Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Historic Edinburgh cinema wins reprieve

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 June 2009
CAMPAIGNERS fighting an attempt to demolish a historic cinema building to make way for a new hotel are celebrating after the plans were called in by the Scottish Government.
Only the art deco facade of the former Odeon in Edinburgh's southside would have been retained, although experts rate the auditorium one of the best in the country.

Plans for a boutique hotel, bar-restaurant and art gallery were agreed by counc
illors after just one hearing, despite protests from the national heritage watchdog Historic Scotland.

Now a public inquiry will decide the fate of the building and the £20 million development.

The building's owner, the developer Duddingston House Properties, has come under fire for its handling of the building, which has been lying empty for several years since it was last deployed as a temporary Fringe venue.

A previous scheme to create student flats on the site was shelved amid protests about the loss of the cinema auditorium, while plans for a nightspot or concert venue on the site were met with equal opposition.

Campaigners, who collected more than 5,000 signatures on a protest petition have been lobbying MSPs of all parties.

Sana Bilgrami, spokeswoman for the Save the Odeon campaign, said: "The decision to call in these plans is quite a turnaround, and we are confident the plans for the Odeon will now get the fair and unbiased hearing it failed to get during the council's planning process.

"But we are not complacent, and there will be no let-up in our campaign to save this wonderful building for the city and citizens of Edinburgh."

The surprise decision, revealed by culture minister Mike Russell yesterday, is another major embarrassment for the council's planning committee.

In the last year alone, the local authority's handling of major developments has seen the capital's world heritage site come under investigation by heritage body Unesco, while a 17-storey hotel development in the Haymarket area has been called in for a public inquiry, which is currently ongoing.

Mr Russell said:

"This is a complex case and it is important all aspects are considered to determine the best way forward.

"A wide range of factors will have to be taken into account, including the current economic climate, but I am sure we can resolve the matter as quickly as possible."

The government's decision, made on the strong recommendation of Historic Scotland officials, will mean Duddingston's plans for the building being put on hold for at least a year.

Jim Lowrie, chairman of the council's planning committee, said: "We note the decision by Scottish ministers that the application should be considered at a full public local inquiry. An inquiry held by an independent reporter allows all parties to put forward their views and we will co-operate fully with the process."





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Davy,

04/06/2009 03:35:15
It could be turned into a beautiful smoking & alcohol research centre. The smoker would gladly contribute by doing what makes them happy & he could have a pint at the same time. A lot of money could be earned. It could maybe revive the economy, it would catch on, a lot of spin offs tourists, people from out of town etc. None smokers, would not be allowed on the premises of course.
They would just cause trouble.
2

Statsman,

Edinburgh 04/06/2009 04:22:49
"The surprise decision, revealed by culture minister Mike Russell yesterday, is another major embarrassment for the council's planning committee."

Not commenting on this specific case but in general:

The councillors are advised by the planning officials. If the councillors are not told the whole story, then the councillors tend to pass c**p plans on the advice the have been given by council officials.

You'll find the documents sent by councillors to the officials acting in the interests of the public on the physical planning files. You won't find that online. You need to ask for access to that (EIR).
3

Buttress,

04/06/2009 06:35:57
Lowrie:-

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2009/06/london-calling.html

Will co-operate fully? You have no choice. The plans shouldn't have been passed in the first place. Now a great deal of money will have to be spent on an inquiry. If CEC planning was anything like competent, it wouln't have come to this. The council paid for a totally inadequate report from Montagu Evans (ask it how much!) and also set the brief for that report. The only people consulted were the developers, not the Cinema Theatre Association, not the Theatres Trust, no-one who could have put the full story.

Decent offers for the cinema were refused by the developer, on spurious grounds; the only interest was the maximum profit.

How many other plans are there that should never have been passed but that were, and a small amount of scrutiny would reveal how much against national and local policies those plans were?
4

Buttress,

04/06/2009 07:14:50
I also note Cameron Rose is whining again about this decison, and blaming all but himself and his council:-
http://cameronrose.blogspot.com/

"For six years this building has been unoccupied - effectively planning blight on the Southside community."

Far from it. If the building has been empty, that's not the fault of the planning system but the owners, past and present. It was a viable cinema before being flogged off, and bought on the 'hope' value of demolition of the site by Duddingston House Properties.

Possibly Coun Rose should at this point shut up and wait until he sees what comes out at the inquiry? He's not covering himnself in glory with his stance over this, backing the developers, although his anti-heritage views are showing again.

5

Kate,

Zurich 04/06/2009 07:30:11
#4 Buttress, I think you'll find that Cameron Rose is very much pro-heritage but, as #2 Statesman so rightly pointed out, if the councillors do not have the full information from the planning department, then they cannot judge or act appropriately!

I agree with you, though that the building was a viable and (my opinion) terrific cinema venue previously and could be again
6

Buttress,

04/06/2009 07:37:18
I don't think he is. His views on a number of matters have shown otherwise.
7

Honest Opinion 2,

Froggyland 04/06/2009 08:04:42
Kate's concluding para - YES! The New Vic heritage should prevail.
8

Buttress,

04/06/2009 10:38:24
A Blast from the Past re Coun Rose:-

'Thorny Subject

Still in Edinburgh, Planning Committee member, Councillor Cameron Rose, has taken it upon himself to expose the architectural and urban design credentials that made him an obvious choice for the job. The retired police inspector feels a “legislative look” at Historic Scotland’s listing policy should be taken, a viewpoint formed from his bewilderment that a building such as the Royal Commonwealth Pool by RMJM could possibly merit it’s A-listed status.

Showing a commendable appreciation of 1960’s architecture, Councillor Rose feels that “it’s debatable whether it has historic significance”. His real beef, however, is with a listing process that allowed two C category buildings to impede the Council’s eagerness to appease the developer of the Caltongate site next to its new headquarters. As with so many of his colleagues, he is happy to repeat the public relations rhetoric that the proposed project is “creating a new living community” in the heart of the Old Town, encouraging the thought that perhaps it is the city’s Planning Committee itself that merits a legislative look at some of its recent decisions.'

http://www.architecturescotland.co.uk/news/719/Wilson

And from his blog:-

'Friday, 11 April 2008
Blackford Conservation area debate
Today is the last day for comments on the proposed extension to the Grange Conservation area of a small patch at Blackford Station. I have submitted an argument against the extension as it is not needed, does not fit the high standard for inclusion in a conservation area and was previously not considered appropriate to include it. I am not persuaded that the restrictions conservation area status confers are in this case necessary or desireable. Edinburgh already had 39 conservation areas.'
9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 04/06/2009 20:03:31
Iongantach! (Amazing!) What are our entrepeneurs playing at?! (Golf off course, and occasionally on course.) An auditorium like that should be easy to use!

I want the Old Royal High School to be used as a "Pantheon of Great Scots", in which we honour all our great engineers, explorers, architects, artists, doctors, etc. The Old Royal High School is absolutely perfect - it has the right majesty, atmosphere, and space. Regular talks could be held for tourists in the auditorium, about specific great Scots - I suggest one talk per hour on the hour. It's perfectly sited to catch the tourist traffic, too!
10

Buttress,

04/06/2009 20:51:07
Possibly not Thomas Bouch however, although he may not qualify, being born in Cumbria (although he resided in Edinburgh, and is buried there).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bouch

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are Edinburgh’s planning regulations too strict on the city’s business community?
Yes - everything should be done to help businesses in a recession
Yes - they pale into insignificance when compared to the tram works
No - the city’s heritage and appearance can’t be compromised


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.