Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 16th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Official backing for £300m Old Town plan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 January 2008
THE biggest development in Edinburgh's Old Town since the 12th century has taken a massive step forward, after the city's top planning official comprehensively backed the controversial Caltongate plans.
Alan Henderson urged councillors to support the development, which includes a five-star hotel, a conference centre and 200 homes a stone's throw from the Royal Mile.

However, the project may yet be passed to Scottish ministers for final approval
after a stream of objections, ranging from residents to the Edinburgh World Heritage Trust, set up to protect the city's UNESCO heritage site.

Mr Henderson listed a string of benefits from the Caltongate development in his report. They included an increase in affordable housing, regeneration of a brownfield site, jobs and investment, and keeping the Royal Mile's historic façades, though buildings would be demolished.

He recommended a new CCTV scheme and a contribution of £120,000 to the £600 million tram scheme.

Mr Henderson said the development boosted the capital's economic competitiveness.

MSPs are likely to back the plan, to prove they favour the modernisation of Scotland, according to one supporter.

"I think the Parliament is keen to show that carefully considered and discussed projects do happen," he said. "It is very unlikely they would kick it into touch."

However, there have been hundreds of objections lodged against the £300 million Caltongate development. Some compromises have been made, such as scaling down the site's access to the Royal Mile to a more modest arcaded entrance. A new architect's firm, Page/Park, with a reputation for sensitive handling of protected sites, has also been brought on board.

But the demolition of two listed buildings is still bitterly opposed. Councillor David Beckett, a city-centre SNP councillor who is not on the planning committee, said: "I just feel it's not in keeping with the Old Town's character. It's really quite an insensitive project."

The developers, Mountgrange, have filed 12 separate applications for the 3.5-acre site, including office and apartment blocks, cafés and restaurants. A new "culture quarter" is promised, with music venues and artists' studios.

The planning committee includes five Liberal Democrat members, three Labour, three Conservative, three SNP and one Green member.

The Lib Dem leader of the council, Jenny Dawe, attacked the Caltongate designs last May. In the parliament, Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP MSP for Edinburgh Central, has raised similar concerns to Mr Beckett about the development. But the First Minister, Alex Salmond, has signalled his support in the past for projects like Donald Trump's golf resort and hotel.

A council spokeswoman said of Mr Henderson's report: "This is just a recommendation from planning officials based on the information they have collected. It does not mean that the committee will follow. It doesn't mean that anything is cut and dried."



The full article contains 471 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 04:45:52
So we can expect more CCTV and the contribution of £120K to the Trams. In return we get to risk a World heritage status, destroy various buildings, ruin views and acquire yet another five star hotel- as an aside is is true that the Sheraton was at only 25% occupancy over the holiday season?

25% of 'affordable homes'?
20% of 'affordable homes'?
15%
10%
5%

How many?

2

madrab,

edinburgh 26/01/2008 09:37:51
Does anyone know if the payment of £120,000 was compulsory?

If it was, why is the sum so small? I'm sure given the size of this development that Mountgrange could afford more than this. You wouldn't be able to buy a one bedroom flat in that area for £120,000.

If it wasn't compulsory to make this payment, can anyone explain when it became acceptable to bribe the planning department?
3

ddmc,

26/01/2008 09:39:44
what price is affordable ?
4

Buttress,

26/01/2008 11:12:45
Suggest readers look at the comments here:

http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/topstories/Objectors-defeated-as-planners-push.3711511.jp#2412330

Ignore the spin in the article, read the comments

and here:

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/

http://www.eh8.org.uk/

http://www.ewht.org.uk/Home.aspx


If these plans are passed, with the insensitive architecture and demolition of listed buildings and conservation area buildings with spurious claims of jobs and money (which another and better development could bring) then Edinburgh is in danger of being put on the danger list of UNESCO, as the very reasons for World Heritage Site status are being eroded. Hopefully the new Director at EWHT can bring a voice of sanity to the city, which seems to be being lead by planners with no idea and in the thrall of developers. The planning report is a joke.

This will lose the city billions in tourism, as being inscribed on the WHS list is something which draws in visitors worldwide.

Interesting also how little in 'planning gain' cash the council is asking - derisory considering the size and cost and potential profits from this development.




5

Buttress,

26/01/2008 14:13:45
And read also this:

'Britain's Lost Cities by Gavin Stamp
What the Luftwaffe began, arrogant, philistine town planners finished off. Now a new study names the guilty men...'

'Keith Waterhouse summed things up in 1975 in two sentences that will resonate with anyone who has ever sat narcoleptically through a local council meeting: “I would put most of the blame on the councillors who invite and encourage the laying-waste of their own townships. The trouble is that many of them are not very bright.” '

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3050987.ece


6

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 17:34:48
Have a look at the new council building right on edge of this development, at Waverley. Designer furniture for all staff - when businesses are going bust with rates to pay for their excesses and follies like trams.
7

McGinty,

26/01/2008 18:07:46
Interesting Glasgow doesn't get the same interest when similar happens here. We've all been brainwashed and numbed into acceptance of mindless vandalism at the hands of planners. One sympathises that economic development = difficult planning decisions but how come there are some excellently preserved towns all over Europe, yet Britain has sites comparable to the worst crap the Soviets excreted.
8

Buttress,

26/01/2008 18:30:15
http://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/edinburgh_world_heritage_site.htm

Possibly new faces will have some influence?
9

IainA,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 18:32:55
Did anyone read the glossy mag and CD the caltongate group sent out? apparently issue 4? Turns out there were no previous issues and the content was a series of pieces claiming that everyone and their dog supported the project. Total rubbish and the usual attempt by a rather dodgy consortium to spin the facts by using a rather dodgy PR firm.

The problem of course is that really, the City Council have always been suckers for the promises of development groups offering to bring business, jobs and benefits to the city and to keep the architecture in keeping with the surrounding environment. Promises which turn out to be well, a bit on the empty side.

I keep thinking of such sensitive treatments as the Apex hotel in the grassmarket, the frontage of which is truly a sensitive homage to georgian architecture.
10

Buttress,

26/01/2008 19:03:23
The 'vison' is available as a download on the Mountgrange site. Given that they can't spell development ot doesn't bode well:

'DIGITAL FLY THROUGH FOR CALTONGATE DEVELOPEMENT'

http://www.caltongate.com/The-Vision.aspx


Same old story - and councils fall for it every time. Frequently the problem is poor quality people working for planning departments and councillors with no idea either about architectures.
11

mad moo,

edinburgh 26/01/2008 19:28:57
More rubbish reporting from the scotsman group, their green policy of recycling must applie to news stories too. this one recycled from evening news yesterday

"MSPs are likely to back the plan, to prove they favour the modernisation of Scotland, according to one supporter.
"I think the Parliament is keen to show that carefully considered and discussed projects do happen," he said. "It is very unlikely they would kick it into touch."

What supporter was this ?
Perhaps one of their pr firms employees Donald Anderson? or perhaps the ex planning convenor Trevor Davis who tried to approve as much of this as possible before being given the boot in May.

Interesting that MSP's for the area Margot Mc Donald, Shirley Somerville and even Sarah Boyak have all raised concerns about parts of this development like the lack of affordable and family housing, the demolition of flats on the Royal Mile and the fact that the DTI grant given to Mountgrange to include ground source heating will not benefit any of the affordable housing which is proposed for areas currently in public ownership.
12

Buttress,

26/01/2008 20:48:41
I think 'the Parliament' will not get the chance to have any say in the matter at all. It's a great pity naive reporters don't check a few facts about planning issues before writing this ill-informed twaddle, fed to them by Mountgrange spin doctors.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should Heritage Scotland lose its power to stop changes to B-listed buildings in the city?
Yes, if it helps to speed up development in the city
Yes, far too many buildings don’t deserve to be protected
No, the council can’t be trusted to get it right

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.