Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Seen to be green – more environmental heroes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 April 2009
TODAY The Scotsman continues its countdown of the top 50 green pioneers in Scotland, with a list that includes engineers, academics, activists and writers.
Numbers 21-30 on the list, compiled by the Scottish Sustainable Development Forum, show that, in terms of environmental thinking, Scotland often leads the world. Our list includes Allan Thomson, who helped to establish the world's first commercial wave farm on Islay, and Barry Sinclair, who worked on the first island wind farm on Fair Isle.

The first Scottish Green List features Bill Ritchie and Alastair McIntosh, two major players in Scottish land reform.

The countdown continues tomorrow, working towards Scotland's top ten green heroes, who will be honoured at a ceremony in The Scotsman building tomorrow night and listed in Thursday's paper. One of the judging panel, Professor James Curran, chairman of the SSDF, said those on the Scottish Green List should be "thanked, celebrated, encouraged and supported for not just talking the talk, but walking the walk".

• Yesterday, we used the wrong image for Mike Robinson, chair of Stop Climate Chaos Scotland.



30 John Ferguson

As he stood on the platform of an oilrig watching 15 flares burn over the North Sea, John Ferguson realised things had to change – and hestarted applying for environmental jobs.

He got "hooked on waste" and helped to draw up Scotland's waste management plan, working to increase recycling and joining the government's Zero Waste think tank. He is now masterminding an eco-innovation park in Perthshire.



29 Barry Sinclair

If you live somewhere as remote as Fair Isle, you have to be resourceful – and the islanders proved so when, inspired by the Seventies' oil crisis, they set up the world's first community-run, standalone, wind-turbine project. Engineer Barry Sinclair, chairman of the Fair Isle Electricity Council, was also the man responsible for keeping the engines running when it opened in 1982. Electricity charges went down from 13p to 4p per kilowatt hour.



28 Clare Symonds

Clare Symonds is an independent planning consultant on the brink of setting up a new group, Planning Democracy. Her mission is to challenge planning procedures, showing how communities can be railroaded into accepting unpopular developments. She says guidelines do not allow enough consultation. She says plans for a new Forth road bridge and coal-fired power station in Ayrshire are examples of inadequate consultation.



27 Dave du Feu

The computing officer for Edinburgh University Medical School is also a very prominent cycling campaigner. With the campaigning group Spokes, he has successfully lobbied governments and councils to do more to support cyclists and maintain cycle networks. He has edited more than 90 newsletters and conducts a survey every year into how much is being spent on cycle projects across Scotland.



26 Tessa Tennant

Tessa Tennant is the chair of the ICE Organisation – a carbon management and loyalty programme. A pioneer of sustainable development, she co-founded the UK's first equitable investment fund for sustainable development and was chair and co-founder of the UK Social Investment Forum and of the Carbon Disclosure Project. Since 1997 she has concentrated on encouraging socially responsible investment in Asia.



25 Bill Ritchie

When he was made an MBE in 2007, Bill Ritchie joked it would mean "a severe dent in my reputation as a revolutionary". The Oxford-educated crofter has been involved in two community buy-outs which revolutionised the political and economic landscape of Scotland. He was secretary of the Assynt Crofters' Trust in its buy-out of the 21,000-acre North Assynt Estate in 1993, and then played a major role in the purchase of the 44,000-acre Drumrunie and Glencanisp estates by the Assynt Foundation.



24 Richard Dixon

Trained as an astrophysicist, the director of WWF Scotland has become a leading campaigner on climate change. WWF Scotland helped to gather 20,000 signatures in support of a climate change bill which would reduce carbon emissions by 80 per cent by 2011. Dr Dixon, who also worked for Friends of the Earth Scotland, is a major supporter of renewable energy and an opponent of nuclear power plants. He caused controversy recently by saying a failure to be energy-efficient should be treated as a crime.



23 Allan Thomson

The marine energy expert who, in 2005, created Aquamarine, the world's first commercial wave-power energy plant on Islay.

In 2007, the company he founded merged with Renewable Energies Ltd to create a new company dedicated to developing commercial wave-power technologies.

The company is currently testing the Aquamarine Oyster, the "big floating hinge", which it hopes will become available commercially in 2014.



22 Alastair McIntosh

Writer, activist and campaigner Alastair McIntosh was once described as "Naomi Klein in a Fair Isle jumper". But despite his homespun style, this Scottish maverick academic has quite a following.

Thom Yorke of Radiohead is such a fan of his book Son and Soil that he has taken to waving it over his head at concerts, urging his fans to buy a copy. McIntosh campaigned in support of the community buy-out of Eigg and against the superquarry on Harris and is a director of the Galgael Trust.



Writer in love with landscape

21 Kathleen Jamie


The work of Kathleen Jamie is, said the critic Richard Mabey, "as close as writing gets to a conversation with the natural world". The Fife writer has been chosennot for environmental activism – but for the way she helps us look afresh at our surroundings.

One of her most recent projects has been to write a collection of pieces about Jura for Spirit of Jura, about the writers' retreat on the island.

Mark Lambert, director of the Scottish Book Trust, said: "We chose Kathleen because she is without rival as a poet and an observer of the natural environment. She very simply but very powerfully gives a sense of how incredible Scotland's landscape is, without being at all strident.

"She does what all great writers do, which is show and not tell."

David Robinson, The Scotsman's books editor, said: "Kathleen Jamie writes nature poetry with the same attention to detail as a great landscape photographer. She is precise, illuminating, and above all clearly focused."


YESTERDAY: 50 - 31

The full article contains 1039 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

El Franko,

Dagenham 21/04/2009 09:29:15
Better than yesterday's list, so the ranking process is credible for me. Except for #24, who is clearly an enemy of the people and of decent, tolerant society. And #26 seems a tad on the sinister side. But best of all, none of their blurbs mentions 'climate change'. Is the mojo of that phrase fading, or am I clutching at a straw here?
2

eyeswider,

21/04/2009 10:06:05
China.

Coal.

Lots.

Good luck with that.
3

Climate change is real,

Edinburgh 21/04/2009 10:27:09
I'm sure Richard Dixon will be mildly amused by the insult. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

As for climate change, it is real. Get over trying to pretend it is not, even the oil companies have largely given up trying to claim that. The argument now is about how we should deal with climate change.

As for China, they are many things including the manufacturer of most of the solar tubes used in solar thermal panels. They developed the engineering and are now making a tidy profit out of it.
4

El Franko,

21/04/2009 10:41:35
#3 'climate change is real'. Well, blow me down with a shamal. If you can point to a time when the climate hasn't changed, then you are pointing at the earth before an atmosphere appeared around it. It changed before homosapiens, it changed during homosapiens, and it will change again with or without homosapiens, and there is two-thirds of very little that homosapiens can do to have any appreciable impact on it whatsoever. (excuse the curious word for mankind but the Hootsmon pc word checker disnae like the correct version).
5

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/04/2009 10:43:23
Response to Sara MacLennan post yesterday (re her inclusion in yesterday's listing)
Many thanks for taking the time to respond - much appreciated.
Firstly. let me be clear - our climate is changing as it has done for time immemorial. I am, therefore, NOT a climate change denier.
What I am is an anthropogenic global warming denier - based on a long since discredited theory - after all life on planet earth is entirely dependent on CO2 and many of the steps taken by government to allegedly mitigate this effect are useless.
That said, I recognise that fossil fuels are a finite resource and we need to be prepared for when these eventually run out - AND teaching children to respect our environment is entirely laudable and to be encouraged. I would like to learn a bit more about the "unbiased scientific facts" you refer to? Note that Seanie's references are highly selective and strongly biased - try looking at the web site Watts Up With That (http://wattsupwiththat.com).
What I object to is children being sat down in front of a screen to be shown Al Gore's scaremongering video.
I hope this clarifies my position
6

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 21/04/2009 10:47:25
Wal Thornhill:

Global warming has been deemed a fact. However, the inconvenient truth is that humans are not causing it. Al Gore has been given poor advice. Like Darwin's theory of evolution and Big Bang cosmology, global warming by greenhouse gas emissions has undergone that curious social process in which a scientific theory is promoted to a secular myth. When in fact, science is ignorant about the source of the heat — the Sun.

The really inconvenient truth is that we cannot control Nature. But we can begin to learn our true place in the Universe and figure out how to cope rationally with inevitable change. Clearly, reducing air pollution is an admirable goal in itself. But we must not be deluded into thinking it will affect climate significantly. The connection between warming and atmospheric pollution is more asserted than demonstrated, while the connection with variations in the Sun has been demonstrated.


It is crucial that we know what is really going on in space-and in particular how the Sun really works. By historical accident the theory of what makes the Sun shine was developed at the time nuclear energy was discovered and when plasma physics was in its infancy. The Sun, instead of being an aboriginal campfire in the sky with limited fuel, became a "thermonuclear campfire" with practically limitless fuel. Not such a big advance over Stone Age thinking!

The electrical model of the Sun and its environment answers the question of how the solar cycle can have more effect on the weather than expected from solar heating alone. Because the planets are minor electrodes in the Sun's circuit, they are subject to the full variation of the galactic electrical input. It explains the simultaneous warming of other planets and changes in their atmospheres. Even distant Pluto (at the time still a planet) baffled astronomers by continuing to warm up eighteen years after its orbit began to take it further from the Sun. Electrical energy may constitute a major
7

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/04/2009 11:25:48
I totally agree #6. The fear factor being built on the back of a totally unproven theory - a theory developed many years ago and which has not been shown to be at all consistent with actual factual climate behaviour in the past two decades. Whereas the sun has been studied and shown to align with earth temperature - the more sunspots the higher the temperature and vice versa.
Let's all do what we can to improve and enhance our environment BUT we must stop the zealots from using unsustantiated fear factors to try to influence decisions. This, as has been shown already, results in silly and expensive decisions being made for all the wrong reasons
8

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 21/04/2009 15:04:39
6 Yok

AGW is still at the hypothesis stage and shows no signs of becoming scientific theory any time soon. That would require experimental or empirical evidence. So far we see none!
9

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/04/2009 17:36:12
Yet again not one of these individuals has reduced CO2 by as much as a gram. Where does the Scotsman find them?
10

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/04/2009 17:37:12
I should be on this list - I have 3 low energy bulbs now!!
11

Incandescent,

21/04/2009 18:16:32
#3 "As for climate change, it is real. "

And an astrophysicist is just the man to convince folk. come to think of it, what does astrophysics even have to do with wildlife. Somethings just not right here.
12

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 21/04/2009 18:36:07
"Greenness never made a leaf."

However the "Scotsman" could use their initiative to publish a page by each person on the green list to promote thinking and debate. It's what serious daily newspapers should be doing.
13

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:11:00
The American Physical Society;

http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/07_1.cfm

“The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.”
14

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:11:27
The Royal Society;

http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=6229

"Our scientific understanding of climate change is sufficiently sound to make us highly confident that greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming. Science moves forward by challenge and debate and this will continue. However, none of the current criticisms of climate science, nor the alternative explanations of global warming are well enough founded to make not taking any action the wise choice. The science clearly points to the need for nations to take urgent steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, as much and as fast as possible, to reduce the more severe aspects of climate change. We must also prepare for the impacts of climate change, some of which are already inevitable."
15

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:11:43
A Joint Science Academies’ statement;

http://www.icsu-africa.org/Resource_centre/Globalresponseclimatechange.pdf

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action. It is vital that all nations identify cost effective steps that they can take now, to contribute to substantial and long-term reduction in net global greenhouse gas emissions."
16

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:12:05
The American Association for the Advancement of Science;

http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society."
17

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:12:16
A statement from The Royal Meteorological Society;

http://www.rmets.org/news/detail.php?ID=332

"The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is unequivocal in its conclusion that climate change is happening and that humans are contributing significantly to these changes. The evidence, from not just one source but a number of different measurements, is now far greater and the tools we have to model climate change contain much more of our scientific knowledge within them. The world’s best climate scientists are telling us its time to do something about it."
18

seanie,

21/04/2009 21:12:30
Remember...

...the last five years have been warmer than the five before, which in turn were warmer than the five before them.

When average temperature goes up, that's called warming.
19

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 21/04/2009 22:17:48
"Normally the sun goes through an 11-year cycle of more, then fewer, sunspots and a similar cycle when it comes to solar wind strength. But scientists said the sun is in "a very prolonged minimum." Typically a solar minimum lasts about a year, but this low point has gone on since the summer of 2006.

It is "like turning down the heat on a stove," said McComas, a scientist who used the Ulysses solar probe to document a significantly weaker solar wind. The 17-year-old space probe, which circles the sun from a distance of about 337 million miles, has been studying the environment above and below the poles of the sun.
Recently, the solar wind has been about 14 percent cooler and 17 percent less dense, according to a paper by McComas in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

For the past 15 years or so, the sun's overall output seems to be lower than normal, even when it was at the maximum for its cycle about eight years ago, McComas said. It may be part of a centurylong trend, said Boston University space physicist Nancy Crooker."

The gravity-fed thermonuclear model assumed by mainstream science is is not explained by physics. The electric (therefore magnetic) model which radiates from the surface plasma agrees with known observations. It's an electric sun! in an electric spiraled galaxy.
20

seanie,

21/04/2009 22:39:03
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/hadcrut3gl.txt

The HADCRU anomalies averaged over five year periods.

1994-1998: + 0.296
1999-2003: + 0.382
2004-2008: + 0.416

So the most recent five year period is warmer than the previous five years, which itself is warmer than the period before that.
21

seanie,

21/04/2009 22:39:19
The GISS anomalies;

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

The anomalies averaged over five year periods.

1994-1998: + 0.38
1999-2003: + 0.45
2004-2008: + 0.53

Again the most recent five year period is warmer than the previous five years, which itself is warmer than the period before that.
22

seanie,

21/04/2009 22:39:36
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/gtc2008.csv

The last decade of the 20th century averaged 0.268°C above the 61-90 baseline.

So far this century is averaging at 0.428°C above the baseline.

It a very safe bet that the first decade of the 21st century will end up the warmest since records began.
23

seanie,

21/04/2009 22:39:53
The warming trend continues.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It's physical properties and role as such have been accepted science for over a century; since about 1860.

CO2 levels have risen signifcantly since the onset of industrialisation; from around 280ppm to around 385ppm. There is no scientific dispute on this.

That increase is due to human activity. We know this from the entirely uncontroversial fact that burning fossil fuels creates CO2, and the equally obvious fact that we've been burning a lot of fossil fuels since the onset of industrialisation.

The isotopic signature of CO2 in the atmosphere also confirms this.

That an increase in C02 should generally lead to an increase in temperature is not some wild and extravagant speculation. It's exactly what accepted scientific understanding tells us to expect.

It might be possible that there is some completely unknown and as yet to be discovered mechanism that is responsible for the warming trend. But that seems unlikely since we'd also have discover some hitherto completely unknown reason why the increase in CO2 isn't causing it.

Because basic physics tells us IT SHOULD BE.
24

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 21/04/2009 23:23:22
But WILL it continue? There's a good argument too that cooling is as likely. We can't tell China what to do, and the USA has its own agenda. Restoring tropical forest cover is a sound idea -- is there a global determination for this?

Meanwhile we could push with tidal projects in Scotland, at least, and organise conferences for the new energy sources, that have already been tested, and are ready to prototype. Whether that elusive thing called scottish money can ever be found for it, we'll see.

The extreme greenhouse atmosphere of Venus is not why it stays so hot.
25

Climate change is real,

23/04/2009 10:19:24
Global warming and cooling has been going on for at least 650,000 years (see An Inconvenient Truth), but that has always been between upper and lower bands. We are now outside the upper band by a considerable way and we know, with as much certainty as science can ever have, that we have caused this.


We have two choices. If we pull our fingers out now, not at some time in the vague future, and cut emissions dramatically then warming will continue for a while and then reduce to manageable levels.

The second choice is to do what government is doing, be that the SNP in Scotland or the Labour Party in London and continue to stick our heads in the sand. If that happens then we will soon reach a tipping point.

Those who think the second approach is the one we should take would be well advised to watch the short animated film called "Wake Up, Freak Out - then Get a Grip" at http://wakeupfreakout.org/film/tipping.html to see what that is likely to be like.

They should also watch the Age of Stupid. As the Head of Climate Impacts at Met Office Hadley Centre says in http://www.ageofstupid.net/the_science

"The frightening vision of the near future depicted in The Age of Stupid is not science fiction.

"The world in which the Archivist lives is the clearly visible destination of present - 'business as usual' (BAU) - policies regarding greenhouse gas emissions. Whether we get there in 2055 or 2075, we don't need to do anything different from what we are doing today to arrive in the terrifying future shown in our film."


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.