Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Glenn Gibbons: This is not Scottish football's worst season – 1997-98 was just as bad

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 March 2009
OBSERVERS of Scottish football seem to have been moved by an ever-deepening sense of despair to conclude that the current season is responsible for the most abysmal standards in living memory. The cyclical nature of the game, however, suggests that this is unlikely, while personal recall and a check of the records appear to confirm that the tortuous present is nothing other than 1997-98 revisited.
Then, as now, two consistently unimpressive Old Firm teams staggered towards the finishing line of the league championship, Celtic finally reaching it two points ahead on the last day, with Hearts only a further five points adrift in third. As if to
underline the general impoverishment, Kilmarnock were fourth and St Johnstone fifth, with Hibernian relegated.

It was a measure of the unreliability of the top two that Celtic should draw 0-0 with Hibs in Glasgow in their third-last match and that Rangers – by then the new favourites for the title – should follow a week later by losing the penultimate match of the campaign at home to Kilmarnock.

This was the final season of the old, ten-team Premier Division and, like the present one, it started badly and fell away. Rangers failed even to qualify for the Champions League, suckered 3-0 by IFK Gothenburg in Sweden before drawing 1-1 in the home leg of their preliminary round tie. In the Cup-Winners' Cup, Kilmarnock were eliminated in the first round by the French second division side, Nice, on a 4-2 aggregate.

Dundee United capitulated at the same stage of the Uefa Cup, beaten by Trabzonspor of Turkey. Celtic may have been unfortunate in drawing Liverpool, but they, too, failed to negotiate the first hurdle of the tournament.

What distinguishes 97-98 from now is that the failings seemed to be more shocking, due largely to David Murray's pre-season proclamation of the glories that awaited Rangers. The Ibrox chairman rather presumptuously asserted that Walter Smith had done his shopping early, he had spent £18 million (the actual figure was £12m), he had all the players he wanted and Rangers now had a squad not just ready to make a credible challenge in the Champions League, but one capable of winning it by 2000.

Smith had certainly been busy that year, adding Lorenzo Amoruso, Rino Gattuso, Marco Negri, Antti Niemi, Sergio Porrini, Jonatan Johansson, Seb Rozental, Stale Stensaas, Jonas Thern and Tony Vidmar to a squad that already included Paul Gascoigne, Brian Laudrup, Andy Goram and Ally McCoist.

By the end of October, the Champions League humiliation had been followed by the failure to get past even the last eight of the League Cup (beaten by Dundee United, the pot ending up at Parkhead), Rangers were trailing Celtic in the league, and Smith's sacking (although not described as such at the time) had been announced at the club's annual meeting. On 16 May, the previously dominant Ibrox side's barren season was confirmed by Hearts' victory in the Scottish Cup final. Not even a domestic trophy had been won, far less Europe's premier tournament.

Even if there are spooky parallels to be found in the past, however, it does not make the pain of the present any more bearable.



The full article contains 555 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2009 12:13 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Glenn Gibbons
 
1

jimbhob,

paisley 28/03/2009 00:20:51
This is the worst piece of journalism i have ever had the misfortune to read. The 1997-98 season was one of the most thrilling in recent memory. Celtic stopped Rangers going for an unprecedented 10 in a row, on the last day of the season; Hearts ran them both close and won the cup.

To distinguish that season from this on the basis that David Murray squandered £12-18m is breathtakingly stupid. I am unable to fathom any germ of logic in this article.

As a dear deaperted man commentator on the game would have said, "sheer and utter bunkum."
2

jimbhob,

paisley 28/03/2009 00:23:43
my apologise for the typos- 'dear deaperted man commentator on the game' = James Sanderson'.
3

,

28/03/2009 07:50:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Moonbeams,

28/03/2009 07:54:16
Well said Jim, I thought it was an excelent season for Celtic fans. I can still remember the tension and nerves for most of that season and then the unadultarated joy of stopping ten.

Very fond memories for me. I spent the last game of the season biting my nails with two Bears in an Austrailian Sports pub in Tokyo (sent on a two week training course....bad timing eh)waiting for the half time and full time results coming over BBC Worldwide radio. I can still picture the crazy looks I got when I was jumping around the bar cheering and kissing everyone that came near me as well as the look of depression and pain on my work mates faces. I Phoned my mates in the early hours to join in there celebrations get a sing song from the other end of the world.

A GREAT year.
5

,

28/03/2009 09:22:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

FTH22inarow,

28/03/2009 09:38:01
What a pile of kak, any of the 3 teams at the top of the league that season would have had the league won by now this season, this season is clearly the worst ever, I fear next may be even worse
7

Mick Bhoy,

Paisley 28/03/2009 09:39:18
Mr Gibbons is commenting on the quality of football and the ability of the two top teams to throw points away in 97-98 and comparing it to this season - very valid comparison.

As for Mr Gibbons not saying anything about Smith being sacked at the time, although I can't find anything confirming otherwise, I'd say if anyone would have said so at the time, he'd have been the one.

As a Celtic fan I don't take this article as a criticism of Celtic and I congratulate Glenn Gibbons on being probably the only journalist currently working in Scotland who had never toed the Murray party line.
8

Shape to Shoot,

28/03/2009 09:47:47
Only a rangrs fan could look back on 97/98 with regret.
Celtic had won their first title in ten years and prevented a record breaking 10 in a row.

A most joyful season for Celtic fans, and anyone who speaks about it so glumly as Gibbons must surely follow the rearrangerz.

But when Celtic run away with the title, the laptops' consensus is that scottish football is boring, rubbish.
When it's tight (but it looks like Celtic are going to win it) , they howl in protest about the lack of quality.

Basically, they're no' happy bunnies if the rangers are gettin' gubbed.
9

Devries4,

Glasgow 28/03/2009 09:53:10
Surely this season is worse than 1997/98, in particlar the press staff as they were not all getting paid off then.
With articles like this going to print then I can only hope the author has a few years in for when the compy calculator gets switched on.
10

dottyviveca,

28/03/2009 10:19:47
Good article - Hibs needed to get out of that turgid anti-football league for a year to recharge their footballing batteries. They came back up. they came back stronger - Le God, Latas, etc. A total footballing side who would blow away the hoofball Yams in the 6-2 embarrassment which should have been double figurtes. 98 was dire - the Baddies fluked the cup thanks to a non=penalty and scrappy goal, and the Hibbies were booted down the league by thugs, journaymen and biased refs. Came back like the Phoenix
11

Adso,

28/03/2009 10:45:43
I struggle to follow any of the logic in the article. Is this season supposed to be rubbish because the OF are dropping points? 1997-98 was rubbish because the OF didn't stroll the league?

I prefer watching the OF under pressure - last weekend's matches at Ibrox and Tannadice were way more exciting than watching a couple of 4 - 0 hammerings.

OK, the OF did poor in Europe - but last season they did well in Europe. Does that really mean last season the standard in Scotland was great and this year it is not?

I think all this talk of dropping standards is a load of nonsense. Teams in the SPL by and large are getting better technically, fitter and passing the ball better imo. The league remains spoiled by the repetitiveness of playing teams 4 - 6 times each year, the tightness that a twelve team league encourages and the referreeing from the dark ages which continues to encourage hammer throwers rather than skillful players.
12

,

28/03/2009 10:57:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

GeorgeCowieOrWalterKidd?,

28/03/2009 10:57:41
Speak for yourself Gibbons! A season with the OF being challenged (despite having vastly superior budgets and supposedly world class players), with teams like Killie and St Johnstone finishing high up the league, and one of the OF winning nothing at all has to be a one of the best seasons no?

Personally seeing your team finish a close third, winning the big cup and having your rivals relegated all in one season is hard to beat!
14

,

28/03/2009 11:11:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Shape to Shoot,

28/03/2009 11:27:24
naka just scored for japan.
Free kick , 30 yards out. Naka makes a a short pass, receives the return , takes 2 steps before blasting , took a deflection of the advancing wall before zooming into the net.
16

The Shrink,

28/03/2009 11:45:16
15

Only bright spot of the nineties for Scotland was the 1998 WC finals and playing Brazil in the opener in front of a Billion people.

Rangers also in 92-93 had an extraordinary European CL run and came within a whisker of the final and a chance to win Europe's ultimate prize.

Both decades had ups and downs and one wasn't particularly better than the other.

Best decade for Scottish football was the 80s. Four teams (5 if you inc Hearts in 86) all going for it every season for 7 seasons.

Plus 80's saw three European finals. Two victories (by Aberdeen) and some very close things - Dun Utd in the EC Semis in 1984 and Celtic in the EC Qtrs in 1980. Both should have gone through.

In the 80s Scotland also qualified for 1982, 86 world cups.

It was the best decade by far.


17

The Shrink,

28/03/2009 11:48:59
In the 80s Scotland actually qualified for 3 world cups if you include Italia 90. The qualifiers were in the 1980s.
18

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 12:17:22
Simply unbelievable that the Scotsman would publish such nonsense.

A Scottish newspaper promoting the idea that what we need is a strong Old Firm. The Old Firm, who look to their strange notions of Ireland and want to play in England, what do the rest of us care about them?

An Edinburgh paper suggesting that the poorest-ever season was the one when Hearts (note to Scotsman editor - your newspaper is published in Edinburgh; Hearts are an Edinburgh team) won their first trophy in over thirty years and were still in the running for the league into April.

Or is this an early April Fool?

Glen Gibbons, good grief.
19

Cramondo,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 12:22:08
I forgot to add: Rousset, McPherson, Naismith, Weir, Ritchie, Salvatori, Flogel, McCann, Cameron, Fulton, Adame, subs including Robertson

Poor players all. How glad we are to be rid of that dross. Aye, right.
20

,

28/03/2009 12:56:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

macarthur,

LONDON 28/03/2009 17:03:42
The excitement of 97-98 was great - but the QUALITY was much better than this season as well. It may have turned out to be a bad season for trophyless Rangers - but look at the list of players quoted: far better than the rubbish they have to put out now. Hearts team was also streets ahead of the mediocre personnel they have now - some of the stuff they played (first half of the season especially) was as good as anything they've produced in almost 50 years (including 85-86 or Burley's short reign). Even relegated Hibs - you could make a case for saying theirs was a better side than they have now - it's just the poor quality of the other sides that's keeping them almost mid-table this season. Kilmarnock and St Johnstone did indeed have capable sides in 97-98, and as for Celtic - well they had the nail-biting drama of nipping 10IAR in the bud.

Glenn Gibons is a fool.
22

I.J,

The Diggers 29/03/2009 19:33:11
I've never read such utter, utter p1sh in all my life.
23

Troy Tempest,

15/07/2009 11:15:46
This is odd as I remember 98-99 being quite exciting due to the fact that it wasn't a snooze-inducing Rangers procession, and a good Hearts team deservedly lifting the cup. United missed several sitters against Trabzonspor with McSwegan the main culprit if memory serves. Rangers were very poor and Celtic were competent, wasn't that Larssons first season?

The standard outwith OF is probably better now. We have a strong Dundee United. Hearts & Aberdeen also improving. Rangers are probably just as bad as 98. Celtic I think have improved a bit as their CL progress illustrates.
24

Troy Tempest,

15/07/2009 11:16:17
Thought provoking column.
25

Pmonkey7,

19/09/2009 10:54:12
Classic season 97/98.

Rubbish article.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.