Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Film review: The Banishment



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
THE BANISHMENT (12A)
**
DIRECTED BY: ANDREY ZVYAGINTSEV
STARRING: KONSTANTIN LAVRONENKO, MARIA BONNEVIE, ALEXANDER BALUEV

RUSSIAN director Andrey Zvyagintsev made a big impression on the international scene a few years ago when his deb
ut film The Retur won the Golden Lion at the 2003 Venice Film Festival and went on to become a considerable critical success around the world. His second feature, The Banishment, has fared rather less well, dividing critics at Cannes last year and taking more than a year to find a UK distributor. It's not hard to see why. Though it begins intriguingly enough in the guise of a thriller, what transpires is a willfully slow, painfully laboured exploration of the modern family full of religious metaphors, pompous symbolism and pseudo-intellectual attempts at profundity. Based on a 1953 William Saroyan novella entitled The Laughing Matter – now there's an ironic title – The Banishment revolves around a gun-shot wounded criminal called Alex (Konstantin Lavronenko) who returns to his seemingly idyllic life in the country only to be informed by his wife that she's pregnant with another man's child. Wounded, furious and humiliated, he forces her to get an abortion – a course of action that has tragic results. Regret, guilt and the nature of forgiveness are the dominant themes coursing through a beautifully composed, relentlessly morose picture, but to what purpose? There's no emotional pay-off, just obfuscation and pretension.





The full article contains 235 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 7:29 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Film reviews
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.