "It's already clear that Edinburgh is showing a degree of resilience to the economic downturn that is perhaps less evident elsewhere.

"This supports our contention that Edinburgh needs to take the lead in counter-acting the effects of the credit crunch and in continuing to attract investment both now and during the upturn."

Myles White, a fund manager at Henderson Global Investors, the firm planning an £850 million redevelopment of the St James shopping centre, said: "We believe Edinburgh has excellent future development opportunities. We are committed to the redevelopment of St James to deliver a world-class mixed-use quarter that will significantly improve Edinburgh's retail offering.

"It will create an estimated 7,000 jobs during its construction, planned to start in 2010, with 3,000 to 4,000 permanent and part-time positions on completion, and generate an additional £20 million tourism spending within Edinburgh city centre."

Capital gains: the six key targets

These are the six key targets in Edinburgh's regeneration bid.

1. Attract £500 million of new private-sector investment in the capital's physical regeneration. The waterfront and west Edinburgh, particularly in and around Edinburgh Airport, are seen as the most attractive areas for large-scale investment. Opportunities will also be promoted in Princes Street.

2. Attract £100 million of new commercial investment. It is hoped there will still be huge demand from hotel operators, retailers and office builders for sites across the city. Among the major developments coming to fruition are the St James quarter and Caltongate.

3. Increase tourism spending by 15 per cent by 2012: By the spring, Edinburgh is to have its own marketing body which will run campaigns aimed at attracting tourists to the city.

4. Boost Edinburgh's independent shopping centres. Extra resources will be ploughed into areas such as the West End, Grassmarket and Leith to help them cope with tramworks and draw up plans for their own business improvement districts.

5. Deepen Edinburgh's cultural offer. It is hoped quiet months, such as March-May and September-October, can be filled with major sporting fixtures, cultural events and new festivals.

6. Improve transport links. Priorities are securing an improved Edinburgh-Glasgow rail link, ensuring that extra tram routes go ahead and encouraging Edinburgh Airport's expansion.

Protests as new name for Leith development 'fails to respect the area's traditions'

DEVELOPERS masterminding the multi-billion pound transformation of Leith's docklands have come under fire after unveiling "Edinburgh Harbour" as the new name for the heart of the development

Business leaders, councillors and community groups say Leith's history and heritage as a trading port has been snubbed in the new "brand" image for the area.

Forth Ports, the company behind the docks transformation, has spent years drawing up the plans for the central area around the existing Ocean Terminal shopping and leisure centre.

The company claims to have consulted dozens of groups over its vision for the area, but is understood to have rejected protests that the new name fails to respect the area's traditions.

Edinburgh Harbour is planned to become home to a new marina, a 26-storey hotel, a new commercial district between Ocean Terminal and the Scottish Government HQ at Victoria Quay, 1,800 new homes and waterfront promenades.

More than 15,000 new homes are envisaged across the entire docklands, along with schools, community centres, parks, cafes, bars and restaurants.

Edinburgh Harbour is to be the first phase of a 30-year transformation, with the new marina expected to become home to a cruise liner terminal, a tram terminus and a new home for the Royal Yacht Britannia.

Sir Tom Farmer, the Leith-born entrepreneur and Kwik-Fit founder yesterday led criticism of the new name.

"I'm amazed that they have chosen this name," he said.

"Leith is the oldest port in Scotland and has a great name all over the world.

"It's incredible that they've chosen to ignore this and I would hope the people of Leith would make representations to Forth Ports for a rethink."

Mary Moriarty, the landlady of the Port O'Leith pub and one of the organisers of Leith Festival, said: "I'm not impressed at all. Leith just seems to get forgotten about when these ideas being discussed.

"A lot of people have told Forth Ports they don't want this name used but they just seem adamant about it."

Roland Reid, secretary of Leith Central Community Council, one of the groups involved in talks with Forth Ports about the new name, said:

"Leith has got such a wonderful history and heritage and it's a real shame they've not chosen a name to reflect it."

A spokesman for Forth Ports said: "The naming of Edinburgh Harbour was done in wide consultation with a number of organisations and individuals, including community groups, who felt the development should reflect the wider city as the regeneration of Leith Docks has an impact on the whole of Edinburgh."


The full article contains 1289 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 December 2008 12:17 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Council
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/12/2008 00:33:10
The previous poster is appatrently a loon.
2

Daft Old Git,

10/12/2008 00:48:11
hmm... about the same price as the trams
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/12/2008 00:49:18
cksake.
4

lulach mac gille coemgain,

10/12/2008 01:09:01
Alternatively - we change the way society works and we need eff all !

Simple really !
5

One-man-bucket's older twin,

10/12/2008 01:18:11
Investors in Edinburgh would need to be involved in a business that doesn't involve either staff or clients having to travel.
6

Goggsie #,

10/12/2008 01:20:30
Seems to me that the regeneration of Leith has resulted in the yuppies who bought accommodation there deciding that a new name might help their property prices.

by the bye the censor rejected F.E.C.K
7

,

10/12/2008 01:24:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Guga II,

Rockall 10/12/2008 01:26:16
Does the £600 million required include any council blackmail demands for contributions towards their trams?
9

Dark Lochnagar,

Symington 10/12/2008 02:14:29
#7

Try FVCK
10

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 04:54:49
Hearts is the problem.

Owned by the Russian Mafia.

Is puts people off going to our capital city
11

Hmm ...,

10/12/2008 05:05:52
... `Princes Street, the Waterfront, west Edinburgh and the Little France area will be at the centre of global promotional efforts aimed at staving off what the council believes could be years of "terminal decline".'

Now what current project would link up all of these areas "at the centre is global promotional efforts - and desperately needs more cash?

And what is its likely pay-back for the investment?

Well, if it is the misrouted, horrifically expensive tram system, the payback will be zilch, no, less than zilch because it is a major part of the problem, not the solution.

And how would this £600 million "investment" improve the attractiveness of the Waterfront and Princes Street when they are already in terminal decline due to the City Council's policies of making travel as difficult as possible?
12

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 05:10:14
Hearts is the problem.

Until it's sorted out why would anyone go to Edinburgh?
13

Hmm ...,

10/12/2008 05:15:11
... "Extra resources will be ploughed into areas such as the West End, Grassmarket and Leith to help them cope with tramworks and draw up plans for their own business improvement districts."

Yes, th trams are part of the problem and the ongoing subsidy needed to keep them running will not only bring down Lothian Buses but will also be a "surcherge" on local council tax, again making Edinburgh a less attractive place to live and work.

A good first step toward regeneration would be to scrap the tram project and ask the Scottish Goverment if the remaining grant could be used in carefully selected regeneration projects CALCULATED TO BRING SPECIFIC FINANCIAL BENEFITS - not just more money down the plughole of political optimism.
14

drunken proffet,

Tassy 10/12/2008 05:29:41
Well before you make any long term regeneration plans that involve lots of money, maybe you wait a year or so to see just how deep this recession goes. At the end of the day using HM prisoners to complete unfinished projects may not be a bad way to go. Who was it said that the end justifies the means?
15

Mallory,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 05:36:34
Nice view of the castle - why not do superimpose the marvellous Haymarket Gateway to the City hotel design? While you are at it do a similar shot from the Western Approach Road, from Dundee Street and the canal.

16

donald,

glasgow 10/12/2008 05:37:20
Who do they think they are, London?
17

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 05:42:43
Another SNP co#k up
18

Evan Owen,

Cut this red tape 10/12/2008 07:08:45
Stop spedning all the money on 'reports' then!
19

eric,

lothian 10/12/2008 07:32:07
Scrap the trams,that should cover it.
20

Erica from East Kilbride,

10/12/2008 07:58:17
Not hard to see why you chaps are Scotsman forum 'commentators' and the real economic experts are running the country. All this simplistic nonsense about scrapping a much-needed public transport investment in order to 'fund' wider investment in the city is wishful thinking at best, not to mention economic naivety. Try thinking laterally for once.

We have to hope the jaded Scottish Government gets behind these plans for Scotland's economic and political powerhouse. The Nats have an appalling track record when it comes to investing in the capital, prefering to scratch the backs of voters in the Highlands instead.
21

materialise,

10/12/2008 07:59:51
Don't tinker with a loser.

Put the tram work on the back burner and face the commercial situation head on by releasing this earmarked amount into a plan that can help now.

Sometimes you have to take a step backward for the leap forward, to me its a no brainer.
22

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 08:09:26
#22 The tram line is not needed, not wanted and has a business case that is a complete joke.

If it had been subject to rigorous financial assessment rather than being scrutinised by completely unqualified politicians it would never have proceeded.

Remember that to be a politician is one of the very few jobs for which no formal qualifications are required.
23

Bigwull,

edinburgh 10/12/2008 08:16:10
13 I think people might be confused when they hear Hibernian are in Edinburgh, ye'd think its Dublin or something. Ye must be sweating now that yer gonna have to work for yer benefits.
24

Fecker,

Somewhere out there 10/12/2008 08:18:16
the phrase "eggs in one basket" springs to mind.....

#24.....neither does an estate agent....hmmmmm!
25

11+failed,

the pans 10/12/2008 08:49:46
Curiously all the successful areas in and around Edinburgh have free car parking eg Straiton, the Gyle, Ocean Terminal, Cameron Toll, Meadowbank, Fort Kinnaird to name a few. I don't suppose there is any connection!
26

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 08:58:42
In my young day, it was like Laour or shove it, pal.

Now, I just like them
27

A Crofter,

Western Isles 10/12/2008 09:00:34
Why not demolish all Edinburgh's historic buildings and turn the whole city into one big shopping mall with a huge car park?

Better still, why not just give £120 to everyone in the country?
28

W Smith,

Middle East 10/12/2008 09:02:45
This is a problem Gordon and Alastair could fix in their lunch hour.

They've fixed bigger problems than this.




Eh... sorry... my spelling mistake.

Change 'fix' and 'fixed' to f.e.c.k and f.e.c.k.e.d!
29

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 09:03:35
#29

The gift voucher idea was Salmond's. Him and his smug and ugly crew.

What's the voucher worth now.....thanks to Salmond
30

I can see for miles,

10/12/2008 09:11:04
#32

Yes, did SNP ever get a train on time?

No.....That's what i'm saying
31

Darien,

Panama 10/12/2008 09:33:18
The British Nationalists (aka Unionists) on here should reflect that the current economic mess is a result of successive Labour & Tory (i.e. Westminster) rule. It is not the fault of the SNP Government in Scotland. The latter need the tools of independence to repair our economy and society, but Scots-British Nationalists prevent this from hapening.

By the way, another big mistake of Westminster was to sell Forth Ports on the cheap to its management back in 1991. The people of Leith and Edinburgh are paying for that mistake even today, and will pay for a long time to come yet.
32

jdships,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 09:41:50
" Forth Ports, the company behind the docks transformation, has spent years drawing up the plans for the central area around the existing Ocean Terminal shopping and leisure centre."

FPA track record of breaking promises made to the local community is appalling.
Undertakings made to ensure "old" Leith wasn't neglected were just so much hot air
Terry Smith who was at the forefront of making these promises held the view "it is a good idea if it is mine" and the new regime is not much better.
I have attended a number of presentations by FPA over the past few years and there arrogance is unbelievable.
Ther were warned years ago that unless they were careful they were in danger of painting a white line down the middle of Commercial Street with the "Uppies" to the north and the "Doonies" to the south .
Terry Smith laughed at the idea at the time but this is what we are looking at now.
I back Sir Tom totally on this !!!!
33

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 10/12/2008 09:49:15
Unfortunately if the tram project was cancelled there would be no money saved as the council would still have to pay the full cost of the project for breach of contracts, thats in the contract. and the city would not get anything for the money But the contractors would be laughing all the way to the bank but the employees would be crying all the way to the dole que
34

Darien,

Panama 10/12/2008 09:57:52
#36 FPA were succeeded by FP plc. The latter has extracted over £1 billion in profit from the estuary since privatisation, and put very little back in. By the way, the non flushing out of the Water of Leith is an environmental nonsense that has completely avoided attention, even from 'experts' like SEPA. Remedying that will cost a great deal. Sir Tom is right - Leith and its illustrious history has been swept aside. But then, the 'custodians' of the port, FP plc, are a waste of space.
35

Hugh Roscombe,

10/12/2008 10:03:58
#7 & #10

Try f­eck.
36

,

10/12/2008 10:11:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

Old Town Resident,

edinburgh 10/12/2008 10:17:22
Well said Tweedmouth!
38

Miss H,

10/12/2008 10:34:53
22 Would you like to justify that?
39

ccc,

10/12/2008 10:38:49
Everything goes in cycles.

Edinburgh is no different.

We have had our boom time. Years of construction programmes, new HQ's, house prices shooting up, bars, shops, stylish cafes.

This has now come to an end - for the time being. This is not being pessimistic in any way. It is simple realism.

Think what Edinburgh was like in the late 70's and 80's. People that think those days are gone forever are delusional.

Edinburgh is a great place. However it is going to become a little more 'scummy' over the next few years.

No point fighting it.
40

Alan B,

10/12/2008 10:44:12
Labour have devasted the economy. We better just get used to it. There is little you can seriously do about the mess now we are in it.
41

Old Town Resident,

edinburgh 10/12/2008 10:45:31
What do you mean by, Edinburgh will become a little more `scummy` ccc?
42

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 10/12/2008 11:09:19
I have always known that the citizens of Edinburgh and their council leaders were relatively profligate,short-termist, greedy, arrogant, blinkered and selfish. Now it's official - and they've made such a mess of things, they are £600 million worse off than anywhere else in Scotland.

Of course, the rest of us must touch our forelocks and be pathetically grateful that we have been given the chance to bail them out yet again.
43

EK,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 11:58:07
Well that's great! After years of being told Edinburgh is rich and a thriving financial centre and building thousands of new flats, we are now told we're sorry it was all a big mistake. Our council and politicians seem useless! Why are we wasting all this money (still) on trams? Why not try and sort out the problems of anti-social behaviour - the graffiti the rubbish the cigarette ends everywhere? The drunks and the broken bottles? The food wrappers and discarded food on every city pavement? Neds and screeching shouting teenagers everywhere? Then maybe people will want to visit here and invest! As it is, it is a filthy dump, resting on its laurels! Who would want to come here? Look at other cities in the world - friendlier people, better places. Get real, citizens of Edinburgh.



44

Dorian,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 12:19:30
#45 That is a rather rash and sweeping generalisation.
45

ccc,

10/12/2008 13:04:27
#44

Roads a bit messier. Derelict buildings on the increase. Just generally not as pleasant a place to live.

That sort of thing.
46

Arfur,

10/12/2008 13:06:58
Cant scrap the trams as we would have to pay the full amount anyway.

Rip up and re-build Princes street. There was once a plan to knock down 15 buildings in Princess Street including the M&S building, BHS and newer part of Jenner's and rebuild them. I would personally rip down more than that and rebuild them. No glass fronted garbage. This is Edinburgh's main street. There must be a architect out there somewhere that can design 20 odd buildings looking like a mixture of Jenner's and the museums. Instead of just shops have cafes, bars and restaurants on Princes street. Price the tartan tat shops off the street.

Combine underground space with storage and a link to a underground road/tunnel coming from St James Centre refurb area which will make deliveries to all shops on Princess street instead of the wee ally ways off Rose street. These streets can then be filled in providing more space to Princes street shops and more actual shops space on Rose Street.

Allow the St James centre refurb to go ahead.

The second forth road bridge should help commuters get to Edinburgh.

Fountainbridge/Tollcross development needs to go ahead. Find a new buyer if need be.

Same with Leith docks area. If need be split it into 10 sections and sell off to different development companies. Maybe that way it would only take 10/15 years to build instead of 30.

Two more global headquarters out by Gogarburn. (Reduce corporate tax)

Move all companies in Sighthill industrial park to unused building at the gyle or build them offices at the gyle. Rip up sighthill industrial estate and build affordable homes on the sight while making the sighthill area a nicer place to live. (get rid of the tower blocks and do up the fronts of existing houses).

Council to buy Castle Terrace car park and make it free. Also build free parking underground at the mound and make it free.

Make park and ride free.

47

NorT,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 13:16:56
It is no wonder the Council want developments. TRhis is so they can blackmail the devolopers into making S75 agreements as it is the only way they can get the money for the trams. If the developers have nay sense they won't do any devlopment and put 2 fingers up to the Council.
48

Luke Skywalker,

10/12/2008 13:42:47
51 "If the developers have nay sense" I suspect that they do have sense and so they will do devlopment (whatever that is) and will not put 2 fingers up to the Council.
49

Shaken,

10/12/2008 14:44:46
Tram debacle can only be left at Labours door.

Edinburgh's transport system which was already on it's knees and has had a shot in the head with all the tram works.

Personally cannot stand going into the capital for anything other than a show at the Fringe. For business purposes it's worse than terrible - getting anywhere on time is difficult to impossible.

I'd stop the tram project right now. Repair the roads and plough the money into something worthwhile -train link improvement would be good

50

Shredder,

10/12/2008 15:35:15
Do I hear the sound of Leith nationalism? Try as the locals might to paint a different picture, the reality is that "Leith" summons up images of a rundown harbour area, with associated vice and social problems.
51

Scimitar1,

10/12/2008 15:40:19
"It will create an estimated 7,000 jobs during its construction, planned to start in 2010, with 3,000 to 4,000 permanent and part-time positions" - Will these jobs go to local people or go to foreigners ?
52

lachlan,

10/12/2008 15:51:29
and the last administation in holyrood was moving jobs out of edinburgh!
53

Euan,

Edinburgh 10/12/2008 17:53:00
#55

Well said.

The entire tram project should be scrapped with immediate effect. Edinburgh does not need nor want this disgraceful project to continue any further.

It would appear that the view of the council is that any new developers should gladly be paying £x million or whatever towards the trams as supposedly they will benefit from their existence far, far into the future - wrong.

All this stance is doing is putting developers off investing in Edinburgh. Just look at the crazy amount of £500,000 to council are trying to prise out of the proposed hotel development on Princes St, an absolute joke and a total insult to the developer.

Yes, the tram line's cancellation would involve penalty clauses in contracts being called in, but at least Edinburgh would be saved from even more destruction and despair, not to mention it's citizens spared from years, if not decades, of crippling council tax rises and service cuts all to help bankroll the tram LINE.

Any remaining funds can then be used to put Edinburgh's roads back to how they were before they were heavily-meddled with by the previous Labour council and help compensate many of the businesses that have taken a huge hit financially due to the mayhem of the tram construction.

The way things are going just now, by 2011, with the amount of money the tram project is already sucking out of Lothian Buses, we may well not have an award-winning bus service any more, not to mention all the other local services which are already being sacrificed to make way for the money-gulping white elephant that is the tram project.




54

Gled,

10/12/2008 19:07:42
#41 You're not a public sector worker are you.? As not only does post #21 highlight the current straitened times we are in, they and others are on the right track in regard to both the costs and the costings.

Why waste money on this inflexible narrow band of transport infrastructure when the real economy is up the creek and need help now.

The clue is in the article title.

55

Alan Reid,

Ringkobing 10/12/2008 22:37:17
46, Spot on!
56

Alan Reid,

Ringkobing 10/12/2008 22:41:39
# 17 I can see for miles, "Another SNP co#k up"

You're full of it and it sinks from here, Unionist f@ckwit.
57

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 12/01/2009 11:25:41
Cut back on the super inflated expenses paid to councillors and you will soon get the 600million and also cut out their free junkets and holidays abroad paid for by the Tax payers

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.