Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fears over Google phone tracking

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 February 2009
NEW software that allows people to track friends, partners and children has triggered privacy and safety concerns.
Google Latitude, launched yesterday by the internet search engine company for use with its Google maps software, allows users to activate tracking software on their mobile phone or wi-fi device.

That enables them to appear on home computer maps so
their friends and loved ones can see where they are.

But the technology has raised concerns that people will be able to spy on their partners from home – and fears that it could potentially place children at risk from paedophiles.

Helen Hughes, a family lawyer, said she feared that the device would be used by people to track their partners.

"In abusive relationships there is an element of control. You will see people checking receipts to find out when their partner was at the shops. This could be abused by people seeking to control their spouses."

The software is extremely precise as it uses the Global Positioning System which can calculate a person's location within yards.

Dr Andreas Komninos, a computing expert with Glasgow Caledonian University, said the information could possibly be misused in the future.

"Google are always gathering data; the problem is now this information is very personal. A phone number is very specific to an individual," he said.

Google has stated it will not retain any information about users' movements.

But Dr Komninos said: "I would take Google's promise with a pinch of salt. I can foresee a situation in the future where agencies could force the company to store the data, possibly for police or anti-terrorist use."

Dr Komninos has also warned parents to be watchful of their child's use of the new software.

"In theory, it is a possible security risk," he said.

The software, which is free to use in the 27 countries where it has been launched, has also caused concern for child welfare organisations.

Nikki Kerr, projects manager at Kidscape, said: "It is a concern that children are posting precisely where they are. There is the danger that they don't realise what is out there."

A spokesman for Google last night responded to security concerns by pointing out that users need to turn on the tracking software and can choose who is able to view their location.

John Scott, a lawyer who specialises in human rights cases, said: "There are privacy implications that should be looked at and the question that should be asked is not can we do it but should we be doing it?"

The software will initially work on BlackBerrys and devices running on Symbian software or Microsoft Windows Mobile. It will also operate on some T-1 Mobile phones and eventually on Apple's iPhone and iTouch.

FACTS

GOOGLE began in 1996 when US students Larry Page and Sergey Brin devised a plan to make a search engine that ranked websites according to the number of other websites linked to that site. In 2004, Google launched Google Earth – a detailed map of the earth based on satellite imagery.






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2009 10:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Google
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

05/02/2009 00:32:13
Oooh - I'm scared. I am afeared. This is scary. Oh! This is very terrifying indeed.

Is that enough fears?
2

Brodric,

05/02/2009 08:31:46
No 1 Fifi - NO, you are not afraid enough yet. Try again.
3

Paul Mac,

Out There in the Real World 05/02/2009 11:07:44
Forget all the Human Rights, secrecy, political correctness and lawyers mumbo jumbo. Speaking as a parent I think this is a step in the right direction.

My children are 10 & 9 and for the last year or so I have been looking into tracking devices that will allow me to watch their movements and help me protect them. There will come a time very soon when they don't want Mummy or Daddy taking them to school and back. They want to be big boys and girls.

I'm not saying this Google system is perfect, but it's something that needs to have further research put into it. There must be a way of installing software that requires a code to track a number and you can only get that code if you are the mobile owner. Even if it sends a text to the number that a certain name or codename is tracking them that will add as a safety warning.

There is so much that can be done here it's worth sticking in and taking it forward.
4

Banana Heid,

Ayrshire 05/02/2009 12:25:13
I think this is a braw idea. I will be able to phone home and find out where I am when i get lost. this has happened to me 0 times in the past and is likely to happen 0 times in the future...
5

ddmc,

05/02/2009 18:36:59
#3 there are already tracking systems that let you know when phones move out of range of certain cells

without using a feed into the mobile phone networks this system relies on having GPS built into the phone & always on data access to the internet, so its limited to a few models of phones like cr@pberry & iCones, its a natural extention to location based services which goggle have been promoting via goggle
earth & up my street , the ultimate aim is an advanced advertising & marketing tool

as for the good Doctors claim about being misued & a security concern anything stored on a computer anywhere risks misuse & is insecure
6

Upandunder,

06/02/2009 09:26:46
Paul Mac, nothing personal - but you need to relax a little. All you will do is run the risk of making your children nervous about preventing an event that probably won't happen.

The chance of a child getting snatched on the street is considerably less than falling down the stairs and breaking your neck or back. Should we all move to bungalows?

Protect your children from what? It's not as if there are opportunist paedos on every street corner. Truth of the matter is 99 per cent of child abuse victims fell prey to a parent, an uncle, a carer, a family "friend"... ie: someone known to the child.

There's no better substitute for making a "big boy or girl" than by cutting those apron strings and giving them the freedom they deserve, equipped with good old-fashioned tips based around common sense.

My own daughter is 17, I pointed her to karate to make her more confident (she took it up with gusto, is now a brown belt) and she follows a few simple rules like walking home with a friend after dark, and letting me know when I can expect her home.

No need for excessive surveillance - how will all this nonsense make a child feel other than fearful?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.