Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


One in 15 deaths in surgery is linked to patients' drinking

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 September 2009
ALCOHOL abuse was linked to one in 15 surgical deaths reported in Scotland last year, a report has revealed.
The Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality (SASM) found that alcohol was a factor in the deaths of 194 patients in 2008. Of these, alcohol played a "significant role" in 147 patients, contributing to 112 deaths and causing 35.

The report found "ac
ute alcohol intoxication" was a factor in the deaths of 31 patients under the care of surgeons.

Experts said the figures showed for the first time the impact of alcohol abuse on the work of surgeons in Scotland.

The audit identified 3,461 deaths under surgical care last year from all groups, apart from cardiac and obstetric surgery. More than 500,000 operations were carried out in Scotland.

SASM chairman John Orr said this was the first time questions of alcohol abuse had been posed in relation to surgery. "Most surgeons are aware that alcohol abuse contributes to death, particularly around cancer and road traffic accidents," he said.

If someone had been abusing alcohol, it could lead to greater complications during surgery. "If you have a patient who has been drinking and needs urgent surgery then it's a risk factor for the operation and the anaesthetic," he said.

Dr Nick Pace, also from SASM, added: "There may have been incidences where, because of chronic alcohol abuse, you start getting liver damage. When you get liver damage, you start getting problems with blood clotting and it just complicates an already complicated situation."

Dr Pace said chronic drinkers were also more likely to get pneumonia after surgery, and more prone to infections.

Yesterday's interim report for 2008 also highlighted that, in 15 per cent of deaths, auditors had highlighted "an area of concern or for consideration", or Acon.

The most common Acon was linked to patients being inappropriately placed on a surgical ward. This was followed by the fact that in retrospect, the operation should not have been done, and delays in referral.

In 2008, the report said, there were 86 cases where Acons may have contributed to death – down from 137 in 2007 – and two where it caused death, both linked to the fitting of feeding tubes. This is down from 11 the previous year. This number is expected to rise before the final report is ready in November.

The report also found that in 30 per cent of patients who died after surgery, infections such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile were a factor, up from 29 per cent in 2007 and 26 per cent the previous year.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 September 2009 11:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

scotnotbrit,

camelon 03/09/2009 00:39:33
it wasnt smoking (class b) marijuana ? definitely the cheap and freely avaiable electric soup ? you can get half price beer vouchers at tescos , five pounds to get "smashin' windaes" drunk , five pounds worth of weed can get you the jail in front of the wrong bench .
2

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/09/2009 09:28:03
"The report found "acute alcohol intoxication" was a factor in the deaths of 31 patients under the care of surgeons.

Were the surgeons p*ssed then?

I can hear the distant rumble of the tanks getting closer and the crunch of the jack boots as they stomp over people's heads.

Keep smoking the dope #1. It numbs the senses. That way you won't notice when they finally remove the last of your freedoms.
3

El Franko,

03/09/2009 09:52:13
Better wording in the headline today. The previous coverage of this made it seem that the drink was being consumed by the surgeons.
4

,

03/09/2009 10:25:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

english charlie,

03/09/2009 10:41:20
14 in 15 deaths in surgery is linked to patients' not drinking.
6

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/09/2009 11:08:12
#4:

"If you had your way we would all be pi$hed all of the time."

How wrong you are. With that comment you have demonstrated to all that you simply do not understand any of these issues---and that you don't bother reading my comments before jumping to conclusions either.

I have never advocated that people get p*ssed. If you had ever taken the trouble to read my posts, you would realise that I am an advocate of people HANDLING their drink. I am also an advocate of people who do drink responsibly not finding themselves caught up in the net of laws designed to control the irresponsible minority.

Additionally, I am against new laws which seek to control the responsible majority rather than the irresponsible minority.

Things like this are just propaganda. It is completely meaningless until you compare it with the number of operations carried out and the reasons why they were carried out.

From your posting track record you won't be happy until we are all living like puritans. I personally do not want to live like a puritan and neither do the majority. Read your history books and you will see what puritanism means---and it is not too far removed from what this insane government is aiming for.

Yes, by all means come down hard on those who can't handle their drink but LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE!
7

,

03/09/2009 14:49:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/09/2009 16:21:48
spagan:

The remark about the surgeons being p*ssed was tongue-in-cheek. Did you really miss that one?

"All the Government is doing is trying to rein back excess."

It is absolutely no business of the government to stop people drinking or smoking as much as they want. That is not why governments are there. They can advise, yes. Not a problem with that but when they start legislating in an attempt to control people who are not breaking the law or otherwise doing anyone any harm, that is bang out of order.

Laws already exist to cover the irresponsible behaviour of the minority when they are drunk. We do not need price increases, permitted hours restrictions, age restrictions, consumption restrictions, separate aisles, separate checkouts, courses on how to serve drink, restrictions on what bar staff can say or any other inane restriction or law that is being proposed by the brain-dead politicians.

Measures aimed at those with problems should ONLY target those with problems. Everyone else should be completely unaffected.

This is all stupid, nanny-state control-freakery and it MUST stop.
9

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 03/09/2009 23:12:12
In the cowboy movies the surgical approach was to bite on a piece of wood having consumed a bottle of whisky. I know the NHS is strapped for cash but this new approach based on old tech seems a tad reckless!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.