Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


RSPB calls for more wind farms in bid to counter global warming

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 March 2009
THE RSPB yesterday called for a large increase in the number of onshore wind farms, after a report said far more could be built without damaging wildlife.
The conservation charity said climate change threatened many species with extinction, and there was an urgent need for renewable energy to tackle greenhouse gas emissions.

But despite the UK's "abundant" natural wind resources, it is lagging behin
d other European countries, with wind turbines providing just 2 per cent of the country's energy needs in 2007. The government must step in to provide a clear lead on developing wind farms more quickly without damaging wildlife or alienating communities, the RSPB urged.

A report from the Institute for European Environmental Policy said that the UK was far behind countries such as Denmark, where wind meets 29 per cent of demand; Spain, where it accounts for a fifth of power needs; and Germany, where it meets 15 per cent of demand.

The report for the RSPB, which compared the UK with those other countries, said an effective planning system could ratchet up the number of wind farms. Ruth Davis, head of climate change policy at the RSPB, said: "This report shows that if we get it right, the UK can produce huge amounts of clean energy without time-consuming conflicts and harm to our wildlife. But get it wrong and people may reject wind power."





The full article contains 241 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 March 2009 9:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Wind Power , Global Warming
 
1

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 24/03/2009 07:29:40
That'll be the same RSPB that lodged an objection to the Lewis wind farm then?

Hmm, I wonder how squeeky clean the RSPB is. Got anything you wish to admit?
2

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 24/03/2009 07:41:41
Good point RBNR's.

I'm wondering if the RSPB are looking to diversify their income. After all, they are one of Scotlands largest land owners and recieve agriculturally related subsidies AND have charity status.

I reckon they are trying to pathe the way so they can generate rental income from having turbines on their own land.

I don't think we should allow them since they objected to the Lewis wind farm.
3

Unimpressed one,

24/03/2009 08:03:32
See the RSPB has a 'climate change' officer. Christ, what next? Typical greenie luddite organisation - bleat with the rest of the bammy sheep.
4

thinking,

Scotland 24/03/2009 08:58:04
What global warming?
see
http://www.citizenlink.org/videofeatures/A000009650.cfm
5

John Cameron,

St Andrews 24/03/2009 09:07:59
It is not the number of birds killed by the proliferation of the ugly windmills that is the problem. It is the cost and the science behind the batty Heath-Robinson contraptions. Let me try to help the RSPB as I would the dimmest first year student in Geophysics:

1. Is there an established Theory of Climate? No.
2. Do we understand fully how climate works? No.
3. Is carbon dioxide demonstrated to be a dangerous atmospheric pollutant? No.
4. Can deterministic computer models predict future climate? No.
5. Is there a consensus amongst qualified scientists that dangerous, human-caused climate change is upon us? No.
6. Did late 20th century temperature rise at a dangerous rate, or to a dangerous level? No.
7. Is global temperature currently rising? No.

There you go. Read this over at your leisure because there WILL be a test.
6

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 24/03/2009 09:43:56
"CO2 is a dangerous pollutant. Try breathing only it for a while."

Try living WITHOUT it and let me know how you get on.

That is the exact mentality that destroys any argument regarding MMGW.

Be as well stating oxygen is dangerous too. It's a free radical and can cause enormous damage to biological life, but without it, we'd be dead. Same for CO2.

At what CO2 concentration levels does life cease to exist?
7

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 24/03/2009 09:49:54
What was the CO2 concentration during the Cambrian period?


What was the CO2 concentration whne life began?
8

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 24/03/2009 09:53:46
As #1 points out, this statement by the RSPB smacks of double standards.

They obviously have a site prime for development and raising a few quid for themselves to cover the hefty losses they have suffered in the Global financial collapse along with all the other "charities" !!
9

El Franko,

Dagenham 24/03/2009 10:42:54
I regard the RSPB as a sinister organisation, funded by the government. It is a fake charity. How many know that, for example 'In 2008, it received a staggering £19,731,000 in public money' (Source: http://fakecharities.org/pages/posts/the-royal-society-for-the-protection-of-birds63.php?searchresult=1&sstring=rspb). It is used, as are many other fake charities, to campaign for government policies in an underhand way. In this recent press release, they are warning windfarm developers off wherever it is the RSPB decides is special for birds - and then explicitly supporting the windfarm lunacy anywhere else. I advise all readers: donate nothing to the RSPB. It is an agent of the government. The climate aspect is of course also an agent of the lunatic asylum since there is not a shred to evidence to suggest any non-trivial human impact on the climate. I advise all journalists: check on http://fakecharities.org for useful background whenever tempted to rush to print with a press release.
10

Tierney,

West Calder 24/03/2009 12:00:22
#9
What was the CO2 concentration during the Cambrian period?

What was the CO2 concentration when life began?

Dave from Barra is correct. CO2 concentrations where much higher during the Cambrian and higher again over 3.5 billion years ago. There is no argument here. It is the rate at which CO2 is increasing that is the problem. The CO2 concentraion in the atmosphere is increasing at a rate that has never been observed before, look at the keeling curve. There are a few ways in which to examine past concentrations such as ice core samples and these do not not show as rapid a change occuring. There is a consensus amongst scientists that the human impact has meant CO2 levels are increasing at a rate higher than they would be if only natural events were the factors.
Life has existed when there has been more CO2 but a sudden change in CO2 gives little time for the natural world to adapt. It can not be denied that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and an increase in greenhouse gases can cause global warming (which is occuring John Cameron, just check out mean averages over the last few decades). Life has always managed in the past to adapt and will continue to do so but when ever there has been a sudden change in a factor such as temperature it has stuggled at first and mass extinctions have occured.
11

Vlad Tepes,

Snagov 24/03/2009 12:42:58
The RSPB DO seem to be lagging a bit (like some of our denier posters above, lol). They were initially leery about wind turbines and are only now recognising they are beneficial as we turn more towards tidal power.
12

Stan Butler,

24/03/2009 13:21:46

"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one!"

13

sam the god,

24/03/2009 13:35:35
Typical of the RSPB spouting rubbish as usual it is an organisation that does not know what the right and left hands are doing.
14

mr and mrs smith,

GLASGOW 24/03/2009 13:49:09
I now know i made the right decision when i cancelled my RSPB membership.One wonders what Ruth Davis will be saying in twenty years when the british countryside is destroyed by wind turbines and none of the predictions of MMGW have come true.
15

Banana Heid,

Ayrshire 24/03/2009 13:56:32
That's a bird brained Idea, The blades would need to be 100 times the size to have any chance of cooling the planet...
16

sceptic,

livingston 24/03/2009 15:08:22
Who is left to care for the thousands of birds mangled by turbine blades with the RSPB's changed agenda?
17

traprain,

24/03/2009 15:15:22
Now eleven years since mean global temperature peaked and the RSPB belatedly decide to change their objective from birds to global warming. I suppose they will now change their name to RSAGW.
18

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 24/03/2009 15:35:25
Should bring in a nice few quid in 'unsolicited' donations from various energy corporations and organisations. How does one ask for such information under the public information acts?
19

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 24/03/2009 15:39:05
How clean is "clean energy" with the Mafia involved in Italian wind farms and now Spain has a story that sounds more like a 'South Park' episode.

Scandal sullies Spain's clean energy

The arrest of 19 people accused of corruption highlights the dirty by-product of the country's booming economy in renewable fuel

* Giles Tremlett in Madrid
* The Observer, Sunday 22 March 2009

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/22/la-muela-renewables-spain-corruption
20

broadgait,

gullane 24/03/2009 15:47:58
7 Rulesbutnotrulers
"Once the scientific consensus was that the world was flat"
You mean like the claimed scientific consensus for man made global warming despite 30 years of essentially unchanged global temperature and 11 years since temperature peaked at 14.54C. Let us not forget that the warmers tell us that due to rising CO2 the underlying decadal rate of temperature increase is between 0.2C and 0.55C. Further we have farcical, totally unfounded claims that the rate of increase has been underestimated and is accelerating to or is at some mythical imagined "tipping point".
21

Dragonfire,

17/07/2009 16:13:09
The wind farm vultures are on the loose so lookout.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.