Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Zoo will sell land to house-builders for regeneration funds



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 November 2007
BOSSES at Edinburgh Zoo are to press ahead with plans to sell off part of the site for housing to help fund a multi-million pound redevelopment of the attraction.
The zoo had expected to secure the go-ahead last month to allow up to 100 new homes to be built on the land.

But plans to plough cash raised from the land sale into a £72 million revamp of its historic site on Corstorphine Hill were thrown into c
haos when the city's planning committee voted to retain it as green belt land - against the advice of the authority's own officials.

Officials have vowed to fight the rejection of the plans, which would have raised more than £20 million by disposing of a swathe of land to the west of the zoo.

The decision threatens a number of schemes involved in a 20-year masterplan to improve the zoo, including a new entrance and visitor centre on Corstorphine Road, several modern new animal enclosures, and new research facilities which would be open to the public. Improvements in the general infrastructure around the site are also said to be long overdue.

David Windmill, the chief executive, yesterday said they had ruled out pursuing a stand-alone planning application for the housing development, opting instead to make a strong case at next year's public inquiry into a city-wide blueprint, which will explore the fate of the zoo site.

He said: "We have now decided to make our case through the inquiry process. We will then leave it to the inquiry reporter to make their recommendations.

"Edinburgh Zoo will definitely be staying in Edinburgh; what is uncertain at the moment is what kind of zoo will exist," Mr Windmill went on.

"We want to create a world-class visitor attraction here, with modern facilities and new exhibits. If we sit on our hands, the zoo will go into decline."

The zoo is banking on the independent inquiry reporter, who will be appointed by the Scottish Government, coming down on the side of the attraction because of the promised improvements.

Property experts say it would be "extremely unwise" for the council to overturn an inquiry reporter's recommendation, as this would be at the heart of any subsequent appeal over a rejected planning application.

One insider said: "The decision on the final local plan is up to the council, but if it rejected the reporter's recommendation on the zoo site, and the zoo eventually wins an appeal, the legal bill could run well into six figures."

The city's local plan, which effectively lays down the ground-rules that developers will have to work from for the next eight years, is already set to be challenged by a number of housebuilders trying to have green belt sites across Edinburgh freed up.



The full article contains 476 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2007 12:05 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Zoo
 
1

AbandonAllHope,

27/11/2007 08:03:42

Theres just something wrong about zoos, as a child its exotic, as an adult its cruel.

2

Cadgers,

Perth 27/11/2007 09:15:55

#1 Yes, they are all so much better off and safer in Africa. Try telling that to the black Rhinos in Zimbabwe.

http://www.sokwanele.com/thisiszimbabwe/archives/690

3

McMicrogal,

27/11/2007 11:33:10

The zoo is part of many breeding programmes which include release of certain species - they are no longer the menageries of Victorian times.

4

honestly7,

Edinburgh 27/11/2007 11:48:57

What scaremongering!
There are a lot of what ifs here....and a lot of gambling by the Zoo on perceived outcomes. Of course, like the last vote, it may not go in their favour. Have their property experts considered that or are they confident that their bully boy tactics will force through their own way?
If the Reporter decides in the Zoo's favour to take the Green Belt out of the Local Plan, and the Council accept the recommendation, why would the Council then vote to reject the subsequent planning application? If they don't accept the Reporter's recommendation and the Zoo still apply for permisison for Green Belt land, then too bad...no grounds for appeal as the decision was taken in accordance with the Local Plan.
Now here is controversy...what if the Council decided NOT to lease the Zoo the parts of Corstorphine Hill that they expect to be granted for their new development, once they have built on their own land. Would they threaten to move to Glasgow again?
We should expect lots more stories like these in the press no doubt planted by the Zoo in the months to come.

5

Wild about woods,

West Edinburgh 28/11/2007 22:52:53

I object to the Zoo trying to blackmail the CEC into allowing houses to be built in their piece of the Greenbelt, but I am utterly incensed at their rarely mentioned intention of taking over part of the Corstorphine Hill Local Nature Reserve. Should the Zoo be successful with their building plans there are at least two other developers nearby waiting to follow suit. Soon very little of the current woodland will be left for the Scottish native species who live there.
I wonder if Mr Windmill believes that Brazil should stop destroying its rainforest and can he see any similarities closer to his own domain ?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.