Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Rooftop garden, cinema and private rooms in Scotland's £840m hospital

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 November 2009
EVERY detail has been considered. Private rooms, state-of-the-art scanners and a tunnel linking adult and children's wards to a cutting-edge laboratory.



But to top it all, literally, the sick children's unit on Scotland's largest and most expensive hospital campus will have a covered roof garden with its own stage for theatrical productions.

For the first time yesterday, the public was given a preview of how the vast £840 million campus will look on completion in 2015, when health secretary Nicola Sturgeon named the successful bidder for the project.

The rooftop theatre will be part of the 256-bed, five-storey children's hospital, which will replace the Royal Hospital for Sick Children at Yorkhill.

It will be accompanied by an in-house cinema, where children can be taken in their beds to enjoy the latest Hollywood fare.

A spokeswoman for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said that such entertainment facilities were an important part of the children's facility: "They will be open for use by both long-term and short-term patients, to enjoy whatever is on offer.

"There are young patients who are here for a very long time. Sometimes they are virtually residents, so things like this make their stays much more varied and interesting."

Ms Sturgeon, who is also the MSP for Govan, where the campus will be built, said the announcement was an important step towards creating a "world-class" hospital campus.

"This is a really big and exciting day, certainly for Govan and Glasgow, but also for Scotland as a whole," she said. "This is the biggest ever hospital construction project in the 61-year history of the NHS in Scotland. That's how big and significant it is, it is a landmark occasion."

Ms Sturgeon said the gathering of adult, children and maternity services together on one site was the "gold standard" of delivering health care.

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said the "inspiring" design was unanimously agreed to be the outstanding contender from three strong bids and gave the best value for money.

The hospital, which is expected to treat 110,000 patients every year, will be built on the site of the existing Southern General Hospital.

It will have one of the biggest emergency departments in Scotland, 1,109 beds in single-room accommodation and 20 state-of-the-art operating theatres.

Ms Sturgeon welcomed the 100 per cent single-room accommodation in the adult hospital: "As somebody who has repeatedly said that tackling health care infection is my top priority, that pleases me immensely."

The campus will also be home to specialised services, such as renal medicine, transplantation and vascular surgery.

It will be paid for entirely through public funding, with the construction contract worth £670m. About 2,500 jobs are expected to be created on the project, with at least 10 per cent coming from the local area.

The contract for the campus has been awarded to property developers Brookfield, who also built the new Wembley Stadium, a project which became mired in controversy when it was finished late and over budget.

But the company's managing director, Ashley Muldoon, yesterday said he was in no doubt that the hospital campus would be brought in on time and on budget.

Robert Calderwood, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde chief executive, said of the decision to award the contract to Brookfield: "The three companies bidding for the project offered a range of innovative and creative designs but Brookfield captured the best of all worlds in their proposal."

The company, which is currently working on a £350m hospital in Peterborough, said the latest deal would mark its first major construction contract in Scotland.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 10:59 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 06/11/2009 22:56:14
So the SNP is against Glasgow?
2

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 06/11/2009 22:59:23
And by the way, Neville Chamberlain was the architect of the NHS. WW11 prevented its implementation and Labour pinched the idea.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/11/2009 01:19:43

I thought, and to my knowledge, the NHS, were discouraging anything to do plant life in or at our Hospitals, taking flowers in for a mother and her new born baby is now a NO-NO, as far as I Know!, So how come the,,,Roof Top Garden?


4

Baggy Troosers,

07/11/2009 04:00:16
That Wicked wicked Wicked SNP should be ashamed of themselves.

Why don't they understand that we cannae dae that for ourselves.

WE'll be punished ,mark my words
5

R Davis,

Vienna 07/11/2009 08:01:23
Wonder if it if it has budgeted for the overspend, like the Scottish Parliament? Lets hope they will have the money to staff it.
6

Soosider,

Glasgow 07/11/2009 08:31:17
I am incensed at the SNP ripping off Glasgow in this way, how dare they invest £840m in this city. It is shocking that they intend to build a state of the art hospital in a city riddled with serious health problems. I am sure they are doing it deliberately. Just think in a little under 4 years this city will be scarred with a beautiful clean modern hospital, paid for by the SNP led Scottish Parliament. Disgraceful so it is by the way
;-)
7

eric,

lothian 07/11/2009 09:13:59
Well done beats squandering millions on a tramline thats just for vanity.
8

Mc Max ,

07/11/2009 09:57:15
5
R Davis,Vienna.
Labour and their Rip off PFI PPP are not involved.
9

Boudicca's Henchman,

the wash 07/11/2009 13:11:23
No 2: Please get your facts right; the health service was proposed by Beverige a liberal politician, approved by Churchill and stolen as his own by Nye Bevin, the greatest con man in modern times
10

mark mccann,

07/11/2009 13:39:56
And the silence from the unionists is deafening!
11

Evia,

07/11/2009 16:13:29
Very OTT. The money for fancy extras would have been better spent on life-saving drugs and equipment for those who need them. I have no problem with money being spent on a new hospital if that is what is needed but money should be used to benefit the majority.
12

puskas,

East kilbride 07/11/2009 17:00:32
No11.

The majority ?
13

puskas,

East kilbride 07/11/2009 17:08:18
The Scotsman headline is an attempt to ridicule this new Southern General Hospital..

I see some posters are starting a conga in support of Brown..

A hospital built to specification with a few add - ons to help the sick to convaless is alright by me..

A hospital built in Glasgow direct from the public purse is the way to go.. PPP - PPI would have doubled the price and maybe more. Of course the Andy Kerr brown envelopes have been thredded.

14

puskas,

East kilbride 07/11/2009 17:10:36
Under present circumstances and the massive cutbacks in the Scottish budget I expect some of the complainants would rather support GARL...
15

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 07/11/2009 17:50:33
9, Boudicca's Henchman. Chamberlain came up with the NHS when he was Chancellor.
16

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 07/11/2009 17:53:12
re 15. Chamberlain came up with the idea of it. He was the architect. I do have my facts right.
17

MissRc,

Scotland 19/11/2009 15:52:47
I would like to know how much of our money goes to pay for people who are employed to pick construction companies on a points system for public buildings. What are their qualifications – what do they know about construction? Who designed the points system which is obviously flawed?

Take the recent example of the new Southern General Hospital in Glasgow awarded to Brookfields/Multiplex. Please name a hospital they have completed in the UK. Are we going to trust a company who has never built a hospital even in Europe to build the largest Acute hospital in Europe let alone Scotland.

The largest hospital I can find that Multiplex have built is Casey Hospital, Victoria, Australia just 229 beds, slight difference to 1109 beds for Glasgow.

The Australian/Canadian company only came to the UK in 1999 completing two jobs – West Stand Chelsea FC then Wembley Stadium. Everyone knows what a disaster that was, not a few months late but 2 years!!

Their total number of staff in UK is 120 based in London, so no Scottish staff and no Scottish supply chain. Why trust a company that is not actually going to do the majority of the work themselves when there are two good companies that were on the list that have a track record of building hospitals on time and in budget that are based in Scotland.

I would also like to know why each contractor that accepts bids for public work have to spend c.£2m each. Would it not be better for the system to be re-worked so that this money is better put to use refurbishing or building small public projects.

Would it not be better to get rid of the consultants, the point system staff and choose a construction company that has a successful track record of building safely to time and budget thus saving us the tax payer?

Is there a budding “John Pilger” at the Scotsman who could so some investigative journalism into this public scandal of procurement of public buildings in Scotland?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.