Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Growing army of obese patients costs NHS £5m a year for drugs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 March 2008
THE cost of drugs to tackle Scotland's spiralling obesity crisis has shot up by hundreds of thousands of pounds in the past year, as more doctors resort to pills to reduce the nation's waistlines.
The NHS bill for prescriptions to treat the life-threatening condition has risen by £770,000 to £4.89 million, according to figures released yesterday, with patients in the west of Scotland the biggest consumers.

Last night, politicians and health
experts said the figures showed a worrying increase in our sedentary lifestyle and poor diet, and called for more government help to tackle the crisis.

According to the Scottish Government, 9,500 people over the age of 12 make daily use of the drugs, which work by either suppressing the appetite or preventing the body absorbing fat. Drugs dispensed in hospitals are not included in the figures.

Each patient costs the NHS more than £500 a year, and in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde area, there are almost 3,000 of them.

One GP warned he had yet to see any evidence that the drugs provide a long-lasting solution.

Dr Dean Marshall, who practises in Dalkeith, Midlothian, said: "If we are going to use them, we have to see clear evidence that they actually work and, in my own experience, I have yet to see that evidence that they lead to a long-term loss of weight."

He said the drugs would be used only on patients who had already explored other options, such as taking advice and seeing a dietician.

"These drugs are given to people who have got extreme problems – it's not just the average person who is overweight," he said. "These people are significantly overweight. Many have other illnesses like diabetes, so we are dealing with the particularly difficult cases."

In 2006-7, a total of 104,274 obesity-drug prescriptions were dispensed, an increase of 14,404 on the previous financial year. The cost per head of the population has risen from 4p in 1998-9 to £1.01 in 2006-7 – although ten out of the 14 Scottish health boards spend more than this.

The health board most likely to hand out pills is Western Isles, where 0.35 per cent of over-12s, or 80 people, receive them. In the Greater Glasgow and Clyde and Lanarkshire health board areas, 0.27 per cent of the population – 2,800 and 1,300 people respectively – are given the drugs.

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde put its high numbers down to the large area it serves. A spokeswoman said: "The rise in the prescribing of weight-loss drugs shows more patients are seeking treatment for weight management, but also reflects the growing concern over obesity rates. We are working with our partners to reverse the obesity explosion through environmental and lifestyle changes."

Richard Simpson, Labour's public-health spokesman, said the figures indicated a "worrying trend of increasing rates of obesity due to our sedentary lifestyle and poor diet" and demonstrated the need for the SNP to renew its commitment to invest in schemes to combat obesity and promote sport.

But he said it also showed the NHS making use of effective new treatments – which had to be combined with education.

Mary Scanlon, for the Tories, said the figures showed "a failure in terms of support" and claimed when some patients asked for help, they were "often told to go and join WeightWatchers".

Shona Robison, the public-health minister, said the government realised obesity was "an increasing problem and poses a serious threat to health".

She said it would be investing £56.5 million – £40 million in new money – in initiatives to tackle obesity, healthy eating and physical activity. They will be included in an obesity action-plan due for release this spring.

She said the government had a role in education but, for some people, advice and exercise would not have any effect. "In such cases, a clinical decision to prescribe drugs, based on the specific health interests of the patient, may be the most appropriate step to take," she said.

HEAVYWEIGHT DRUGS
THE three drugs which can be prescribed in Scotland to tackle obesity are:
Orlistat, also known as Xenical, was introduced in October 1998, and is an anti-obesity drug which acts on the gastro-intestinal tract, inhibiting the absorption of dietary fat.

Sibutramine, or Reductil, was introduced in June 2001.

A centrally-acting appetite suppressant the drug inhibits the re-uptake of noradrenaline and seratonin – mood-enhancing chemicals naturally produced by the body, which stimulate the appetite.

Rimonabant, or Acomplia, was introduced in February 2007, and is also an appetite suppressant that acts centrally.





The full article contains 787 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 March 2008 11:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Obesity
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 26/03/2008 06:50:20
A fat tax! £1 a month for each pound over weight. That'll larn 'em.
2

Deeside,

Scotland 26/03/2008 09:33:10
What an irrisponsible article, in fact, what an irrisponsible debate by the stick insect culture we now have.....let's just try and breed cloned perfected human beings rather than individuals. Why do I feel that we are now living in a modern day Nazi dictatorship....

Do these people realise what they are doing to the self-esteem of so many young people? Some individuals are naturally bigger than others - it has nothing to do with diet more genetic make-up. If we dont produce perfect size 0 children they will be taken away from us by the middle class pratts wearing stripey jumpers. The children will be shunned and bullied at school for being slightly larger....and we will end up with a society full of anorexic screwed up individuals and a massive youth suicide rate!

Only a few days ago our politicians told us that drug addicts should be treated with dignity and respect - yet a slightly overweight child should be torn away from their happy lives at home, or singled out by do gooders and made to feel wholly inadequate.

We have politicians who have nothing better to do with their time other than make rediculous policy and flippent comments about those who least need that type of criticism.

Maybe all MSPs should be assessed on how overweight they are and be humiliated in public!!! Now there's an idea for the Scotsman!

3

Smutley,

Embra 26/03/2008 09:41:58
Or even better: journalists.

Nice bit of direct-to-consumer advertising for the pharmas too.
4

G,

dundy 26/03/2008 10:19:49
Deeside

This has gone beyond a few people who a bit tubby - the number of people who are clinically obese and suffering health probs is rising year on year and will cost the NHS even more in future years in treatment of their chronic obesity related debilitating conditions.....
5

Scotish Exile,

26/03/2008 10:28:48
Chicken feed, how much do junkies and alcaholics cost the NHS every year, I will bet it is a hell of a lot more than £5m. Don't see ay articles about how much money is wasted on these parasites!
6

Smutley,

My High Horse 26/03/2008 13:04:15
Alcohol costs £110m to the NHS in Scotland, and £1.1bn overall (adding social, legal, etc costs) (British Medical Association, 2006: http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/content/manifestobriefingalcohol)

Obesity surgery is far more effective than pills.
7

Guga II,

Rockall 26/03/2008 13:22:47
#6 Not only that, but the government gives alcoholics an extra £10 a day, over and above the other money they give them, to buy booze. This results in most of these alcoholics being given somewhere in the order of £300 a week (tax free) from the government. That is a lot more than many people get as a wage!
8

Robert,

Kirriemuir 26/03/2008 14:47:22
Obesity arises only from the food we eat so what is in today's food that is causing this problem? The further we move away from nature or that which is natural the more unhealthy and obese we become so why blame the poor consumer when the problem lies in governmental ignorance. A little legislation might just solve the problem but nothing so fatuous that prohibits the sale of unpasteurised (etc) milk and adds poison to the public water supply.
9

,

26/03/2008 16:21:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

John Blackley,

Florida 26/03/2008 18:29:35
Given that the cost to the NHS of obesity-related illness is probably considerably more than five million a year, weight-reducing drugs costing five million a year may be a good bet.

To counterbalance that, I fear that - with obesity being a behavioral affliction (as opposed, say, to diabetes or cancer) - simply giving someone pills isn't going to do a lot to change their behavior. I'm aware that the NHS is also trying to teach people better behaviour but, given the success of such efforts in the past, I'll reserve judgment on the success or failure of that.

On the fatuous (sorry) side, I'm amused by Mary Scanlon's mock outrage at overweight people being told to join WeightWatchers. The nerve!

Does she really think that patting them on the backs of their pudgy hands and telling them they're not to blame will shed the pounds?
11

Robert,

Kirriemuir 27/03/2008 00:27:10
#10 Hardtruth, Are you speaking from personal experience or just guessing? My comment is sincere, genuine, factual, and based on full time study and experimentation of 13 years. For your information obesity occurs through the continual consumption of carbohydrates which. although part of today's staple diet, are harmful to the body and cause weight gain. Contrary to the cherished views of others (like yourself) excessive energy expenditure is not relevant to weight gain. Carbohydrates, coupled with polyunsaturated fats which are potent suppressors of the immune sytem, together cause ill health such as cancer, diabetes, athritis, anurisms, cardiac problems, and birth defects to mention but a few of the adverse affects of today's diet. No reference was made to the diet of the 19c. Why not address the article rather than criticise those of other posters?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.