Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Alarm over porn on child-friendly sites

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 September 2006
SOCIAL networking websites used by children and teenagers can contain pornography, cyber bullying and discussions on alcohol and hard drugs, the UK's leading consumer body warns today.
Computing Which? investigated two of the most popular sites used - MySpace.com and Bebo.com - and were able to set up accounts by pretending to be a 14-year-old without providing proof of age or identity.

This allowed them access to millions of p
hotographs and personal profile details of youngsters who had created their own webpages.

Alarmingly, within minutes the researchers were also confronted with pornographic profiles and images.

In another instance, a teenage boy was running a poll on his website, asking his friends to vote on whether a girl they knew had AIDS.

MySpace, Bebo and other social networking sites monitor photographs only after they have been posted and rely on members to report rule-breaking. Jessica Ross, the editor of Computing Which?, said: "Children are spending hours every week on networking sites, building up their profiles and chatting with friends. However, what might seem like innocent fun has a darker, more sinister side.

"Teenage users need to be aware that there is no way of knowing who is behind the face of a 'friend'," she said. "Networking sites, such as MySpace.com and Bebo.com, need to do more to protect their millions of trusting members."

Social networking sites are a massive phenomenon. MySpace, the biggest of them, has more than 60 million members .

Bebo categorises members by schools and allows youngsters to join after being recommended by a fellow pupil.

However, some schools have been pro-active in protecting children from an activity which may be beyond the computer skills of their parents.

George Watson's College, one of Edinburgh's top private schools, had the Bebo site, along with a number of unsuitable links, filtered out of the school's computers.

Gareth Edwards, the principal, said: "We took the view that you don't always get the best results if you come across as a Luddite saying, 'Don't do this'.

"So we explained the consequences to pupils and said it was not a good idea to be placing photographs of themselves on these sites."

Michael Birch, Bebo's chief executive said: "Suddenly, parents are seeing this is happening and there's this kneejerk reaction to blame Bebo. But we have nothing to do with it. Seeing what their children are doing could help parents learn more about the realities of childhood."

But a spokeswoman from the government-run Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, which has run forums with parents, warned: "Where young people go online, so will paedophiles."



The full article contains 456 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

scottwebb,

14/09/2006 02:20:35

Corporations are not happy that the masses are educating themselves. They want their cut and are actively creating a environment of fear so they can come in and start charging us for what up until now we have taken for granted as free. The application of common sense and communication between parents and their children is the key,not the suppression of the net

2

Malky,

Cumbrae 14/09/2006 03:10:58

Bad internet....bad, bad internet.....we need to change the internet...regulate it....control it....dominate it....we know best...we're the govenrment....don't believe the internet....believe us...we never tell you lies....we're your government....the internet is for bad people.....paedophiles...pornographers....TERRORISTS...bad peple who ask questions about our "good intention to spread democracy and freedom across the world"....we don't like questions...we're your government....we'll tell you what you need to know....trust us don't you?

3

CyclingEdinburgh,

you'll never know... 14/09/2006 08:14:30

quite right Malky the interweb thing is terrible it allows people to get their stupid ideas out into the wild instead of keeping them to themselves.

We need to get back to a world run for us by the people who know best

4

Chris Cooke,

Tamworth,Staffs 14/09/2006 08:37:53

I'm heartened to see so many people sussing out the true motives behind so-called "government concerns" about the internet. Through such "concerns" for our "safety" so they'll seek to control us all. For our own good of course. Well, thanks, but no thanks Big Bro.

5

Cant use my name anymore-Alex,

Prisoner of the Machine 14/09/2006 09:56:54

And they dont control you now ???

6

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam Tanzania 14/09/2006 11:40:36

BOOZE AND MORE BOOZE or call this the HARD LIQUER.. this leads to porno or short of cash by some hooligan or may be a singer or a politician or a church leader or a teacher. This world is porno full of porno started by Danish.... and Playboys and nudes posters and porno adverts and dating webs ARE YOU SINGLE I CAN HELP.. So the child goes for help and no history no maths, no english just watch just watch just watch and tell friend you discovered new channel in TV....

7

billybob,

14/09/2006 11:52:29

The usual moans about governments interfering. The truth is you are no more free on the internet to indulge in criminal activity than you are in the real world. Anyone who peddles child pornography or attempts to entice children should be no more protected on the Net than they would be in "real life". There is a distinction to be made between the right to hold opinions and engage in debate compared to acts of criminality committed on the net. The former must be protected and the latter rooted out.

8

Malky,

Glasgow 14/09/2006 15:17:25

Well, Billybob - if they're ON the net then we can find them and prosecute them, yes? If they're forced underground, we'll never get them.

There actually is no sound argument for the proposed reform of the internet by the government.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.