Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

After 7,861 days on Death Row in the US, Richey finally comes home



View Video
Download Video

Video

Kenny Richey: After 21 years on death row Kenny Richey flew into Edinburgh airport last night.
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 January 2008
IT WAS a journey he must have thought he would never make. Yesterday, Kenny Richey returned home to Scotland more than two decades after being sentenced to death for the murder of a two-year-old girl.
After touching down at Edinburgh Airport at 5:45pm, the 43-year-old defiantly held his fist in the air and declared: "It's great to be back". After 7,861 days on Death Row in the United States, which saw him come within an hour of execution, the fact that his homecoming was delayed by just over three hours because of bad weather was a minor inconvenience.

Richey, who was accompanied by his brother, Steven, along with a member of the charity Reprieve, which had campaigned for his release, hummed to himself as the plane landed on home soil.

Richey – released from prison in Ohio on Monday after a plea deal – briefly shared his thoughts with a huge scrum of reporters, photographers, campaigners and curious passengers, who gathered at the international arrivals gate to witness the man who thought he would never live to see the day.

Looking tired but relieved, he said: "It feels great. Thanks to everyone who supported me over the years. It's good to be back."

Asked what he thought about the people who put him behind bars, he answered: "You don't want to hear that."

Richey then raised a fist for the cameras before he was ushered into a waiting car. He obliged photographers by sticking his head out of a window and holding a Lion Rampant.

The former US marine now faces a world of uncertainty. He has spoken about his desire to take up photography and to campaign with the charity Amnesty for the release of other people on Death Row.

Some precious stability will be provided by his mother, Eileen Richey, who has prepared a room for her son at the tenement flat she shares with her partner in the capital's Dalry district.

She has seen her son only a handful of times since he was convicted of setting fire to the home of his former girlfriend, and murdering her daughter Cynthia Collins, two, on 27 January, 1987.

Richey always protested his innocence and, in August, he won an appeal against his capital conviction. On Monday he entered a "no contest" plea to reduced charges.

Mrs Richey was not at the airport to greet him yesterday, waiting instead at a hotel, where the pair were reunited last night.

Support groups, including the charity Reprieve, the community-safety body Sacro and Edinburgh social work staff, have met to discuss the help that Richey might need, including supported accommodation, as he attempts to adjust to life after spending half of his own locked in isolation for 23 hours every day.

Last night Karen Torley, Richey's former fiancée, who has campaigned tirelessly for his release, said she was looking forward to meeting him as a free man. "I'm very excited for him. It's an emotional day," she said.

Clive Stafford Smith, the legal director of Reprieve, who has been a member of Richey's legal team for 15 years, said:

"What matters most is that Kenny finds the support he needs to rebuild his life. For many (people in his position] adjusting to freedom turned out to be the hardest battle of all."

THE FILM, OF THE BOOK, OF THE NEWSPAPER EXCLUSIVE

KENNY Richey arrived in Scotland accompanied by representatives from a Sunday newspaper who, along with a rival publication and two television companies, have paid Richey a reported £35,000 for the story of his 21 years on Death Row.

Various media deals are likely to net him around £100,000, possibly much more if his remarkable story is translated to cinema.

PR guru Max Clifford, who negotiated the lucrative interviews also confirmed he had been in touch with book publishers and documentary makers.

Mr Clifford said yesterday: "There is a lot of interest from press, (and] from television worldwide."

He defended the media deals saying: "He is not getting millions of pounds in compensation for the 21 years he has been locked up and this is the only chance he has got of making some money that he can live on.

"He hasn't got two ha'pennies to rub together.

"He has a story that the media want and I imagine you're allowed to make money from the story that the media want, that the media will make money from."

The full article contains 757 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2008 11:51 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Kenny Richey , Video Archive
 
1

Archie, Gourock,

10/01/2008 01:13:43
Have a look at the following....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenny_Richey

Your thoughts.
2

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 10/01/2008 01:14:33
does anyone know what bru or social he is entitled to?
3

Jim A,

10/01/2008 01:52:30
#2 Ross, I would hope that with the money he's going to make touting is story he won't get anything from the bru or the social.
4

George F,

Michigan 10/01/2008 01:57:07
There you go Scotland he's all yours, good luck with that.
5

,

10/01/2008 02:17:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 10/01/2008 04:07:37
#2 Ross . If he has not being paying at least a Class 2 national health stamp (doubtful) he is not even entitled to free medical on the National Health.
7

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA ......ex Mexican Territory 10/01/2008 04:40:54
This man Richey was imprisoned for 21 years awaiting execution ,
All based on circumstantial evidence for allegedly burning a house where a 2 year child died.

Based on circumstantial evidence O J Simpson was accused of murdering his wife and her boy friend . But OJ went free.

Dudes can you sport the disparity here

Richey had no money and could not afford top flight lawyers to defend him.

OJ Simpson had the money, and spent $millions on top flight lawyers to defend him , who got OJ off the hook.

MONEY its the American way ... you can forget LAW or JUSTICE , just have a DEEP pocket.

GC
8

Aesop,

TheScottishPatient .com 10/01/2008 07:25:45
You've hit it on the nail GC. You need weath to buy justice in the USA.

Its worrying that some folk still dont seem to understand that the paper that Kenny Richey signed in order to be freed was NOT an admission of guilt for murder but to be held culpable for the child's death for not babysitting when he said he would. As signed admissions of guilt go it ranks alongside the ones signed by the Birmingham Six.

But even so, Richey's release and what was written on that piece of paper was the America judicial system unequivocally putting its hands up and admitting Richey didn't do the crime he was convicted of, that he shouldn't have spent 21 years on Death Row, and that there's been a diabolical miscarriage of justice. BUT crucially it gets them off the hook for compensation.
9

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 10/01/2008 07:29:14
# 6

yeh right? he gonna pay for health care? with what??
10

The worlds going mad,

10/01/2008 08:21:40
The nature of this blokes release is all very unsatisfactory either which way, innocent or guilty, but we will never find out now. If he is innocent its a terrible thing to have been locked up for so long,however if he did the crime I'd have been quite happy for the yanks to have fried him long ago. It seems the authorities are incompetant where ever you are and these cases will always crop up. I'm not sure the Americans are unequivocally putting their hands up and admitting he didn't do the crime. Sounds a bit sus though, him going around saying he was going to burn down the building and the as if by magic it is on fire?! I really don't think we should have all this media circus surrounding Kenny Richeys return IF he may have carried out this crime.
11

Paul Voltaire,

10/01/2008 08:27:35
#10
It is indeed a media circus and Richey is a performing monkey within that.
12

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 10/01/2008 08:41:53
Richey remains innocent until proved beyond all reasonable doubt otherwise.

If you know he is guilty then provide the conclusive proof, or remain silent.
13

Paul Voltaire,

10/01/2008 08:46:02
#13
The man is a convicted criminal.
We don't need your blessing to express our opinions.
14

Media 1,

cape town 10/01/2008 08:46:35
NOBODY gets released from death row if their guilty! NOBODY...
And the no contest plea is nothing more than legal politics and beaurocracy..
By pleading no contest he gets his freedom and the state saves itself from a multi million dollar pay out!
He would NEVER have been released if the evidence against him was conclusive, no way!
He is out because the law got it wrong and the legal fraternity save face in the no contest plea.
I believe in the death penalty, but the juducial system that convicts people to death really needs to be addressed...
15

Richard Head,

10/01/2008 08:52:34
He is evil.
A true sociopath if ever there was.
You can see it in his eyes.
Watch out, if he moves in next door to you.
16

Lyn Allison,

Edinburgh 10/01/2008 08:54:46
Welcome Home Kenny. All the very best mate.
17

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 09:10:23
#14
Quite right blessing not required, He is a convicted felon who served his time. Every jail in the world is full of prisoners protesting their innocence.
18

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 10/01/2008 09:16:42
#18 He didn't "serve his time". The mother who committed the same crime served 45 days. Richey did 21 YEARS, which is a lot more than "his time" for such a trivial offence as "not babysitting when you said you would". It's pathetic and embarrassing to see the way the hang-'em-and-flog-'em brigade such as yourself are desperately seizing on the fact that - in a purely technical and procedural sense - Richey has been convicted of a crime as an excuse to continue your hate-filled bigotry against a man who everyone, from the US judicial system down, now accepts DIDN'T KILL ANYONE.
19

Dublin Hibs,

10/01/2008 09:35:16
welcome home kenny......

is it true you have been lined up for the vacant hotseat at Tynecastle?
20

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 09:42:22
#19
'EVERYONE' accepts', where do you get your ideas from? Are the contributors to these columns with the other view non-existent. From what I read many on both sides of the Atlantic do not share your parochial views.
21

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 09:46:24
16) Are we to assume then that you have qualifications and experience in forensic psychology, which enable you to diagnose a persons mental state from their appearance
in a picture.
Can you then tell us all from your superior knowledge
what kind of eyes an idiot has?
what kind of eyes a bigot has?
what kind of eyes an illiterate has?
what kind of eyes a reactionary has
what kind of eyes a hypocrite has?
what kind of eyes a saint has?
what kind of eyes a Dick Head?
22

BowBel,

Kilmarnock 10/01/2008 10:07:37
I would like to know has he been 'deported'? As a 'convicted' criminal and presumably a US citizen (he served in the US marines) would he be allowed to just walk back into Scottish society? I think theres more to this than meets the eye!
23

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 10:32:37
23) Like what, He was born of Scottish and American parents, and as a result probably has dual nationality.
He is an embarrassment to the American legal system, has done far more than his time for the little crime he did commit, and they want rid because they don't want a massive compensation claim against them.
24

sam the god,

10/01/2008 10:41:49
another mouth to feed
25

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

10/01/2008 10:43:00
Whatever...he will never be able to get on with his life now...if he is innocent..they have taken that from him as well....Great how the article states that he raised a fist to the camera...how about, you more accurately state, a screetching hack yelled "Kenny Kenny raise a fist Kenny"...and he unenthusiastically obliged....
26

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 10:53:42
#24
Like he was a embarrassment to the U.S.Marine corps?
Also part of his get out plea was no chance of compensation as explained to him fully by the releasing judge.
#19
If this country had more of the'Hang-em-and-Flog-em' brigade it might be a better place to stay. We are overrun with do-gooders, social workers,reformers,counsellors, re-habilitators etc.etc. etc. No doubt the aforementioned will be flocking around KR at this moment.
27

sam the god,

10/01/2008 11:07:39
#27

well stated
28

freethekillie2,

kilmarnock 10/01/2008 11:50:03
#5 You are a very sad person, think about itgo read the case files on google.

its easy to knock a man when he is down as some on the comments page do.

i would like to see some of the people who bad mouth you on the scotsman
do 21 years on death row,
then come out to all the abuse aimed at him.

GOOD LUCK KENNY.

DONT LET THEM GET YOU DOWN!
29

Phil1888,

10/01/2008 12:14:27
After 21 years of work, he gets an early retirement.
30

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 10/01/2008 12:32:01
#21 "'EVERYONE' accepts where do you get your ideas from? Are the contributors to these columns with the other view non-existent."

Sorry, should have been clearer - anyone with any right to an opinion about it, which is to say the defence, the prosecution, Amnesty International etc. I wasn't including "loonies on forums who don't know what they're talking about". It is accepted by everyone INCLUDING the US prosecutors that Richey did NOT start the fire, otherwise they would have pressed on with the retrial instead of letting him go on a plea bargain for a much lesser offence.
31

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 10/01/2008 12:33:11
PS I like how the word "do-gooders" is used as a term of abuse. Because doing good is such a terrible thing, isn't it?
32

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 12:38:53
27) And you would know that he was an embarrassment to
the U.S. Marine Corps Because......?
Yes we know what no contest means, thank you. If you cannot see that it is a legal device which lets the authorities off the hook, then you are a case of extreme prejudice.
And finally to dissect your juvenile remark
"If this country"
Which Country?
"had more of the'Hang-em-and-Flog-em' brigade"
So you would continue to kill innocents. Not all who
have suffered the ultimate penalty were guilty of the crime. Not all who hanged whilst Guilty deserved the death penalty
"it might be a better place to stay."
No, it would become a bad place to die.
"We are overrun with do-gooders, "
Thus the converse is a do badder, I would rather do good than bad wouldn't you?
"social workers,reformers,counsellors, re-habilitators etc.etc. etc."
We all have our place in society, OK they don't always get it right, but just hope you are never in need of the services of such do gooders.
No doubt the aforementioned will be flocking around KR at this moment."
He will certainly need counselling, would you deny him that, would you condemn him to life as a misfit, when that would be to the detrement of all around him.
You really are a sad reactionary little piggy are you not.
33

NoSnax,

10/01/2008 12:42:49
He has been found not guilty of aggravated murder, the conviction was overturned.
Therefore – Not Guilty.
Kenny plead no contest to breaking and entering (stealing a plant, unrelated to the death of Cynthia Collins)
Attempted involuntary manslaughter, that he was asked to baby sit, agreed to do so, failed to do so and as a result Cynthia was left alone and died.
Child Endangerment, essentially the same above, but this charge has been added to increase the sentence to 21 years already served.
There should be no mistake that this deal is nothing short of a complete vindication for Kenny. The prosecutors no longer accuse him of murder or having anything to do with starting the fire. Instead, they have charged him with, essentially failing to baby sit. For all intents and purposes, he is free, completely exonerated
34

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 12:44:20
#31
Are we to assume then that contributors to this forum who do not agree with your views are 'loonies'. I am afraid your idea of who has a 'right to a opinion on this matter' needs further thought from you. I for one would not like to listen to your sermons.
35

Rev. S. Campbell,

Bath 10/01/2008 12:53:38
People who have failed to understand the most basic facts of the case are the ones not entitled to an opinion. It is a FACT that the prosecutors now accept Richey's innocence of starting the fire.
36

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 12:53:59
#33
(1)Because they gave him a dishonourable discharge.
(2)By this country I mean Britain.
(3)Do-gooding is a business in this country as with the others I mentioned.

Keep your farmyard remarks to yourself. END of
37

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 13:16:29
37) Point The first I was not aware of this, though if true has no bearing on the case.
Point The second Britain is a member of the EEC, no state
which retains the death penalty can be a member. Thus any discussion on it's reintroduction is pointless, accept that we "do-gooders" have permanently won our point on this issue and move on.
Point the third Doing good is not a business it is a personal life choice if you wish to continue doing bad
then perhaps you require some form of incarceration
Point The fourth What farmyard remarks, if you can't take it don't dish it!
Point the fifth I presume you have no response to the other valid opinions I expressed.
38

wee one,

10/01/2008 13:20:51
#27 said:
"If this country had more of the'Hang-em-and-Flog-em' brigade it might be a better place to stay. We are overrun with do-gooders, social workers,reformers,counsellors, re-habilitators etc.etc. etc."

You are conveniently forgetting the fact that the death penalty has been proven NOT to be any kind of deterrent. In fact, some states of America where the death penalty exists have HIGHER murder rates than states who do not use the death penalty.

This is just one of the many arguments against it, but I've realised that arguing with death penalty supporters is usually futile.
39

Pocket Dictionary,

10/01/2008 13:24:24
Well let's see here. After 21 years on death row, you have a heart condition. You have the choice of a plea bargain or opt for the stress of a new trial. The majority of people in that situation would go for the plea bargain.

It also gave the Ohio legal system a chance to save face too.

At the end of the day it's immaterial because of his heart condition. And what he has had to endure for 21 years. The chances are because of his poor health, caused by the American prison system, he will probably be dead within a year from a heart related complaint.

You can't win here. If he got income support they would complain. He makes money by selling his story to support himself, they complain. And no doubt be wishing a premature death for Kenny as soon as possible.

Welcome to Scotland Kenny.
40

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 10/01/2008 13:27:37
Where is the PROOF that Richey is guilty of the death?

Or don't we need proof any more?
41

JabbaTheFifer,

Dunfermline 10/01/2008 13:34:55
Whatever the alleged personality flaws, whatever the opinion people have shown above about Kenny Richey; look at what's relevant here.

If it helps, go here and look for the briefing notes at the bottom of the page :

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=10410

There's no doubt that the original conviction, at best, is entirely unsafe. A decent legal defence in the first place, would have had the case laughed out of court.
42

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 13:40:43
36) I would agree with you that those contributors to which you allude are not entitled to an opinion. It is not that they do not understand the case, it is more that
they have not read the evidence which does not suit their purpose, they try to fit their version of the little they may have read around their feelings for the man, rather than fitting the facts to the case. They are not interested in justice, or humanity here. There is no resolution with them, and it is thus pointless debating with them. All we can say is that it is now time to move on and let Kenny rebuild what little he can of his life. Leave him be, he has done nothing to harm anyone contributing here.
43

sam the god,

10/01/2008 13:55:38
If he has done the babysitting that he was ment to do then this wee girl would be 23 now but he decided he would sling his hook just remember that.
44

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 14:10:48
44) Kenny was drunk when allegedly asked by the mother to babysit. He had no recollection of being asked, and neither did three male witnesses in the car at the time
one of whom was the mothers then boyfriend. It is therefore not known conclusively if he was actually asked.
What is known is that the mother was known to social services in the area for leaving her child home alone while she went of seeking her dubious pleasures with sundry males. What is known is that the little girl was prone to firestarting herself, and little wonder out of boredom, and to seek attention.
What is known is that if this excuse for a parent had taken her responsibilities seriously and not acted in such a selfish manner Little Miss Collins would have been 23 now, barring some other accident or neglect, just you remember that.
45

JabbaTheFifer,

Dunfermline 10/01/2008 14:12:11
44) - the point is, that the girl's mother, after the party at about 2am, shouted to Richey (lying drunk in the flat below) to watch the kid whilst she drove off in a pickup truck with a couple of guys who were at the party. That's hardly what you'd call a babysitting arrangement, is it?
46

number withheld,

edinburgh 10/01/2008 14:20:38
#42 thanks for highlighting the amnesty international link. its makes interesting reading, and anyone who hasn't and who has posted on this link should do so.
47

albaus,

...somwehere west of Scotland 10/01/2008 14:36:51
This man has been found innocent of this crime. Let's hope he can successfully rebuild his life. Welcome home.
48

Media 1,

cape town 10/01/2008 14:48:52
albaus #48

Before they come on and tell you that he was not found innocent, which he wasnt, let me say this.
The no contest plea means he was not declared innocent of the crime, he has not been exonerated! But that is nothing more than legal beaurocracy and state bargaining! Bottom line is that he would NEVER be out if he was guilty beyond doubt, and thats the bottom line....
49

Crawford, B,

OHIO, USA 10/01/2008 15:06:40
I live just minutes from where Richey was convicted and ultimately released. Contrary to popular media culture, people is the US are not gun-toting, lynch mob-minded folks. There are many people here who helped to get him retried. Which is what should have happened years ago. Then he could have been convicted of the crime for which he was able to be held responsible-serve his time and hopefully be rehabilitated. Unfortunately for Scotland, you're getting a hardened criminal with no guidance or sense of responsibilty.
People who have posted here proclaiming KR's innocence should keep in mind that he never has said he is innocent, only that he doesn't remember. What is a fact, and is probably not known to most of you, is that part of the US Constitution proclaims that if someone speaks a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER (i.e. threatening to burn down a building) and within 24 hours, that event happens, then that individual can be CHARGED with that crime. There was only circumstantial evidence linking him to the crime and the punishment (death) certainly outweighed the crime. But as for Richey's most recent public comments on the US Justice System ("it sucks") I have to add- he's still breathing, isn't he? For the poster who said that guilty people don't get released from death row (and it would be spelled they're-not their) unfortunately, our justice system lets as many guilty people walk away as innocent. It's not perfect, just like anywhere. Richey has to prove himself to Scotland now..I hope he has a big safety net of support, because he's never had a normal life, even before his time in prison. From what I've read, he has quite a criminal past. I hope this leopard can change his spots, but with all the media attn. and money being thrown at him, it seems he is on a bad path.
There are so many misconceptions about this case. To truly be able to comment with intelligent information, one should read all the facts.
50

albaus,

...somewhere west of Scotland 10/01/2008 15:23:24
#49. Thank you for correcting me.

#50. From what I have read recently, the two people who said they heard him threaten to burn down the building recanted their statements later.

I understand he's no angel, and I am sure there are people out there who will be only too willing to make things even more difficult for him. Let's hope his family and friends can keep him on the straight and narrow.
51

sam the god,

10/01/2008 15:50:44
#45,#46
if he was that drunk can he be sure of what he did that night? look at the man who thought a bin bag was a wolf.
52

JabbaTheFifer,

Dunfermline 10/01/2008 16:21:35
52) - read the link I posted in 42. Go on, I dare you. You might find it enlightening.
53

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 16:23:11
52)That is the whole point on this issue. There had been a party he was only one of a few drunks, some of the others being Cynthias Mother, The Mothers Boyfriend, and two of his friends. All of whom were in a car when the mother claims she asked Kenny to babysit, Neither Kenny nor any of the other occupants of the car recall such a request so what's the choices here? Either she did, and Kenny being drunk forgot. Or she didn't in which case she is the main guilty party in her daughters death. Or she is just saying she did to cover up her own selfishness and irresponsibility
and transfer some of the blame away from herself.
Bearing in mind she was known to the authorities for
similar neglect in the past, I'll let the reader draw their own conclusions.
54

sam the god,

10/01/2008 19:00:01
#53 jabbathefifer

yes i read it but if you used the internet you could find other sites that would say the exact opposite peronally i think amnesty over exagerate everything they do
55

Hunky Dorey,

Glasgow 10/01/2008 19:56:48
# 13........Rulesbutnotrulers. What utter drivel you are spouting.This moron was as guilty as hell,and you know it. So! cut the crap.
56

Tatiana,

edinburgh 10/01/2008 21:01:59
A leopard never changes it's spots, a bad lot before Cynthia Collins and a bad lot now. He'll be in trouble inside a week and in the "Nick" before the year ends. Maybe then the unnaturally quiet Rentagob Torley can be important again trying to release an "innocent man".
57

Waspy100,

10/01/2008 21:07:14
They might not have been guilty legally, but morally?
58

,

10/01/2008 21:28:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
59

supercelt,

10/01/2008 21:30:58
On the question of USMC he was dishonourably discharged for violent behaviour not depression. He is listed in Marine Medical Corp paperwork as anti social and a liar. His brother was discharged from the army for murder while serving but on leave, which is why he was sent to Walla Walla not the USDB at Lavenworth.
60

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

10/01/2008 21:54:58
56), 13)makes a succinct simple, obvious and valid point
which you choose to dismiss in ignorant ionsult, because
you do not have an answer. I think it is obvious who the real moron is here, don't you?
57) Just listen to yourself will you, what are you a clairvoiant with an infallible crystal ball?
58) Who?
59) What?
60) What has any of that got to do with the issues here?
61

supercelt,

10/01/2008 22:00:03
#61 your aggressive tone with people you do not know says allot about you. An earlier poster was asking about his connection with the USMC. I was pointing out what it is. And indeed you speak of the little girls irresponsible mother indeed Mr Richey was quick up to leave an infant son in and return to partying.
62

Crawford, B,

Ohio USA 10/01/2008 22:32:03
#62 You are right. Obviously #61 is baiting everyone and anyone he can, don't be taken in. Some people like to argue nonsense.
Facts are facts and people can twist them and believe whatever they like. Time will tell who is misguided in where their support lies and the only person who will proove anything will be Richey.
That being said, #61 in response to your #43 post- EVERYONE is entitled to an opinion, whether you agree or not. Also, Kenny isn't an embarrassment to the USMC or the Ohio or American Justice system, he is an embarrassment unto himself. And of that I speak not of his sentence or guilt, but of his behavior, past and present.
The person who said being in prison caused his heart problems, it is a documented fact that diabetes caused his heart problems. And probably a very unhealthy lifestyle. I would bet the farm that he smokes. And all that admitted drinking and drugs, not healthy either.
Finally, 61, for your comment to #57, a leopard isn't physically capable of changing its spots and you don't need a crystal ball to know that.
63

\seasider,

Saltcoats 10/01/2008 22:37:32
#62
I concur with your observations on 'The Ghost'.I do not know him either but he has already suggested to me today that I may require incarceration, that I was a 'sad reactionary little piggy' whatever that may be and he has also added the word 'do badder' to the English language? Certainly (for a self confessed do- gooder in post #38)he has,from his ramblings,what would appear to be a rather aggressive attitude.
64

Tatiana,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 00:49:57
61* Just remember my words.
65

Crawford, B,

Ohio, US 11/01/2008 01:02:16
#65 I have to ask, what's a Rentagob? (From 57) I think I know what you are saying about Torley and agree with you-in the little bit I can follow of her part in all this, I find it interesting that suddenly all is quiet on that front. But I'm curious as to the terminology :) Thanks!
66

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

11/01/2008 08:37:20
Please tell me what is more aggressive than seeking
the execution of a man you do not know, a man against
whom all capital charges have been withdrawn and a man who has done you no harm. I attack people who pass judgement based on what they feel about the man not on what they know about the case. If this offends your alleged sensitivity then so be it, perhaps you may feel
something of what he feels being judged by the self righteous, the ignorant, and those who can have no concept of what he has been through. "Judge not lest ye be judged yourself" I sense you express this outrage against me because you are annoyed with yourselves for
not being able to answer the questions I raise, you are uncomfortable because the facts don't fit with your preconceptions, which your particular psyches cannot let go of. "Don't shoot the messenger, because you don't like the message"
I attack those who claim to have a crystal ball and imagine all sorts of evil and wish him ill in the future. "A leopard does not change it's spots" is a favourite clique here, actually it does and I expect he
will to, he is not the Kenny of 21 years ago, he has
done military service and 21 years in prison he will wish to do nothing which could bring about his return
to incarceration anywhere, wouldn't you want to keep your nose clean.
Is it aggressive to suggest that now a form of justice
has finally been done and the man is home, that the press, his detractors, and indeed supporters leave him
alone to rebuild what he can of his life. If I were foolish enough to predict the future I might see a financially rewarding one of litigation against all
the doomsayers.
67

supercelt,

11/01/2008 11:28:26
#67 You seem to know allot about who people know and who they don't know. You have taken the aggressive stand and dismissed other people's feelings out of hand. This family do not have a wonderful record and I feel there is allot more to come from them that's all.
68

Neil, Texas,

Austin 12/01/2008 06:42:50
Scum, should have fried.
69

P Phillips,

UK 12/01/2008 23:21:42
#69, I totally agree that he should've fried had he been guilty. But where is your evidence to say that he is? His conviction has twice been overturned on appeal and the prosecutor himself admitted that the Appeal Court decisions and the passage of time would've made it difficult to prove the case.
Even if he was guilty in some way, he's done 21 years inside FFS, so why not just let him be?
I doubt if you'd last 21 minutes on Death Row, never mind 21 years.
And Ghost Of Scotland Past, thank you for your sensible analyses on this thread, however as you say there's little point in trying to have a sensible discussion with those of such bigoted ilk.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you welcome the return of Kenny Richey to Edinburgh?
Yes, he was clearly an innocent man
Yes, but now he should be left alone
No, he’s just another drain on taxpayers’ money

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.