Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

US seeks the death penalty for 9/11 terror 'mastermind'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 February 2008
KHALID Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, is to face the death penalty at the hands of a United States military tribunal, along with five other detainees at Guantanamo Bay, the Pentagon announced yesterday.
The charges sought by the Pentagon include conspiring with al-Qaeda to attack and murder civilians and 2,973 counts of murder for those killed in the September 11 attacks, when four hijacked passenger planes crashed into New York's World Trade Centre
, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania.

The charges – which must be approved by a Pentagon appointee who oversees the military court at Guantanamo before a trial can be ordered – are the first from that court alleging direct involvement in the 2001 attacks, and the first involving the death penalty.

"These charges allege a long-term, highly sophisticated, organised plan by al-Qaeda to attack the United States," said Brigadier-General Thomas Hartmann, the legal adviser to the tribunal system. He added that the charges have been sworn "against six individuals alleged to be responsible for the planning and execution of the attacks" in 2001.

The military will recommend the six men be tried together before a military tribunal. But recent revelations that Mohammed was subject to a harsh CIA interrogation technique known as waterboarding – which critics call torture – has clouded the case. It involves strapping a person down and pouring water over the suspect's cloth-covered face to create the sensation of drowning.

The other five men being charged are: Mohammed al-Qahtani, labelled the "20th hijacker"; Ramzi Binalshibh, said to have been the main intermediary between the hijackers and al-Qaeda leaders; Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, known as Ammar al-Baluchi, a nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who has been identified as Mohammed's lieutenant for the 2001 operation; al-Baluchi's assistant, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi; and Waleed bin Attash, known as Khallad, who is accused of selecting and training some of the hijackers.

In Guantanamo Bay hearings that have been criticised as unfair, Mohammed confessed last March to the 9/11 attack and a string of other plots. "I was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A to Z," Mohammed said in a statement, according to transcripts later released by the Pentagon.

The men would be tried in the military tribunal system that was set up by the Bush administration and has been widely criticised for its rules on legal representation for suspects, hearings behind closed doors and past allegations of inmate abuse at Guantanamo.

Brig-Gen Hartmann said yesterday that the defendants would have the same rights as US soldiers tried under the military justice system. He called the charges sworn yesterday "only allegations".

The decision to seek the death penalty is also likely to draw criticism from the international community. A number of countries, including US allies, have said they would object to the use of capital punishment for their nationals held at Guantanamo.

Mohammed was among 15 "high-value detainees" who were held at length by the CIA in secret overseas prisons before being handed over to the military in 2006.



The full article contains 528 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 February 2008 9:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: International terrorism
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 12/02/2008 07:22:45
Death penalty? I thought Western Democracies wanted to show their moral superiority to the 9/11 barbarians?
2

BK,

Cyberspace 12/02/2008 08:33:15
Kidnapped, "rendered," illegally imprisoned for years then tortured till they "confessed," and now to be tried, not by the normal process of law, but in a military "court" then murdered. American "justice?"
3

scottish person,

paisley 12/02/2008 08:52:33
Execution is too easy a way out for these people. Just make sure they are guilty or the usual cowards will be plotting how to kill more innocent westerners.
4

Mikey,

12/02/2008 09:08:41
I agree with BK. After all this time, they have managed to charge him?

Sorry, but I don't trust American 'justice.'
5

Jason,

Vietnam 12/02/2008 10:40:40
Welcome to the United States of Torture. Moral leadership? You're having a laugh.
6

Griffe,

12/02/2008 21:21:02
If found guilty show them the same level of mercy they showed their victims on 9-11. Execute them
7

Em,

13/02/2008 00:35:54
Griffe,

"If found guilty"
Of course they will be found guilty the pentagon won't allow a trivial matter such as innocence get in the way of the show trial they need to give closure to who was behind the 911 attacks. No they have their confession extracted by means of torture and as far as they're concerned this is enough to prove to the world that they have caught and dealt with the perpetrators.

the only problem is, people are waking up and no longer content with being spoon-fed the official version of events which has so many holes in it that it would even make Tiger Woods feel nauseous.
The pentagon is staging this fony trial in order to regain credibility for their story, however their brass neck approach has the potential to back-fire angering the American people into action and a demand for the real perps to be brought to justice.
8

Wayne,

Calabash 13/02/2008 01:54:14
Let me inform all of you people that want to slam the USA about justice!Every country out there has committed atrocities.Mikey and BK,and the guy in vietnam,the slime bags that drove jets into the towers did not give a damn about the innocent children on those planes!As an ex paratrooper I would not care if the prisoners we had slept on cold concrete floors or could not pray.And I would do anything that I had to do to find out who commited that crime.Then I would not give them the same rights that our soldiers have!We have given those loathsome vermin fit only for extermination more rights then they give our soldiers over in the middle east today!You bleeding heart liberals make me sick!
9

Biker,

Ayr 13/02/2008 19:07:15
The main issue as I see it is that they will be dealt with by a militery court. Why?
I also agree with BK.
10

Lynne,

USA 13/02/2008 22:32:15
The best, very best punishment for these vermin...send the to a civilian, hardcore prison. No isolation for them...Put them in general population. Let's see how long they last!!
The prisoners could exact their own form of justice.
11

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 15/02/2008 10:37:57
#10 Lynne

"The best, very best punishment for these vermin..."

....You do realize that they refer to you in the same way. Maybe here is some justification in both directions.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.