Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Patients may be sent abroad for treatment

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 September 2008
PATIENTS who cannot be treated within new, legally-binding, waiting-time guarantees in Scotland could be sent overseas for surgery, according to plans by the Scottish Government.
Fears have been raised that placing a legal obligation on health boards to treat patients within a 12-week target could create a "litigation culture" in the NHS when the goal is not met.

But Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish health secretary, said thi
s was not the intention of the proposals, which she said would end long waits for patients.

A consultation document also raises the prospect of a "no-fault compensation scheme" for the NHS, removing the need for long court battles between the health service and patients. But Ms Sturgeon revealed this would not yet be included in the new Patients' Rights Bill, as further work was needed to look at the costs of such a scheme.

Launching the consultation at the Beatson cancer centre in Glasgow, Ms Sturgeon said the bill was an "important piece of healthcare legislation".

Among the proposals, patients referred for surgery will have to be treated within a 12-week legal guarantee, set within an 18-week overall target from GP to treatment, due to be met in 2011.

Ms Sturgeon said they envisaged that if boards could not meet the 12-week target, they would have to send patients for treatment elsewhere.

"That could mean another NHS board … potentially the existing private sector capacity we have in Scotland, or in extreme cases then treatment in another country," she said.

Ms Sturgeon admitted that, in some situations, patients could take their case to court if they faced long waits, as was already the case for those who believed they had a claim against the NHS.

"But we're not intending to create an increased legal culture in the NHS. Patients don't want to have to take an NHS board to court," she said.

"They want to get treatment and what this does is clarify the obligations a board is under to make sure that that kind of situation doesn't arise."

Ms Sturgeon also raised the possibility that a no-fault compensation scheme could be simpler than current methods used in the NHS. "I think getting away from a very adversarial, defensive system is a good idea," she said.

The NHS in Scotland paid over £21 million in compensation for clinical negligence cases in 2006-7.

A British Medical Association Scotland spokeswoman said: "Doctors have always had concerns about waiting-time targets and the need to focus on clinical need, not political priorities.

"There are also concerns that the prospect of legal action may create more problems than it resolves."

Labour's health spokeswoman, Cathy Jamieson, said the SNP could best achieve lower waiting times by putting more money into the system. "Labour believes that government policy should focus on improving treatment for patients, not creating more work for lawyers," she said.

But Margaret Watt, of the Scotland Patients Association, welcomed the legally-binding guarantees. "Patients should not be left in long queues like in a supermarket," she said.





The full article contains 516 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 September 2008 10:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 00:50:11


Yes!,..'bin laden' and his 'motley crew' are,...

...'waiting for you'! :)

Nothing like a little "Surgery" in a tent, with the camel's outside, having a 'wee' or worse!

Yes! If you have the 'Brass Neck' to legally challenge our unique NHS, be wary, very wary!

NO Point in 'crying wolf', when one finds their,..

...'Big Toe, sticking out their Eye Socket'

BTW: That Spade for clearing the 'Camels Dung' is later used for cutting you open, on the needed stomach surgery!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 00:57:06


Better the,...'Devil you Know'! quite frankly it is,...

..'Medicine in the Bottle' rather than 'Dolly Mixtures'
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 01:18:22


***********"motley"*********
ADJ
1 made up of people or things of different types ? a motley assortment of mules, donkeys, and camels

2 multicoloured

:DD
4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA: for more WAR VOTE McCain 23/09/2008 04:36:42
So dude .
When or if Scotland goes independent ..Wii sending patients to foreign lands to have surgery done STOP,?

What exactly is the problem wiTh ur NHS...

Not enough money . not enough doctors and nurses, not enough hospitals , not enough equipment in the hospitals.


Here in the US, u will get treatment and surgery immediately on demand. . And yes we have issues . but no body but nobody waits for surgery in the US.

Sending patients to foreign lands to have surgery sounds incredibly bizarre.

Is shroom omelette time

GC
5

Cappo Del Monte,

23/09/2008 06:41:28
This story is older than the hills, liebours stated this down south years ago and virtually it never happened
6

Lanna,

23/09/2008 06:46:14
This is old news. The medical systems need to get their acts together and start taking care of their patients whether US, Canada,or UK.
Trouble with this medical-tourism...it doesn't quite go hand in hand with green eco-tourism...just think of all those air-miles per gall-stone removals.
7

Lanna,

23/09/2008 06:48:28
#4 GC
for your reading pleasure:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/
healthcare/medicaltourism.html
8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Still here 23/09/2008 08:29:56
As long as we get sent somewhere pleasant. It may come as shock to find you're getting your appendix out in some banana republic somewhere, say the UK.
9

Boy Wonder,

23/09/2008 09:01:16
I've asked my doctors to consider Goa as mestination of choice.

It's good to have the NHS as a surgical/holiday operation, isn't it???
10

WKKB,

23/09/2008 09:45:23
A dear friend of my family had a stroke and was left unable to swallow. The Dr decided he would need a permanent feeding tub inserted. He waited in hospital over a month for the procedure simply because "the only surgeon qualified to do the procedure is on holiday". When my friend passed away just days before the procedure because of an infection picked up in the hospital the family tried invain to get an answer why it had happened.

I want to know why in the whole of Falkirk there was only ONE Dr who was qualified to insert a permanent feeding tube?

Instead of all the meetings to decide when to have meetings and instead of paying to send patients to private practices or even out of the country... Why doesn't the NHS simply hire more qualified specialists which would in effect reduce the waiting list/time.

I work for the NHS and can't believe the un-necessary spending on a daily basis... Putting people up in hotels for meetings over night when they live less than 10 miles from the event. Creating "jobs for the boys". Hiring taxies to pick up and deliver staff from their homes to jobs and home again. I have to pay to drive to work why can't they???? And those are just the pennies... Add in a few hundred bonuses for the big boys in suite and I can only imagine where the rest of the big bucks are going!

There is SO much waste in the NHS, I would venture to say that if they could stop the waste for just one year and collect the funds they'd be able to hire possibly 50 - 100 specialists to take the load and lower the waiting times AND keep the patients in Scotland.

It's not productive to send patients to another country, not just because of the money but they're then away from their support groups and healing, especially for the elderly, becomes a question to be concerned about.

Someone in the NHS really needs to get smart and take over the thinking for those who haven't a clue!
11

WKKB,

23/09/2008 09:49:16
GalacticCannibal, every time I see you I mean to tell you I have a very dear frind in Murrieta CA. He built a nice home there about 20 years ago. I imagine you're a lot warmer there than we are here in Scotland at the moment.
12

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 23/09/2008 11:42:22
Of course, if you're sent abroad for treatment, she may not do you much good medically but it may help to take your mind off medical matters.
13

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 23/09/2008 16:54:22
I do hope they don't send Scottish NHS patients to Canada because we are overburdened here and are compelled to send some of our Canadian patients to the US of A for treatment.

We would like to help you out but we are inundated with sick patients already as the population ages and people live longer.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.