Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Glenn Gibbons: Old Firm's domestic decline shows how helpful European run can be

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2009
ON THE morning after Rangers' defeat by Inverness Caledonian Thistle, the "hotline" column of a tabloid newspaper carried an item which revealed at least one fan's astounding perspicacity.
These uncannily prophetic comments, it should be stressed, were posted hours before the kick-off at Ibrox and could have fixed odds punters flocking to his door in search of lucrative forecasts.

"Walter (Smith) is surely having a laugh," he said,
"when he says he's going to give Davie Weir another year's contract. I have been watching him for the past few weeks and he's an accident waiting to happen."

A few hours later, the veteran Rangers central defender would commit the error that led to Caley Thistle's injury-time penalty kick, Ian Black's match-winning conversion and his own ordering-off.

Anyone paying as close attention as that hotline subscriber through the course of this season would have been less shocked by the scoreline than those bookmakers' odds compilers, who had priced Terry Butcher's side as high as 18-1 on the night.

Despite occasional surges of form that have brought unbeaten runs, neither member of the Old Firm has given the impression of a team heading onwards and upwards towards ever-heightening standards. Indeed, the visual evidence of general mediocrity is supported by statistics which suggest that, since last season, their level of performance has been on the wane. When Celtic's recent draw at Motherwell finally brought the pair together at the top of the Scottish Premier League, there was widespread speculation that the title would be decided by the Glasgow giants' respective form in away matches. This, however, seems much more appropriate to Rangers than to their great rivals.

While Celtic have conceded nine points at home, they have lost only three more on the road. Rangers, on the other hand, have dropped eight at Ibrox and precisely double that amount on their travels. But it is the pair's overall totals which hint at deterioration.

Celtic have two fewer than at the same stage last season, but Rangers are a full 11 points off the pace they were setting after 28 matches. This has resulted in their six-point lead last March having been turned into a three-point deficit a year later. Nor has there been a telling improvement in the chasing pack. Motherwell, in third place 12 months ago with 46 points, have been replaced by Hearts on 48.

The most striking – and revealing – aspect of these figures is that they have been "achieved" without the so-called "distraction", or physical and mental demands, of being involved in Europe. If anything, this season's performances by the country's two leading sides expose the myth of the rigours of competing in domestic and continental football.

Rangers, of course, famously made it all the way to the Uefa Cup final last season, having first contested the group phase of the Champions League. Celtic retained an interest in the premier tournament until March, when they were eliminated from the last 16 by Barcelona.

Rangers were excused European football altogether this time, having been evicted by Kaunas even before the season started, while Celtic completed the group stage of the Champions League in early December.

Significantly, the Parkhead side's least productive period of the campaign – in January and February, when they lost a seven-point lead – occurred long after their departure from Europe.

All of this tends to reinforce the comments made by Neil Lennon three years ago, when, in an interview for a feature in The Scotsman, he responded to the proposal that Celtic's run to the Uefa Cup final in Seville had cost them the domestic championship in 2003.

"Oh, I don't go along with that at all," said Lennon. "The truth is that players much prefer playing to training.

"If you're involved in Europe, with midweek games, you don't need to train much anyway, and it's much less boring. Believe me, playing in Europe is no handicap. If anything, it keeps players fresher, happier and much more likely to do well than if they weren't."





The full article contains 689 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Shape to Shoot,

07/03/2009 07:46:58
How refreshingly honest of Neil Lennon to have said that...I don't recall reading that interview.
And it was said long before the threadbears UEFA Final, so he can't be accused of having a dig at them.

However, I'm not sure I agree that it is true for all players. It isn't just the physical side of the games, but the mental strength to psyche yourself up for a performance is a factor.
For some players, this is perhaps easier than others.
Neil Lennon seems to have thrived on that, but if you're a winger for example, or a striker who's going through a lean spell, getting mentally prepared for a match, getting focussed and all that involves a kind of self-hypnosis and some players are much better than others in finding that focus Saturday-Wednesday-Saturday. Coming out of one big game and getting ready for another almost straight away, week in week out for months is extremely demanding. All the wee niggling injuries, the cuts and bruises don't get enough time to heal properly and are soon joined by a new collection of cuts and bruises and sprains.

Neil Lennon it would seem is made of stronger stuff than many of his fellow professionals.
2

Shape to Shoot,

07/03/2009 09:59:20
A European run is vital for rangers next season regardless of the demands that it will put on their reduced squad.

The threadbears' desperately need champions league money next season...I think if you offered it to minty on the basis that they'd get tanked 10v0 in every match, he'd bite the hand off.

Today a story is breaking in another scottish newspaper that the backroom staff have been asked to take voluntary redundancies....no reduction in hours, no job sharing...right oot the door redundancies.

And off-course, if there are no takers, or not enough takers, the axe will be wielded.

It didn't need to come to this for rangers. The Cuellar money should have been banked and Smith should have been told that he'd had plenty and that he'd have to work with what he had.

Smith spent almost £4m on Lafferty, describing him as 'one for the future'.
Rangers were in NO position to be spending that amount of money on 'one for the future'...they were desperately short of cash and that kind of expenditure could only be justified on a player who could come stright into the team and do a job.

And the £1m on Velicka ? Smith already had plenty of strikers, and to blow that amount on a hearts reject was just unforgiveable given rangers' perilous financial circumstances.

If neither of those two players had been bought, they might have needed only to dip into the Cuellar money to the tune of around £3m to get Mendes and Davis.

That would have left £4m of the Cuellar money to see them through. Rangers fans must despair at what has been going on at ibrox.

3

Backofthenet,

07/03/2009 11:42:50
It would of course be absurd to suggest fixture congestion can't affect a team's chances of winning trophies.
4

BEMUSED EXILE,

07/03/2009 12:34:48
Patrick

You really need to employ the services of a decent copy editor before committing your musings to the screen. He or she could cut your nonsense by about 90%.

Sure, Rangers are in a tight position financially, and I'm certainly a long way from impressed by much of what I see on the park, but not reinvesting the Cuellar money would have amounted to abject surrender.

Quite how £3 million would have secured the services of Davis and Mendes, when they both cost approximately that sum individually, is beyond me, but I'm growing accustomed to your habit of pulling figures out of a hat.

Without signing those two, as well as Bougherra, who I reckon was a pre-emptive purchase to cover the possible loss of Cuellar, Rangers would be struggling for second place right now, and Celtic would have the league all sewn up already. If RFC go on to win the league from here, it will be money well spent, and will all come back to us from our participation in next season's CL.

Velicka was certainly a mysterious signing, although hardly an expensive one. Lafferty also has much to do to justify his price tag, but I reckon that he's effectively a replacement for Boyd, who RFC tried to shift in January, and who they hope will move on for at least £3 million in the summer.

It will take some time for the whole picture to unravel.
5

Shape to Shoot,

07/03/2009 13:04:26
4

Bemused I think you must be a bit bleary eyed today. If you read my post again, with a little more care, you'll see that I'm saying around £3m PLUS the money spent on Velicka and Lafferty would have paid for Mendes and Davis.

£1m for a failed Hearts player hocking his wares with some norwegian outfit when you've no' got tuppence, is a lot of money if you ask me, all things being relative.
6

Shape to Shoot,

07/03/2009 13:06:35
Saint Mirren v Celtic

Scrappy, few chances, mcdonald had the ball in the net but he was offside.
The surface appears good but the ball seems to be bobbling about all over the place, and it must be hard because the bounce is very, very high.
7

BEMUSED EXILE,

07/03/2009 13:18:07
Patrick

That being the case, I offer my apologies for misinterpreting your comments.

I think that the Cuellar money has been reasonably well spent, but I would agree that the prior purchase of Lafferty was not prudent, although I can only hope that it proves shrewd in the longer run.
8

Shape to Shoot,

07/03/2009 14:12:31
Rrrrrrubbish performance by Celtic, but credit to Saint Mirren for stopping us getting any rythymn into our play.

But even so, we should have been able to carve out a few chances...even when we got the ball into the box, far too often neither of our two strikers were up with the play. No doubts about the penalty BUT we had a very good shout in the second half when Venegoor was barged from the back...as Jan fell forward, his hand caught the ball, and to add insult to injury, the ref booked him for handball.

But no complaints about the result. We went out with a whimper. If we weren't top of the league, today would be a very long day for me.

Strachan needs to work them very hard in training this week.
9

BEMUSED EXILE,

07/03/2009 14:26:23
Patrick

St Mirren join the growing list of teams who have wounded both of us this season. It makes football more interesting.

Most of the banter is taking place on the Beckham thread, BTW.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.