Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Warning over critical lack of sperm donors



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 November 2008
URGENT action is needed to tackle a shortage of sperm donors in the UK, experts warned yesterday.
Anonymous sperm and egg donation was banned from April 2005, meaning children can now trace their biological parents when they reach 18.

Leading fertility experts, writing in the British Medical Journal, now say new measures are needed to increase
donor numbers after a severe decline in men willing to donate since the rules were changed.

Dr Mark Hamilton, chairman of the British Fertility Society (BFS) and based at Aberdeen University, and Dr Allan Pacey, secretary of the BFS, said around 4,000 UK patients needed donor sperm each year.

This meant that a minimum of 500 new donors were needed each year to meet demand.

In 1996, 403 men were newly registered with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) as sperm donors in the UK, falling to 247 in 2004.

Figures for 2006 showed a rise to 307 but fewer women overall were treated with donor sperm.

In 2005, 2,727 women were treated with donor sperm but this fell to 2,107 in 2006.

"Currently, many clinics struggle to recruit donors, have long waiting lists for those needing treatment, have high costs, and in some areas have ceased to provide treatment services altogether," the doctors said.

Dr Hamilton and Dr Pacey criticised limits placed on the number of children donors can help conceive. They said the current limit of ten families from a single donor was "arbitrary".

Dr Hamilton said while some men would prefer to father only a few children, others might be happy to help conceive many more. In the Netherlands, which has a smaller population than the UK, the upper limit is 25, he said.

The experts also called for more "sperm sharing" schemes to be established.

Such programmes allow the male partners of women needing fertility treatment to donate sperm in return for cut-price IVF. Similar schemes are already in place for egg-sharing.

The doctors called for better advertising to attract potential donors, improved efficiency in dealing with first inquiries, and more convenient clinic opening hours.

Dr Hamilton and Dr Pacey rejected other measures, such as increasing the age limit for donors – currently 40 – because gene mutations can occur as men get older, or lowering the threshold for acceptable semen quality.

But some experts suspect that the shortage of donors may already mean clinics are using sperm of lower quality, resulting in fewer pregnancies.

Professor Richard Fleming, director of the Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine, said the shortage of donors in Scotland was a serious concern.

"We need to be recruiting about 50 new donors every year in Scotland, but currently the supplies are not there," he said.

"We are nowhere near that level and it means that patients are going abroad to places such as Denmark for treatment."

Clare Lewis-Jones, chief executive of Infertility Network UK, said the BFS recommendations could help ease the UK's sperm shortage. "We know from the calls we receive from patients needing donor insemination how devastating it is to not be able to access the treatment they need to have a family because of the current shortage of donors, which in some cases is simply because of where they live."

BACKGROUND

SCOTLAND has had problems recruiting sperm donors over a number of years.

In 2006 it was reported that just one active sperm donor remained north of the Border, forcing patients to go elsewhere for treatment or join long queues. The situation has since improved, but both NHS and private clinics are still reporting shortages.

Professor Richard Fleming, director of the private Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine, said two years after opening, the centre had only recently recruited five new sperm donors a year. He said even before anonymity was removed from donors, recruits were falling due to men's concerns about being stored on a national database





The full article contains 656 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 November 2008 11:17 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 00:18:19
Come again?
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 00:18:58


Scotsman News! Please get your IT team sorted out, this newish web-site is bad enough, without you being allowed to use the word "Sp&rm" and NOT US!

Now if I use the Word,...'Tadpole'! as a replacement, can I please pass GO!?

3

Conan the Librarian™,

12/11/2008 00:29:56
1
What are you trying to say? Spit it out man!
4

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 00:37:35
#3

One swallow doesn't make a summer..............































........but it sure makes your night!
5

drunken proffet,

Tassy 12/11/2008 00:50:07
I would say that the word cr*p is derived from the name of the gentleman who invented the flushing toilet. If he had been called Smith, would we suffer the same penalty in our postings if we described an item as a load of Smith. As far as sp*rm donation is concerned the choice of being anonymous or having some scruffy teenager turning up eighteen years in the future and asking for free lodgings is not difficult to make. You are right about using "sp*rm" in postings.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 00:52:23



HOY ABOVE!!

LESS off the 'Vulgarity'! it is a 'Serious Subject you know!


7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 01:04:07


I see that the above few 'Wan)kers' are quiet so I will continue!
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 01:04:29

Soo here we GO!

My DYW and I were told, if the 'worst-came-to-the-worst', it would be at least a year to find a suitable,'Tadpole' donor, luckily our first round of IVF went 'OK' in that department, but being a, 'first round' it was 'tears', as we never got pregnant, however, this is quite normal for a 'first attempt' although, my Wife doesn't see it that way!

10years of praying and hoping and this time going through ICSI (basically a test tube fertilisation) I can see why her hopes were high.

When we started our IVF (6years ago) I was 'OK' in the old "Tadpole" Dept, but alas, now I have problems!

It quite 'Definitely' would NOT be the same if on our next round, we would have to use "Donor Tadpoles", but we have both agreed, this would be better than NO BABY atall,

This being the case, and actually living through the whole IVF scenario, I would quite happily "Donate" my "Tadpoles" to help other couples, funny though, my wife does not see the same about her eggs, she would want plenty of info, to where the were going, or to whom!, maybe that's a 'Woman's Thing'!?
9

Conan the Librarian™,

12/11/2008 01:17:23
8
Charles you are going through IVF, and are calling us vvankers?

Ejaculate is the posh term.Tadpoles is a wee bit zoomorphist.
10

Guga II,

Rockall 12/11/2008 01:27:28
Who in their right mind would want to be in a situation where, in eighteen years, ten (or 25 in Holland) obnoxious teenagers could turn up on your doorstep.

As for increasing the numbers that any spèrm donor can contribute to, surely that increases the probability of their being a higher number of incestuous relationships in the future. That will really do a lot of good for the gene pool, and I don't think.

11

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 01:29:33

Conon ~9,

I say the word in jest! no harm or indendos meant!

How come you got away with using that word anyway, I get a message "unsuitabe word" if I type the word wan)kers?
12

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 01:39:18
#8

I can see that you are a Master Debater with that post :)
13

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 02:15:16


jerrymanders ~12,

Yes! I see your point!, but after 10years of trying to get 'Pregnant', the 'Heartbreak' it brings is unthinkable!

My Wife and I have been, through it all! and still going through, the last disappointment, 'Big Style'!

"Master Debater" yes! I don't mind! and if it helps other couples with the 'Agony' of infertility, I will keep posting on,..'Real Life Story's'.

Thankyou for your observation's and comment and the jest of, smile!

If one cannot see a little humour, with meaning on Spérm donation, one would go,..'Nuts'! :D


14

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 02:20:50
#13

Keep trying. My Mother and Father were on the adoptive list for years because they couldn't conceive. They were actually about to adopt when my Mother fell pregnant at 40. This was back in the sixties. Good excuse for Dad!(there's three of us!) Glad you can see the funny side but best of luck too.
15

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 02:24:51



BTW! you might get our live interview with the Herald Newspaper on Monday next!

Photo's Included!


16

,

12/11/2008 02:29:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 02:33:11
#15

The Herald? Good God, is that not the same as swearing on here?!!!!!!! (When is it?)
18

Guga II,

Rockall 12/11/2008 02:43:53
#15 Charlie.

I'll have to buy the Herald next Monday then, to see a photo of a 95 year old with his DYW.
19

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 02:47:01



Subject Matter being the New IVM, with great success rates to become pregnant, rather than IVF, the Scotsman News is very slow in giving, 'up-to-date' health issues, unlike the 'Times-on-Line', and the,...
...'Daily Mail'

When the 'Herald' Newspaper contacted us about our IVF scenario and the new IVM treatment, the first thing I said to the reporter was,....

"Why can the, Scotsman News not do this!, why are they Soo behind in,..'Health Issues'!?

They have someone at there,..'Door-Step', if wanted, but it takes other 'Newspapers' to take advantage of people like us, that can write an encyclopedia
on the subject matter of, Infertility and IVF.

Look, 'on-line' on Monday or better still, Purchase the Herald, to see our interview!

20

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 02:52:59

Guga II ~18,

'Dinny get Smart'!

Just because of Boy Wonders common believe, I am NOT in a 'Wheelchair' with cobwebs all over my face, like the show on BBC3

"Touch Me, I am Karen Taylor"! :))

21

Warden An' All, Reborn,

12/11/2008 03:27:01
This has got to be a call to snp members to stop wasting their own production, there is a greater need for what they have than a few seconds of pleasure. This is not to say that a bunch of low sp#rm donors will be much good though.
22

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/11/2008 03:35:54


Warden An' All, Reborn ~21,

Funny Post!, but with 'fun'!

Night, Night, Dont let,..'Salmond's Bed Bugs Bite'!

23

Dave,

Western Isles 12/11/2008 07:37:59
Men

Under no circumstances should you facilitate wimmins "choice" to have kids without a male role in her or the kids life. With that in mind, do not donate sp*rm, otherwise another generation of badly adjusted kids will be brought up and one day you may get a knock on the door from a teenage boy or girl looking for her "daddy" and 18 years back pocket money to which you cannot help on either front.

Tell them thier daddy was a turkey baster.

DO NOT donate sp*rm! It is YOUR DNA and should be kept that way until Miss Right "comes" along and it's done naturally, with consent and you are able to have an active role in her life and the life of your kid(s).
24

Boy Wonder,

12/11/2008 08:12:07
Deny it all you want, Chuckles ... people will at last see 'The Truth' (if that's what it is) Monday next.

Who was your stand-in, while you were hiding in the other room???
25

paulr,

edinburgh 12/11/2008 08:34:54
A sudden claim for 18 years of child support payments from a brat you helped produce but never met.
HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!
26

Douglas,

Bathgate 12/11/2008 08:36:50
Since there are obviously donors aplenty visiting "massage parlours" and patrolling tolerance zones why not organise a collection service from these areas? It's free, anonymous and provides employment for the wee van driver.
27

Warden An' All, Reborn,

12/11/2008 08:45:58
I can see it now, birth certificate: father's occupation :shake!
28

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 12/11/2008 09:38:58
This is exactly how Nazi Germany started
29

Conan the Librarian™,

12/11/2008 10:53:47
11
Charles, it's all in the vvrist action.
30

Douglas,

Bathgate 12/11/2008 11:06:46
28 Strict Ivan Jellicoe: You're confused, this is how the Prussian empire began. Nazi Germany was the result of lap dancing clubs.
31

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 12/11/2008 11:13:54
Of course!
32

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 12/11/2008 11:14:40
You are all warned - this is exactly how the Prussian Empire began
33

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 12/11/2008 11:18:52
30 Douglas from Bathgate

Where DO you get some of your more wacky theories?

If some virile and younger men would stop mast*urbating long enought perhaps they would have enough sp*rm left over to make a contribution.

That is, after they have been screened and are not cretins, have not inherited and life-threating medical conditions, and are of at least minimal superior human genetic material.

Charles Linskaill

Good morning and good luck in your quest to get pregant - your DYW, OF COURSE!

34

big_meat,

tissueland 12/11/2008 12:55:32
Well, I shall wipe this nonsense off my screen with a flick of my wrist, and bring up another atricle which perks my interest, and grabs my attention.
35

big_meat,

Queen Street 12/11/2008 13:31:00
I think that I have been given some misinformation about the location of my new branch of HBOS. I was told you that just like you go to the bank, and get your money from a hole in the wall machine, there was a new way to bank while you use the loo... multi tasking at its best!
I had seen some rather odd holes recently in public conveniences in Edinburgh...and was told these new facilities were for deposits.
I mentioned I had a large ammount to deposit, was shown a large ammount of interest, and happily made my deposit with no queueing!
I was even given a slip of paper with a number on it, though this was unusual as it was slipped under the door, instead of coming out of the machine with the hole in it.
I do hope I havent been duped, it will leave a bad taste in my mouth.
36

jerrymanders,

12/11/2008 14:37:55
#35,36

This thread will be pulled if you carry on like that!
37

Poetess50,

12/11/2008 20:01:34
Given the sorry state of the majority of Scottish men, I'h quite happy to remain childless!!!!
38

Scunnert,

12/11/2008 22:53:41
"URGENT action is needed to tackle a shortage of spermatazoa donors in the UK, experts warned yesterday."

Urgent? How many abortions are carried out each year in the UK? We've got one lot doing abortions and another lot making women pregnant. Society has sunk into insanity.

This technology should be banned.
39

Scunnert,

12/11/2008 22:54:56
I copied a sentence from the article but couldn't post it as one of the words was "unsuitable". Had to change it to spermatazoa. ???
40

truthsleuth,

12/11/2008 23:43:16
The premier modifiable source of accelerated climate change is Human population.
Lets stop all these artificial fertilisation methods the birth rate is to high.

There is no such right as the right to have children - just a responsibility.
41

Mark Lyndon,

14/11/2008 17:56:22
According to HFEA figures, the numbers of sp-rm donors have gone *up* since the ending of anonymity, thus reversing a long-term decline. The 307 donors in 2006 was the highest figure since 2001.

http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1459.html

I don't have a huge problem with sp-rm donors being paid, or the numbers of children per donor being increased, but we should never go back to the days of anonymous donors. The donor-conceived are the ones who matter in this, not the parents, not the clinics, and not the donors.

If a sp-rm donor wants to be anonymous, then he's simply shouldn't be a sp-rm donor. I was a sp-rm donor over 20 years ago, and if I have any genetic children looking for me, I've made it as easy as possible for them to find me. I believe they have a fundamental right to know who I am.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.