Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fletcher's unjust red card merely underlines Uefa's lack of appeal

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 May 2009
ALTHOUGH the physical discomfort experienced by Denis Law in his right knee was severe enough when the Manchester United player lay in hospital after a botched cartilage operation ruled him out of the 1968 European Cup final, it was almost a minor irritant compared to the emotional upheaval experienced by his compatriot Darren Fletcher as the midfield player struggled to come to terms with the unfairness of missing out on the Champions League final this month.
Like a condemned man who is punished for a crime he didn't commit, the player will only find aggravation rather than solace in his innocence. It will be no comfort to either the young Scot or his club that Roberto Rosetti's refereeing error in the se
cond leg of the semi-final against Arsenal at the Emirates and the ensuing intransigence of Uefa, European football's governing body, have combined to pilfer what would have been the most notable moment of Fletcher's career.

Apart from Law, who was resigned to missing out 40 odd years ago because of injury, United's Roy Keane and Paul Scholes were also denied an opportunity to play in the 1999 Champions League final against Bayern Munich after picking up yellow cards in the second leg of the semi-final against Juventus that season. Of course the punishment was harsh, and the sense of disappointment for Keane and Scholes at missing out on a showpiece game was deeply felt, but it wasn't half as cruel as the fate which befell Fletcher.

As the former England manager Graham Taylor observed: "It takes something away from the game, that red card. You feel for people like Fletcher. He's a first-class pro."

Over the two legs of the tie against Arsenal, one of the reasons Arsene Wenger's side struggled to get into the match was because of the tireless, unselfish shifts put in by Fletcher. In a team of glittering stars, the Scot would deserve a nomination for United's best supporting player. His energetic runs stop the opposition from finding space and tidy work on the ball help his own side keep possession.

It was typical of Fletcher, when the game was won and Arsenal were playing only for pride, that he should track a run from Cesc Fabregas deep into United's penalty box and somehow get his boot round the Spaniard's legs to clear the ball before the collision brought down his opponent.

From the Italian referee's vantage point, standing behind the incident, he couldn't see whether or not Fletcher got the ball. Rather than consult his assistants, however, Rosetti immediately awarded Arsenal a penalty and showed Fletcher a red card for denying Fabregas a goalscoring opportunity. As the TV replays showed, he was wrong on both counts.

While mistakes are part and parcel of the ebb and flow of football and it would be wrong in retrospect ever to change their bearing on the outcome of a match, it defies logic an unjust suspension can't be overturned for a subsequent game simply because Uefa has no appeals procedure.

That's why it was disingenuous for one unnamed Uefa source, who was quoted by a respected agency yesterday, to claim: "It opens Pandora's box if you can challenge every decision. And if you rule that it is not a red card, then you are also saying it is not a penalty, and therefore not a goal, and what do you do then? Start changing the results of matches?"

If Fletcher had been playing in a domestic match in either England or Scotland and the same incident had taken place, the Scot would have been exonerated and his suspension over-ruled. Both the FA and the SFA have found ways to apply common sense and rescind red cards when referees acknowledge errors.

In Uefa's through-the-looking-glass world, however, not even an admission by the referee that he got it wrong will change the ruling. The organisation has confirmed no appeal can be made against Tuesday's decision, no matter what the referee says in his report.

"Manchester United have the right to protest the decision," volunteered a spokesman for Uefa. "However, the protest is only admissible if the referee made an error and mistakenly identified and cautioned or sent off the wrong player. There cannot be an appeal against a factual decision taken by the referee and there is nothing to indicate the referee made a mistake in identifying Fletcher as the player he penalised."

So, Fletcher, who sat on the bench when United were triumphant in Moscow last year, must serve a statutory one-match ban and will miss the final in Rome later this month. "I feel so frustrated for him," said team-mate Patrice Evra. It's a sentiment everyone who cares about fair play in sport will share.

Costly cards which deprived players of final appearances

Midfielder Darren Fletcher will miss the Champions League final after being dismissed in the semi-final against Arsenal. But the Scotland international is not the first player to have to watch his team-mates contest a final from the stands.

ROY KEANE – 1999 CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FINAL

THE former Manchester United captain had arguably one of his finest games against Juventus in the 1999 semi-final, scoring a header to spearhead United's comeback. However, the Irishman picked up a booking, ruling him out of the side's memorable victory over Bayern Munich.

PAUL SCHOLES – 1999 CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FINAL

Scholes scored a vital away goal against Inter Milan in the last eight but an untimely card ruled him out the showpiece.

LAURENT BLANC – 1998 WORLD CUP FINAL

In the semi-final, talismanic defender Blanc and Croatia's Slaven Bilic jostled at a free-kick, with the Frenchman raising a hand to Bilic's face. The result was a much-criticised Bilic collapsing theatrically to the floor and robbing the eventual winners of their captain.

MICHAEL BALLACK – 2002 WORLD CUP FINAL

Playmaker Ballack scored the only goal in Germany's 1-0 semi-final win over South Korea, but was cautioned for a cynical foul, depriving the finalists of a key player. They lost 2-0 to Brazil.

PAVEL NEDVED – 2003 CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FINAL

The Czech Republic captain scored to help Juventus through to the final against Real Madrid but was also booked for a foul on Steve McManaman.

LOUIS SAHA – 2006 WORLD CUP FINAL

In the semi-final against Italy, France striker Saha received a yellow card putting him out of the final against Italy.

LUIS GARCIA AND HAYDEN MULLINS – 2006 FA CUP FINAL

In a bizarre twist, a late-season league game pitted finalists Liverpool and West Ham against each other in a dress rehearsal for the Millennium Stadium. Both Mullins and Garcia saw red for a fracas which ensured they would play no part.













Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 May 2009 10:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Mike Aitken
 
1

Shantaram,

07/05/2009 02:01:58
Mike Aitken - It was only an error in your opinion. In my opinion it was a reckless challenge by Fletcher and a deserved penalty and conssequent red card. It's tough on the lad, but rules are rules.
2

16thMay1998,

Edinburgh 07/05/2009 02:40:12
#1 "Rules are rules"...erm, isn't that what this whole article is about? Be honest, did you read it or skim it?
No great fan of Fletcher myself, but the fact remains he got the ball. Wasn't actually a foul, so shouldn't therefore have been a penalty or a red card.
3

Shantaram,

07/05/2009 03:39:27
#2 - He got the merest of touches to the ball with the studs of his right boot and the ball fell in front of Fabregas, who still had a chance to go on and shoot, but Fletcher's left leg then followed through and tripped Fabregas, which is the point when I believe the ref gave the penalty.

Also, BEFORE he got his merest touch of the ball, he had his hand on the Arsenal player's shoulder, pulling him back.

All of which is why I disagree with the article.
4

Laddy Saunders,

07/05/2009 09:15:47
#3 He won the ball, it doesn’t matter if the subsequent slide/momentum takes out the player, he won the ball 1st. If someone does a slide tackle which kicks the balls out of the pitch and the attacking player proceeds to fall over the trailing leg it isnt a free kick. It would have been great to see a Scot in the champs league, Fletch has been awesome this season for Man U and watching Chelsea last night simply highlighted the lads professionalism. Shantaram - quite frankly i dont think you have a clue about football, stick to playing it on the computer.
5

Kiwiarab,

Christchurch, New Zealand 07/05/2009 11:00:21
#3

WRONG!

Contact with ball then opponent = no foul. Some of the most telling tackles a defender will make will involve the merest touch of the ball and following contact with the opponent.


6

A Jambo come rain or shine,

07/05/2009 12:29:19
#1&3 I can only think that you dislike Man U/Fletcher or both. There is no explanation that can uphold the red card. Slightest touch or not (not as it happens as the ball changed direction by about a 30o angle!) he got the ball. Put it this way, had Fabregas been in the process of shooting when Fletcher touched the ball, Fabregas would have taken a fresh air swipe because the ball wouldn't have been where his foot was aiming - due to the tackle!
Any chance of it being overturned will have been quashed after last night because if they overturn Fletchers then Barca will ask for their red to be overturned which is still harder to prove.
7

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 07/05/2009 18:27:37
"Shantaram"

The only time a tackle that wins the ball first would be deemed a foul is if the tackle was made between the legs, or was made in a reckless manner, or was made with excessive force. None of those conditions were true for Fletcher's tackle. It was a great challenge and the referee got it wrong.

FIFA rules are available online as a pdf document. Perhaps you should take a look through the relevant section on foul play before you comment further.
8

Media at One,

07/05/2009 19:15:20
It wasnt a penalty, that has been proved on all television channels around the world -
But forget that, this is about the appeals system
9

Fitba Krazy,

07/05/2009 22:38:06
Are you guys who say it was not a foul blind or incapable of understanding that if you first put your hand on the shoulder of an opponent who is running away from you in the penalty box and tackle him from behind you are liable to be penalised? It doesn't matter if you get the ball because you have ALREADY COMMITTED a foul.

Is it too much for you to comprehend that if you do this AND are also the last man that the referee might just see it as a foul and penalise you with a red card?

Why do you think Fletcher put his hand on his shoulder?

Was it to slow him down, perhaps, so that he could then get to the ball?

LOOK again and stop being so boringly biased, puleeeeese. You are only making a mockery of the rules or are completely unaware of the FACT that you are not allowed to put your hand on an opponents shoulder when he is running in front of you. I just don't think you get it, but you would be most annoyed if it was your team's player who was about to score and was slowed down by an opponent PUTTING HIS HAND ON HIS SHOULDER TO SLOW HIM DOWN SO THAT HE COULD GET ROUND HIM TO THE BALL.
10

Fitba Krazy,

08/05/2009 00:08:26
#8 Media at One

It looks like they might be able to appeal the red card after all. I hope they do and he can play because you should only get a yellow for that at worst in my opinion as it was not a violent challenge and the penalty kick is enough in that situation. Also this kind of thing goes on all the time without players being penalised.

It's the inconsistency that is most annoying as in other situations also.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.