Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Carnage in Iraq as suicide bombers target pilgrims



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 July 2008
A SHADOW of Iraq's recent violent past fell across the country yesterday, as two suicide bombings killed at least 50 people and left many more wounded.
Three female suicide bombers killed 28 people and wounded 92 when they blew themselves up among Shiites walking through the streets of Baghdad on a religious pilgrimage.

In the northern oil city of Kirkuk, a suicide bomber killed 22 people and wou
nded 150 at a protest against a disputed local elections law. The bomber may also have been a woman.

The attacks mark one of the bloodiest days in Iraq in months and underscored the fragility of recent security gains in the country, where violence is at its lowest level since early 2004.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the Baghdad blasts, but Sunni Islamist al-Qaeda often targets Shiite pilgrims. It considers Shiism – Iraq's majority Muslim denomination – heretical.

At least one million people are expected to take part in the pilgrimage in the Iraqi capital, which peaks today and marks the death of one of Shiite Islam's 12 imams, one of the most important events in the Shiite religious calendar.

"These blasts that happened today will increase our determination to finalise this ceremony… and defeat terrorism," said Taher Abd-Noor, a pilgrim.

Al-Qaeda has increasingly used women to carry out suicide attacks, as they can often evade the more stringent security checks applied to men. Women have carried out 20 suicide attacks in Iraq this year, the US military has said. The apparently co-ordinated blasts in Baghdad shattered a period of relative calm in the city and took place despite tight security for the pilgrimage to the Kadhamiya shrine.

US commanders caution that, despite better security, suicide bombers wearing vests packed with explosives will still periodically slip into crowded places.

In Kirkuk, Kurdish television footage showed thousands of people demonstrating against Iraq's provincial elections law when an explosion prompted a rush for cover. A security official said witnesses saw a woman carry out the attack. Tensions have been high due to the provincial polls expected to be held late this year or early 2009.

Mosques called for people to give blood. Television footage showed Kirkuk's main hospital packed with wounded, some lying on a floor slick with blood because of a lack of beds.

Demonstrators seeking refuge after the blast ran to an office of Kirkuk's ethnic Turkmen minority, but were fired upon by guards, who thought they were under attack, said a police chief.

Kurds in the ethnically mixed city say it should belong to the largely autonomous Kurdistan region in northern Iraq, but Arabs and ethnic Turkmen want it to stay under central government authority.

Last week, Jalal Talabani, Iraq's president, rejected the provincial election law as unconstitutional after Kurdish lawmakers boycotted the parliament session that passed it.





The full article contains 479 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 July 2008 10:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

Muskrat,

29/07/2008 00:08:58
More human sacrifices offered up by nutjob adherents to the religion of peace as they slaughtering their delusional way to their non-existent heaven.
2

,

29/07/2008 01:29:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/07/2008 02:07:20
It's insurgents dummy..INSURGENTS. It's also the summer BEFORE an election there. Something that wasn't already expected.
4

,

29/07/2008 03:59:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Griffe,

29/07/2008 11:15:01
Not only is Islam not the religion of peace. There is no peace within Islam.
6

Countryman,

29/07/2008 11:25:07
The benefits of multiculturalism are clearly to be observed in the news of suicide bombings from Iraq and Turkey.
How long before the pent-up rage of "oppressed" Muslims and "disrespected" negroids here in Britain takes on similar violence?
Though it is totally unlikely, it would be justified if the victims of the next bombings were those politicians of the Rainbow colours who have done so much to bring the "enrichment" of multiculturalism to our country.
7

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 29/07/2008 12:02:41
7# Countryman = BNPman.
8

Gulliver,

Africa 29/07/2008 14:21:09
An oversimplification of problems, ignorance and arrogance are the things I fear most about American foreign policy. This is why some are very uncomfortable to get US interference in other countries' affairs and would rather deal with issues the way they understand them. CONTEXT is a very important aspect that the US tends to overlook in formulating its foreign interventions.

Why is it that these things weren't as big a problem during Saddam's reign, or were they a problem? Was it just a matter of time before these problems came out or did Saddam have a way of dealing with such senseless killings? I honestly want to understand where the root of the problem is.

Coming back to my concerns about American foreign policy, the behaviour of America can best be exemplified by considering an undisciplined teenager- strong and agile yet overconfident, tendency to act on impulse and in haste, and the feeling that they know better than everyone else. The results, poor judgement and getting involved in issues that could have been resolved in a better manner.
9

Gulliver,

Harare 29/07/2008 14:50:36
# 6, Griffe

"Not only is Islam not the religion of peace. There is no peace within Islam."

Is Christianity a religion of peace?

Eh.. before all Christians go for my head all I'm trying to make you see is that perhaps it is not fair to make blanket statements like that. Just because they are a few extremists in any religion that doesn't taint the rest of the believers in that religion.

In fact if you think about it if all Islamists were extremists then we wouldn't be calling them extremists would we? Which means that the guys who do these kind of senseless acts are in fact in the minority.
10

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/07/2008 18:20:28
Listening to the news last night, and polls having been taken in British universities, I see a prospect of more attacks by these people.
It seems 1/3 believe in killing, and its justification.
40% believe that Sharia Law should be along side British Law, and 33% believe in a world wide caliphate.
These are your university students. Is there not something to be concerned about here?
Before you dump your garbage, that I am wrong...look it up. These are yesterday's polls, what about the polls 5 years from now?
11

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/07/2008 18:29:58
above should read... 1/3 believe in honor killings..
12

American,

29/07/2008 19:13:24
#10-gulliver-of course there are a few religious nuts in all religions, but islam seems to have many. 5,000 honor killings of daughters & sisters, childrens shows for young palestinians that glorify honor killings, killing jews, martyrdom, and jihad.
One more thing about christians---they are taught to try & live by the 10 commandments. Of course, you do have fools like obamas former pastor who preaches that white men are to blame for all the blacks problems in the world today.
13

American,

29/07/2008 19:25:41
#9-gulliver-I guess you've never seen the videos of saddams henchmen throwing bound people off roofs, or hearing of the many little girls who were raped (but paid) by his sons, or chemical poisonings of men, women and children. Also, I guess you're unaware of his involvement in the 93 ny wtc attack, or the $10,000-$25,000 payoffs to the families of palestinian homicide bombers, or the shootings at our (british and American) planes that flew in the no-fly zone (as UN mandated deal). FYI-homicide bombings and islamic terrorist attacks are occuring in pakistan, india, turkey, yemen, thailand, russia (beslan is unforgettable, as is the bombed plane just before that, and hostages in the theater before that), hamas vs. fattah, lebanon, israel....etc.--get the picture?

Really time for people to start looking beyond iraq and afghanistan.
14

Laurette,

Carlsbad, California 29/07/2008 20:24:54
You also have the Nutjobs like Hagee (Like Moses to Lieberman) who at the End Times in Jerusalem tells the Jews that unless they become Christian like him - they're all going to Hell! Having just been to Israel -he's not going to have too many takers.
15

American,

29/07/2008 23:48:42
#15-laurette-Don't you think there's a Big difference between saying someones going to hell and blowing them up? Are you serious by comparing the two?
16

American,

29/07/2008 23:49:53
MY bad--#16--should be "or blowing them up"--like the radical islamists do!!!
17

P·K ,

30/07/2008 01:08:14
#10

Don't ever worry sick of Christians going after your head! Head chopping off business is your own Muslim brothers' practice and tactics of terror. Don't be mistaken, most terrorists belong to Islamic faith.
18

57Nomad,

california 30/07/2008 03:34:37
#2 pmk

pmk said:

"And yet certain American commentators keep claiming that the Americans have already won the war in Iraq."

Well, pmk, thats because we won the war. Check it out, loser.

http://www.galesburg.com/news/x1470913863/Analysis-U-S-now-winning-Iraq-war-that-seemed-lost
19

,

30/07/2008 05:38:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Gulliver,

Harare 30/07/2008 09:37:44
#14 American,

You sure were making a lot of guesses there mate!!

Anyway, I agree with you that people need to look beyond Iraq and Afganistan. There was a twist to this whole terrorism saga when Al-Qaeda bombed two US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Of the 212 dead 200 where Kenyans/Tanzanians. I wouldn't consider such massive fatalities of locals as just collateral damage. The message is clear, the world needs to deal with fundamentalism of this nature in all its forms, and if I am to be fair that also means the radical nature of American foreign policy also needs to change otherwise America risks being labelled terrorists as well.

In dealing with one problem we shouldn't create another problem. It's like trying to swat a fly that's relaxing on your plasma screen TV with a 50 pound hammer, it might do the job but you will certainly do a lot more damage to your own property in the process.

To deal effectively with the problems of terrorism one has to correctly identify the causes and give each cause a relevant weighting, and then come up with a packaged solution thats reflect the diagnosis. E.g., suppose poverty is 60% of the cause (e.g., in the Niger Delta) then you want that to reflect in the resources you channel to win your war. You put more effort at addressing poverty issues and less on military engagement.

Religious beliefs can only to a large extent be successfully influenced by religous ideas and not by violence as proved by history (e.g., Christian Dark Ages).

If one uses a disproportionate portion of their resources and efforts in tackling one aspect of the problem and not putting enough effort in the other the chances of success are minimal.
21

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 30/07/2008 10:59:09
#19

"thats because we won the war. Check it out, loser".

Oh, of course I forgot, George Bush declared "Mission accomplished" in 2003.

If he said it must be so.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/bushs_mission_accomplished.html
22

Hugo Rafael Chávez,

Venezuela 30/07/2008 23:03:05
#22 Let's have the truth

You're such a tool.

23

57Nomad,

california 31/07/2008 01:11:43
#22 lhtt

lhtt said:

""thats because we won the war. Check it out, loser".
Oh, of course I forgot, George Bush declared "Mission accomplished" in 2003."

You shouldn't put words in other peoples mouths, it's very rude. I don't know who you are or where you're from but I doubt if you are a journalist currently working in Iraq. Since you aren't, then read what a journalist who is there has to say. I provided this in my previous post. Maybe you didn't catch it. Here it is again.

http://www.galesburg.com/news/x1470913863/Analysis-U-S-now-winning-Iraq-war-that-seemed-lost

Do you have greater insight into what is going on in Iraq than the AP writers? Maybe you do, but you're going to have to demonstrated it. What you sound like is a sour grapes loser rejoicing over a suicide bombing. L O S E R!!!

24

57Nomad,

california 31/07/2008 01:20:08
#21 Gulliver

Gulliver said:

"To deal effectively with the problems of terrorism one has to correctly identify the causes"

and:

"hen you want that to reflect in the resources you channel to win your war. You put more effort at addressing poverty issues and less on military engagement."

Gulliver you have failed to connect poverty and terrorism. Why do you think poverty is the cause of terrorism? Osama bin Laden is (or was) very wealthy. If there is a causal relationship between poverty and terrorism you haven't demonstrated it hear. All but a few of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis. None of them were poverty stricken.

The root cause of terrorism today is the violent ideology of the Muslim fundamentalists. Not much more to it than that.

25

57Nomad,

31/07/2008 01:21:22
#25 reprise

that should say "you haven't demonstrated it here" not 'hear'.
26

Gulliver,

Harare 31/07/2008 09:06:13
# 25, 57 Nomad

I gave poverty as an example and that's why I zeroed in on Nigeria and the Niger Delta specifically where the struggle is for control of oil by locals who feel that the BPs and the like are ripping them off.

If the chief cause is religious fundamentalism you have got to fight that war using a multi-pronged approach- education, and possibly on your knees as opposed to with a gun. The Christians used it effectively and that's why a religion that was started over two milleniums ago is still very much around.
27

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 31/07/2008 12:54:19
#19 57 Nomad

Your claim: "Well, pmk, thats because we won the war. Check it out, loser".

From you journalist in Iraq: "Despite the favorable signs, U.S. commanders are leery of proclaiming victory or promising that the calm will last".

I take it you either have a problem comprehending English text or you look at the world through rose coloured glasses. IDIOT.

28

mike - across the pond,

lhtt and postmark 31/07/2008 16:33:52
um...

methinks thou chooses to split hairs....

we won the war (against saddam hussein) even if we pulled out tomorrow, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for the 2002 Iraqi regime to "win"... they are all gone, most of the leaders are dead....

2003/2004 things got better

then when enough insurgents flooded in, CIVIL WAR broke out... insurgents not killing coalition troops but Iraqis...

the "insurgents" are not Iraqi... plain and simple

postmark, what would your china do if you had a flood of insurgents in (oh I dont know) TIBET?
29

57Nomad,

california 31/07/2008 18:34:24
#28 lhtt

lhtt said:

"I take it you either have a problem comprehending English text or you look at the world through rose coloured glasses. IDIOT."

I half way agree with you. One of us is an idiot, but it's not me.

I have no problem whatsoever with the English language or slapping around a nitwit like you. Here is the opening paragraphs of the AP story.

"Baghdad The United States is now winning the war that two years ago seemed lost.
Limited, sometimes sharp fighting and periodic terrorist bombings in Iraq are likely to continue, possibly for years. But the Iraqi government and the U.S. now are able to shift focus from mainly combat to mainly building the fragile beginnings of peace — a transition that many found almost unthinkable as recently as one year ago."

Now, cretin, which one of us fails to comprehend the written word. We won, you lost. All of your whining and crying isn't going to change that. You have sided with the terrorists and now your jihadi pals are running with their turbans under their arms. They are beaten and so are you, dumbass.
30

quaraing,

31/07/2008 22:20:12
#30 no-man

"The United States is now winning the war"

is a long way away from

"The United States has won the war"

When the germans started WWII they were "winning" the war, and according to the Carlsbad clowns way of thinking, they must have won it.

Funny, most historical records say they lost.

What colour of frilly underwear do you have on today no-man?












31

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 01/08/2008 01:05:06
57 Nobrain

"Well, pmk, thats because we won the war. Check it out, loser".

Either you are someone who believes all they read in newspapers or you know the situation on the ground in Iraq better than US commanders.

Are you posting from a lunatic asylum?
32

,

01/08/2008 03:38:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

After five years in Iraq, do you think we will be out of the country by 2013?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.