Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Iran election result stands as 'no irregularities' are found

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2009
An injured protester is led to safety after more trouble on the streets of Tehran on Sunday Picture: Reuters
IRANIAN officials have declared the hotly disputed presidential election result to be correct, after a partial recount designed to placate the opposition.

State television reported that Guardian Council Secretary Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati had yest
erday presented interior minister Sadegh Mahsouli with a letter saying the council had approved the election after a recount of 10 per cent of the ballots.

Requests for a new election and allegations of voting irregularities were rejected.

Opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi claims he, not incumbent president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is the rightful winner of the 12 June election, and has called for a new poll.

Iran's state-run English-language Press TV television station said the recount of a random 10 per cent of the votes, carried out yesterday, had shown no irregularities.

Official results of the election, released on 13 June, sparked the most widespread street protests in Iran since the country's 1979 Islamic revolution.

Mr Mousavi and two other defeated presidential candidates had submitted a total of 646 complaints about the election.

But the Guardian Council said most of the complaints were not considered as election irregularities and that it had dismissed them after conducting "precise and thorough studies" of the election process.

The council is a 12-man body – six senior clerics appointed by the Supreme Leader and six Islamic jurists – which must ensure all laws agree with sharia law and Iran's constitution. It also vets aspiring candidates for presidential elections.

Reporting from different locations where recounting took place, Iranian news agencies said representatives of Mr Mousavi and another defeated candidate, Mehdi Karoubi, were not present even though they had been invited.

"This recount is being done before (state broadcaster] IRIB cameras in various provinces and cities and we will subsequently announce the outcome for public information," the Guardian Council said.

Press TV broadcast live from one Tehran district where a Guardian Council supervisor was quoted as saying the recount in this area had shown no major irregularities.

The official said 34 ballot boxes, representing 10 per cent of the total in the district, had been opened under "full and precise supervision". He went on: "The results were positive – no irregularities in the results announced."

A witness said riot police had been deployed in force yesterday along a section of tree-lined Vali-ye Asr, Tehran's most famous boulevard. That relatively prosperous area is a stronghold of Mousavi supporters.

In the northern city of Babolsar, the semi-official Fars News Agency said recounting there had not changed the result.

State media say 20 people were killed in the aftermath of the election, and the authorities have accused Mr Mousavi of having responsibility for the bloodshed. He says the government is to blame.

Mass protests by demonstrators who said the poll was rigged were broken up by pro-government militia and riot police. The demonstrations had echoes of the Islamic revolution that toppled the shah and exposed rifts in the clerical leadership.

The hardline rulers, locked in a row with the West over nuclear activity and who say the poll was fair, have also blamed the trouble on foreign powers.

Four quized as war of words goes on

IRAN was yesterday interrogating four local members of staff from the British embassy in Tehran.

The authorities earlier released the other five embassy workers detained in Tehran at the weekend.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown condemned the Iranian action. Speaking at a news conference in Downing Street, he said he was "deeply disappointed", adding: "Iran's action…is unacceptable, unjustified and without foundation."

Iran's intelligence minister Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei said on Sunday the British embassy had played a role in the unrest following this month's election, including sending people among the protesters telling them what to do and what to chant. Iran and Britain have already expelled two of each other's diplomats since the election.

Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki was last week quoted as saying Iran was reviewing whether to downgrade ties with Britain.

But a foreign ministry spokesman yesterday said closing down any foreign embassy or cutting diplomatic ties was not on Iran's agenda.





The full article contains 706 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 June 2009 9:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 30/06/2009 00:20:47
Oh good, Britain said it was "unacceptable" that should do it.
Amahdinejad won... let's get back to work chaps. Harmonise now and stop listening to these crazy westerners.
2

,

30/06/2009 01:49:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 30/06/2009 02:11:42
http://the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=12666

here is a link about the very liberal think tank named Brookings Institution and how it is advocating war with Iran. Look at the links embedded there that document the Iranian election was not fraudulent. Ahmidinejad really did win by a 2-1 margin.

there is a growing movement in America to cancel the celebration of 4'th of July until America stops torturing, invading and occupying other nations. If you are American, then you can vote, here is a link.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/do-you-think-july-4th-celebrations-should-be-put-hold-until-america-stops-torturinginvading-

currently, 91% of Americans favoring canceling the 4'th of July celebrations until we stop doing those things. Unfortunately about 90% of the Democrats now support the war funding as a democrat is the new war president - so democrats have switched sides and are pro-war.

http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_12700391?nclick_check=1

4

,

30/06/2009 02:24:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

30/06/2009 02:38:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

30/06/2009 03:42:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Tatties ower the side,

#6 Whitecaps 30/06/2009 05:49:51
#3 Wally is very aptly named.

91 % of Americans favour cancelling 4th July celebrations? What an absolute wally!!!
8

Mashimaro,

China 30/06/2009 06:43:59
#7 They should, though.
9

,

30/06/2009 06:58:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Rob Royston,

Bishopbriggs 30/06/2009 07:52:18
So the British Diplomats have been caught at it again, sending their national staff out on the streets to stir up unrest.

Not very diplomatic at all, it's not surprising that we are down the tubes when they fall out with every country on earth.
11

bluehead,

edinburgh 30/06/2009 10:11:57
this is quite normal in the murky world of politics,to find no irregularities in a place where irregularities
are in abundance is just part of a working day
the day you believe what the politicians say is the day you should declare yourselves insane.
12

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 30/06/2009 10:55:59
It doesn't really matter what the Iranian Government declares, as long as the protesters continue to protest Ahmendinajad will not have the credibility he so desperately craves.

Many may not remember but the protests that eventually brought down the Shah lasted for almost a year.

It is common in Shia culture to commemorate a death 40 days after it took place. This 40 day protest cycle kept the protesters in the street, and as more where killed by security forces it repeats itself 40 days later.
13

,

30/06/2009 12:10:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

30/06/2009 12:46:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

30/06/2009 13:11:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

30/06/2009 13:19:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 30/06/2009 15:33:09
witness for example the incredible dysfunctionalisms of the people who support the ruling regime. In #3 I posted a link to 'the peoples forum' thread that shows off several links pertinent to the situation in Iran. First it shows a Brookings Institute white paper that advocates strategies for creating war with Iran. This is an important link because Brookings Institute is a liberal think tank, it is not a neo-con group. and they advocate the pursuit of war. We should take these things seriously and consider them carefully.

Also, I posted a link on how 90% of the democrats in the House voted for a war-funding bill. It came from San Jose Mercury News which is a suburban city outside of San Francisco. It is a factual article, not an opinion piece. It happens to be a re-print from New York Times. You can find the exact same info in an AP article. and the only comment they can think of is that san jose mercury news is unacceptable. San Jose Mercury News had a journalist working for them who published an important story about 10-12 years ago. He was murdered maybe 3-4 years ago. Through the years that paper has come up with many important stories. It no longer pursues important stories. but look how brainwashed people are to think they can't read that paper.

18

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 30/06/2009 15:43:24
Regarding this 4'th of July controversy - I posted a fun link in #3 that referred to an unscientific poll where people could vote if we will have 4'th of July celebration this year. and 91% of respondents said that it should be canceled until we stop invading, torturing and occupying other nations. that link has changed, you can't see it anymore.

These idiot flag-wavers on this site do not seem to comprehend that our nation is deteriorating badly and rapidly under the rule of the war-mongers and the oligarchs who insist that we are peasants and they our lords. Many of us Americans do strongly disapprove of the invasions, the torture, the occupations, etc. and we do sincerely wonder why we celebrate July 4'th when our nation does this. There are some Americans for whom the significance of our nation is taken seriously and we don't feel like celebrating a nation that invades, tortures and occupies systematically as we do. We are the Americans who actually did believe in the ideals of the founders.

Regarding our holiday of July 4'th - it is very much in decline. Many local cities across the country are canceling these fireworks displays - because they just don't have the money.

In this atmosphere where our nation is in serious decline the war-mongers want to start more wars. They are insane. They won't rest until our country is completely destroyed.
19

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 30/06/2009 16:22:12
# 18 wally

"Regarding this 4'th of July controversy - I posted a fun link in #3 that referred to an unscientific poll where people could vote if we will have 4'th of July celebration this year. and 91% of respondents said that it should be canceled until we stop invading, torturing and occupying other nations. that link has changed, you can't see it anymore. "

I also did an unscientific poll of my American colleagues and 100% of them thought you where a complete moron.
20

Wally,

Kampung in Jakarta 30/06/2009 16:45:09
do you have an substantive comment other than a personal slur? Are there any facts I've put up that you disagree with?

I assume you are upset with me because you love killing and death and destruction and would like to see it pursued without any complaint from someone like me. I assume that you are anti-American and therefore are happy that our current leadership is pursuing a path of destruction.

I am American. Where I live many local communities have canceled the 4'th of July celebrations because of money. Here is an article from the LA Times that says it is a common phenomenon all over the country.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fireworks29-2009jun29,0,2351470.story

California is in an extreme budget crisis. California is a very expensive place to live and their tax base is falling apart. The same trend is happening across the country. School funding is being cut in many places, lots of local government spending is being cut.

Kampung is a fellow who lives in Indonesia. He's not even an ex-pat American. He's british. He cheers for the destruction of my nation. and my family first came here to America over 300 years ago. when I merely speak all he can do is throw mud. He feels it is illegitimate for an American to speak for the American interest. Such is the nature of the extreme delusions and deceptions that have been sent to us today.
21

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 30/06/2009 17:15:46
# 20 wally

"there is a growing movement in America to cancel the celebration of 4'th of July until America stops torturing, invading and occupying other nations."

"Where I live many local communities have canceled the 4'th of July celebrations because of money."

So wally which is it, they want to cancel it because they share your strange conspiracy theories or simply because the state of California is broke?

"He's british."

Hey, there is no need to be insulting, I didn't call you a moron.

I just mention what you posted to three of my colleagues who are Americans and all three of them said you where a moron.

So you can feel better, its not foreigners like me telling you what an idiot you are, its your countrymen.
22

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 30/06/2009 17:51:05
Kampung - to call you british is not an insult, merely a statement of fact. I don't pretend to be knowledgeable of things British. But all over the world people pretend to be knowledgeable of things American. You were commenting on things American and that is why I said you were British.

and I repeat my question to you as to whether you have any substance to talk about.

I think those who really do have the American interest at heart will look at Kampung's comments in #20 and see that he does not have our interests at heart. The California budget crisis is a huge event for us Americans at least. Not just because it is quite severe & California is over 10% of the US. but also because the large majority of other states are having similar financial troubles though less severe - so far.

The American interest means nothing to the pro-war reprobates whether such people be American, British or other.
23

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 30/06/2009 17:58:51
Last week the US House of Representatives passed a huge tax increase. It is special because it will affect every household and business that consumes electricity. The electric bills of everyone in America are going to go up by it seems well over 50% all at once. This is not a tax put onto rich people. this is a general tax spread across the board.

Back in 1960 rich people paid almost all the taxes in America. In 1986 a huge tax increase on the middle & lower income people was passed - payroll tax was greatly increased and the revenue diverted from its intended purpose of supporting the elderly. Corporate income taxes were cut dramatically after 2000. Investment income taxes were cut very dramatically around 2005. The payroll tax as a percentage of a person's income is now higher than the investment income tax paid by the very richest people. and the payroll tax is the one federal tax that the poor people pay.

The wise policies that America once had that made it a special nation are now completely turned on their heads. Its like abraham lincoln said - you can fool all of the people some of the time. you can fool some of the people all the time. but you can't fool all the people all the time.

Don't blame me if I'm not fooled.
24

,

30/06/2009 21:02:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

30/06/2009 22:12:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

,

15/07/2009 15:43:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.