Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The public face of Saddam's regime faces deaths trial



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 April 2008
TARIQ Aziz, the suave public face of Saddam Hussein's brutal regime, returned to the limelight he once revelled in as he went on trial yesterday over the deaths of 42 merchants in 1992.
For two decades as Saddam's top diplomat, Aziz had been instantly recognisable with his Cuban cigars, glasses and bushy moustache – all of which gave him an uncanny resemblance to Groucho Marx.

But frail, white-haired and leaning on a walking st
ick, the 72-year-old looked a pale shadow of his swaggering former self yesterday as he faced the same judge who condemned Saddam to the gallows in 2006.

On trial with Aziz are seven other members of Saddam's inner circle, including two half-brothers and the dictator's notorious cousin, Ali Hassan al-Majeed, nicknamed "Chemical Ali" for gassing thousands of Iraqi Kurds in the 1980s.

Majeed was sentenced to death for that crime last June, but his execution has been held up by legal arguments. He did not attend yesterday's brief hearing because of ill-health.

Aziz, as a Christian in a mainly Sunni Muslim government, was not considered a member of Saddam's innermost circle of clan members from the town of Tikrit.

He had stoutly defended Saddam's policies on the world stage, but surrendered without a whimper to US forces two weeks after the collapse of his master's regime in 2003.

Aziz's family says that after five years at a US-run detention centre he is in very poor health with high blood pressure and heart problems.

They insist he played no role in the merchants' deaths and that as a diplomat with no decision-making powers he was entirely innocent of any of the regime's bloody excesses.

They argue that Aziz, the son of a waiter, had achieved prominence because of his negotiating skills and fluency in English – he had a degree in English literature.

"Keeping him in prison for five years has embarrassed the government. There is international pressure and so they had to present him as a defendant," his lawyer, Badie Aref, declared. "Legally, there's no case, but we can't predict how politics will influence it."

But Aziz's accusers believe his avuncular appearance was deceptive and that as a member of Saddam's ruling Revolutionary Command Council he was a sinister figure complicit in some crimes and an apologist for many others.





The full article contains 398 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 April 2008 10:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

Kipling,

30/04/2008 01:42:33
I always took to Tariq Aziz as an apologist. If he did have a hand in the deaths of the merchants (for alleged sharp price increase practices at the time of the embargo) then I hope that fair & above-board processes of justice are followed. In this country Bliar's Director of Communications and Strategy from 1997-2003, Alastair John Campbell is party to the deaths of thousands of individuals. Perhaps a swap could be made. We could have Aziz, who could deal with the sharp city practices we have recently been witnessing, and the Iraqis could get Campbell and meet out the due processes of justice and law upon him.
2

Kipling,

30/04/2008 01:47:54
The above should have read: if Mr Aziz is to come to trial then I hope that fair & above-board processes of justice are followed in determining the outcome.

And as for Mr Campbell, 'meet' should, of course, have been spelled 'mete'.
3

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 30/04/2008 04:15:12
Mr. Aziz was treated very badly at the Baghdad airport prison facility. He was elderly when he was first put there. He made no attempt to flee at all. I read an article about how he was treated years ago. some of the torture systems were applied to him. He went downhill physically very badly as a result of his treatment. He was healthy when he went in. and then next time anyone saw him he was barely able to walk. that happens when you put stress positions onto an old man I guess. Then he had bad heart problems, I think he may have had a heart attack in prison, he had some health catastrophe where they almost lost him.

I think forgiveness is a good thing. They should've let him go. What is his real crime?

we all forget that the US government favored Hussein strongly beginning over 45 years. The US helped hussein come to power in the 1970's. and then in the 1980's the US gave Hussein's government $40 billion worth of aid. If the US can be forgiven that it favored Hussein so much, then can't an Iraqi person be forgiven for also serving that same government that the US favored for so long?
4

Kipling,

30/04/2008 07:51:17
I agree, I think compassion should be involved here.
5

,

30/04/2008 08:29:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Stonefield,

30/04/2008 14:34:52
5 bill2

Troll
7

Ardanaiseig,

Argyll 30/04/2008 14:43:19
1-6

The above posts would make great round table talk for the next "Paranoid Conspiracy Theory Leaders of London"
8

John Blackley,

Florida 30/04/2008 17:53:01
It will be interesting to see the quality of the evidence against Aziz.

Being an apologist for the ruler of your own country is not a crime but I think the Iraqis are being driven by two forces - their own revenge against anyone associated with Hussein and the United States' government's wish for a "got 'em all" headline.

If the evidence against Aziz is less than compelling and if he is convicted and sentenced to death, this can only do further damage to the United States' reputation as associated with its activities in Iraq.
9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 30/04/2008 21:59:58
Who said: "Commit a small crime and you will be vilified, commit a huge crime and you will be praised"?
I have read several books about Iraq. First hand witnesses describe Iraqi children starving as a result of sanctions. Doctors describe Iraqi children dying of diseases because of a lack of medicine. First hand witnesses describe how the AmerUSAns broadcast radio messages into Iraq at the end of the first Gulf War, calling on them to rise against Hussein and promising support. When they rose and fought, there was no AmerUSAn support - the AmerUSAns and ourselves held back and watched as Saddam butchered thousands. I have read the Royal Society Working Group Reports on the hazards of depleted uranium. I was shocked to find that the Working Group analysed no soil or water samples from Iraq, spoke to no Iraqi doctors and analysed no tissue biopsies from Iraqi children or from autopsies of dead Iraqi cancer victims, to establish the uranium content in bones. The Working Group ignored the behaviour of uranium oxide gas, which collects in low places such as air raid shelters. I am shocked that no less an authority than Prof Dudley Goodhead would be so utterly dimwitted as to have his own name on the Working Group Reports, which seem to involve no scientific analyses of actual Iraqi specimens. I ask myself: What has happened to us, that we can have allowed wretches of such obvious low intelligence and weak moral fibre as George Bush and Tony Blair to rule us? George Bush is a man who has knowingly supported the horrific torture of innocent people in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere - an immoral hypocrite who dared to pretend to a moral fight against Saddam Hussein. It is a gross understatement that I am disgusted with the quality of the leaders of the age I live in - going right back to Nixon, Reagan, Thatcher and others. How have we fallen so low? What went wrong? I want to build a new country - Alba, Scotland - a country that will do what is good and right.
10

,

30/04/2008 22:19:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

bill2,

01/05/2008 00:04:46
9,10

We know this. You are not alone.
12

Browards,

01/05/2008 02:43:22
This thread has really turned south by all the idiotic posts.
13

Deuchars,

Edinburgh - FH 01/05/2008 09:46:29
#11 bill2

Troll
14

,

01/05/2008 10:22:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 01/05/2008 15:21:41
it will be a bad day if Aziz is executed. He is on trial today so that the people who rule us can define who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. It is an entirely political definition. Anyone who opposes the clique that rules us is considered a bad guy and thus in order to wage the war on terrorism is open to persecutions of all kinds including being put on trial and executed for any alleged crimes.

The fellow in 9 & 10 made a very good point in that the US commits larger crimes routinely and nobody is every held responsible.

Donald Rumsfeld was a big public shill for the idea that the US give huge aid to Saddam Hussein during the 1980's. He is the one who argued to Reagan that Hussein get so much money, he is the one who testified before congress advocating it. Yet he was never discredited. he was secretary of defense when the war against Iraq began.

The US did impose economic sanctions against Iraq and many international personalities & institutions cooperated with that. And this cost 1 million lives, mostly children, complete non-combatants.

This is but one example, I could list other decisions made in Washington that wasted a million lives. Yet this is not a crime. Aziz served a government that executed people. and so he is guilty.

the people that rule us are like totalitarians, they feel that every knee must bend to them.
16

American,

01/05/2008 21:57:50
#9-caora-Hhmm. You must be one of those bleeding-heart libs who puts blame on others. Why no criticism of saddam building palaces and buying more cars and paying homicide bombers families in the palestinian area while his people starved and while he and his sons tortured and raped the people? Why no criticism of the un and their most profitable "oil for food" scandalous program? Why no criticism that saddam invaded it's neighbor (for the oil). I'm sure you think we invaded for the oil---well, if that was the reason then it's time to get that oil flowing to here and all the other countries that stood by us because I'm tired of the rising gas prices.
17

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 01/05/2008 22:33:32
American..one minister in Iraq has made his thoughts known..saying..The "US has No Claim to Oil Boom"..

"America has hardly even begun to repay its debt to Iraq," said Abdul Basit, the head of Iraq's Supreme Board of Audit, an independent body that oversees Iraqi government spending. "This is an immoral request because we didn't ask them to come to Iraq, and before they came in 2003 we didn't have all these needs."

This coming from the gov't of corruption, and missing American funds.!!

Well, I say, to Mr. Basit...that Congress should vote not to fund anymore funds for reconstruction. They can use the profits from their "Oil Boom" that so readily admit they have.
18

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 01/05/2008 22:36:22
American, I think we have overpaid with lives and the other trillions, while millions disappear.
We've paid enough..I know we can't leave, and we should leave, but they can pay for their own reconstruction. I am sending a letter to my Sentaor and Congressman to that effect.
19

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 02/05/2008 01:30:56
American..It is supposed to say
We've paid enough..I know we can't leave, and we SHOULDN'T leave, but they can pay FOR THEIR OWN RECONSTRUCTION.
20

American,

02/05/2008 18:41:06
#19-lynne-understood and I agree.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.