Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

A less than towering start for Sarkozy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 July 2008
SHE sings in English and dreams in Italian, while his roots reach to Hungary and Greece. Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife, Carla, could be a metaphor for a harmonious, borderless Europe.
The real Europe is a cacophonous place, however, and, as the Sarkozys became the continent's public face yesterday, with France taking over the presidency of the European Union for the first time since 2000, it was a case of bickering as usual.

Peter Mandelson, the EU trade commissioner, chose yesterday to retaliate for comments Mr Sarkozy had made about him on Monday.

Another note of disharmony came from Lech Kaczynski, the Polish president, who said ratifying the EU's Lisbon treaty would be "pointless" after the Irish rejected it last month. Vaclav Klaus, the Czech president, has already voiced similar sentiments.

Officially, yesterday was a cause for celebration – the Eiffel Tower was illuminated in the blue and yellow of the EU flag – but there were glaring problems behind the scenes, principally Ireland's vote last month to reject a treaty meant to make the EU work better. Mr Sarkozy has a personal stake in seeing the deal through, as he was one of its architects. But the Irish have thrown the whole process into turmoil: it can only take effect if ratified by all 27 EU states.

François Fillon, the French prime minister, insisted the treaty was still alive. "The ratification process is continuing," he said, adding there would be "permanent dialogue" with Ireland to try to find a way out of the impasse. "In the meantime, Europe must move forward," he said.

As France takes the EU helm, officials stressed that Paris remained firmly against EU membership for Turkey. It will allow entry negotiations that began in 2005 to continue, but only in selected areas that do not go to the heart of membership.

Mr Sarkozy's brash style has already caused irritation. On television on Monday evening, he slammed Mr Mandelson and the head of the World Trade Organisation, saying they wanted to make job-destroying concessions in global trade talks.

Mr Mandelson responded forcibly yesterday, saying the French president's comments were disappointing, unjustified and uncalled-for, and undermined the EU's trade position ahead of world trade talks in Geneva later this month.

Last night, Mr Mandelson, who had been in Paris with his fellow commissioners to mark the start of the French presidency, snubbed dinner with Mr Sarkozy at the Elysée Palace, heading instead to a trade-related engagement in Marseilles.

One of Mr Sarkozy's first decisions as France takes the EU helm from Slovenia will be whether to boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics over China's treatment of Tibet. The repercussions of a walkout on the EU's relations with China could be huge.

French diplomats also hope Mr Sarkozy stakes out a high EU foreign-policy profile, while the United States is sidelined with a presidential transition until early next year.

Six months is not a long time in terms of EU bureaucracy, and few countries make great strides during their half-year terms in charge. Mr Sarkozy may hope to be an exception – after all, he met, courted and married the supermodel-turned-singer Carla Bruni within three months.

FACT FILE

ENERGY/CLIMATE CHANGE


Possibly the most difficult of France's four priorities will be brokering a deal on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

IMMIGRATION

President Nicolas Sarkozy has said he wants the French presidency to be relevant to the lives of ordinary people, and argues that harmonising immigration and asylum rules is a key part of that.

DEFENCE

Sarkozy has made a priority of boosting European defence, an aim that is usually mentioned in the same breath as his readiness to return France to NATO.

The full article contains 628 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2008 10:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: France
 
1

Joseph Gibson,

Ayrshire 02/07/2008 02:12:29
I love that in this site they have not listed our foreign secretary speech.

"Europe must develop its military capabilities along the lines proposed by the EU's French presidency if it is not always to wait for America and Nato to be ready to intervene, David Miliband,"

It has taken France a very long time, and now they have achieved their goal, to control Europe. The British government shows clearly to the British people that it no longer cares about the people of Britain.

What will it take for the people of Britain to wake up and see that our government, our parliament is failing. It has been failing for a long time now and yet no one is doing nothing about it. How many of us British can actually tell you what it is to be British? are you proud to be British or is it just proud to be English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish? seriously, how many people have forgot that "united" we given the world alot, United we created the world largest Empire, United we given the world alot that it should be thankful for. And I know, Today what have we done, whats actually happend to what we achieved, whats going on?... The time is coming we're we will throw away what we are, and do we British really wanna do this? should we "the people" just stand aside and allow our government to throw away what we are, throw away what our ancestors all fought and died for? I know that alot we achieved is gone, but we're still here, and we're British, that means something, no?
2

Scullion,

Canada 02/07/2008 02:34:17
The reason many brave men and women died in innumerable European wars, some absolutely unfathomable (the War of the Spanish Succesion)some due to hairtrigger mentalities (WWI), was due to the very inability to see that we are all in this together. Any move to make Europe less of the historical slaughterhouse it has always been must be welcomed.
3

Jimmy the Pie,

02/07/2008 06:57:12
#1
I'm not British, I'm Scottish.

I have never considered my British and never will.
4

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 02/07/2008 07:33:54
The Irish must vote again, and again and again if necessary, until they get it right about the EU Treaty.

If not, then Sarkozy is going to get quite cross.
5

Me, myself and I,

Livingston 02/07/2008 08:28:48
#3
You are talking out your pie hole ...

Your passport says British and will until the unlikely event of the Scottish electorate voting to leave. Then it wouldnt matter as you are already governed from Brussels and not Westminster.

Eighty percent of our laws are implemented from an unelected Brussels dictatorship. People like Mandelson and Kinnock for Gods sake!

It's time we left the EU rather than navel gaze like yourself.
6

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 09:11:13
1

GTF you moron. Invading nearly every country in the world in order to build an empire is a bad thing not a good thing. And dont forget the first 3 victims of this global war mongering were the Scots Irish and Welsh followed by the French.
My ancestors fought and died to keep their country free from English domination I dont know about yours.
We are not "United" we are subjegated by a bigger power.
IDIOT!
7

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 09:12:35
5

At least if "Scots" vote to leave or stay in the EU then we will leave or stay in we wont have to "tag along" with however the English wish to vote would we?
8

Me, myself and I,

Livingston 02/07/2008 10:03:20
And like the Irish if an "independent" Scotland voted against it the EU would ignore it, change the rules and fix the result to complete the project.
9

Me, myself and I,

Livingston 02/07/2008 10:05:55
ps
Like ninety nine percent of nationalists in here your comment appears more anti-English than pro-Scot.

I hope that chip on your shoulder doesn't hurt too much.
10

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 10:09:02
8

Really when did that happen then? Has the Lisbon treaty taken effect?

9

Not anti British?
11

bluehead,

edinburgh 02/07/2008 11:05:40
it seems that only the Irish and poland want to obey the euro rule's if only the small countries will conform to the rules,just imagine the mayhem that is to follow.
this world should be declared a madhouse,nothing makes
sense anymore
the last prime minister was a poodle,this one is a chihuahua
may God help us!!!

12

Guga II,

Rockall 02/07/2008 11:38:22
That fop Sarkozy wants to promote the French dream of being the leader of Europe, and, of course, to promote more hand-outs for French farmers and fishermen.

In the meantime, the Westmiddenster government are selling us down the road.

An independent Scotland should get out of the EU altogether.
13

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 02/07/2008 11:47:40
"The only hope for Britain is for Scotland to get free of Britain and be able to come to our rescue. The high tech barbarism, in which we now live, is far more dangerous than previous threats to our existence, which we have managed to survive. Conquest by consent is now well advanced."

(from an english perspective)
14

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 02/07/2008 12:06:09
The blue flag with the gold stars is not a specifically EU emblem. It was introduced after the war - long before the European Union was founded - by the much larger Council of Europe, along with Beethoven's Ode to Joy as the musical equivalent. It is a general European flag, and not an EU one.

15

Dukov Norfolk,

The Palace 02/07/2008 13:11:29
Beware of little men (Bonaparte, Sarkozy) who wear elevated shoes.
16

PRR,

Pennsylvania 02/07/2008 14:09:49
Beware of the beast.
17

Joseph Gibson,

Stevenston 02/07/2008 15:05:30
#6

Sounds to me that you are anti british aswell as Scottish, and according to your location, are you Scottish? Empire's may have brought problems, but without us British the world would not have advanced. Wonder how many of your own family acnestry had given their lives, and for what?

Anyway... If you, anyone can't see that the EU is simply not following the will of its people then you are blind and stupid. You think the Irish going to feel the whip of the French EU, ahaha...just wait till we British have no more say, or rights. Anyone can see that the EU politicians wont accept anything that is against what they want and a prime example;

"With the Irish people in quarantine, the other 26 EU countries will press ahead with ratifying the Treaty - 19 have done so. Mr Sarkozy made it very clear that there would be no renegotiation of a Treaty that was Part II of the EU Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters three years ago.

"There will be no Treaty Part III," he said.

The Irish do not count.
"


Lets all sit back and allow Britain to follow the Irish and lets all be ruled by the French government.
18

Peter,

SNP for me! 02/07/2008 15:09:35
Sorry is this a surrealist thread?

How is thinking Mandelsson is a pillock anti-English? You are just simply one in a very long queue that think this, second in line to the multi-national queue that want to do him over.

How is wanting Scotland to regain its sovereign parliament and independence - anti-English?

How is pointing out that Scotland has been lied to by Westminster about the Union since 1707 - anti-English?

As confidence in the Holyrood Parlaiment grows the need for a bully diminishes and with it anti-English sentiment, instead what we increasingly see is pro-Scottishness, a willingness to stand our corner and do what is best for Scotland.

The problem for Unionists is that putting Scotland first is not anti-Englishness, picking fights with Westminster or other lame Uncle Tom excuses, it is the sovereign right of the Scottish Nation.
19

Joseph Gibson,

Ayrshire 02/07/2008 16:34:39

Scotlands independance, not sure how this began on this article. I have an open mind about Scotland breaking away, and i know people think if Scotland does, it'll remain independant, which I doubt. Only as a whole; Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England can we all be better off. I wonder why people wanna throw away what our ancestors all fought and died for. I wonder why people allowed our government to do that to what we achieved throughout 300+ years. Personally I think its down to what everyone is taught in schools from the day they first attend. It was amazing in a survey not long ago held in scotland that very few people actually knew when the Battle of Bannock burn happened and other things like that. That just shows how many people today don't actually know their own history, yet they probably would comment on it.

I believe if Scotland did get independance, we'd join the EU, don't ask me how or why... I just feel that we will, and already the EU is hurting our heritage, and thats only the beginning. Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland are all feeling the pinch of the EU and its not even started yet. Instead of fighting with each other, we should should united against the EU politicians... We are British, lets start acting like it. That goes for all you pro-English, pro-Welsh, pro-Irish and pro-scots (myself) you think that we're all gonna remain independant when we throw away what we are altogether? maybe we'll all lay claim to what our ancestors acheived once we're all no longer British? hehe, maybe we'll just all go, Yer we stopped those Nazi's *correction* our ancestors did, not us. We're not British, remember.
20

Alan B,

02/07/2008 16:42:34
#Joseph Gibson

Would far rather scotland was independent and a member of the EU on its own right.

The uk simply does not work in scotlands interest.

As for ur comment about scottish history. It would help if u actually commented why people are ignorant of our history in scotland. The answer is simply as scottish history has been sanitised to not create any any uk feeling.

I see the EU being on balance beneficial. I like the single market, i would like scotland to join the euro (sterling is not in scotland economic interest), i like the free movement of people. I cannot see in any way how the EU is hurting our heritage. Unless u call it allowing us to use a currency that is economically beneficial.
21

Alan B,

02/07/2008 16:46:07
sorry meant to say:

The answer is simply as scottish history in schools has been sanitised to not create any any bad feelings regarding the union.

I studied scottish history at school and it was the 2 world wars, the russion revolution and some pathetic piece about scottish history that centred round the cotton industry. If the uk union is not strong enough to withstand scotland having an educational system that informs about scottish history and the major points and events in that history it is not a union worth having.
22

Joseph Gibson,

Stevenston 02/07/2008 17:19:28

I feel alot of people have just been led to believe of Independance, and the SNP didn't win because of that, it was because of Labour. SNP doesn't actually focus on the best interests of the Scottish People, well it hadn't before, maybe it will now, we'll see in time. Yes, SNP much better than Labour, thats good.

Politicians, don't know why people keep trusting them. Its them that have caused such a divide in Britain. Scottish, Irish, Welsh and English people should all be treated equal, given the same educational benefits, health and all the rest. Though, fact is we're all feeling left out on something which creates all this nonsense;

English get everything, damn scots get this and we don't!!! stuff like that.

If all of us we're to stand united, I think we'd actually love being British. Though I think we're all going to lose out one by one, and the EU will play a part in it. Just listen to that french president, you'll notice hes on a mission.
23

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 20:47:38
17

Empire's may have brought problems, but without us British the world would not have advanced

Says who?

"Anyway... If you, anyone can't see that the EU is simply not following the will of its people then you are blind and stupid. You think the Irish going to feel the whip of the French EU, ahaha...just wait till we British have no more say, or rights. Anyone can see that the EU politicians wont accept anything that is against what they want and a prime example;"

What are you slavering about? The fact that the Irish have in their constitution the right of referendum is why this EU treaty is now trully F*cked and binned.
Every nation on the planet should have this enshrined into their constitutions and then you would see a better fairer more broadminded Europe.
It isnt Europe or the EUs failing that individual nations dont have a constitution which allows power to its people its the individual nations which are at fault.

The Irish are not in quarantine because this treaty requires all member signitures to endorse it within the EU constitution.
The Irish have literally roared and put the EU back on its collective a*se and all the screaming and posturing by the French Brits and Germans is just babies spitting out their dummies.
The Lisbon treaty is Kaput.
What we should be fighting for is the same rights the Irish have within their constitution not blaming the French or Germans or Dutch for our lack of control over our Government.

"The Irish do not count"

GTF you wee Walter Mitty get a grip of reality.

24

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 20:54:49
19

You are something of a moron you know that?
The reason people in Scotland are unaware of their own history is the fact that the "British History" curriculum concentrates on English history such as the succession of the various monarchs the war of the Roses and Battle of Hastings. I bet every school kid in Scotland could give you the date of the battle of Hastings without having to look it up.
It took a hollywood blockbuster to wake up our youngsters as to the events in Scottish history and the fact that there was a war of Independence going on for centuries.

The Scots Irish and Welsh are all ethnic minorities within the UK of GB not a satisfactory state of affairs ask any ethnic minority anywhere.
British? only the English have difficulty seperating their own national identies with that of the UK because most of them see it as exactly the same thing in other words we are all British/English.
25

MisterN,

Scotland 02/07/2008 20:56:40
22

Stand united? when 5 million voices are constantly drowned out by 55 million other voices? and its worse for the Welsh and Irish.
Dont be bloody nieve.
26

Dukov Norfolk,

The Palace 03/07/2008 02:00:12
#19

"INDEPENDENCE"

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

It’s National Escargot Day on Saturday. Will you be joining in and eating snails?
No, eating snails sounds disgusting.
Yes, I’d like to try a portion of snails.
Yes, but only if they’re served in their shells.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.