Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Most-wanted terrorist in threat to hit White House

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 April 2009
THREATENING an attack on the White House that would "amaze" the world, Baitullah Mehsud, Pakistan's most wanted Islamic terrorist, yesterday claimed responsibility for Monday's deadly assault on a Lahore police academy.
Mehsud, who last week had a £3.5 million bounty placed on his head by the US, said the attack was in retaliation for American missile strikes against militants along the Afghan border.

"Soon we will launch an attack in Washington that will amaze
everyone in the world," Mehsud said by phone. He provided no details.

Mehsud has never been directly linked to any attacks outside Pakistan, but strikes blamed on his network of fighters have widened in scope and ambition in recent years.

Mehsud leads the Tehrik-e-Taleban Pakistan, or Movement of Taleban Pakistan, a loose umbrella group of factions which has carried out assaults across the country.

Pakistan's former government and the CIA named Mehsud as the prime suspect behind the December 2007 killing of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto. Officials accuse him of harbouring foreign fighters, including Central Asians linked to al-Qaeda, and of training suicide bombers.

In his latest comments, Mehsud identified the White House as one of the targets.

Mehsud also claimed responsibility for a suicide car bombing that killed four soldiers in Bannu district on Monday and a suicide attack targeting a police station in Islamabad last week that killed one officer.

Such attacks pose a major test for the weak, year-old civilian administration of Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari that has been gripped with political turmoil in recent weeks.

An interior ministry spokesman said it was too early to respond to Mehsud's claim, but the department's chief, Rehman Malik, said on Monday that authorities had information linking the Lahore attack to Mehsud. He said at least one of the attackers arrived there about 15 days ago from Mehsud's stronghold of South Waziristan near the border with Afghanistan, and rented a house.

The gunmen who attacked the police academy killed seven officers and two civilians, holding security forces at bay for about eight hours before being overpowered by Pakistani commandos. Some of the attackers wore police uniforms, and they took hostages and threw grenades during the assault.

Earlier yesterday, a spokesman from a little-known militant group linked to the Pakistani Taleban also claimed responsibility for the attack and a similar ambush-style attack against the Sri Lankan cricket team earlier this month.

Omar Farooq, who said he is the spokesman for Fedayeen al-Islam, said the group would carry out more attacks unless Pakistani troops withdraw from tribal areas near the Afghan border and the US stops its drone strikes. The group previously said it was behind the September bombing of the Marriott hotel in Islamabad that killed 54 people.

Mehsud declined to comment on Fedayeen al-Islam's claim that it carried out the attack or to say whether the group is linked to his own. The Pakistani Taleban leader also said he was not deterred by the US bounty on his head: "I wish to die and embrace martyrdom. You can't imagine how we could avenge this threat inside Washington, inside the White House," he said.

The Pakistani Taleban has links with al-Qaeda and Afghan Taleban militants who have launched attacks against Nato forces in Afghanistan from a base between the countries.

Pakistan faces tremendous pressure to eradicate militants from its soil and has launched several military operations in the Afghan border region.

The US has stepped up drone attacks against militants in the area, causing tension with Pakistani officials who protest they are a violation of the country's sovereignty and kill civilians.

Monday's highly co-ordinated attack highlighted that militants in the country pose a threat far outside the border region. It prompted the interior ministry chief to say that militant groups were "destabilising the country."

After gunmen stormed the academy, security forces surrounded the compound, exchanging fire in televised scenes reminiscent of the militant siege in the Indian city of Mumbai in November.

Officials were yesterday still trying to sort out how many attackers were involved, giving varying accounts to the media.

Zulfikar Hameed, a senior Lahore police investigator, said that three of the attackers blew themselves up when commandos retook the academy and one was shot by security forces.

Hameed said it was difficult to say precisely how many militants carried out the attack and some may have escaped.

Tasneem Qureshi, a top official at the interior ministry, told Express News TV that four attackers were in custody and "one, who was wounded, managed to escape".

Punjab police chief, Khawaja Khalid Farooq, said one of the captured militants had provided useful information and that about 50 other people in Lahore were detained overnight for questioning.

AL-QAEDA ALLY

INTELLIGENCE officials say Baitullah Mehsud's Tehrik-e-Taleban Pakistan movement is a loose alliance of about 13 groups based on the Afghan border.

Mehsud, an al-Qaeda ally, was declared emir of the group in 2005. It is thought Mhe has been behind a wave of attacks across Pakistan since the army stormed Islamabad's Red Mosque in July 2007 to crush a militant movement based there.





The full article contains 869 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2009 11:12 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: International terrorism
 
1

,

01/04/2009 00:58:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

01/04/2009 02:05:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

01/04/2009 02:24:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Polly Ann,

01/04/2009 03:03:40
#2 Ladiesman217

Thank you for saying so. When most European leaders think Obama to too much of a socialist you know he is a disaster.
5

Polly Ann,

01/04/2009 03:05:25
#3 Richard

Why are you calling other members obscene names? Are you a homophobe?
6

W Smith,

Middle East 01/04/2009 03:36:26
Asking Jihadists if they like america is a bit like asking the local rats if they like the Rentokil man.

Funny how the SNP supporters still don't get it.

BTW
So William Wallace was an anti-monarchy, anti-war leftie who wouldn't dream of invading England as that would be "illegal", then eh?

Hello-oo.

EARTH CALLING SALMOND.

COME IN SALMOND!
7

redcliffe62,

01/04/2009 04:42:42
one of these days i hope the scotsman will let us comment on an israeli story. as per the last 20 stories their answer is "not yet though!".
the fact that israel rejects a two state solution and claims that the 1300 deaths admitted by their own soldiers as war crimes were exaggerated somehow when civilians were of course shot and phospor bombed is news to me even if it is quietly hidden in the back pages.
8

Jim A,

01/04/2009 06:36:00
#1 Richard, "The proof that the war on terror has been an absolute disaster is now there for all to see."

Ok, so lets say your right. How do you suggest terrorism be fought? I assume of course that you don't condone terrorism and something has to be done about it.
9

Mashimaro,

China 01/04/2009 07:39:35
#8 Experience has shown that you cannot shoot your way out of terrorism. This bombing of Pakistan by the US has only served to drive moderates into the arms of the Taleban. It is exacerbating the problem, not solving it. The west should pack up and GO HOME and maybe spend some resources on solving the murder of those 3,000 or so folks who died on 9/11.
10

Jim A,

01/04/2009 07:50:40
#9 Mashimaro, fair comments. Same question to you then. I assume you don't condone terrorism and that it has to be dealt with. So how do you suggest it's dealt with?
11

,

01/04/2009 08:21:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Mcsnagpile,

01/04/2009 09:51:15
Humanity are funny. They worry about so called terrorism which is really a gnats bite. Pattern bombing of entire cities, dropping nuclear bombs now that is making a statement. Blowing up a couple of buildings is hardly worth a mention. Trying to blow up a plane with chemicals so unstable you would probably blow yourself upon the way to the airport or mixing them in the toilet. Trying to ignite your trainers--dumbo's incorp. In a world of six billion people you have a better chance of catching bird flu.
If Terrorism was equated to road carnage on a daily basis the world would be in up in arms.
13

Mashimaro,

China 01/04/2009 09:53:04
#11 Well if you're a country from another continent that's messing around... you leave it alone. If it's a next door neighbour you police your borders. If it is a home grown effort you police your people.
14

Freddie and Bruno,

Paisley 01/04/2009 10:29:11
12 St Scotland

Hear Hear...New bogeyman eh! The real terrorists are the American and UK governments. It was they who carried out the 911 and 7/7 atrocities. It was Labour who murdered their own citizens and are avoiding an independent investigation for that reason. Go watch the video links on www.paisleyexpressions.blogspot.com where you will get the proof of the guilty parties.
15

Mashimaro,

China 01/04/2009 10:41:52
#12 I'm just amazed that Bin Laden is not the NO 1 terror suspect in the world. what does a guy have to do, I ask you!
16

Trond,

Home of trolls 01/04/2009 10:59:27
The price of an afterlife in Paradise seems to be highly inflated.

www.freeafterlife.org
17

,

01/04/2009 11:03:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

01/04/2009 11:27:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

01/04/2009 11:46:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

01/04/2009 11:47:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

01/04/2009 12:40:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Jay Kay,

01/04/2009 13:07:04
maybe the Americans would find it just to go and drop a very large nuclear weapon on someone responsible, after all aren't they the only country to have ever used one in anger?

WWIII when will it begin and where?

With so much world debt and rising violence around the globe it would appear the only solution to the problem, the US after all are intent on finding the terrorists if it kills every man woman and child on the planet, borders mean nothing to the high powers, China just waiting in the wings to make a major push out, all they need is an excuse.

Fight, fight, fight, thats all we on this little ball of mud ever do. Forget world hunger and millions dying all over the globe from war and disease, lets turn up the heat and make it worse for the poorer nations of the globe, well I have news for you, we are one of the poorer nations on the globe, well everywhere north of Watford that is.
23

,

01/04/2009 13:17:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Mashimaro,

China 01/04/2009 14:12:35
#23 I'm taking bets on Somalia (even money), Georgia (2 -1) Pakistan (even money) Taiwan (4-1)
The problem is quite simple. There are too many people in this world. You westerners keep on going in and "saving" the poor folks. Well they have like NINE children each. Only 1 in 10 is meant to survive. But with western medicine interfering, more are surviving. More people = more global warming = more hunger, capiche?
Now the wonderful Deng told the Chinese people to rein it in or suffer the consequences. And we have.
I'd like to know what you - the rest of the world - is doing.
25

Jim A,

01/04/2009 17:31:40
#14 Mashimaro, "Well if you're a country from another continent that's messing around... you leave it alone. If it's a next door neighbour you police your borders. If it is a home grown effort you police your people".

Ok, fair enough, but what if you have terrorists that don't respect international boundries which has been known to happen, how would you deal with that?
26

VAR,

Zavelstein 01/04/2009 22:47:49
Mashimaro, I must take issue with your propaganda. "The west should pack up and GO HOME and maybe spend some resources on solving the murder of those 3,000 or so folks who died on 9/11." 9/11 was committed by Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden basically admitted it afterwards. AQ killed Ahmed Shah Massoud on 09SEP01 for the Taleban to get AQ a refuge after the attacks. Being an AQ refuge is why Afghanistan was attacked (after refusing to turn over AQ). Further, your idea on responding to terrorism: "Well if you're a country from another continent that's messing around... you leave it alone. If it's a next door neighbour you police your borders. If it is a home grown effort you police your people.". So China does not cross borders with its Army? What about the Vietnam expedition of 1979 where the peace-loving Comrade Deng said "It's time to smack the bottom of unruly little children"? Or Nepal? I suppose all those Buddhist monks slaughtered since 1959 were really not meditative holy men, but violent terrorists? And the current oppression of the Uighurs, Falung Gong, Catholics, and other sects is completely justified because they are terrorists and need policing? Last: "Now the wonderful Deng told the Chinese people to rein it in or suffer the consequences. And we have. I'd like to know what you - the rest of the world - is doing." Most of the "West" has a declining birth rate and has had for a while without dictatorial policies and forced abortions. European and American demographics are changing because of low "native" birth rates and immigration (legal or illegal) from the third world (including your country). Your spouting anti-Western Chinese propaganda, revisionist history and blindness are amazing.
27

Conan,

Moffat 01/04/2009 23:51:20
If, and its a big 'if', the US was ruin by truly smart people - still faced with their current threats - they would be well-advised to 'decentralize' their available targets (such as the symbolic 'White House') and make it just a little more difficult for their enemies. The notion of maintaining the same 'HQ' for centuries, regardless of the changing threat picture, does not strike me as particularly smart.
28

Mashimaro,

02/04/2009 01:21:15
#26 "Ok, fair enough, but what if you have terrorists that don't respect international boundries which has been known to happen, how would you deal with that?"

Such as???

Terrorists who don't respect international borders - if there is such a thing - still has to cross those international borders. POLICE YOUR BORDER!
29

Mashimaro,

China 02/04/2009 01:36:07
#27 "9/11 was committed by Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden basically admitted it afterwards."
Can you tell me how he did it? Cos it's an international mystery. And when you start looking at it, you will realise how big a mystery it is. Really. Just to accept what "Bin Laden" if it even was "Bin Laden" says - knowing that he was a CIA asset, his family in close business ties with Carlyle - a company that makes weapons for the US - is a bit naieve, neh?

Here are some questions you might like to answer in your reply:

How did two pilots managed to actually fly their passenger liners right into the WTC? According to sources they had training in a light aircraft and one troubled to fly that too. How did that pilot manage to fly the plane into the Pentagon, a move many very experienced pilots say is extremely difficult to manage?
Why did WTC 1 and WTC 2 fall down?
Why did they fall down so neatly instead of buckling and falling over?
Why did WTC 7 fall down?
What is Promis and how does it work?
Who put the "put" options on the airline stock on the day of 9/11.
Why did Mossad know it was going to happen?
What were Israeli camera crew found celebrating? How did they know what it was, or who it was?
Why were Jewish people told not to go to work in WTC that day?
Why did the airforce not follow standard operating procedure and scramble planes to escort the airliners?
An airliner hit the pentagon? Really? What happened to its wings? Why was there no marks on the lawn in front of the crash site? What happened to its tail? Why were the cable spools in front of the crash site still upright?
Why did the missile battery at the pentagon fail to operate? How did the airliner manage to get past the signal required to not set it off?
Why was Bush left at the school instead of being carried off to a safe place immediately?
Why were the members of the Bin Laden family flown out of the country before they could be questioned and when all other flights were grounded?

Did yo
30

Mashimaro,

China 02/04/2009 01:38:23
#27 "So China does not cross borders with its Army? What about the Vietnam expedition of 1979 where the peace-loving Comrade Deng said "It's time to smack the bottom of unruly little children"? Or Nepal? I suppose all those Buddhist monks slaughtered since 1959 were really not meditative holy men, but violent terrorists?"

China has a long history of war. We've learned out lesson. It appears many other countries have not.


31

Mashimaro,

China 02/04/2009 01:44:08
#27 And the current oppression of the Uighurs, Falung Gong, Catholics, and other sects is completely justified because they are terrorists and need policing?

Well, first of all the catholics are not "oppressed". They have their churches and are welcome to worship in them, as are the Buddhist, Russian orthodox and others.
There are some who choose to swear loyalty to the Vatican and like to follow the Vatican rules... in our country. First and foremost people need to follow the law of their country, not swear allegiance to outside leaders.
The Falun Gong are a cult. We've seen what cults do, such as the one that attacked in Japan with Sarin gas in the underground. They don't have to be oppressed. If they met in small groups and followed their way of worship no one would worry about them. But they don't. They insist on looking for trouble and they find it.
They are also supported by the CIA in their efforts to destabilise China. We will not let that happen. Hence, we police them.
The Uighers are doing just fine. They have their mosques in which to worship. When they start bombing and killing our policemen... we police them.
32

Mashimaro,

02/04/2009 01:49:49
#27 "Most of the "West" has a declining birth rate and has had for a while without dictatorial policies and forced abortions."
The western countries where you have a declining birthrate have been socially engineered. It might have taken time and a lot of money, but it has been successful. China did not have the luxury of time or money. It was a poverty stricken country which had faced a number of famines and natural disaster. It had to take desperate measures. More power to it for doing do. It did was was needed.
However, for every westerner not born, the west helps three to four poverty stricken africans or asians to survive, thereby directly foisting upon them more mouths to feed. What is that, a cruel attempt to provide cheap labour for the western masters? Hence the "legal" or "ilegal" immigration? Eh?
There are some jobs the westerners won't do so they like to import the labour. Pity about the hundreds of thousands left back home to starve.
33

Let's have the truth,

Australia 22/04/2009 14:49:26
I wonder how Obama will justify receiving Avigdor Lieberman at the whitehouse or Netanyahu come to that?

34

Flash Gordon,

19/07/2009 06:32:00
These guys are everywhere and keep multiplying.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are US threats to cut tourism and business ties over the Megrahi case justified?
Yes, Americans have got a right to be angry
No, they’re in no position to claim the moral high ground
No, the decision to free Megrahi was the right one

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.