Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

FSA clampdown on 'shorting' of rights issue bank shares



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 June 2008
A SHOCK clampdown on investors who bet on big share price falls during the course of company rights issues has been ordered by the financial regulator.
The unprecedented move by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) follows slumps in the stocks of companies – particularly banks – that have recently completed or are in the process of issuing new shares.

From next Friday, 20 June, the FSA has rule
d that any investor "shorting" 0.25 per cent or more of the shares in a business doing a rights issue will have to tell the market.

In a statement yesterday, the FSA said: "In current market conditions, there is increased potential for market abuse through short-selling during rights issues.

"As a result, there has been severe volatility in the shares of companies conducting rights issues.

"This is potentially damaging not only to the issuers in question but also to confidence in the overall fairness and quality of the UK market."

The FSA said this could be "particularly prejudicial" to the interests of private shareholders.

It has also launched a wider review into how capital-raising by listed companies can be made more efficient.

The FSA added that short-selling, as it is known in City parlance, was a legitimate technique that was "not in itself abusive".

But it was also the case "that the rights issue process provides greater scope for what might amount to market abuse, particularly in current conditions".

Yesterday's move by the FSA, which took the markets by surprise, was welcomed by the British Bankers Association.

The BBA said the new rules "would improve transparency meaning the market would not get a false impression of the demand for the securities (in a rights issue]".

Recent major cash calls include HBOS, the Bank of Scotland/Halifax banking group, Royal Bank of Scotland and Bradford & Bingley.

RBS got its £12 billion cash call away a week ago, but its shares had fallen steadily towards its 200p rights issue price.

At the time of the rights announcement, RBS shares were trading at 372p, compared with last night's closing price, up 3 per cent at 236.25p.

HBOS, the middle of a £4bn rights issue, is at the centre of an FSA probe into a short-selling raid on the bank's shares in March, and the bank was widely seen as the target of a renewed raid this week that temporarily drove the share price below its 275p rights issue price.

Yesterday HBOS closed up 13 per cent at 321.75p, compared with a 486p trading price at the time it announced its cash call.

Most controversially, Bradford & Bingley changed the terms of its £300 million rights issue when the shares fell below the initial 82p rights price.

It was changed to a new issue price of 55p and came with the entrance of a new 23 per cent shareholder in B&B in the shape of private equity giant Texas Pacific Group

B&B's shares closed yesterday 8 per cent higher at 78.75p compared with the 103p they were trading at when the cash call on investors was announced last month.

BACKGROUND

"GOING short" is a widespread City practice, mostly among market professionals.

It involves selling shares an investor does not actually own in the hope of buying them back more cheaply in the market later to make an overall profit.

In trading strategy, it is therefore a bet that shares are going to fall.

The shorters originally borrow the relevant shares – most commonly from pension funds – in return for a fee.

Once they, hopefully, buy the shares later at the cheaper price they return them to the original owner, pocketing the difference as profit after subtracting the fee they have had to pay the original lender.

The process is not illegal, or indeed inherently unethical – just a different view on the direction a share price will go.



The full article contains 655 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

14/06/2008 02:53:38
Even the FSA, who have not acquitted themselves honourably during the credit crisis, must realise this is nonsense.

The entire reason that banking shares are in trouble is useless bankers. This is scapegoating of the most ridiculous sort.

Hopefully the public won't be fooled and will see this as desperation and a very good reason to get out of banks.

In a debt-deflation what they're calling "market abuse" is just plain common sense. Who wants to lose yet more money?

2

Justin,

14/06/2008 09:45:39
Shorting is unethical and should be outlawed by the FSA. Share markets are supposed to be a market for companies to raise capital, not a glorified betting shop.

If people wish to indulge in this form of betting, it should be done through betting indices that have no impact on share prices.
3

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 14/06/2008 11:14:44
I can see why the FSA thinks it can stop speculators messing the rest of us about but it will all end in tears, interfering in markets when you don't understand them is a very dangerous pastime, they should find something else to do with their spare time rather than standing to attention every time the banks bark.
4

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

14/06/2008 18:28:51
Justin: shorting is necessary means for markets to maintain liquidity. It also helps prevent the formation of bubbles as speculators who spot shares which are overvalued will short them. One factor in housing being driven into a bubble was that it's very difficult to short housing.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.