Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Deadly intent of Mumbai gunmen caught in recorded phone calls

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 January 2009
Chilling tapes of the Mumbai massacre gunmen calmly discussing killing their hostages over the phone were released today.
India revealed recordings it had made of the terrorists contacting their "handlers" via mobile phones in the middle of the raid.

One gunman says: "We have three foreigners, including women."

The response is brutally simple: "Kill them." Gunshot
s then rang out inside the Mumbai hotel, followed by cheering that could be heard over the phone.

India said the transcripts were part of a dossier of evidence handed to Pakistan this week that it says proves the attack was launched from across the border.

The transcripts were translated into English by Indian authorities and obtained by the newspaper The Hindu.

They show that the 10 gunmen who carried out the attacks were in close contact with their handlers throughout the siege. India says those directing the attacks that left 164 dead were senior leaders of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based militant group.

The handlers told a team of gunmen who had seized a Jewish centre to shoot hostages if necessary.

"If you are still threatened, then don't saddle yourself with the burden of the hostages. Immediately kill them," he said.
Six Jewish foreigners, including a rabbi and his wife, were killed inside the Jewish centre.

Later in the night, nearly 24 hours after the attacks began, the handlers urged the gunmen to "be strong in the name of Allah"

"Brother, you have to fight. This is a matter of prestige of Islam," the handler said. "You may feel tired or sleepy, but the commandos of Islam have left everything behind, their mothers, their fathers."

The gunmen were told several times not to kill any Muslim hostages.

The attackers used several different mobile phones, including those belonging to the hostages. Shortly after the siege began, Indian authorities say they began intercepting calls from inside the hotel.

They were also able to pick up calls carried over the internet, which the handlers used to route some calls, according to the dossier.

The siege lasted nearly three days, far longer than security experts said it should have, and, apparently, far longer than the terrorists expected as well. The handlers told the gunmen on November 27 that "the operation has to be concluded tomorrow morning." But it was 36 more hours before it finished.

Much of the dialogue has a teacher-student feel, and indeed, the surviving gunman has said he and the rest of the group were trained by Lashkar in Pakistan.

"We made a big mistake," one of the gunman says into the phone in the early hours of the siege.

"What big mistake?"

"When we were getting into the boat ... another boat came. Everyone jumped quickly. In this confusion, the satellite phone of Ismail got left behind." The investigation shows the gunmen entered Mumbai, which sits on the Arabian sea, by a rubber dinghy.

The attacks against the Mumbai targets were covered non-stop by news channels around the world, and the handlers used TV reports to guide the gunmen, the dossier says. The handlers warned when commandos abseiled down to the Jewish centre from helicopters.

The dossier included photographs of dozens of items recovered in the attacks, including GPS units, mobile phones, guns, and explosives, as well as data gleaned from satellite phones, and details from the interrogation of the lone surviving gunman.

It also had pictures of more mundane items India calls incriminating because they were made in Pakistan, including pickles, detergent, a match box, tissue paper, a Mountain Dew bottle, shaving cream and a towel.

But the strongest – and most chilling – evidence that the gunmen were not acting alone came from the phone transcripts.

"Keep your phone switched on," a handler said in the midst of the siege, "so that we can hear the gunfire.




The full article contains 645 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 January 2009 4:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Indian terrorist attacks
 
1

Muskrat,

07/01/2009 17:10:07
Wakey, wakey world!
2

Houssine,

Nanterre.Fr 08/01/2009 00:00:58
The question is who want provoking the war between both India and Pakistan?? The phone communication was not a proof. We can imagine this is a provocation for implication a parts in conflict and not the first. The but of all this actions was the hoppe to see a new nuclear war between the two countries. India as Pakistany officiels said the two countries was already for the war than the question was at what time will be the war declared?? The war is in the road and they are not diplomatic action to stop it and as the Gaza conflict the "International community " wait the last moment to beging consultation and diplomatic action. The "Big" problemes is the USA play a great roles in international affaires but the "Big" problemes is in this periods of passation of the power between GWB and BARAK HUSSEIN they are a laps of the time where the americain administration was absent. What international community can do for stoping the probable next nuclear war between India and Pakistan?? I think nothing. We have the experience of the precedent wars as the Irak war....I think we assist to the rising in the tension between India and Pakistan as the crise between the Hamas and Israel, each one accuse the other. Now we can analyse the impact of the next probable war between India and Pakistan, what is the repercusion of nuclear war on the climat?? second what impact in internation relation abaout Iran? Third did you think sincerky Hillary Clinton can do anything??
We can see the faux pas of the Obama's administration: when the international presse was focalised about why Obama don't take position about the Gaza crise, his response was a naive (naif) response he call the president is G.B and in international politic the voice of america is one as his speach in Berlin this declaration was a proof of his immaturel politic, he don't have any experience. I read in the news Hillary have declared she is don't known the position of Obam Hussein about the Gaza crise!! this types of declar
3

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 08/01/2009 00:04:16
Wakey,wakey indeed. Like all "good muslims",the Pakistanis were "furious" at it even being hinted that the survivor was Pakistani. Now they are denying any Agency in Pakistan had complicity in the affair.Are they to be believed? Not for a nano-second.Playing both ends against the middle will be their undoing.A minister who said openly that "it appeared there was evidence of a Pakistani involvement", was IMMEDIATELY SACKED! Pakistanis, trained, equiped, and directed the attack,of that there is NO DOUBT at all.
4

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 08/01/2009 00:21:19
#2Houssine,Nanterre.Fr
You are obviously upset at the events unfolding in Asia Minor.So are many others in the world.India has repeatedly said it does not seek war with Pakistan.Muslim extremists are hell-bent on creating such a war.It suits their purposes to do so.You are totally in denial at Pakistan's involvement in the Mumbai atrocity.Like most muslims (you may of course not be a muslim)denial is one of your main weapons.They can justify (to themselves)any atrocity in the name of Islam. Now those are the terrorist extremists.For the rest of the Muslim world, where are the cries of outrage at atrocities committed in the name of Allah,from the majority of the EXTREMELY silent muslim majority?
The evidence of Pakistani involvement is overwhelmingly obvious.The phone calls are proof positive of that involvement.At what level remains yet to be discovered.All your protestations of innocence, smoke and mirrors attempts at clouding the issue, are of no avail.Pakistan has been implicated,a)By the lone survivor, b)By subsequent release of the phone calls before and during the atrocity,and other materiel produced.
India has in fact calmed a nation in shock at such an attack.It is time the world woke up to the sheer duplicity of the Pakistani government.The louder they squeal "foul", the more the other nations of the world should press for answers.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.