Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scottish Parliament water leaks cost £94k to plug

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 February 2009
HOLYROOD managers are spending almost £100,000 trying to stop water leaking into the Scottish Parliament building, it emerged yesterday.
A total of £39,000 was originally put aside from the maintenance budget to solve the problem of the leaky roof in the £414 million building.

But that has already been overspent by £55,000, taking the total to £94,000 – on top of the general mainte
nance budget of £1 million.

The main problem is in the car park with its entrance on Holyrood Road. The iconic roof on the car park, which consists of rolling concrete sections topped with meadow grass, has proved difficult to keep dry.

Contractors have been hired to excavate the car park roof and to fit new drainage systems in an attempt to fix the problem.

But the recent wet and wintry weather has exposed other problems as well, with ceilings around the building springing leaks – including some close to the debating chamber.

The situation became so acute through December and January that some MSPs used buckets to catch water dripping into their offices.

A Scottish Parliament spokesman said: "It has been clear for some time that we have a problem with leaks in the upper basement and car park area."

"Over the course of this financial year contractors have carried out work to address the problem. This has included excavation work, work on the drainage system and work on the membrane material above the car park ceiling," he added.

"The budget reflects that this is on-going work."



The full article contains 262 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

eric,

lothian 17/02/2009 07:27:36
Just as well no works of art inside !
2

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 17/02/2009 07:44:59
Quite indicative of the Labour party ideals, eh?

Full of leaks and costly.
3

sam the god,

17/02/2009 08:15:17
the building has never been fit for purpose.
the wooden sticks over the windows should be replaced with metal bars and secure doors fitted to the office door just like in prison.
4

Mallory,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 08:34:12
Right Sam - lock em up and throw away the keys. You know t makes sense.
5

Mallory,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 08:35:42
Shock horror. Architects and builders discover that water runs downhill.
6

donald,

glasgow 17/02/2009 08:36:31
What do you expect from an upturned boat.
7

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 08:43:40
Perhaps the Scotsman can remind us who sanctioned the design of this building?

Dewar’s folly indeed.
8

Drat,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 09:33:24
"The budget reflects that this is on-going work." What's that supposed to mean?
The budget reflects that this is a load of money down the drain trying to maintain a poorly built building.
9

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 09:42:29
#6 - and the ultimate irony is that Enrico Manuelezez drew 'inspiration' for his back-of-a-fag-packet concept from looking out the window as the train passed through Northumbria. He was on his way to flog some Emperor's New Clothes to Daft Old Donald Dither but his 'Iconic Upturned Boats' were actually in England.
10

Teargas,

Catalunya 17/02/2009 09:55:30
Just another example of shoddy, penny-pinching, uninspected workmanship that ultimately costs twice as much. Everybody's to blame, from the contractor right to the top. Sadly, it doesn't only happen in Scotland - this is a worldwide phenomenon and it seems to be becoming the norm. Guess who gets to pay pay for all these massive and costly blunders that could be rectified quite easily and cheaply if anybody gave a f*** at the time.
11

Mr. Lachie Todd,

17/02/2009 10:01:25
"MPs face ejection to allow repairs to crumbling Parliament!"

You can find this headline in the 16th October, 2008, edition of The Times (online).

However, it doesn't apply to the Scottish Parliament but the House of Commons.

A £250,000 feasibility study is underway into £350 MILLION worth of repairs to the building including a leaking roof. Recently there have been 33 leaks reported!

From next year, the Members will have to vacate the House of Commons for up to 3 years to allow repairs and upgrading to be carried out.

The cost of an alternative venue has not yet been calculated but it has been suggested that the Lords vacate the upper chamber to make way for the Commons.

12

Walter Ego,

Durness 17/02/2009 10:22:35
What is the Scottish Government doing about this?
13

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 17/02/2009 11:23:02
After second login attempt successful. This has been a problem for some time!

When will trendy politicians architects and builders learn that the only type of roof with half a chance of remaining watertight in Scotland tends to be a pitched roof with slates! Rolling concrete with grass sounds like a complete recipe for disaster just like Dewar and Labour's other efforts in Scotland and elsewhere.

The trendy Lego bricks on he outside and daft stick things tell you this was really meant for Spain as it just jars as a design in the capital of Scotland, being more used to a conventional design like say the Royal Museum extension which is both tasteful and functional. No need to expect that of our politicians.

14

,

17/02/2009 11:45:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Teargas,

Catalunya 17/02/2009 13:16:47
Oh! and by the way - roof excavation - is this a world first?
16

WJohn,

Wet Lothian 17/02/2009 14:36:36
Help ma Boab. Wet and wintry weather in Scotland and doos too..
Obviously the building design anticipated the coming Global Warming catastrophe.
Maximum surface area to maximise heat dissipation and a porous roof suitable for the desert clime.
Perhaps if they had used good old stationary concrete instead of the rolling type .......
Even the Metropolitan’s finest can not stop the leaks at Westminster.
17

your friendly surveyor,

Edinburgh 17/02/2009 17:08:57
Surely this is either a claim against the Architect for designing a roof structure that leaks or a latent defect caused by the contractor not building the design properly. Either way, there should be no cost to the Scottish Parliament
18

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 17/02/2009 20:11:44
#17
Absolutely! Same goes for the Forth Road Bridge and many other public works. All public works contractors should be properly bonded to ensure (a) that the works are completed in time, (b) they remain within budget, and, (c) they do their intended job for their intended lifespan. If these bonds were not in place, the civil servants responsible for approving the contracts should be responsible for the consequent losses to the taxpayer - instead of being handed a handsome pension and their much-coveted "honour".

At the very least, if the contractors fail to accept liability for the costs, they should be blackballed and never be allowed to tender again for any public contract.
19

eric,

26/07/2009 09:28:36
sinking ship eh!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you support tour guides campaigning for the lion sculpture at Holyrood to stay?
Yes, they are best placed to say how popular it is
No, the sculpture is a lump of populist rubbish
Maybe but it’s more important that locals like it than tourists

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.